AI correctly predicted the Verl win.
The match finished 4–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Verl Verl ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 1-0 4-0 ✖ Incorrect
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.39) — 4 goals materialised
- Verl attacking xG significantly stronger (1.90 vs 1.49)
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The model's directional lean matched the full-time result (Verl win 4–0).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Before kickoff Forecast generated
- xG · Verl 1.90 — Stuttgart II 1.49
-
Feb 01, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Verl win · 4–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pending
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation pending
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Verl & Stuttgart II!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
3. Liga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 24 | 8 | 6 | 80 |
| 2 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 21 | 9 | 8 | 72 |
| 3 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 20 | 10 | 8 | 70 |
| 4 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 19 | 11 | 8 | 68 |
| 5 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 18 | 13 | 7 | 67 |
| 6 | Verl | 38 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 64 |
| 7 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 64 |
| 8 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 56 |
| 9 | SV Wehen | 38 | 15 | 8 | 15 | 53 |
| 10 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 52 |
| 11 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 15 | 6 | 17 | 51 |
| 12 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 49 |
| 13 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 14 | 7 | 17 | 49 |
| 14 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 13 | 7 | 18 | 46 |
| 15 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 44 |
| 16 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 43 |
| 17 | Havelse | 38 | 9 | 8 | 21 | 35 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 34 |
| 19 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 9 | 6 | 23 | 33 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 5 | 6 | 27 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verl | 38 | 82 | 48 | +34 | 64 |
| 2 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 78 | 66 | +12 | 70 |
| 3 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 76 | 57 | +19 | 64 |
| 4 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 74 | 49 | +25 | 67 |
| 5 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 72 | 51 | +21 | 72 |
| 6 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 66 | 34 | +32 | 80 |
| 7 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 66 | 49 | +17 | 68 |
| 8 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 65 | 56 | +9 | 49 |
| 9 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 65 | 71 | -6 | 43 |
| 10 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 59 | 72 | -13 | 52 |
| 11 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 57 | 69 | -12 | 46 |
| 12 | Havelse | 38 | 57 | 89 | -32 | 35 |
| 13 | SV Wehen | 38 | 54 | 52 | +2 | 53 |
| 14 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 54 | 53 | +1 | 56 |
| 15 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 54 | 58 | -4 | 49 |
| 16 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 51 | 53 | -2 | 51 |
| 17 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 51 | 57 | -6 | 44 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 51 | 70 | -19 | 34 |
| 19 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 49 | 78 | -29 | 33 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 38 | 87 | -49 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Energie Cottbus | 38 | 48.1 | 34.3 | +13.8 | 72 |
| 2 | Hansa Rostock | 38 | 49.0 | 35.6 | +13.4 | 67 |
| 3 | VfL Osnabrück | 38 | 44.5 | 31.3 | +13.2 | 80 |
| 4 | Verl | 38 | 44.0 | 31.6 | +12.4 | 64 |
| 5 | MSV Duisburg | 38 | 38.0 | 30.8 | +7.2 | 68 |
| 6 | FC Ingolstadt 04 | 38 | 47.0 | 40.4 | +6.6 | 49 |
| 7 | TSV 1860 München | 38 | 45.8 | 42.6 | +3.2 | 56 |
| 8 | Rot-Weiß Essen | 38 | 41.9 | 38.8 | +3.1 | 70 |
| 9 | Waldhof Mannheim | 38 | 38.3 | 35.4 | +2.9 | 52 |
| 10 | FC Saarbrücken | 38 | 41.1 | 40.6 | +0.5 | 44 |
| 11 | SSV Jahn Regensburg | 38 | 40.8 | 40.6 | +0.2 | 49 |
| 12 | SV Wehen | 38 | 37.7 | 38.1 | -0.4 | 53 |
| 13 | FC Viktoria Köln | 38 | 33.4 | 34.1 | -0.7 | 51 |
| 14 | Stuttgart II | 38 | 37.1 | 41.0 | -3.9 | 46 |
| 15 | SSV Ulm 1846 | 38 | 37.4 | 42.3 | -4.9 | 33 |
| 16 | Alemannia Aachen | 38 | 37.1 | 42.9 | -5.8 | 64 |
| 17 | Hoffenheim II | 38 | 44.5 | 51.1 | -6.6 | 43 |
| 18 | Erzgebirge Aue | 38 | 33.6 | 46.8 | -13.2 | 34 |
| 19 | Havelse | 38 | 31.9 | 50.5 | -18.6 | 35 |
| 20 | FC Schweinfurt 05 | 38 | 32.9 | 55.1 | -22.2 | 21 |