Estadísticas / Fútbol / Mundo. Copa AFC / Viettel vs Melbourne Victory

Viettel vs Melbourne Victory Statistics & Analysis

Sep 16, 2026 - 12:15
1 1.32
1 1.28
xG Accuracy: 85%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
  • 1X2 Viettel Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Correcto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 10, 2026 · 01:57 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7846452

Closing Odds 1.69
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Viettel 1–1 Melbourne Victory
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mercado se mantuvo estable antes del inicio. No se detectó un cambio implícito relevante entre PRE30 y PRE1 en la captura priorizada.

A pesar del movimiento tardío limitado, el modelo sigue tasando Viettel (1X2),Dibujar (1X2),Menos de 2,5 goles claramente por encima de lo implícito en esas capturas de cierre: es una lectura estática de «modelo vs precio», no de persecución tardía.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en Viettel (1X2) en unos 12.7 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
Viettel (1X2) 36.1 23.4 +12.7
Dibujar (1X2) 29.7 22.7 +6.9
Melbourne Victory (1X2) 34.2 53.8 -19.6
Más de 2,5 goles 48.2 54.6 -6.4
Menos de 2,5 goles 51.8 45.4 +6.4
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 36.1% en Viettel (1X2), mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 23.4%. La diferencia —unos 12.7 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE30 → PRE1 · Casa: Pinnacle

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Las cuotas detalladas están plegadas abajo — el movimiento implícito fue insignificante.

Ver tabla completa línea a línea
Mercado Temprano (PRE30) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
Viettel (1X2) 3.88 3.88 0.0
Dibujar (1X2) 4.0 4.0 0.0
Melbourne Victory (1X2) 1.69 1.69 0.0
Más de 2,5 goles 1.71 1.71 0.0
Menos de 2,5 goles 2.06 2.06 0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "d2f28eceb7070285d89091373edbfd956aea5d3f93109332aca9b808c019cc1d",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.28,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3424,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.455,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2965,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.92,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.77,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.32,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3611,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "No predictions available",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "33%",
      "percent_draw": "33%",
      "percent_home": "33%",
      "winner_name": null
    },
    "away_xg": 1.28,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Viettel",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.1265,
        "edge_gap": 0.0185,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.2344,
        "model_prob": 0.3609,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 34.2,
          "draw": 29.7,
          "home": 36.1
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 3.88
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 3.88,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Viettel Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 4.27,
        "market_odds": 3.88,
        "model_odds": 2.77,
        "overround": 9.9,
        "prob_edge": 10.3,
        "value_pct": 40.1,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 0,
        "away_failed_to_score": 0,
        "away_played": 0,
        "away_score_rate": 72.2,
        "home_clean_sheet": 0,
        "home_failed_to_score": 0,
        "home_played": 0,
        "home_score_rate": 73.3,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.5,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.28,
        "home_expected": 1.32,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.8
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.5
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.3
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.0
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Viettel or Draw",
            "prob": 65.7
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Viettel or Melbourne Victory",
            "prob": 70.3
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Melbourne Victory",
            "prob": 63.8
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Viettel or Melbourne Victory",
        "pick_prob": 70.3
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 34.2,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 36.1,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Viettel"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.0,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.0,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 40.1,
        "implied_prob": 25.8,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market": "Viettel Win",
        "model_prob": 36.1,
        "odds": 3.88
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Melbourne Victory",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 53.82,
        "draw": 22.74,
        "home": 23.44
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-16 12:14:11",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-16 11:44:12",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Viettel",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 23.44,
          "gap_pp": 12.65,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 36.09
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 22.74,
          "gap_pp": 6.93,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.67
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 53.82,
          "gap_pp": -19.58,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 34.24
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 54.64,
          "gap_pp": -6.44,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 45.36,
          "gap_pp": 6.44,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 3.88,
          "early": 3.88,
          "implied_closing_pct": 23.44,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 23.44,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 4.0,
          "early": 4.0,
          "implied_closing_pct": 22.74,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 22.74,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.69,
          "early": 1.69,
          "implied_closing_pct": 53.82,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 53.82,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.71,
          "early": 1.71,
          "implied_closing_pct": 54.64,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 54.64,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.06,
          "early": 2.06,
          "implied_closing_pct": 45.36,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 45.36,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 12.7,
        "kind": "1x2_h"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": 0.0,
        "ev": 0.0,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 8.0,
        "market_prob": 0.125,
        "market_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 9.8
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.5
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.3
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 8.0
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.32,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2156,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.01,
          "edge": 0.0126,
          "edge_pp": 1.3,
          "market_prob": 0.4597,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.2371,
