Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 RKAV Volendam Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-2 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.84
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Draw · RKAV Volendam 2–2 Spakenburg
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "920020e4d2822e1b16fe070baddcf0bd18c852995d21fbc5a08ee492016a283d",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.3,
"away_win_prob": 0.3517,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.84,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.84,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.3,
"home_win_prob": 0.3517,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Spakenburg",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "50%",
"percent_draw": "50%",
"percent_home": "0%",
"winner_name": "Spakenburg"
},
"away_xg": 1.3,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "RKAV Volendam",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.0761,
"edge_gap": 0.0,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2757,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 35.2,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 35.2
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.26
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.26,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "RKAV Volendam Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 3.63,
"market_odds": 3.26,
"model_odds": 2.84,
"overround": 11.3,
"prob_edge": 4.5,
"value_pct": 14.8,
"value_rating": "value_bet"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 0,
"away_score_rate": 72.7,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 0,
"home_score_rate": 72.7,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.3,
"home_expected": 1.3,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "RKAV Volendam or Draw",
"prob": 64.8
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "RKAV Volendam or Spakenburg",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Spakenburg",
"prob": 64.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "RKAV Volendam or Spakenburg",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 35.2,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 35.2,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "RKAV Volendam"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 0.0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 14.8,
"implied_prob": 30.7,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market": "RKAV Volendam Win",
"model_prob": 35.2,
"odds": 3.26
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Spakenburg",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 48.84,
"draw": 23.59,
"home": 27.57
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-22 18:02:35",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-22 17:32:25",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "RKAV Volendam",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.57,
"gap_pp": 7.61,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 35.18
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 23.59,
"gap_pp": 6.06,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.65
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.84,
"gap_pp": -13.67,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 35.18
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 62.5,
"gap_pp": -14.3,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.5,
"gap_pp": 14.3,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 3.26,
"early": 3.26,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.57,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.57,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.81,
"early": 3.81,
"implied_closing_pct": 23.59,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 23.59,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 1.84,
"early": 1.84,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.84,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.84,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.47,
"early": 1.47,
"implied_closing_pct": 62.5,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 62.5,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.45,
"early": 2.45,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.5,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.5,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 14.3,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 1.2,
"ev": 0.1025,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 8.75,
"market_prob": 0.1143,
"market_prob_pct": 11.4,
"model_prob": 0.126,
"model_prob_pct": 12.6,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.3,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1426,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0197,
"edge_pp": 2.0,
"market_prob": 0.3795,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1961,
"best_odd": 1.465,
"edge": -0.0272,
"ev": -0.1308,
"implied_prob": 0.6205,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5933
},
"p_final": 0.3993,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2406,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0437,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1426,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0197,
"ev": -0.0437,
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.3993
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2674,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -26.7,
"text": "-26.7%"
},
"ev_under": 0.3209,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 32.1,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.3209,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10438.81,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1563,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0137,
"edge_pp": 1.4,
"market_prob": 0.3671,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1563,
"best_odd": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0137,
"ev": -0.0479,
"implied_prob": 0.3671,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3808
},
"p_final": 0.3808,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1375,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0479,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2149,
"best_odd": 1.45,
"edge": -0.0189,
"ev": -0.1097,
"implied_prob": 0.6329,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.614
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.1966,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 19.7,
"text": "+19.7%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1825,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.2,
"text": "-18.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.1966,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10176.94,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"consensus_odds": 3.26,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.0354,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.5,
"text": "-3.5%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0354,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.5,
"text": "-3.5%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1469,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+14.7%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "RKAV Volendam",
"sort_key": 1791.15,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "3/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "3/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +12.4%",
"alert_team": "Spakenburg",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 13.7,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -13.67,
"hero_label": "Spakenburg",
"market_prob_pct": 27.6,
"market_team": "Spakenburg",
"model_prob_pct": 35.2,
"model_team": "RKAV Volendam",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 46,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 13.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 13.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 13.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 13.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3209,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3209,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.7,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 50,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates RKAV Volendam at 35.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies RKAV Volendam as the value side (35.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 7.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "RKAV Volendam",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.7/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "63 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "50 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"Decision strength: 4.7/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 63,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0354,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.5%",
"consensus_odds": 3.26,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3067484662576687,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1469,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+14.7%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.0 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.0
