Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Correcto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.2
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Draw · Virtus Ciserano Bergamo 1–1 Club Milano
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "c4c25487ef10f7b4f66d833684614fd4cd9e1e834656b33a9c05a31272da9fc1",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.29,
"away_win_prob": 0.347,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.88,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.81,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.31,
"home_win_prob": 0.3564,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : Virtus Ciserano Bergamo or draw and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo"
},
"away_xg": 1.29,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.0324,
"edge_gap": 0.0087,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3235,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 34.7,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 35.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.78
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.78,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 3.09,
"market_odds": 2.78,
"model_odds": 2.81,
"overround": 11.2,
"prob_edge": -0.4,
"value_pct": -1.1,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 3,
"away_played": 4,
"away_score_rate": 72.5,
"home_clean_sheet": 2,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 73.0,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.29,
"home_expected": 1.31,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.1
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo or Draw",
"prob": 65.2
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo or Club Milano",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Club Milano",
"prob": 64.3
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo or Club Milano",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 34.7,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 35.6,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.5,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 16.6,
"implied_prob": 29.8,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Club Milano Win",
"model_prob": 34.7,
"odds": 3.36
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Club Milano",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 26.77,
"draw": 40.88,
"home": 32.35
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE10",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 12:55:46",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 12:36:18",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 32.35,
"gap_pp": 3.24,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 35.59
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 40.88,
"gap_pp": -11.2,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.68
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.77,
"gap_pp": 7.96,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 34.73
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.5,
"gap_pp": 10.7,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 62.5,
"gap_pp": -10.7,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.78,
"early": 2.78,
"implied_closing_pct": 32.35,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 32.35,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 2.2,
"early": 2.2,
"implied_closing_pct": 40.88,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 40.88,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.36,
"early": 3.36,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.77,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 26.77,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.45,
"early": 2.45,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.5,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.5,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.47,
"early": 1.47,
"implied_closing_pct": 62.5,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 62.5,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.7,
"kind": "ou_o"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -4.1,
"ev": -0.244,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.0,
"market_prob": 0.1667,
"market_prob_pct": 16.7,
"model_prob": 0.126,
"model_prob_pct": 12.6,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.1
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.31,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1542,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.35,
"edge": 0.0147,
"edge_pp": 1.5,
"market_prob": 0.3864,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1542,
"best_odd": 2.35,
"edge": 0.0147,
"ev": -0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.3864,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4012
},
"p_final": 0.4012,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 9.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1327,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0573,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.212,
"best_odd": 1.48,
"edge": -0.0203,
"ev": -0.1219,
"implied_prob": 0.6136,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5933
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.1809,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 18.1,
"text": "+18.1%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1867,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.7,
"text": "-18.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1809,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10312.81,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1988,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.955,
"edge": 0.0154,
"edge_pp": 1.5,
"market_prob": 0.4673,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2187,
"best_odd": 1.715,
"edge": -0.017,
"ev": -0.1156,
"implied_prob": 0.5327,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5157
},
"p_final": 0.4827,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0655,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0562,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1988,
"best_odd": 1.955,
"edge": 0.0154,
"ev": -0.0562,
"implied_prob": 0.4673,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.4827
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2128,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -21.3,
"text": "-21.3%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.0682,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.8,
"text": "+6.8%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0682,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10061.38,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"consensus_odds": 2.78,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.062,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -6.2,
"text": "-6.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.03,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.0,
"text": "-3.0%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0106,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-1.1%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"sort_key": 1792.5,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "5/7",
"alert_breadth_note": "5/7 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -8.3%",
"alert_team": "Draw",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 11.2,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.23,
"hero_label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 32.4,
"market_team": "Draw",
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"model_team": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 58,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1809,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1809,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Virtus Ciserano Bergamo at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 32.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Virtus Ciserano Bergamo as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 3.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +18.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +18.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +18.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+18.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.062,
"consensus_ev_display": "-6.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.78,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3597122302158274,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0106,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-1.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "5/7",
"breadth_ratio": 0.7142857142857143,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (11 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.4,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.1,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 58,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 11.23,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 11.23,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.29,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.31,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.31,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.31 \u00b7 Away xG 1.29 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -3%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.3,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -8.3%",
