Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 — Under 2.5 (1 goals) — N/A
- Both Teams To Score — No — N/A
- 1X2 — Cardiff — N/A
- Correct Score Insights — 1-0 — N/A
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Cardiff attacking xG significantly stronger (2.38 vs 0.64)
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Before kickoff Forecast generated
- xG · Cardiff 2.38 — Exeter City 0.64
-
Dec 26, 2025 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Cardiff win · 1–0
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pending
- High xG deviation from league baseline (76%+)
- Strong model lean
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation pending
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotProbability Calibration
- Expected: 76.1%
- Historical Bucket: 75–80% — Building sample
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Cardiff & Exeter City!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
League One — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lincoln | 46 | 31 | 10 | 5 | 103 |
| 2 | Cardiff | 46 | 27 | 10 | 9 | 91 |
| 3 | Stockport County | 46 | 22 | 11 | 13 | 77 |
| 4 | Bradford | 46 | 22 | 11 | 13 | 77 |
| 5 | Bolton | 46 | 19 | 18 | 9 | 75 |
| 6 | Stevenage | 46 | 21 | 12 | 13 | 75 |
| 7 | Luton | 46 | 21 | 11 | 14 | 74 |
| 8 | Plymouth | 46 | 22 | 7 | 17 | 73 |
| 9 | Huddersfield | 46 | 18 | 13 | 15 | 67 |
| 10 | Mansfield Town | 46 | 16 | 17 | 13 | 65 |
| 11 | Wycombe | 46 | 17 | 12 | 17 | 63 |
| 12 | Reading | 46 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 63 |
| 13 | Blackpool | 46 | 17 | 9 | 20 | 60 |
| 14 | Doncaster | 46 | 17 | 9 | 20 | 60 |
| 15 | Barnsley | 46 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 59 |
| 16 | Wigan | 46 | 14 | 14 | 18 | 56 |
| 17 | Burton Albion | 46 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 54 |
| 18 | Peterborough | 46 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 53 |
| 19 | AFC Wimbledon | 46 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 53 |
| 20 | Leyton Orient | 46 | 14 | 10 | 22 | 52 |
| 21 | Exeter City | 46 | 12 | 13 | 21 | 49 |
| 22 | Port Vale | 46 | 10 | 12 | 24 | 42 |
| 23 | Rotherham | 46 | 10 | 11 | 25 | 41 |
| 24 | Northampton | 46 | 9 | 8 | 29 | 35 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cardiff | 46 | 90 | 50 | +40 | 91 |
| 2 | Lincoln | 46 | 89 | 41 | +48 | 103 |
| 3 | Plymouth | 46 | 75 | 63 | +12 | 73 |
| 4 | Huddersfield | 46 | 74 | 64 | +10 | 67 |
| 5 | Stockport County | 46 | 71 | 58 | +13 | 77 |
| 6 | Bolton | 46 | 70 | 52 | +18 | 75 |
| 7 | Wycombe | 46 | 69 | 58 | +11 | 63 |
| 8 | Luton | 46 | 68 | 56 | +12 | 74 |
| 9 | Barnsley | 46 | 68 | 73 | -5 | 59 |
| 10 | Reading | 46 | 64 | 60 | +4 | 63 |
| 11 | Peterborough | 46 | 64 | 68 | -4 | 53 |
| 12 | Mansfield Town | 46 | 62 | 50 | +12 | 65 |
| 13 | Leyton Orient | 46 | 59 | 71 | -12 | 52 |
| 14 | Bradford | 46 | 58 | 51 | +7 | 77 |
| 15 | Blackpool | 46 | 54 | 65 | -11 | 60 |
| 16 | Exeter City | 46 | 52 | 61 | -9 | 49 |
| 17 | AFC Wimbledon | 46 | 51 | 72 | -21 | 53 |
| 18 | Burton Albion | 46 | 50 | 60 | -10 | 54 |
| 19 | Doncaster | 46 | 50 | 69 | -19 | 60 |
| 20 | Stevenage | 46 | 49 | 46 | +3 | 75 |
| 21 | Wigan | 46 | 49 | 58 | -9 | 56 |
| 22 | Rotherham | 46 | 41 | 71 | -30 | 41 |
| 23 | Northampton | 46 | 39 | 74 | -35 | 35 |
| 24 | Port Vale | 46 | 36 | 61 | -25 | 42 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Huddersfield | 46 | 21.2 | 12.8 | +8.4 | 67 |
| 2 | Bolton | 46 | 18.1 | 12.5 | +5.6 | 75 |
| 3 | Cardiff | 46 | 22.0 | 17.0 | +5.0 | 91 |
| 4 | Wigan | 46 | 15.6 | 11.5 | +4.1 | 56 |
| 5 | Peterborough | 46 | 22.5 | 18.5 | +4.0 | 53 |
| 6 | Wycombe | 46 | 17.0 | 14.0 | +3.0 | 63 |
| 7 | Luton | 46 | 16.8 | 14.1 | +2.7 | 74 |
| 8 | Reading | 46 | 16.6 | 14.8 | +1.8 | 63 |
| 9 | Stockport County | 46 | 15.4 | 15.2 | +0.2 | 77 |
| 10 | Port Vale | 46 | 12.9 | 12.8 | +0.1 | 42 |
| 11 | Plymouth | 46 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 0.0 | 73 |
| 12 | Burton Albion | 46 | 14.6 | 14.8 | -0.2 | 54 |
| 13 | Doncaster | 46 | 16.8 | 17.3 | -0.5 | 60 |
| 14 | Stevenage | 46 | 11.2 | 12.4 | -1.2 | 75 |
| 15 | Rotherham | 46 | 11.9 | 13.2 | -1.3 | 41 |
| 16 | Lincoln | 46 | 16.7 | 18.8 | -2.1 | 103 |
| 17 | Leyton Orient | 46 | 19.6 | 22.4 | -2.8 | 52 |
| 18 | Bradford | 46 | 13.4 | 16.2 | -2.8 | 77 |
| 19 | Barnsley | 46 | 12.3 | 15.2 | -2.9 | 59 |
| 20 | AFC Wimbledon | 46 | 11.0 | 14.4 | -3.4 | 53 |
| 21 | Mansfield Town | 46 | 12.7 | 16.6 | -3.9 | 65 |
| 22 | Exeter City | 46 | 10.7 | 15.1 | -4.4 | 49 |
| 23 | Northampton | 46 | 13.5 | 18.0 | -4.5 | 35 |
| 24 | Blackpool | 46 | 21.6 | 26.3 | -4.7 | 60 |