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "3/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.375,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (14 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 18.2,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 3.8,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 63,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 13.67,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 13.67,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.3,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -4.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.3,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.3,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.30 \u00b7 Away xG 1.30 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -4%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.4,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +12.4%",
"steam_team": "Spakenburg",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 50,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 62,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 62,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 13.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 13.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 13.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 13.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3209,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3209,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.7,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 50,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates RKAV Volendam at 35.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies RKAV Volendam as the value side (35.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 7.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "RKAV Volendam",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.7/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "63 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "50 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"Decision strength: 4.7/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 63,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0354,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.5%",
"consensus_odds": 3.26,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3067484662576687,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1469,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+14.7%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.0 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.0
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: RKAV Volendam 1.30 xG vs Spakenburg 1.30 \u2192 RKAV Volendam 35.2%",
"Market: Spakenburg ~27.6% implied",
"Market Drift: Spakenburg odds \u2191 +12.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean RKAV Volendam with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": 7.6,
"fair_prob": 35.17,
"label": "RKAV Volendam",
"market_prob": 27.57,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.06,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 23.59,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": -13.67,
"fair_prob": 35.17,
"label": "Spakenburg",
"market_prob": 48.84,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -14.06,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 62.26,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 14.06,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 37.74,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.64,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 63.14,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.64,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 36.86,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -13.67,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.17,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Spakenburg",
"market_prob_pct": 48.84,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Spakenburg"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Spakenburg\u0027s win probability at 48.8%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 35.2%, a difference of 13.7 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 13.67,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "RKAV Volendam",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 27.6,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 7.6,
"model_prob_pct": 35.2,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 7.6,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 63,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "RKAV Volendam \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 50,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 62,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 62,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: RKAV Volendam 1.30 xG vs Spakenburg 1.30 \u2192 RKAV Volendam 35.2%",
"Market: Spakenburg ~27.6% implied",
"Market Drift: Spakenburg odds \u2191 +12.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean RKAV Volendam with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -13.67,
"hero_label": "Spakenburg",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Spakenburg odds lengthened \u2191 +12.4%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "Confirmation remains limited (3/8 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Spakenburg than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Spakenburg.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Spakenburg than the current fair estimate.",
"Confirmation remains limited (3/8 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Spakenburg."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Spakenburg more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"Recent line movement on Spakenburg (\u2191 +12.4%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (3/8), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 13.67,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.0 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.0,
"max_prob_pct": 35.2,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Spakenburg",
"largest_gap_pp": -13.7,
"lead": "The closing market prices Spakenburg higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 13.7,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": 7.6,
"edge_pp": 7.6,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.17,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "RKAV Volendam",
"market_prob_pct": 27.57,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 6.06,
"edge_pp": 6.06,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 23.59,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -13.67,
"edge_pp": -13.67,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.17,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Spakenburg",
"market_prob_pct": 48.84,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Spakenburg.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Spakenburg (27.6%).",
"Spakenburg odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +12.4%, 3/8) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 RKAV Volendam, Market \u2192 Spakenburg, while Spakenburg odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 54.35,
"closing_odds": 1.84,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 54.35,
"entry_odds": 1.84,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 3,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.9
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "3/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 1.91,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +12.4%",
"move_pct_abs": 12.4,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 20h 15m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Bet365 led repricing on Spakenburg (12.4%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"Sharper sportsbooks initiated the move, but wider market participation remains limited."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.4,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"1.91",
"1.80",
"1.70"
],
"display": "1.91 \u2192 1.70 \u2192 1.91",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 20h 15m",
"pick_team": "Spakenburg",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "1.91"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "1.70"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "1.91"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
1.7,
1.84,
1.91
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,6.0 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "1.70"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "1.70"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "1.91"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "1.91"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 1.7,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Spakenburg",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 1.91,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +12.4%",
"open_odds": 1.7,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Spakenburg",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 46,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "3/8",
"current_odds": 1.91,
"move_display": "\u2191 +12.4%",
"open_odds": 1.7,
"pick_team": "Spakenburg",
"steam_score": 46,
"steam_team_name": "Spakenburg",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 13.7,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "spakenburg",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Spakenburg",