            "best_odd": 1.71,
            "edge": -0.0138,
            "ev": -0.0997,
            "implied_prob": 0.5403,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.5265
          },
          "p_final": 0.4723,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 5.8,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.0412,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0508,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.2156,
            "best_odd": 2.01,
            "edge": 0.0126,
            "ev": -0.0508,
            "implied_prob": 0.4597,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.4723
          },
          "value_side": "under"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": -0.1083,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -10.8,
          "text": "-10.8%"
        },
        "ev_under": 0.0878,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 8.8,
          "text": "+8.8%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.0878,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10229.02,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
        "consensus_odds": 3.88,
        "decision": "small_edge",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": 0.0289,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 2.9,
          "text": "+2.9%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.2344,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0289,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 2.9,
          "text": "+2.9%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3609,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.4003,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Viettel",
        "sort_key": 5223.12,
        "tier": "lean"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2242,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.02,
          "edge": 0.0005,
          "edge_pp": 0.1,
          "market_prob": 0.4526,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.455,
          "n_bookmakers": 6,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.2242,
            "best_odd": 2.02,
            "edge": 0.0005,
            "ev": -0.0847,
            "implied_prob": 0.4526,
            "model_prob": 0.455,
            "p_final": 0.4531
          },
          "p_final": 0.4531,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 0.2,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.0809,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0847,
          "value_side": "no",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.2466,
            "best_odd": 1.67,
            "edge": -0.0006,
            "ev": -0.0868,
            "implied_prob": 0.5474,
            "model_prob": 0.545,
            "p_final": 0.5468
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": -0.0445,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -4.5,
          "text": "-4.5%"
        },
        "ev_yes": -0.0462,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -4.6,
          "text": "-4.6%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": -0.0445,
        "n_bookmakers": 6,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "sort_key": 1788.875,
        "tier": "bad_ev",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "6/9",
        "alert_breadth_note": "6/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +26.2%",
        "alert_team": "Viettel",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 19.6,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -19.58,
        "hero_label": "Melbourne Victory",
        "market_prob_pct": 23.4,
        "market_team": "Melbourne Victory",
        "model_prob_pct": 36.1,
        "model_team": "Viettel",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 68,
        "steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "A",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 19.6,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 19.6,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 19.6,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 19.6,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.4004,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.2,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 18,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Viettel at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 23.4%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Viettel as the value side (36.1%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 12.7,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Viettel",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "drift_against_model",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Viettel \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.70 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +40% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1630347 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.70 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Reliability below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "53 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "18 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 5,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Reliability below 65",
            "Outlier price +40% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 53,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0289,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
            "consensus_odds": 3.88,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.2344,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3609,
            "raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.2577319587628866,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.4003,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -2.2,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.04
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "6/9",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.6666666666666666,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 57,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (20 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 15.2,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 6.7,
            "steam_coherence": 0.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 53,
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 19.58,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 19.58,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.28,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -2.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.32,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.32,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.32 \u00b7 Away xG 1.28 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -2%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 26.2,
        "steam_conflicts": true,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +26.2%",
        "steam_team": "Viettel",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 18,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 12,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 36,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 12,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 19.6,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 19.6,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 19.6,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": false,
              "pricing_key": "low",
              "probability_gap_pp": 19.6,