"steam_team": "Draw",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 29,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 29,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1809,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1809,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Virtus Ciserano Bergamo at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 32.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Virtus Ciserano Bergamo as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 3.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +18.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +18.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +18.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+18.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.062,
"consensus_ev_display": "-6.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.78,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3597122302158274,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0106,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-1.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Virtus Ciserano Bergamo 1.31 xG vs Club Milano 1.29 \u2192 Virtus Ciserano Bergamo 35.6%",
"Market: Draw ~32.4% implied",
"Market Steam: Draw \u2193 -8.3%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo, but sharp money moved toward Draw.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": 3.29,
"fair_prob": 35.64,
"label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"market_prob": 32.35,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -11.23,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 40.88,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.93,
"fair_prob": 34.7,
"label": "Club Milano",
"market_prob": 26.77,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 9.09,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 39.11,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -9.09,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 60.89,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.7,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 46.8,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -7.7,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 53.2,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -11.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"hero_side": "draw",
"hero_team_name": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 40.88,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Draw"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE10",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Draw\u0027s win probability at 40.9%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 29.6%, a difference of 11.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 11.23,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 32.4,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 3.2,
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 3.2,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 58,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 29,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 29,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Virtus Ciserano Bergamo 1.31 xG vs Club Milano 1.29 \u2192 Virtus Ciserano Bergamo 35.6%",
"Market: Draw ~32.4% implied",
"Market Steam: Draw \u2193 -8.3%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo, but sharp money moved toward Draw.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.23,
"hero_label": "Draw",
"hero_side": "draw",
"market_activity": "Draw odds shortened \u2193 -8.3%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Draw than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Draw.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Draw than the current fair estimate.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Draw."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Draw more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"Recent line movement on Draw (\u2193 -8.3%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (5/7) supports the current market view on Draw."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 11.23,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
"max_prob_pct": 35.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Draw",
"largest_gap_pp": -11.2,
"lead": "The closing market prices Draw higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 11.2,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": 3.29,
"edge_pp": 3.29,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"market_prob_pct": 32.35,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -11.23,
"edge_pp": -11.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 40.88,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 7.93,
"edge_pp": 7.93,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Club Milano",
"market_prob_pct": 26.77,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Draw.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Draw (32.4%).",
"However, Draw has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -8.3%, 5/7).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Virtus Ciserano Bergamo, Market \u2192 Draw, Recent sharp money \u2192 Draw.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 45.45,
"closing_odds": 2.2,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 45.45,
"entry_odds": 2.2,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE10",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 5,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -20.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -17.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -17.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -16.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -16.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -9.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -9.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.3
}
],
"books_total": 7,
"breadth_display": "5/7",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.75,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -8.3%",
"move_pct_abs": 8.3,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 19h 44m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book steam on Draw (8.3%, 5/7) \u2014 aligned shortening, not a single-book blip.",
"A meaningful move led by sharper sportsbooks, with moderate market confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.3,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.00",
"2.60",
"2.20"
],
"display": "3.05 \u2192 2.20 \u2192 2.75",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 19h 44m",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.05"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.20"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.75"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.0,
2.2,
2.75
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,18.0 56.0,5.6",
"sparkline_trend": "volatile",
"sparkline_trend_label": "V-shape swing",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.00"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.20"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.75"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.0,
"page_alert_line": "Strong steam move across 5/7 sportsbooks on Draw",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Pinnacle",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc8",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.75,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -8.3%",
"open_odds": 3.0,
"summary": "Market moved toward Draw while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Draw",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "market_steam",
"signal_label": "Steam",
"steam_score": 58,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "5/7",
"current_odds": 2.75,
"move_display": "\u2193 -8.3%",
"open_odds": 3.0,
"pick_team": "Draw",
"steam_score": 58,
"steam_team_name": "Draw",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 11.2,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "club-milano",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Club Milano",
"away_team_id": 22307,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/22307.webp",
"away_team_name": "Club Milano",
"away_team_public_id": "2ZzEylaTS41nTz",
"away_team_slug": "club-milano",
"country_code": "IT",
"country_display_name": "Italy",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/it.svg",
"country_id": 79,
"country_name": "Italy",
"fixture_id": 1624363,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Italy",
"home_team_display_name": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"home_team_id": 9462,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/9462.webp",
"home_team_name": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"home_team_public_id": "5N88ouHD5P7I8Z",
"home_team_slug": "virtus-ciserano-bergamo",
"ht.home_team_slug": "virtus-ciserano-bergamo",
"league_country": "Italy",
"league_country_display": "Italy",
"league_display_name": "Serie D - Girone B",
"league_id": 427,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/427.webp",
"league_name": "Serie D - Girone B",
"league_public_id": "4ip7mb0wd1BGNm",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-27 13:00:00",
"public_id": "2Ks436cNRu8oEQ",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2642,
"best_odd": 3.36,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.021,
"ev": -0.03,
"implied_prob": 0.2677,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2677,
"draw": 0.4088,
"home": 0.3235
},
"model_prob": 0.3473,
"p_final": 0.2887
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.3744,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0419,
"ev": -0.1929,
"implied_prob": 0.4088,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2677,
"draw": 0.4088,
"home": 0.3235
},
