The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).
The model had projected Suecia at 45.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Suecia Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-2, 1-1, 2-2, 1-3, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correcto
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Suecia; match finished Draw
Market lesson
The full-time result was Draw 1–1, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.
Cronología de predicción
Cómo esta predicción pasó del pronóstico a la revisión a tiempo completo.
-
Oct 02, 2026 · 19:21 UTC Forecast generated
- xG · Bosnia y Herzegovina 1.59 — Suecia 2.20
-
Oct 02, 2026 · 18:45 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Instantánea histórica
Congelado en el inicio: el resultado del modelo tal como estaba antes de que comenzara el partido.
Métricas previas al partido (contexto histórico)
- Validation: Pending
- High xG deviation from league baseline (63%+)
- Moderate model lean
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation pending
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Revisar preguntas frecuentes
- ¿Qué tan precisa fue la predicción?
- Esta página clasifica los mercados direccionales (1X2, Más/Menos de 2,5, BTTS) con respecto al resultado final. El grado de predicción refleja cuántos de esos mercados rastreados coincidieron con la realidad.
- ¿Qué mide la precisión xG?
- xG Accuracy compara el perfil de goles esperados previo al partido del modelo con el marcador real, no si todos los mercados acertaron. Una revisión direccional sólida puede coexistir con una puntuación de precisión xG moderada.
- ¿Por qué no se predijo la puntuación exacta?
- Los resultados de puntuación correcta son colas de baja probabilidad incluso cuando el modelo lee bien el perfil de coincidencia. Destacamos los contenedores de puntuación más altos para el contexto; faltar la línea exacta no invalida una revisión direccional.
- ¿Esto mejora el registro de IA?
- Cada partido finalizado se registra en nuestro proceso de validación. Las tasas de aciertos agregadas y los estudios CLV se publican por separado; esta página es el registro de auditoría por partido.
Las predicciones son sólo para fines informativos. Juega siempre de forma responsable y dentro de tus límites. El rendimiento pasado no garantiza resultados futuros.
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "33f04326d751e1621d243573f138000bf0409d7299d58409350eb2e9e86df955",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"afp_away_win_prob": 0.4535,
"afp_draw_prob": 0.2441,
"afp_home_win_prob": 0.3024,
"away_predicted_xg": 2.2,
"away_win_prob": 0.4535,
"away_win_prob_posterior": 0.4535,
"bayes_applied": 1,
"btts_no_prob": 0.282,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.718,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2441,
"draw_prob_posterior": 0.2441,
"fair_odds_away": 2.21,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": 2.21,
"fair_odds_draw": 4.1,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": 4.1,
"fair_odds_home": 3.31,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": 3.31,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.59,
"home_win_prob": 0.3024,
"home_win_prob_posterior": 0.3024,
"over_25_prob": 0.73,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.271
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Winner : Suecia and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "Winner : Suecia",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Suecia"
},
"away_xg": 2.2,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Suecia",
"confidence": 45.3,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "Winner : Suecia",
"edge": 0.0618,
"edge_gap": 0.1506,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3914,
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"pick_type": "winner",
"probabilities": {
"away": 45.3,
"draw": 24.4,
"home": 30.3
},
"reason": "",
"selection": "away",
"selection_name": "Suecia"
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.47
}
],
"risk_color": "#f44336",
"risk_key": "high_risk",
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.47,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Suecia Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 2.56,
"market_odds": 2.47,
"model_odds": 2.21,
"overround": 3.4,
"prob_edge": 4.8,
"value_pct": 11.8,
"value_rating": "value_bet"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 1,
"away_score_rate": 88.9,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 0,
"home_score_rate": 79.6,
"no_prob": 28.2,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 71.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 71.8
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 2.2,
"home_expected": 1.59,
"scores": [
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 7.9
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.9
},
{
"away": 3,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-3",
"prob": 6.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.3
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Bosnia y Herzegovina or Draw",
"prob": 54.6
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Bosnia y Herzegovina or Suecia",
"prob": 75.6
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Suecia",
"prob": 69.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Bosnia y Herzegovina or Suecia",
"pick_prob": 75.6
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 45.4,
"draw_pct": 24.4,
"home_pct": 30.2,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Suecia"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 3.79,
"away_avg_scored": 2.0,
"confidence": "high",
"home_avg_scored": 0.0,
"over_prob": 73.0,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 73.0,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 3.79,
"under_prob": 27.1
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 12.1,
"implied_prob": 40.5,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Suecia Win",
"model_prob": 45.4,
"odds": 2.47
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Suecia",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 39.14,
"draw": 26.34,
"home": 34.52
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-02 18:45:26",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-10-02 18:15:08",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Bosnia y Herzegovina",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.52,
"gap_pp": -4.27,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 30.26
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.34,
"gap_pp": -1.91,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 24.43
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 39.14,
"gap_pp": 6.18,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 45.32
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 58.08,
"gap_pp": 14.92,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 73.0
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.92,
