AI correctly predicted the Waldhof Mannheim win.
The match finished 1–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Waldhof Mannheim Waldhof Mannheim ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 2-1, 1-1, 2-2, 1-2, 3-1 1-0 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waldhof Mannheim | 47.5% | 40.5% | +7.0 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 23.2% | 24.8% | -1.6 pp | Aligned |
| SSV Jahn Regensburg | 29.2% | 34.7% | -5.5 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Waldhof Mannheim's win probability at 47.5%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 40.5%, a difference of 7.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Waldhof Mannheim win 1–0).
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Waldhof Mannheim.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Waldhof Mannheim attacking xG significantly stronger (2.08 vs 1.62)
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (1 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Waldhof Mannheim more conservatively (40.5% vs model 47.5%, 7.0 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Waldhof Mannheim win 1–0).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 09, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Waldhof Mannheim 47.6% · Draw 23.2% · SSV Jahn Regensburg 29.2%
- xG · Waldhof Mannheim 2.08 — SSV Jahn Regensburg 1.62
-
May 09, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Waldhof Mannheim 2.36 · Draw 3.85 · SSV Jahn Regensburg 2.75
- Implied 1X2 · Waldhof Mannheim 40.5% · Draw 24.8% · SSV Jahn Regensburg 34.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 09, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Waldhof Mannheim 2.36 · Draw 3.85 · SSV Jahn Regensburg 2.75
- Implied 1X2 · Waldhof Mannheim 40.5% · Draw 24.8% · SSV Jahn Regensburg 34.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 09, 2026 · 14:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Waldhof Mannheim win · 1–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- High xG deviation from league baseline (54%+)
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Waldhof Mannheim & SSV Jahn Regensburg!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
3. Liga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 24 | 8 | 6 | 80 |
| 2 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 21 | 9 | 8 | 72 |
| 3 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 70 |
| 4 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 68 |
| 5 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 18 | 13 | 7 | 67 |
| 6 | Verl | 38 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 64 |
| 7 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 64 |
| 8 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 56 |
| 9 | SV Wehen | 38 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 53 |
| 10 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 52 |
| 11 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 15 | 6 | 17 | 51 |
| 12 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 49 |
| 13 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 49 |
| 14 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 13 | 7 | 18 | 46 |
| 15 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 44 |
| 16 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 43 |
| 17 | Havelse | 38 | 9 | 8 | 21 | 35 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 34 |
| 19 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 9 | 6 | 23 | 33 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 5 | 6 | 27 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verl | 38 | 82 | 48 | +34 | 64 |
| 2 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 78 | 66 | +12 | 70 |
| 3 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 76 | 57 | +19 | 64 |
| 4 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 74 | 49 | +25 | 67 |
| 5 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 72 | 51 | +21 | 72 |
| 6 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 66 | 34 | +32 | 80 |
| 7 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 66 | 49 | +17 | 68 |
| 8 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 65 | 56 | +9 | 49 |
| 9 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 65 | 71 | -6 | 43 |
| 10 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 59 | 72 | -13 | 52 |
| 11 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 57 | 69 | -12 | 46 |
| 12 | Havelse | 38 | 57 | 89 | -32 | 35 |
| 13 | SV Wehen | 38 | 54 | 52 | +2 | 53 |
| 14 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 54 | 53 | +1 | 56 |
| 15 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 54 | 58 | -4 | 49 |
| 16 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 51 | 53 | -2 | 51 |
| 17 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 51 | 57 | -6 | 44 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 51 | 70 | -19 | 34 |
| 19 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 49 | 78 | -29 | 33 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 38 | 87 | -49 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 48.1 | 34.3 | +13.8 | 72 |
| 2 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 49.0 | 35.6 | +13.4 | 67 |
| 3 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 44.5 | 31.3 | +13.2 | 80 |
| 4 | Verl | 38 | 44.0 | 31.6 | +12.4 | 64 |
| 5 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 38.0 | 30.8 | +7.2 | 68 |
| 6 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 47.0 | 40.4 | +6.6 | 49 |
| 7 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 45.8 | 42.6 | +3.2 | 56 |
| 8 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 41.9 | 38.8 | +3.1 | 70 |
| 9 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 38.3 | 35.4 | +2.9 | 52 |
| 10 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 41.1 | 40.6 | +0.5 | 44 |
| 11 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 40.8 | 40.6 | +0.2 | 49 |
| 12 | SV Wehen | 38 | 37.7 | 38.1 | -0.4 | 53 |
| 13 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 33.4 | 34.1 | -0.7 | 51 |
| 14 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 37.1 | 41.0 | -3.9 | 46 |
| 15 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 37.4 | 42.3 | -4.9 | 33 |
| 16 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 37.1 | 42.9 | -5.8 | 64 |
| 17 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 44.5 | 51.1 | -6.6 | 43 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 33.6 | 46.8 | -13.2 | 34 |
| 19 | Havelse | 38 | 31.9 | 50.5 | -18.6 | 35 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 32.9 | 55.1 | -22.2 | 21 |