"model_prob": 0.2968,
"p_final": 0.3669
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4281,
"best_odd": 2.78,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0139,
"ev": -0.062,
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2677,
"draw": 0.4088,
"home": 0.3235
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"p_final": 0.3374
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.36,
"edge": 0.0497,
"ev": 0.1669,
"implied_prob": 0.2976,
"model_prob": 0.3473
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": -0.1578,
"ev": -0.3471,
"implied_prob": 0.4545,
"model_prob": 0.2968
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.78,
"edge": -0.0038,
"ev": -0.0105,
"implied_prob": 0.3597,
"model_prob": 0.3559
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2187,
"alpha_yes": 0.1988,
"best_no_odd": 1.73,
"best_yes_odd": 1.96,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.077,
"edge_yes": 0.077,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2128,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1156,
"ev_yes": 0.0682,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0562,
"implied_no": 0.532,
"implied_yes": 0.468,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2187,
"best_odd": 1.715,
"edge": -0.017,
"ev": -0.1156,
"implied_prob": 0.5327,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5157
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1988,
"best_odd": 1.955,
"edge": 0.0154,
"ev": -0.0562,
"implied_prob": 0.4673,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.4827
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"p_final_no": 0.5157,
"p_final_yes": 0.4827,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.1542,
"alpha_under": 0.212,
"best_over_odd": 2.45,
"best_under_odd": 1.57,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.35,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.48,
"edge_over": 0.0909,
"edge_under": -0.0909,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.1809,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0573,
"ev_under": -0.1867,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1219,
"implied_over": 0.3911,
"implied_over_mf": 0.3864,
"implied_under": 0.6089,
"implied_under_mf": 0.6136,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1542,
"best_odd": 2.35,
"edge": 0.0147,
"ev": -0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.3864,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4012
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.212,
"best_odd": 1.48,
"edge": -0.0203,
"ev": -0.1219,
"implied_prob": 0.6136,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5933
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4012,
"p_final_under": 0.5933,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1809,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1809,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1809,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.9,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.9
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1809,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1809,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Virtus Ciserano Bergamo at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 32.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Virtus Ciserano Bergamo as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 3.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +18.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +18.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +18.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+18.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Draw, but the model still strongly favours Virtus Ciserano Bergamo.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.062,
"consensus_ev_display": "-6.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.78,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3597122302158274,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0106,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-1.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2968,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3559,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.02
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.78,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": 0.0139,
"ev": -0.062,
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1988,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.955,
"edge": 0.0154,
"market_prob": 0.4673,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2187,
"best_odd": 1.715,
"edge": -0.017,
"ev": -0.1156,
"implied_prob": 0.5327,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5157
},
"p_final": 0.4827,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0562,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1988,
"best_odd": 1.955,
"edge": 0.0154,
"ev": -0.0562,
"implied_prob": 0.4673,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.4827
}
},
"edge": 0.077,
"ev": 0.0682,
"implied_prob": 0.468,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1542,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.35,
"edge": 0.0147,
"market_prob": 0.3864,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1542,
"best_odd": 2.35,
"edge": 0.0147,
"ev": -0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.3864,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4012
},
"p_final": 0.4012,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0573,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.212,
"best_odd": 1.48,
"edge": -0.0203,
"ev": -0.1219,
"implied_prob": 0.6136,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5933
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.0909,
"ev": 0.1809,
"implied_prob": 0.3911,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1624363,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1809,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3473,
"draw": 0.2968,
"home": 0.3559
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0682,
"implied_prob": 0.468,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0682,
"implied_prob": 0.468,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Club Milano",
"home": "Virtus Ciserano Bergamo"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.061036,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1809,
"implied_prob": 0.3911,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.062,
"consensus_ev_display": "-6.2%",
"consensus_odds": 2.78,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3235,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3597122302158274,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0106,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-1.1%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1624363,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-27T12:55:48.535739+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Virtus Ciserano Bergamo & Club Milano!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Serie D - Girone B — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nibbiano & Valtidone | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | Chievo | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| 3 | Milan II | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| 4 | Brusaporto | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| 5 | Virtus Verona | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 6 | Piacenza | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 7 | Pavonese | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 8 | Pro Palazzolo | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 9 | Leon | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 10 | Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 11 | Caldiero Terme | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 12 | Villa Valle | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 13 | Real Calepina | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 14 | Scanzorosciate | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 15 | Club Milano | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 16 | Rovato Vertovese | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 17 | Tritium | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 18 | Fiorenzuola | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Calepina | 5 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 5 |
| 2 | Chievo | 5 | 9 | 6 | +3 | 12 |
| 3 | Milan II | 4 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 9 |
| 4 | Caldiero Terme | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| 5 | Rovato Vertovese | 5 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 3 |
| 6 | Nibbiano & Valtidone | 5 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 15 |
| 7 | Leon | 5 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 6 |
| 8 | Brusaporto | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| 9 | Tritium | 5 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 2 |
| 10 | Piacenza | 4 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 7 |
| 11 | Villa Valle | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 12 | Virtus Verona | 5 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 8 |
| 13 | Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 5 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 6 |
| 14 | Scanzorosciate | 5 | 5 | 4 | +1 | 5 |
| 15 | Pavonese | 5 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 16 | Pro Palazzolo | 5 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 7 |
| 17 | Club Milano | 5 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 |
| 18 | Fiorenzuola | 5 | 1 | 7 | -6 | 1 |