"gap_pp": -14.82,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 27.1
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.8,
"early": 2.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.52,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 34.52,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.67,
"early": 3.67,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.34,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 26.34,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.47,
"early": 2.47,
"implied_closing_pct": 39.14,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 39.14,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.66,
"early": 1.66,
"implied_closing_pct": 58.08,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 58.08,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.3,
"early": 2.3,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.92,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 41.92,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 14.9,
"kind": "ou_o"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.3,
"ev": -0.13,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-2",
"market_odds": 10.0,
"market_prob": 0.1,
"market_prob_pct": 10.0,
"model_prob": 0.087,
"model_prob_pct": 8.7,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.7
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 7.9
},
{
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.9
},
{
"label": "1-3",
"prob": 6.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.3
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.59,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.64,
"edge": 0.0304,
"edge_pp": 3.0,
"market_prob": 0.5784,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.73,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"best_odd": 1.64,
"edge": 0.0304,
"ev": -0.0015,
"implied_prob": 0.5784,
"model_prob": 0.73,
"p_final": 0.6088
},
"p_final": 0.6088,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 15.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1972,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0015,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1463,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": -0.022,
"ev": -0.101,
"implied_prob": 0.4216,
"model_prob": 0.271,
"p_final": 0.3996
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.241,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 24.1,
"text": "+24.1%"
},
"ev_under": -0.3767,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -37.7,
"text": "-37.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.241,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over_prob": 73.0,
"sort_key": 10366.9,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 27.1,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2089,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.505,
"edge": 0.0217,
"edge_pp": 2.2,
"market_prob": 0.6141,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.718,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1519,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": -0.0158,
"ev": -0.1136,
"implied_prob": 0.3859,
"model_prob": 0.282,
"p_final": 0.3701
},
"p_final": 0.6358,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 10.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0806,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0431,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2089,
"best_odd": 1.505,
"edge": 0.0217,
"ev": -0.0431,
"implied_prob": 0.6141,
"model_prob": 0.718,
"p_final": 0.6358
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2809,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -28.1,
"text": "-28.1%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.1129,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 11.3,
"text": "+11.3%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.1129,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 28.2,
"sort_key": 10101.61,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 71.8
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"consensus_odds": 2.47,
"decision": "small_edge",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.029,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 2.9,
"text": "+2.9%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.029,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 2.9,
"text": "+2.9%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"raw_edge_display": "+6.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1194,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+11.9%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Suecia",
"sort_key": 5223.2,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 806.1,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-2",
"top_prob": 8.7
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "9/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "9/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"alert_team": "Suecia",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 6.3,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 6.21,
"hero_label": "Suecia",
"market_prob_pct": 39.1,
"market_team": "Suecia",
"model_prob_pct": 45.4,
"model_team": "Suecia",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 78,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.241,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.241,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 32,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Suecia at 45.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 39.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Suecia as the value side (45.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Suecia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +24.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +24.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +24.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "73 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "32 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+24.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"Decision strength: 5.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 73,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.029,
"consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"raw_edge_display": "+6.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4048582995951417,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1194,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+11.9%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 63.0,
"reasons": [
"Elevated xG deviation 63%",
"Clear xG separation gap=0.61"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.61
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "9/9",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 76,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "Moderate model lean",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "High xG deviation from league baseline (63%+)",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 21.9,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 73,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 6.21,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 6.21,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 2.2,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 63.0,