"away_team_id": 1249,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1249.webp",
"away_team_name": "Spakenburg",
"away_team_public_id": "599ZMEfindMPpN",
"away_team_slug": "spakenburg",
"country_code": "NL",
"country_display_name": "Netherlands",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/nl.svg",
"country_id": 115,
"country_name": "Netherlands",
"fixture_id": 1638279,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Netherlands",
"home_team_display_name": "RKAV Volendam",
"home_team_id": 1238,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1238.webp",
"home_team_name": "RKAV Volendam",
"home_team_public_id": "4joeLIGbMwvCGW",
"home_team_slug": "rkav-volendam",
"ht.home_team_slug": "rkav-volendam",
"league_country": "Netherlands",
"league_country_display": "Netherlands",
"league_display_name": "Copa KNVB",
"league_id": 90,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/90.webp",
"league_name": "Copa KNVB",
"league_public_id": "4nWf9lxyBZqhOw",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-22 18:00:00",
"public_id": "2FggN85Y85b7KI",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Volendam",
"venue_name": "KWABO-stadion"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.477,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0652,
"ev": -0.2212,
"implied_prob": 0.4884,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4884,
"draw": 0.2359,
"home": 0.2757
},
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"p_final": 0.4232
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2727,
"best_odd": 3.81,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0165,
"ev": -0.0383,
"implied_prob": 0.2359,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4884,
"draw": 0.2359,
"home": 0.2757
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.2524
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.2658,
"best_odd": 3.26,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0202,
"ev": -0.0354,
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4884,
"draw": 0.2359,
"home": 0.2757
},
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"p_final": 0.2959
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": -0.1917,
"ev": -0.3527,
"implied_prob": 0.5435,
"model_prob": 0.3518
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.81,
"edge": 0.034,
"ev": 0.1295,
"implied_prob": 0.2625,
"model_prob": 0.2965
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 3.26,
"edge": 0.045,
"ev": 0.1468,
"implied_prob": 0.3067,
"model_prob": 0.3518
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1563,
"alpha_yes": 0.2149,
"best_no_odd": 2.63,
"best_yes_odd": 1.5,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0864,
"edge_yes": -0.0864,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.1966,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0479,
"ev_yes": -0.1825,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1097,
"implied_no": 0.3686,
"implied_yes": 0.6314,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1563,
"best_odd": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0137,
"ev": -0.0479,
"implied_prob": 0.3671,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3808
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2149,
"best_odd": 1.45,
"edge": -0.0189,
"ev": -0.1097,
"implied_prob": 0.6329,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.614
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.3808,
"p_final_yes": 0.614,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.1961,
"alpha_under": 0.1426,
"best_over_odd": 1.52,
"best_under_odd": 2.55,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.465,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.395,
"edge_over": -0.1406,
"edge_under": 0.1406,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2674,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1308,
"ev_under": 0.3209,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0437,
"implied_over": 0.6226,
"implied_over_mf": 0.6205,
"implied_under": 0.3774,
"implied_under_mf": 0.3795,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1961,
"best_odd": 1.465,
"edge": -0.0272,
"ev": -0.1308,
"implied_prob": 0.6205,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5933
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1426,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0197,
"ev": -0.0437,
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.3993
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5933,
"p_final_under": 0.3993,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3209,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3209,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.3209,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.7,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.7,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.7,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.7
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 13.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 13.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3209,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3209,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.7,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 50,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates RKAV Volendam at 35.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies RKAV Volendam as the value side (35.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 7.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "RKAV Volendam",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.7/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "63 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "50 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"Decision strength: 4.7/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 63,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (RKAV Volendam).",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0354,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.5%",
"consensus_odds": 3.26,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3067484662576687,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1469,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+14.7%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.0 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.0
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3518,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.0
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.26,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": 0.0202,
"ev": -0.0354,
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"max_ev_side": "home",
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "RKAV Volendam"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1563,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0137,
"market_prob": 0.3671,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1563,
"best_odd": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0137,
"ev": -0.0479,
"implied_prob": 0.3671,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3808
},
"p_final": 0.3808,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0479,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2149,
"best_odd": 1.45,
"edge": -0.0189,
"ev": -0.1097,
"implied_prob": 0.6329,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.614
}
},
"edge": 0.0864,
"ev": 0.1966,
"implied_prob": 0.3686,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1426,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0197,
"market_prob": 0.3795,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1961,
"best_odd": 1.465,
"edge": -0.0272,
"ev": -0.1308,
"implied_prob": 0.6205,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5933
},
"p_final": 0.3993,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0437,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1426,
"best_odd": 2.395,
"edge": 0.0197,
"ev": -0.0437,
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.3993
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1406,
"ev": 0.3209,
"implied_prob": 0.3774,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1638279,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.3209,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3518,
"draw": 0.2965,
"home": 0.3518
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1966,
"implied_prob": 0.3686,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1966,
"implied_prob": 0.3686,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Spakenburg",
"home": "RKAV Volendam"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.116358,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.3209,
"implied_prob": 0.3774,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0354,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.5%",
"consensus_odds": 3.26,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2757,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3518,
"raw_edge_display": "+7.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3067484662576687,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1469,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+14.7%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1638279,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-22T18:02:37.131737+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para RKAV Volendam & Spakenburg!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
