AI correctly predicted the NEC Nijmegen win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 NEC Nijmegen NEC Nijmegen ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 2-1, 1-1, 2-0, 1-0, 3-1 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEC Nijmegen | 61.3% | 70.2% | -9.0 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 21.7% | 16.7% | +5.0 pp | Aligned |
| GO Ahead Eagles | 17.1% | 13.1% | +4.0 pp | Aligned |
The closing market estimates NEC Nijmegen's win probability at 70.2%, compared with the model's estimate of 61.3%, a difference of 9.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (NEC Nijmegen win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on NEC Nijmegen. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.39) — 3 goals materialised
- NEC Nijmegen attacking xG significantly stronger (2.25 vs 1.14)
- Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced NEC Nijmegen higher (70.3% vs model 61.3%, 9.0 pp), but the model's lean was validated (NEC Nijmegen win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 17, 2026 · 12:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · NEC Nijmegen 61.3% · Draw 21.7% · GO Ahead Eagles 17.1%
- xG · NEC Nijmegen 2.25 — GO Ahead Eagles 1.14
-
May 17, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · NEC Nijmegen 1.36 · Draw 5.73 · GO Ahead Eagles 7.29
- Implied 1X2 · NEC Nijmegen 70.2% · Draw 16.7% · GO Ahead Eagles 13.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 17, 2026 · 12:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · NEC Nijmegen 1.36 · Draw 5.73 · GO Ahead Eagles 7.29
- Implied 1X2 · NEC Nijmegen 70.2% · Draw 16.7% · GO Ahead Eagles 13.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 17, 2026 · 12:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result NEC Nijmegen win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- High xG deviation from league baseline (67%+)
- Strong model lean
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for NEC Nijmegen & GO Ahead Eagles!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Eredivisie — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PSV Eindhoven | 34 | 27 | 3 | 4 | 84 |
| 2 | Feyenoord | 34 | 19 | 8 | 7 | 65 |
| 3 | NEC Nijmegen | 34 | 16 | 11 | 7 | 59 |
| 4 | Twente | 34 | 15 | 13 | 6 | 58 |
| 5 | Ajax | 34 | 14 | 14 | 6 | 56 |
| 6 | Utrecht | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 53 |
| 7 | AZ Alkmaar | 34 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 52 |
| 8 | Heerenveen | 34 | 14 | 9 | 11 | 51 |
| 9 | Groningen | 34 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 48 |
| 10 | Sparta Rotterdam | 34 | 12 | 7 | 15 | 43 |
| 11 | Fortuna Sittard | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 39 |
| 12 | GO Ahead Eagles | 34 | 8 | 14 | 12 | 38 |
| 13 | Excelsior | 34 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 38 |
| 14 | Telstar | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 37 |
| 15 | PEC Zwolle | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 37 |
| 16 | FC Volendam | 34 | 8 | 8 | 18 | 32 |
| 17 | NAC Breda | 34 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 29 |
| 18 | Heracles | 34 | 5 | 4 | 25 | 19 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PSV Eindhoven | 34 | 101 | 45 | +56 | 84 |
| 2 | NEC Nijmegen | 34 | 77 | 53 | +24 | 59 |
| 3 | Feyenoord | 34 | 70 | 44 | +26 | 65 |
| 4 | Ajax | 34 | 62 | 41 | +21 | 56 |
| 5 | Twente | 34 | 59 | 40 | +19 | 58 |
| 6 | AZ Alkmaar | 34 | 58 | 51 | +7 | 52 |
| 7 | Heerenveen | 34 | 57 | 53 | +4 | 51 |
| 8 | Utrecht | 34 | 55 | 42 | +13 | 53 |
| 9 | GO Ahead Eagles | 34 | 54 | 53 | +1 | 38 |
| 10 | Groningen | 34 | 49 | 45 | +4 | 48 |
| 11 | Telstar | 34 | 49 | 55 | -6 | 37 |
| 12 | Fortuna Sittard | 34 | 49 | 63 | -14 | 39 |
| 13 | PEC Zwolle | 34 | 44 | 71 | -27 | 37 |
| 14 | Excelsior | 34 | 43 | 56 | -13 | 38 |
| 15 | Sparta Rotterdam | 34 | 40 | 62 | -22 | 43 |
| 16 | FC Volendam | 34 | 35 | 55 | -20 | 32 |
| 17 | NAC Breda | 34 | 35 | 58 | -23 | 29 |
| 18 | Heracles | 34 | 35 | 85 | -50 | 19 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PSV Eindhoven | 34 | 69.7 | 37.3 | +32.4 | 84 |
| 2 | Feyenoord | 34 | 67.1 | 37.3 | +29.8 | 65 |
| 3 | Twente | 34 | 60.3 | 36.3 | +24.0 | 58 |
| 4 | AZ Alkmaar | 34 | 61.9 | 42.5 | +19.4 | 52 |
| 5 | NEC Nijmegen | 34 | 61.6 | 45.9 | +15.7 | 59 |
| 6 | Groningen | 34 | 58.0 | 46.2 | +11.8 | 48 |
| 7 | Heerenveen | 34 | 58.3 | 49.4 | +8.9 | 51 |
| 8 | Ajax | 34 | 53.4 | 45.6 | +7.8 | 56 |
| 9 | Utrecht | 34 | 50.0 | 44.4 | +5.6 | 53 |
| 10 | Sparta Rotterdam | 34 | 41.8 | 48.0 | -6.2 | 43 |
| 11 | NAC Breda | 34 | 39.4 | 50.3 | -10.9 | 29 |
| 12 | Telstar | 34 | 47.3 | 58.3 | -11.0 | 37 |
| 13 | Excelsior | 34 | 44.1 | 58.3 | -14.2 | 38 |
| 14 | Fortuna Sittard | 34 | 39.9 | 58.5 | -18.6 | 39 |
| 15 | GO Ahead Eagles | 34 | 41.7 | 62.4 | -20.7 | 38 |
| 16 | PEC Zwolle | 34 | 36.2 | 58.6 | -22.4 | 37 |
| 17 | FC Volendam | 34 | 34.5 | 59.3 | -24.8 | 32 |
| 18 | Heracles | 34 | 39.1 | 65.7 | -26.6 | 19 |