"elevated": true,
"home_xg": 1.59,
"impact_note": "Elevated xG vs league baseline \u2014 treat totals leans cautiously; prefer smaller discretionary stakes if you act.",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 2.2,
"status_label": "High deviation from league baseline",
"summary": "Home xG 1.59 \u00b7 Away xG 2.20 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +63%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.0,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"steam_team": "Suecia",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 32,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 45,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.241,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.241,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 32,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Suecia at 45.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 39.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Suecia as the value side (45.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Suecia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +24.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +24.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +24.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "73 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "32 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+24.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"Decision strength: 5.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 73,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.029,
"consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"raw_edge_display": "+6.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4048582995951417,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1194,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+11.9%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 63.0,
"reasons": [
"Elevated xG deviation 63%",
"Clear xG separation gap=0.61"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.61
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Bosnia y Herzegovina 1.59 xG vs Suecia 2.20 \u2192 Suecia 45.4%",
"Market: Suecia ~39.1% implied",
"Market Drift: Suecia odds \u2191 +20.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Suecia, but the market has moved away from Suecia.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -4.28,
"fair_prob": 30.24,
"label": "Bosnia y Herzegovina",
"market_prob": 34.52,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.93,
"fair_prob": 24.41,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 26.34,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.21,
"fair_prob": 45.35,
"label": "Suecia",
"market_prob": 39.14,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 15.23,
"fair_prob": 73.0,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 57.77,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -15.13,
"fair_prob": 27.1,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 42.23,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 10.33,
"fair_prob": 71.8,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 61.47,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -10.33,
"fair_prob": 28.2,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 38.53,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": 6.21,
"fair_prob_pct": 45.35,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Suecia",
"market_prob_pct": 39.14,
"status": "mild_value",
"steam_team_name": "Suecia"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Suecia\u0027s win probability at 45.4%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 39.1%, a difference of 6.2 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "mild_value",
"max_gap_pp": 6.21,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
"favourite_label": "Suecia",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "medium",
"headline": "Slight edge match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 39.1,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+6.3 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 6.3,
"model_prob_pct": 45.4,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+6.3 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 6.3,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 73,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "slight_edge",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 32,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 45,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Bosnia y Herzegovina 1.59 xG vs Suecia 2.20 \u2192 Suecia 45.4%",
"Market: Suecia ~39.1% implied",
"Market Drift: Suecia odds \u2191 +20.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Suecia, but the market has moved away from Suecia.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "A lead outcome exists, but the match is not one-sided in the model.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Medium",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 6.21,
"hero_label": "Suecia",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Suecia odds lengthened \u2191 +20.0%.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Suecia.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Suecia.",
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Suecia.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Suecia."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate still sits above current market pricing on Suecia.",
"Recent line movement on Suecia (\u2191 +20.0%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (9/9) supports the current market view on Suecia."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 6.21,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 15.1 pp (at 45.4%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 15.1,
"max_prob_pct": 45.4,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Suecia",
"largest_gap_pp": 6.2,
"lead": "The model rates Suecia considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 6.2,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -4.28,
"edge_pp": -4.28,
"fair_prob_pct": 30.24,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Bosnia y Herzegovina",
"market_prob_pct": 34.52,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -1.93,
"edge_pp": -1.93,
"fair_prob_pct": 24.41,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 26.34,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 6.21,
"edge_pp": 6.21,
"fair_prob_pct": 45.35,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Suecia",
"market_prob_pct": 39.14,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "mild_value",
