The model missed the final outcome (Universidad de Concepcion win 2–1).
The model had projected Universidad de Chile at 43.9%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Universidad de Chile Universidad de Concepcion ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universidad de Concepcion | 28.0% | 19.2% | +8.8 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 28.1% | 24.4% | +3.6 pp | Aligned |
| Universidad de Chile | 43.9% | 56.4% | -12.5 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Universidad de Chile's win probability at 56.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 43.9%, a difference of 12.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.
After full time, the result was Universidad de Concepcion win 2–1.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Universidad de Chile than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.69) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Universidad de Chile; match finished Universidad de Concepcion
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Universidad de Chile by 12.5 percentage points (56.4% vs model 43.9%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 19:48 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Universidad de Concepcion 28.0% · Draw 28.0% · Universidad de Chile 43.9%
- xG · Universidad de Concepcion 1.27 — Universidad de Chile 1.42
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 18:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Universidad de Concepcion 5.00 · Draw 3.93 · Universidad de Chile 1.70
- Implied 1X2 · Universidad de Concepcion 19.2% · Draw 24.4% · Universidad de Chile 56.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 18:56 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE5
- 1X2 odds · Universidad de Concepcion 5.00 · Draw 3.93 · Universidad de Chile 1.70
- Implied 1X2 · Universidad de Concepcion 19.2% · Draw 24.4% · Universidad de Chile 56.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 30, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Universidad de Concepcion win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (12 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Universidad de Concepcion & Universidad de Chile!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Primera División — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colo Colo | 23 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 54 |
| 2 | U. Catolica | 23 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 42 |
| 3 | Universidad de Chile | 23 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 42 |
| 4 | Everton de Vina | 23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 36 |
| 5 | Palestino | 23 | 11 | 3 | 9 | 36 |
| 6 | Deportes Limache | 23 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 33 |
| 7 | Nublense | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 32 |
| 8 | Concepción | 23 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 31 |
| 9 | D. La Serena | 23 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 30 |
| 10 | Coquimbo Unido | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 29 |
| 11 | A. Italiano | 23 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 28 |
| 12 | O'Higgins | 23 | 8 | 3 | 12 | 27 |
| 13 | Huachipato | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 25 |
| 14 | Cobresal | 23 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 24 |
| 15 | Universidad de Concepcion | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 22 |
| 16 | Union La Calera | 23 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 17 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U. Catolica | 23 | 50 | 33 | +17 | 42 |
| 2 | Colo Colo | 23 | 48 | 22 | +26 | 54 |
| 3 | Deportes Limache | 23 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 33 |
| 4 | Everton de Vina | 23 | 37 | 25 | +12 | 36 |
| 5 | Palestino | 23 | 36 | 33 | +3 | 36 |
| 6 | Universidad de Chile | 23 | 35 | 19 | +16 | 42 |
| 7 | D. La Serena | 23 | 34 | 38 | -4 | 30 |
| 8 | Cobresal | 23 | 34 | 44 | -10 | 24 |
| 9 | Coquimbo Unido | 22 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 29 |
| 10 | Huachipato | 21 | 29 | 39 | -10 | 25 |
| 11 | Nublense | 23 | 28 | 31 | -3 | 32 |
| 12 | O'Higgins | 23 | 28 | 36 | -8 | 27 |
| 13 | A. Italiano | 23 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 28 |
| 14 | Concepción | 23 | 25 | 26 | -1 | 31 |
| 15 | Union La Calera | 23 | 19 | 40 | -21 | 17 |
| 16 | Universidad de Concepcion | 22 | 17 | 37 | -20 | 22 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U. Catolica | 23 | 1.5 | 1.2 | +0.3 | 42 |
| 2 | Nublense | 23 | 1.2 | 1.5 | -0.3 | 32 |
| 3 | Colo Colo | 23 | — | — | — | 54 |
| 4 | Universidad de Chile | 23 | — | — | — | 42 |
| 5 | Everton de Vina | 23 | — | — | — | 36 |
| 6 | Palestino | 23 | — | — | — | 36 |
| 7 | Deportes Limache | 23 | — | — | — | 33 |
| 8 | Concepción | 23 | — | — | — | 31 |
| 9 | D. La Serena | 23 | — | — | — | 30 |
| 10 | Coquimbo Unido | 22 | — | — | — | 29 |
| 11 | A. Italiano | 23 | — | — | — | 28 |
| 12 | O'Higgins | 23 | — | — | — | 27 |
| 13 | Huachipato | 21 | — | — | — | 25 |
| 14 | Cobresal | 23 | — | — | — | 24 |
| 15 | Universidad de Concepcion | 22 | — | — | — | 22 |
| 16 | Union La Calera | 23 | — | — | — | 17 |