              "summary": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.4004,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.2,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 18,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Viettel at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 23.4%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Viettel as the value side (36.1%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 12.7,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Viettel",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "drift_against_model",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Viettel \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.70 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +40% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1630347 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.70 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Reliability below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "53 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "18 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 5,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Reliability below 65",
              "Outlier price +40% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 53,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0289,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
              "consensus_odds": 3.88,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.2344,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3609,
              "raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.2577319587628866,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.4003,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -2.2,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.04
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Viettel 1.32 xG vs Melbourne Victory 1.28 \u2192 Viettel 36.1%",
            "Market: Melbourne Victory ~23.4% implied",
            "Market Drift: Viettel odds \u2191 +26.2%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model favours Viettel, but the market has moved away from Viettel.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": 12.67,
          "fair_prob": 36.11,
          "label": "Viettel",
          "market_prob": 23.44,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 6.91,
          "fair_prob": 29.65,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 22.74,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -19.58,
          "fair_prob": 34.24,
          "label": "Melbourne Victory",
          "market_prob": 53.82,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -5.12,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 53.32,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 5.12,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 46.68,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -0.36,
          "fair_prob": 54.5,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 54.86,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 0.36,
          "fair_prob": 45.5,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 45.14,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -19.58,
        "fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "Melbourne Victory",
        "market_prob_pct": 53.82,
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Viettel"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Melbourne Victory\u0027s win probability at 53.8%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 19.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 19.58,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Viettel",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 23.4,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 12.7,
          "model_prob_pct": 36.1,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 12.7,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "!",
          "reliability_score": 53,
          "reliability_tier": "limited",
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 18,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 12,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 36,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 12,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Viettel 1.32 xG vs Melbourne Victory 1.28 \u2192 Viettel 36.1%",
              "Market: Melbourne Victory ~23.4% implied",
              "Market Drift: Viettel odds \u2191 +26.2%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model favours Viettel, but the market has moved away from Viettel.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -19.58,
        "hero_label": "Melbourne Victory",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "Viettel odds lengthened \u2191 +26.2%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
            "Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Viettel has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.2%, suggesting weakening support.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Melbourne Victory than the current fair estimate.",
          "note": "Drift away from Viettel \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.2% (weakening support).",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market is materially more optimistic about Melbourne Victory than the current fair estimate.",
            "However, Viettel has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.2%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Drift away from Viettel \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.2% (weakening support)."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market favors Melbourne Victory more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
            "At the same time, Viettel has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.2%, suggesting weakening support."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 19.58,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 1.9 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 1.9,
          "max_prob_pct": 36.1,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Melbourne Victory",
          "largest_gap_pp": -19.6,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Melbourne Victory higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 19.6,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": 12.67,
            "edge_pp": 12.67,
            "fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Viettel",
            "market_prob_pct": 23.44,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 6.91,
            "edge_pp": 6.91,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 22.74,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -19.58,
            "edge_pp": -19.58,
            "fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Melbourne Victory",
            "market_prob_pct": 53.82,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "Drift away from Viettel \u2014 odds lengthened by 26.2% (weakening support).",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Melbourne Victory (23.4%).",
          "However, Viettel has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +26.2%, 6/9) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Viettel, Market \u2192 Melbourne Victory, while Viettel odds drifted longer (market fade).",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 59.17,
        "closing_odds": 1.69,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 59.17,
        "entry_odds": 1.69,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 6,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +26.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 26.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.5%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 20.5
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 20.0