"status_label": "Mild Value",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Suecia.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Suecia (39.1%).",
"However, Suecia has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +20.0%, 9/9) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Suecia, Market \u2192 Suecia, while Suecia odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 40.49,
"closing_odds": 2.47,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 40.49,
"entry_odds": 2.47,
"match_phase": "live",
"match_phase_detail": "1H",
"match_phase_display": "Live \u00b7 1H",
"match_phase_label": "Live",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 9,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +19.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 19.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +17.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +17.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +17.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 16.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.0
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.4,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"move_pct_abs": 20.0,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 68h 15m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"9/9 books lengthened Suecia together (20.0% drift, score 78) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Broad multi-book drift \u2014 odds lengthened across sportsbooks (market fade)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.0,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.47",
"2.24",
"2.00"
],
"display": "2.50 \u2192 2.00 \u2192 2.40",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 68h 15m",
"pick_team": "Suecia",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.50"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.40"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.0,
2.47,
2.4
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,2.7",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.00"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.00"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.47"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.40"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.0,
"page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Suecia odds \u2191 +20.0% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Suecia",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Suecia odds \u2191 +20.0% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.4,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"open_odds": 2.0,
"summary": "Market moved away from Suecia while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Suecia",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 78,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"current_odds": 2.4,
"move_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"open_odds": 2.0,
"pick_team": "Suecia",
"steam_score": 78,
"steam_team_name": "Suecia",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 6.2,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "sweden",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": 0,
"away_team_display_name": "Suecia",
"away_team_id": 5,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/5.webp",
"away_team_name": "Suecia",
"away_team_public_id": "2gOtIvPgul7dU6",
"away_team_slug": "sweden",
"country_code": null,
"country_display_name": "World",
"country_flag": null,
"country_id": 168,
"country_name": "World",
"fixture_id": 1528929,
"goals_away": 0,
"goals_home": 0,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": 0,
"home_team_country": "Bosnia",
"home_team_display_name": "Bosnia y Herzegovina",
"home_team_id": 1113,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1113.webp",
"home_team_name": "Bosnia y Herzegovina",
"home_team_public_id": "3pB0NlNACCXtcR",
"home_team_slug": "bosnia-herzegovina",
"ht.home_team_slug": "bosnia-herzegovina",
"league_country": "World",
"league_country_display": "World",
"league_display_name": "Liga de Naciones de la UEFA",
"league_id": 5,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/5.webp",
"league_name": "Liga de Naciones de la UEFA",
"league_public_id": "2RfJso86Xu4FQW",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-02 18:45:00",
"public_id": "16iHEPQ4jv0cGx",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "First Half",
"status_short": "1H",
"venue_city": "Zenica",
"venue_name": "Stadion Bilino Polje"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4083,
"best_odd": 2.47,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0252,
"ev": 0.029,
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3914,
"draw": 0.2634,
"home": 0.3452
},
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"p_final": 0.4166
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2914,
"best_odd": 3.67,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0056,
"ev": -0.0538,
"implied_prob": 0.2634,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3914,
"draw": 0.2634,
"home": 0.3452
},
"model_prob": 0.2443,
"p_final": 0.2578
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4212,
"best_odd": 2.8,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.018,
"ev": -0.0837,
"implied_prob": 0.3452,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3914,
"draw": 0.2634,
"home": 0.3452
},
"model_prob": 0.3026,
"p_final": 0.3273
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.47,
"edge": 0.0483,
"ev": 0.1193,
"implied_prob": 0.4049,
"model_prob": 0.4532
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.67,
"edge": -0.0282,
"ev": -0.1035,
"implied_prob": 0.2725,
"model_prob": 0.2443
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.8,
"edge": -0.0546,
"ev": -0.1528,
"implied_prob": 0.3571,
"model_prob": 0.3026
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1519,
"alpha_yes": 0.2089,
"best_no_odd": 2.55,
"best_yes_odd": 1.55,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.1033,
"edge_yes": 0.1033,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2809,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1136,
"ev_yes": 0.1129,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0431,
"implied_no": 0.3853,
"implied_yes": 0.6147,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1519,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": -0.0158,
"ev": -0.1136,
"implied_prob": 0.3859,
"model_prob": 0.282,
"p_final": 0.3701
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2089,
"best_odd": 1.505,
"edge": 0.0217,
"ev": -0.0431,
"implied_prob": 0.6141,
"model_prob": 0.718,
"p_final": 0.6358
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.3701,
"p_final_yes": 0.6358,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2008,
"alpha_under": 0.1463,
"best_over_odd": 1.7,
"best_under_odd": 2.3,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.64,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.25,
"edge_over": 0.1523,
"edge_under": -0.1513,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.241,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0015,
