Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 Mulbarton Wanderers Gloucester City ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-2 ✔ Correcto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
Pending
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Gloucester City win · Mulbarton Wanderers 1–2 Gloucester City
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "e49ef8fc99a6355eee64576b5ec5c283173c927bced7bcffbd96528ba27082b4",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.28,
"away_win_prob": 0.3424,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.92,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.77,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.32,
"home_win_prob": 0.3611,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "No predictions available",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "33%",
"percent_draw": "33%",
"percent_home": "33%",
"winner_name": null
},
"away_xg": 1.28,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1269,
"edge_gap": 0.0185,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.234,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 34.2,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 36.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.8
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.8,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Mulbarton Wanderers Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 4.27,
"market_odds": 3.8,
"model_odds": 2.77,
"overround": 12.4,
"prob_edge": 9.8,
"value_pct": 37.2,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 2,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 3,
"away_score_rate": 72.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 2,
"home_score_rate": 73.3,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.28,
"home_expected": 1.32,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Mulbarton Wanderers or Draw",
"prob": 65.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Mulbarton Wanderers or Gloucester City",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Gloucester City",
"prob": 63.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Mulbarton Wanderers or Gloucester City",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 34.2,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Mulbarton Wanderers"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 2.3,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 2.5,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 37.2,
"implied_prob": 26.3,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market": "Mulbarton Wanderers Win",
"model_prob": 36.1,
"odds": 3.8
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Gloucester City",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 53.25,
"draw": 23.34,
"home": 23.4
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE10",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-03 14:04:43",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-10-03 13:45:42",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 23.4,
"gap_pp": 12.69,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.09
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 23.34,
"gap_pp": 6.32,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.67
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 53.25,
"gap_pp": -19.01,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 34.24
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 56.27,
"gap_pp": -8.07,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.73,
"gap_pp": 8.07,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 3.8,
"early": 3.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 23.4,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 23.4,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.81,
"early": 3.81,
"implied_closing_pct": 23.34,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 23.34,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 1.67,
"early": 1.67,
"implied_closing_pct": 53.25,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 53.25,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.64,
"early": 1.64,
"implied_closing_pct": 56.27,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 56.27,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.11,
"early": 2.11,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.73,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.73,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 12.7,
"kind": "1x2_h"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 1.3,
"ev": 0.1125,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 8.9,
"market_prob": 0.1124,
"market_prob_pct": 11.2,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.32,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1987,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0155,
"edge_pp": 1.6,
"market_prob": 0.44,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.017,
"ev": -0.1041,
"implied_prob": 0.56,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.543
},
"p_final": 0.4555,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0878,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0435,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1987,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0155,
"ev": -0.0435,
"implied_prob": 0.44,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4555
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1758,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -17.6,
"text": "-17.6%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1085,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 10.8,
"text": "+10.8%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1085,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10247.65,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"consensus_odds": 3.8,
"decision": "small_edge",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.0065,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.7,
"text": "+0.7%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0065,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.7,
"text": "+0.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3714,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.1%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"sort_key": 5205.2,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.105,
"edge": 0.0042,
"edge_pp": 0.4,
"market_prob": 0.4357,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"best_odd": 2.105,
"edge": 0.0042,
"ev": -0.074,
"implied_prob": 0.4357,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4399
},
"p_final": 0.4399,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 1.9,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0422,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.074,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2403,
"best_odd": 1.625,
"edge": -0.0046,
"ev": -0.0905,
"implied_prob": 0.5643,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5597
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0218,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -2.2,
"text": "-2.2%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1117,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.2,
"text": "-11.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": -0.0218,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 1794.55,
"tier": "bad_ev",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/7",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/7 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +26.7%",
"alert_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 19.0,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -19.01,
"hero_label": "Gloucester City",
"market_prob_pct": 23.4,
"market_team": "Gloucester City",
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"model_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 77,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 19.0,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.0,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 19.0,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.0,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1085,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3715,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.6,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Mulbarton Wanderers at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 23.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Mulbarton Wanderers as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 12.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Mulbarton Wanderers \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.65 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1641117 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.65 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +10.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +10.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+10.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0065,
"consensus_ev_display": "+0.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.8,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2631578947368421,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3714,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "6/7",