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +15.8%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 15.8
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.0%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 4.0
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 4,
            "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.5%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 3.5
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 9,
        "breadth_display": "6/9",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 4.1,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +26.2%",
        "move_pct_abs": 26.2,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 28h 8m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Multi-book drift on Viettel (26.2%, 6/9) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 26.2,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "4.10",
            "3.67",
            "3.25"
          ],
          "display": "4.40 \u2192 3.11 \u2192 4.10",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 28h 8m",
          "pick_team": "Viettel",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "4.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.11"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "4.10"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            3.25,
            3.88,
            4.1
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,4.7 56.0,0.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "up",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.25"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.25"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "4.10"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "4.10"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 3.25,
        "page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Viettel odds \u2191 +26.2% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
        "phase_label": "Market drift",
        "phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
        "pick_team": "Viettel",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Viettel odds \u2191 +26.2% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "fade",
        "signal_icon": "\u2198",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 4.1,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +26.2%",
          "open_odds": 3.25,
          "summary": "Market moved away from Viettel while the model still favours another side.",
          "team": "Viettel",
          "tone": "against"
        },
        "signal_key": "market_drift",
        "signal_label": "Drift",
        "steam_score": 68,
        "steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "A",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "6/9",
        "current_odds": 4.1,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +26.2%",
        "open_odds": 3.25,
        "pick_team": "Viettel",
        "steam_score": 68,
        "steam_team_name": "Viettel",
        "steam_tier": "A"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 19.6,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "melbourne-victory",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Melbourne Victory",
      "away_team_id": 944,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/944.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Melbourne Victory",
      "away_team_public_id": "5lfWjBcitnO56a",
      "away_team_slug": "melbourne-victory",
      "country_code": null,
      "country_display_name": "World",
      "country_flag": null,
      "country_id": 168,
      "country_name": "World",
      "fixture_id": 1630347,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Vietnam",
      "home_team_display_name": "Viettel",
      "home_team_id": 3681,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/3681.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Viettel",
      "home_team_public_id": "4ULdt8CEPKcQLm",
      "home_team_slug": "viettel",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "viettel",
      "league_country": "World",
      "league_country_display": "World",
      "league_display_name": "Copa AFC",
      "league_id": 18,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/18.webp",
      "league_name": "Copa AFC",
      "league_name_canonical": "Copa AFC",
      "league_public_id": "43gwBPcUFswgHG",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-16 12:15:00",
      "public_id": "4SlrYblsz0bBhf",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Hanoi",
      "venue_name": "Hang Day Stadium"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.4238,
            "best_odd": 1.69,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.083,
            "ev": -0.2307,
            "implied_prob": 0.5382,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.5382,
              "draw": 0.2274,
              "home": 0.2344
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3424,
            "p_final": 0.4552
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.1792,
            "best_odd": 4.0,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0124,
            "ev": -0.0408,
            "implied_prob": 0.2274,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.5382,
              "draw": 0.2274,
              "home": 0.2344
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2967,
            "p_final": 0.2398
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.2431,
            "best_odd": 3.88,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0308,
            "ev": 0.0289,
            "implied_prob": 0.2344,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.5382,
              "draw": 0.2274,
              "home": 0.2344
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3609,
            "p_final": 0.2652
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 1.69,
            "edge": -0.2493,
            "ev": -0.4214,
            "implied_prob": 0.5917,
            "model_prob": 0.3424
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 4.0,
            "edge": 0.0467,
            "ev": 0.1867,
            "implied_prob": 0.25,
            "model_prob": 0.2967
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 3.88,
            "edge": 0.1032,
            "ev": 0.4004,
            "implied_prob": 0.2577,
            "model_prob": 0.3609
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.2242,
          "alpha_yes": 0.2466,
          "best_no_odd": 2.1,
          "best_yes_odd": 1.75,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": 0.0036,
          "edge_yes": -0.0036,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": -0.0445,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0847,
          "ev_yes": -0.0462,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0868,
          "implied_no": 0.4514,
          "implied_yes": 0.5486,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 6,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2242,
              "best_odd": 2.02,
              "edge": 0.0005,
              "ev": -0.0847,
              "implied_prob": 0.4526,
              "model_prob": 0.455,
              "p_final": 0.4531
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2466,
              "best_odd": 1.67,
              "edge": -0.0006,
              "ev": -0.0868,
              "implied_prob": 0.5474,
              "model_prob": 0.545,
              "p_final": 0.5468
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 6,
          "p_final_no": 0.4531,
          "p_final_yes": 0.5468,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.2371,
          "alpha_under": 0.2156,