"ev_under": -0.3767,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.101,
"implied_over": 0.5777,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5784,
"implied_under": 0.4223,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4216,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"best_odd": 1.64,
"edge": 0.0304,
"ev": -0.0015,
"implied_prob": 0.5784,
"model_prob": 0.73,
"p_final": 0.6088
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1463,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": -0.022,
"ev": -0.101,
"implied_prob": 0.4216,
"model_prob": 0.271,
"p_final": 0.3996
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.6088,
"p_final_under": 0.3996,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.79,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.241,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.241,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.241,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 5.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.5,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 5.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.5
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.241,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.241,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 32,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Suecia at 45.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 39.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Suecia as the value side (45.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 6.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Suecia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +24.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +24.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +24.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "73 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "32 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+24.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"Decision strength: 5.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 73,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Suecia, but the model still strongly favours Suecia.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.029,
"consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"raw_edge_display": "+6.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4048582995951417,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1194,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+11.9%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 63.0,
"reasons": [
"Elevated xG deviation 63%",
"Clear xG separation gap=0.61"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.61
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.718,
"draw_prob": 0.2443,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4532,
"over_prob": 0.73,
"total_xg": 3.79,
"under_prob": 0.271,
"xg_diff": 0.61
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.47,
"decision": "small_edge",
"edge": 0.0252,
"ev": 0.029,
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Suecia"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2089,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.505,
"edge": 0.0217,
"market_prob": 0.6141,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.718,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1519,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": -0.0158,
"ev": -0.1136,
"implied_prob": 0.3859,
"model_prob": 0.282,
"p_final": 0.3701
},
"p_final": 0.6358,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0431,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2089,
"best_odd": 1.505,
"edge": 0.0217,
"ev": -0.0431,
"implied_prob": 0.6141,
"model_prob": 0.718,
"p_final": 0.6358
}
},
"edge": 0.1033,
"ev": 0.1129,
"implied_prob": 0.6147,
"model_prob": 0.718,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.64,
"edge": 0.0304,
"market_prob": 0.5784,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.73,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"best_odd": 1.64,
"edge": 0.0304,
"ev": -0.0015,
"implied_prob": 0.5784,
"model_prob": 0.73,
"p_final": 0.6088
},
"p_final": 0.6088,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0015,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1463,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": -0.022,
"ev": -0.101,
"implied_prob": 0.4216,
"model_prob": 0.271,
"p_final": 0.3996
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.1523,
"ev": 0.241,
"implied_prob": 0.5777,
"model_prob": 0.73,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1528929,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.241,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4532,
"draw": 0.2443,
"home": 0.3026
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1129,
"implied_prob": 0.6147,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.718,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1129,
"implied_prob": 0.6147,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.718,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Suecia",
"home": "Bosnia y Herzegovina"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.219913,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.241,
"implied_prob": 0.5777,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.73,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 3,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.029,
"consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3914,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4532,
"raw_edge_display": "+6.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4048582995951417,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1194,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+11.9%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1528929,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-02T19:21:12.381962+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Bosnia y Herzegovina & Suecia!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga de Naciones de la UEFA — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Francia | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 | Italia | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 3 | Bélgica | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 4 | Turquía | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Italia | 4 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 7 |
| 2 | Francia | 4 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 10 |
| 3 | Bélgica | 4 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 6 |
| 4 | Turquía | 4 | 2 | 11 | -9 | 0 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Francia | 4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | +1.4 | 10 |
| 2 | Italia | 4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | +0.6 | 7 |
| 3 | Turquía | 4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | -0.6 | 0 |
| 4 | Bélgica | 4 | 0.6 | 2.0 | -1.4 | 6 |