"breadth_ratio": 0.8571428571428571,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (19 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 15.5,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 8.6,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 55,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 19.01,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 19.01,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.28,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -2.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.32,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.32,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.32 \u00b7 Away xG 1.28 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -2%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 26.7,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +26.7%",
"steam_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 12,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 12,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 19.0,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.0,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 19.0,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.0,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1085,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3715,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.6,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Mulbarton Wanderers at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 23.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Mulbarton Wanderers as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 12.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Mulbarton Wanderers \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.65 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1641117 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.65 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +10.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +10.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+10.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0065,
"consensus_ev_display": "+0.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.8,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2631578947368421,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3714,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Mulbarton Wanderers 1.32 xG vs Gloucester City 1.28 \u2192 Mulbarton Wanderers 36.1%",
"Market: Gloucester City ~23.4% implied",
"Market Drift: Mulbarton Wanderers odds \u2191 +26.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Mulbarton Wanderers, but the market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": 12.71,
"fair_prob": 36.11,
"label": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"market_prob": 23.4,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.31,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 23.34,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": -19.01,
"fair_prob": 34.24,
"label": "Gloucester City",
"market_prob": 53.25,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -7.35,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 55.55,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.35,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 44.45,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.82,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 56.32,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.82,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 43.68,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -19.01,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Gloucester City",
"market_prob_pct": 53.25,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Mulbarton Wanderers"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE10",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Gloucester City\u0027s win probability at 53.2%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 19.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 19.01,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 23.4,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 12.7,
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 12.7,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 55,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 12,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 12,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Mulbarton Wanderers 1.32 xG vs Gloucester City 1.28 \u2192 Mulbarton Wanderers 36.1%",
"Market: Gloucester City ~23.4% implied",
"Market Drift: Mulbarton Wanderers odds \u2191 +26.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Mulbarton Wanderers, but the market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -19.01,
"hero_label": "Gloucester City",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Mulbarton Wanderers odds lengthened \u2191 +26.7%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Mulbarton Wanderers has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Gloucester City than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Mulbarton Wanderers \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.7% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Gloucester City than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Mulbarton Wanderers has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Mulbarton Wanderers \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.7% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Gloucester City more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Mulbarton Wanderers has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (6/7) supports the current market view on Mulbarton Wanderers."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 19.01,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 1.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 1.9,
"max_prob_pct": 36.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Gloucester City",
"largest_gap_pp": -19.0,
"lead": "The closing market prices Gloucester City higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 19.0,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": 12.71,
"edge_pp": 12.71,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"market_prob_pct": 23.4,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
},
{
"difference_pp": 6.31,
"edge_pp": 6.31,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 23.34,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -19.01,
"edge_pp": -19.01,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Gloucester City",
"market_prob_pct": 53.25,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Mulbarton Wanderers \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.7% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Gloucester City (23.4%).",
"However, Mulbarton Wanderers has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +26.7%, 6/7) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Mulbarton Wanderers, Market \u2192 Gloucester City, while Mulbarton Wanderers odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 59.88,
"closing_odds": 1.67,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 59.88,
"entry_odds": 1.67,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE10",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +40.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 40.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +33.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 33.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +31.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 31.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +31.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 31.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +27.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 27.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +26.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 26.7
}
],
"books_total": 7,
"breadth_display": "6/7",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.8,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +26.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 26.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 54h 9m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"6/7 books lengthened Mulbarton Wanderers together (26.7% drift, score 77) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Broad multi-book drift \u2014 odds lengthened across sportsbooks (market fade)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 26.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.80",
"3.40",
"3.00"
],
"display": "4.24 \u2192 3.00 \u2192 3.80",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 54h 9m",
"pick_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.24"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.80"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.0,
3.8
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.00"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.00"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.80"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.80"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.0,
"page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Mulbarton Wanderers odds \u2191 +26.7% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Mulbarton Wanderers odds \u2191 +26.7% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.8,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +26.7%",
"open_odds": 3.0,
"summary": "Market moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 77,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/7",