          "best_over_odd": 1.85,
          "best_under_odd": 2.1,
          "consensus_over_odd": 1.71,
          "consensus_under_odd": 2.01,
          "edge_over": -0.0512,
          "edge_under": 0.0512,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": -0.1083,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0997,
          "ev_under": 0.0878,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0508,
          "implied_over": 0.5332,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.5403,
          "implied_under": 0.4668,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.4597,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2371,
              "best_odd": 1.71,
              "edge": -0.0138,
              "ev": -0.0997,
              "implied_prob": 0.5403,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5265
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2156,
              "best_odd": 2.01,
              "edge": 0.0126,
              "ev": -0.0508,
              "implied_prob": 0.4597,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4723
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.5265,
          "p_final_under": 0.4723,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.4004,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0878,
      "confidence": 5.5,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.2,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.2
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 19.6,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 19.6,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.4004,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.2,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 18,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Viettel at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 23.4%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Viettel as the value side (36.1%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 12.7,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Viettel",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "drift_against_model",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Viettel \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.70 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +40% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1630347 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.70 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Reliability below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "53 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "18 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 5,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Reliability below 65",
          "Outlier price +40% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 53,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has moved away from Viettel, but the model still strongly favours Viettel.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0289,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
          "consensus_odds": 3.88,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.2344,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3609,
          "raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.2577319587628866,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.4003,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -2.2,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.04
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
          "draw_prob": 0.2967,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3609,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.04
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 3.88,
          "decision": "small_edge",
          "edge": 0.0308,
          "ev": 0.0289,
          "implied_prob": 0.2344,
          "max_ev_side": "home",
          "model_prob": 0.3609,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Viettel"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2242,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.02,
            "edge": 0.0005,
            "market_prob": 0.4526,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.455,
            "n_bookmakers": 6,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2242,
              "best_odd": 2.02,
              "edge": 0.0005,
              "ev": -0.0847,
              "implied_prob": 0.4526,
              "model_prob": 0.455,
              "p_final": 0.4531
            },
            "p_final": 0.4531,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0847,
            "value_side": "no",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2466,
              "best_odd": 1.67,
              "edge": -0.0006,
              "ev": -0.0868,
              "implied_prob": 0.5474,
              "model_prob": 0.545,
              "p_final": 0.5468
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.0036,
          "ev": -0.0445,
          "implied_prob": 0.4514,
          "model_prob": 0.455,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2156,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.01,
            "edge": 0.0126,
            "market_prob": 0.4597,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2371,
              "best_odd": 1.71,
              "edge": -0.0138,
              "ev": -0.0997,
              "implied_prob": 0.5403,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5265
            },
            "p_final": 0.4723,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0508,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2156,
              "best_odd": 2.01,
              "edge": 0.0126,
              "ev": -0.0508,
              "implied_prob": 0.4597,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4723
            },
            "value_side": "under"
          },
          "edge": 0.0512,
          "ev": 0.0878,
          "implied_prob": 0.4668,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1630347,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0878,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3424,
        "draw": 0.2967,
        "home": 0.3609
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Melbourne Victory",
        "home": "Viettel"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.031836,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0878,
        "implied_prob": 0.4668,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.518,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "under",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 2,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0289,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+2.9%",
        "consensus_odds": 3.88,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.2344,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3609,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.7 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.7,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.2577319587628866,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.4003,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.0%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1630347,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-16T12:14:13.576264+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Viettel & Melbourne Victory!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Copa AFC Copa AFC — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Al Wahda FC 1 1 0 0 3
2 Nasaf Qarshi 1 0 1 0 1
3 Khalidiya 1 0 1 0 1
4 Al Kuwait 1 0 0 1 0
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Al Wahda FC 1 3 2 +1 3
2 Al Kuwait 1 2 3 -1 0
3 Nasaf Qarshi 1 0 0 0 1
4 Khalidiya 1 0 0 0 1