The model missed the final outcome (Energie Cottbus win 0–1).
The model had projected SSV Jahn Regensburg at 38.7%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 SSV Jahn Regensburg Energie Cottbus ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 1-0 0-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38.7% | 22.0% | +16.7 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 25.6% | 21.1% | +4.4 pp | Aligned |
| Energie Cottbus | 35.7% | 56.9% | -21.1 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Energie Cottbus's win probability at 56.9%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.7%, a difference of 21.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Energie Cottbus win 0–1.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- 1X2: model leaned SSV Jahn Regensburg; match finished Energie Cottbus
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on SSV Jahn Regensburg by 21.1 percentage points (59.8% vs model 38.7%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 16, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · SSV Jahn Regensburg 38.7% · Draw 25.6% · Energie Cottbus 35.7%
- xG · SSV Jahn Regensburg 1.69 — Energie Cottbus 1.62
-
May 16, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · SSV Jahn Regensburg 4.27 · Draw 4.44 · Energie Cottbus 1.65
- Implied 1X2 · SSV Jahn Regensburg 22.0% · Draw 21.1% · Energie Cottbus 56.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 16, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · SSV Jahn Regensburg 4.27 · Draw 4.44 · Energie Cottbus 1.65
- Implied 1X2 · SSV Jahn Regensburg 22.0% · Draw 21.1% · Energie Cottbus 56.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 16, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Energie Cottbus win · 0–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (21 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for SSV Jahn Regensburg & Energie Cottbus!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
3. Liga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 24 | 8 | 6 | 80 |
| 2 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 21 | 9 | 8 | 72 |
| 3 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 70 |
| 4 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 68 |
| 5 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 18 | 13 | 7 | 67 |
| 6 | Verl | 38 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 64 |
| 7 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 64 |
| 8 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 56 |
| 9 | SV Wehen | 38 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 53 |
| 10 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 52 |
| 11 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 15 | 6 | 17 | 51 |
| 12 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 49 |
| 13 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 49 |
| 14 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 13 | 7 | 18 | 46 |
| 15 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 44 |
| 16 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 43 |
| 17 | Havelse | 38 | 9 | 8 | 21 | 35 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 34 |
| 19 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 9 | 6 | 23 | 33 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 5 | 6 | 27 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verl | 38 | 82 | 48 | +34 | 64 |
| 2 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 78 | 66 | +12 | 70 |
| 3 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 76 | 57 | +19 | 64 |
| 4 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 74 | 49 | +25 | 67 |
| 5 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 72 | 51 | +21 | 72 |
| 6 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 66 | 34 | +32 | 80 |
| 7 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 66 | 49 | +17 | 68 |
| 8 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 65 | 56 | +9 | 49 |
| 9 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 65 | 71 | -6 | 43 |
| 10 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 59 | 72 | -13 | 52 |
| 11 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 57 | 69 | -12 | 46 |
| 12 | Havelse | 38 | 57 | 89 | -32 | 35 |
| 13 | SV Wehen | 38 | 54 | 52 | +2 | 53 |
| 14 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 54 | 53 | +1 | 56 |
| 15 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 54 | 58 | -4 | 49 |
| 16 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 51 | 53 | -2 | 51 |
| 17 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 51 | 57 | -6 | 44 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 51 | 70 | -19 | 34 |
| 19 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 49 | 78 | -29 | 33 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 38 | 87 | -49 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 48.1 | 34.3 | +13.8 | 72 |
| 2 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 49.0 | 35.6 | +13.4 | 67 |
| 3 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 44.5 | 31.3 | +13.2 | 80 |
| 4 | Verl | 38 | 44.0 | 31.6 | +12.4 | 64 |
| 5 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 38.0 | 30.8 | +7.2 | 68 |
| 6 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 47.0 | 40.4 | +6.6 | 49 |
| 7 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 45.8 | 42.6 | +3.2 | 56 |
| 8 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 41.9 | 38.8 | +3.1 | 70 |
| 9 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 38.3 | 35.4 | +2.9 | 52 |
| 10 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 41.1 | 40.6 | +0.5 | 44 |
| 11 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 40.8 | 40.6 | +0.2 | 49 |
| 12 | SV Wehen | 38 | 37.7 | 38.1 | -0.4 | 53 |
| 13 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 33.4 | 34.1 | -0.7 | 51 |
| 14 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 37.1 | 41.0 | -3.9 | 46 |
| 15 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 37.4 | 42.3 | -4.9 | 33 |
| 16 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 37.1 | 42.9 | -5.8 | 64 |
| 17 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 44.5 | 51.1 | -6.6 | 43 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 33.6 | 46.8 | -13.2 | 34 |
| 19 | Havelse | 38 | 31.9 | 50.5 | -18.6 | 35 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 32.9 | 55.1 | -22.2 | 21 |