"current_odds": 3.8,
"move_display": "\u2191 +26.7%",
"open_odds": 3.0,
"pick_team": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"steam_score": 77,
"steam_team_name": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 19.0,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "gloucester-city",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Gloucester City",
"away_team_id": 8653,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/8653.webp",
"away_team_name": "Gloucester City",
"away_team_public_id": "4Uwkcb7XqlQx3D",
"away_team_slug": "gloucester-city",
"country_code": "GB-ENG",
"country_display_name": "England",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/gb-eng.svg",
"country_id": 49,
"country_name": "England",
"fixture_id": 1641117,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "England",
"home_team_display_name": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"home_team_id": 8875,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/8875.webp",
"home_team_name": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"home_team_public_id": "2wtiKWz3nKrzQv",
"home_team_slug": "mulbarton-wanderers",
"ht.home_team_slug": "mulbarton-wanderers",
"league_country": "England",
"league_country_display": "England",
"league_display_name": "FA Cup",
"league_id": 45,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/45.webp",
"league_name": "FA Cup",
"league_public_id": "3qBU7du2W45n9v",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-03 14:00:00",
"public_id": "0BOCn13IYnPVWV",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4289,
"best_odd": 1.67,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0815,
"ev": -0.2468,
"implied_prob": 0.5325,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.5325,
"draw": 0.2334,
"home": 0.234
},
"model_prob": 0.3424,
"p_final": 0.451
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2715,
"best_odd": 3.81,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0172,
"ev": -0.0452,
"implied_prob": 0.2334,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.5325,
"draw": 0.2334,
"home": 0.234
},
"model_prob": 0.2967,
"p_final": 0.2506
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.2429,
"best_odd": 3.8,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0308,
"ev": 0.0065,
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.5325,
"draw": 0.2334,
"home": 0.234
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"p_final": 0.2649
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 1.67,
"edge": -0.2564,
"ev": -0.4282,
"implied_prob": 0.5988,
"model_prob": 0.3424
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.81,
"edge": 0.0342,
"ev": 0.1303,
"implied_prob": 0.2625,
"model_prob": 0.2967
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 3.8,
"edge": 0.0978,
"ev": 0.3715,
"implied_prob": 0.2632,
"model_prob": 0.3609
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2185,
"alpha_yes": 0.2403,
"best_no_odd": 2.15,
"best_yes_odd": 1.63,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0182,
"edge_yes": -0.0182,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0218,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.074,
"ev_yes": -0.1117,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0905,
"implied_no": 0.4368,
"implied_yes": 0.5632,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"best_odd": 2.105,
"edge": 0.0042,
"ev": -0.074,
"implied_prob": 0.4357,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4399
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2403,
"best_odd": 1.625,
"edge": -0.0046,
"ev": -0.0905,
"implied_prob": 0.5643,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5597
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"p_final_no": 0.4399,
"p_final_yes": 0.5597,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2185,
"alpha_under": 0.1987,
"best_over_odd": 1.71,
"best_under_odd": 2.14,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.65,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.1,
"edge_over": -0.0735,
"edge_under": 0.0735,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1758,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1041,
"ev_under": 0.1085,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0435,
"implied_over": 0.5555,
"implied_over_mf": 0.56,
"implied_under": 0.4445,
"implied_under_mf": 0.44,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.017,
"ev": -0.1041,
"implied_prob": 0.56,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.543
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1987,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0155,
"ev": -0.0435,
"implied_prob": 0.44,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4555
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.543,
"p_final_under": 0.4555,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1085,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3715,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1085,
"confidence": 6.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.6,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.6
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 19.0,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.0,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1085,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3715,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.6,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Mulbarton Wanderers at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 23.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Mulbarton Wanderers as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 12.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Mulbarton Wanderers",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Mulbarton Wanderers \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.65 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1641117 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.65 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +10.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +10.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+10.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Mulbarton Wanderers, but the model still strongly favours Mulbarton Wanderers.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0065,
"consensus_ev_display": "+0.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.8,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2631578947368421,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3714,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2967,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3609,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.04
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.8,
"decision": "small_edge",
"edge": 0.0308,
"ev": 0.0065,
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"max_ev_side": "home",
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Mulbarton Wanderers"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.105,
"edge": 0.0042,
"market_prob": 0.4357,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"best_odd": 2.105,
"edge": 0.0042,
"ev": -0.074,
"implied_prob": 0.4357,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4399
},
"p_final": 0.4399,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.074,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2403,
"best_odd": 1.625,
"edge": -0.0046,
"ev": -0.0905,
"implied_prob": 0.5643,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5597
}
},
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.0218,
"implied_prob": 0.4368,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1987,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0155,
"market_prob": 0.44,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2185,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.017,
"ev": -0.1041,
"implied_prob": 0.56,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.543
},
"p_final": 0.4555,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0435,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1987,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0155,
"ev": -0.0435,
"implied_prob": 0.44,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4555
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0735,
"ev": 0.1085,
"implied_prob": 0.4445,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1641117,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1085,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3424,
"draw": 0.2967,
"home": 0.3609
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Gloucester City",
"home": "Mulbarton Wanderers"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.039342,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1085,
"implied_prob": 0.4445,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0065,
"consensus_ev_display": "+0.7%",
"consensus_odds": 3.8,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.234,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2631578947368421,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3714,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+37.1%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1641117,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-03T14:04:45.254205+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Mulbarton Wanderers & Gloucester City!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
