AI correctly predicted the Philadelphia Union win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Philadelphia Union Philadelphia Union ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 2-1, 1-1, 2-0, 1-0, 3-1 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philadelphia Union | 58.4% | 71.4% | -13.0 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 22.9% | 17.7% | +5.2 pp | Model Higher |
| Real Salt Lake | 18.7% | 10.9% | +7.8 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Philadelphia Union's win probability at 71.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 58.4%, a difference of 13.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Philadelphia Union win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Philadelphia Union than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.27) — 3 goals materialised
- Philadelphia Union attacking xG significantly stronger (2.12 vs 1.15)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Philadelphia Union higher (71.4% vs model 58.4%, 13.0 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Philadelphia Union win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Oct 10, 2026 · 20:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Philadelphia Union 58.4% · Draw 22.9% · Real Salt Lake 18.7%
- xG · Philadelphia Union 2.12 — Real Salt Lake 1.15
-
Oct 10, 2026 · 23:12 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE20
- 1X2 odds · Philadelphia Union 1.30 · Draw 5.25 · Real Salt Lake 8.50
- Implied 1X2 · Philadelphia Union 71.4% · Draw 17.7% · Real Salt Lake 10.9%
- Bookmaker · bet365
-
Oct 10, 2026 · 23:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Philadelphia Union 1.30 · Draw 5.25 · Real Salt Lake 8.50
- Implied 1X2 · Philadelphia Union 71.4% · Draw 17.7% · Real Salt Lake 10.9%
- Bookmaker · bet365
-
Oct 10, 2026 · 23:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Philadelphia Union win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (13 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (57%+)
- Moderate model lean
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Philadelphia Union & Real Salt Lake!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Major League Soccer — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 28 | 15 | 6 | 7 | 51 |
| 2 | St. Louis City | 28 | 14 | 8 | 6 | 50 |
| 3 | FC Dallas | 28 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 47 |
| 4 | San Jose Earthquakes | 28 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 46 |
| 5 | Houston Dynamo | 28 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 45 |
| 6 | Los Angeles FC | 29 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 42 |
| 7 | Seattle Sounders | 28 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 41 |
| 8 | Colorado Rapids | 28 | 11 | 4 | 13 | 37 |
| 9 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 29 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 36 |
| 10 | Portland Timbers | 28 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 33 |
| 11 | Real Salt Lake | 28 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 32 |
| 12 | San Diego | 28 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
| 13 | Austin | 28 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 31 |
| 14 | Minnesota United FC | 28 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 30 |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | 28 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 22 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 28 | 61 | 30 | +31 | 51 |
| 2 | St. Louis City | 28 | 54 | 38 | +16 | 50 |
| 3 | FC Dallas | 28 | 52 | 45 | +7 | 47 |
| 4 | Portland Timbers | 28 | 51 | 54 | -3 | 33 |
| 5 | San Jose Earthquakes | 28 | 50 | 40 | +10 | 46 |
| 6 | San Diego | 28 | 48 | 51 | -3 | 32 |
| 7 | Los Angeles FC | 29 | 44 | 31 | +13 | 42 |
| 8 | Minnesota United FC | 28 | 42 | 51 | -9 | 30 |
| 9 | Real Salt Lake | 28 | 41 | 46 | -5 | 32 |
| 10 | Colorado Rapids | 28 | 39 | 39 | 0 | 37 |
| 11 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 29 | 39 | 50 | -11 | 36 |
| 12 | Seattle Sounders | 28 | 38 | 35 | +3 | 41 |
| 13 | Houston Dynamo | 28 | 36 | 34 | +2 | 45 |
| 14 | Austin | 28 | 36 | 51 | -15 | 31 |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | 28 | 35 | 68 | -33 | 22 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. Louis City | 28 | 18.8 | 10.0 | +8.8 | 50 |
| 2 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 28 | 16.6 | 8.1 | +8.5 | 51 |
| 3 | Colorado Rapids | 28 | 13.8 | 8.2 | +5.6 | 37 |
| 4 | Portland Timbers | 28 | 20.5 | 16.0 | +4.5 | 33 |
| 5 | Minnesota United FC | 28 | 19.1 | 14.9 | +4.2 | 30 |
| 6 | Houston Dynamo | 28 | 13.2 | 12.3 | +0.9 | 45 |
| 7 | San Diego | 28 | 16.9 | 16.2 | +0.7 | 32 |
| 8 | San Jose Earthquakes | 28 | 14.3 | 14.1 | +0.2 | 46 |
| 9 | Los Angeles FC | 29 | 15.6 | 16.9 | -1.3 | 42 |
| 10 | FC Dallas | 28 | 12.6 | 15.2 | -2.6 | 47 |
| 11 | Seattle Sounders | 28 | 11.9 | 16.0 | -4.1 | 41 |
| 12 | Real Salt Lake | 28 | 15.1 | 21.1 | -6.0 | 32 |
| 13 | Austin | 28 | 10.6 | 18.6 | -8.0 | 31 |
| 14 | Sporting Kansas City | 28 | 11.6 | 19.8 | -8.2 | 22 |
| 15 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 29 | 13.1 | 23.8 | -10.7 | 36 |