Prediction Audit: Buxton vs Hebburn Town Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 22, 2026 - 14:00
1 1.43
2 1.17
xG Accuracy: 71%

The model missed the final outcome (Hebburn Town win 1–2).

The model had projected Buxton at 41.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Buxton Hebburn Town ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 1-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Buxton higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Buxton -22.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Buxton 41.4% 63.4% -22.0 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.4% 21.2% +8.1 pp Model Higher
Hebburn Town 29.2% 15.3% +13.9 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Buxton's win probability at 63.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 41.4%, a difference of 22.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.

After full time, the result was Hebburn Town win 1–2.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Buxton; match finished Hebburn Town

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Buxton by 22.0 percentage points (63.4% vs model 41.4%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 22, 2026 · 14:04 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Buxton 41.4% · Draw 29.4% · Hebburn Town 29.3%
    • xG · Buxton 1.43 — Hebburn Town 1.17
  2. Aug 22, 2026 · 13:43 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Buxton 1.46 · Draw 4.36 · Hebburn Town 6.04
    • Implied 1X2 · Buxton 63.4% · Draw 21.2% · Hebburn Town 15.3%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 22, 2026 · 14:04 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE10
    • 1X2 odds · Buxton 1.46 · Draw 4.36 · Hebburn Town 6.04
    • Implied 1X2 · Buxton 63.4% · Draw 21.2% · Hebburn Town 15.3%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 22, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Hebburn Town win · 1–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 52/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (22 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 16, 2026 · 02:01 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4227158

Closing Odds 1.46
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Hebburn Town win · Buxton 1–2 Hebburn Town
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: National League - North
  • Fixture: Buxton vs Hebburn Town
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-22 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.4% · Draw 29.4% · Away 29.3%
  • xG (showing): Buxton 1.43 — Hebburn Town 1.17 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.4%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Buxton & Hebburn Town!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
National League - North National League - North — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Hereford 9 7 1 1 22
2 Oxford City 9 6 1 2 19
3 Macclesfield 9 5 3 1 18
4 Spalding United 9 5 2 2 17
5 Hebburn Town 9 5 2 2 17
6 South Shields 8 5 2 1 17
7 Buxton 9 5 1 3 16
8 Bedford Town 9 5 0 4 15
9 Chester 9 4 2 3 14
10 Morecambe 9 4 1 4 13
11 Merthyr Town 9 3 4 2 13
12 King's Lynn Town 9 4 1 4 13
13 Harborough Town 9 3 3 3 12
14 Worksop Town 9 4 0 5 12
15 Scarborough Athletic 9 3 2 4 11
16 Chorley 9 3 2 4 11
17 Marine 9 3 0 6 9
18 AFC Telford United 9 2 3 4 9
19 Hednesford Town 9 2 3 4 9
20 Southport 9 2 2 5 8
21 Brackley Town 8 2 2 4 8
22 Radcliffe 9 2 0 7 6
23 Darlington 1883 9 2 0 7 6
24 Spennymoor Town 9 1 3 5 6
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Hereford 9 21 4 +17 22
2 Buxton 9 18 14 +4 16
3 Oxford City 9 17 6 +11 19
4 Hebburn Town 9 15 15 0 17
5 King's Lynn Town 9 15 15 0 13
6 Scarborough Athletic 9 14 11 +3 11
7 Chorley 9 14 16 -2 11
8 Spalding United 9 13 6 +7 17
9 Morecambe 9 13 8 +5 13
10 Bedford Town 9 13 13 0 15
11 Hednesford Town 9 13 16 -3 9
12 Macclesfield 9 12 6 +6 18
13 Merthyr Town 9 11 9 +2 13
14 Southport 9 11 18 -7 8
15 Darlington 1883 9 11 20 -9 6
16 Harborough Town 9 10 11 -1 12
17 Marine 9 10 11 -1 9
18 Chester 9 9 8 +1 14
19 South Shields 8 9 10 -1 17
20 Worksop Town 9 9 12 -3 12
21 Spennymoor Town 9 9 19 -10 6
22 AFC Telford United 9 8 10 -2 9
23 Radcliffe 9 8 16 -8 6
24 Brackley Town 8 7 16 -9 8
National League - North England. National League - North Predictions