Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Raków Częstochowa Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 2-2 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.02
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Draw · HNK Hajduk Split 2–2 Raków Częstochowa
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "e76d2f45cf382987d50382675b24f52795003402534df2513a5c18ba9ff16a87",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.42,
"away_win_prob": 0.4091,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.459,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.542,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.294,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.44,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.4,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.37,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.18,
"home_win_prob": 0.2969,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa and +1.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa"
},
"away_xg": 1.42,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1568,
"edge_gap": 0.113,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2527,
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 41.0,
"draw": 29.4,
"home": 29.7
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.67
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.67,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 3.96,
"market_odds": 3.67,
"model_odds": 2.44,
"overround": 7.8,
"prob_edge": 13.7,
"value_pct": 50.4,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 3,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 4,
"away_score_rate": 75.8,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 2,
"home_score_rate": 69.3,
"no_prob": 45.9,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.1,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.1
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.42,
"home_expected": 1.18,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.5
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.5
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "HNK Hajduk Split or Draw",
"prob": 59.1
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "HNK Hajduk Split or Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"prob": 70.6
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"prob": 70.3
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "HNK Hajduk Split or Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"pick_prob": 70.6
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 40.9,
"draw_pct": 29.4,
"home_pct": 29.7,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "+1.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 2.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 4.5,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 50.4,
"implied_prob": 27.2,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa Win",
"model_prob": 41.0,
"odds": 3.67
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 25.27,
"draw": 28.81,
"home": 45.92
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-20 18:59:55",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-08-20 18:30:41",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.92,
"gap_pp": -16.27,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 29.65
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 28.81,
"gap_pp": 0.59,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.39
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.27,
"gap_pp": 15.68,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 40.96
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.26,
"gap_pp": 2.94,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 54.74,
"gap_pp": -2.94,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.02,
"early": 2.02,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.92,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 45.92,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.22,
"early": 3.22,
"implied_closing_pct": 28.81,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 28.81,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.67,
"early": 3.67,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.27,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.27,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.08,
"early": 2.08,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.26,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 45.26,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.72,
"early": 1.72,
"implied_closing_pct": 54.74,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 54.74,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 15.7,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.9,
"ev": -0.132,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.124,
"model_prob_pct": 12.4,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.4
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.4
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.5
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.5
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.18,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"consensus_odds": 3.67,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.0596,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.0,
"text": "+6.0%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0596,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.0,
"text": "+6.0%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"raw_edge_display": "+15.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 15.7,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5032,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+50.3%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"sort_key": 10203.64,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 45.9,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.1
},
{
"decision": "no_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 2050.0,
"tier": "pass",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.2,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.4
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "11/14",
"alert_breadth_note": "11/14 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"alert_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 16.2,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -16.23,
"hero_label": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"market_prob_pct": 25.3,
"market_team": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"model_prob_pct": 40.9,
"model_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 48,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5031,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa at 41.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 25.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa as the value side (41.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 15.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.67 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +50% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1623393 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.67 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +50% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.0%",
"consensus_odds": 3.67,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"raw_edge_display": "+15.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 15.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2724795640326976,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5032,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+50.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 5.2,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.24
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "11/14",
"breadth_ratio": 0.7857142857142857,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (16 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 16.9,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.9,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 56,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 16.23,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 16.23,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.42,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 5.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.18,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.42,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.18 \u00b7 Away xG 1.42 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +5%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.9,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"steam_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 7,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 40,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 7,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5031,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa at 41.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 25.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa as the value side (41.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 15.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.67 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +50% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1623393 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.67 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +50% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.0%",
"consensus_odds": 3.67,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"raw_edge_display": "+15.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 15.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2724795640326976,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5032,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+50.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 5.2,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.24
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: HNK Hajduk Split 1.18 xG vs Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa 1.42 \u2192 Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa 40.9%",
"Market: HNK Hajduk Split ~25.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa odds \u2191 +5.9%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -16.23,
"fair_prob": 29.69,
"label": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"market_prob": 45.92,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.59,
"fair_prob": 29.4,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 28.81,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 15.64,
"fair_prob": 40.91,
"label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"market_prob": 25.27,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 54.1,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 45.9,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -16.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.69,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"market_prob_pct": 45.92,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates HNK Hajduk Split\u0027s win probability at 45.9%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 29.7%, a difference of 16.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 16.23,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 25.3,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+15.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 15.6,
"model_prob_pct": 40.9,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+15.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 15.6,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 56,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 7,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 40,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 7,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: HNK Hajduk Split 1.18 xG vs Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa 1.42 \u2192 Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa 40.9%",
"Market: HNK Hajduk Split ~25.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa odds \u2191 +5.9%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -16.23,
"hero_label": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa odds lengthened \u2191 +5.9%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 5.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about HNK Hajduk Split than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa \u2014 odds lengthened by 5.9% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about HNK Hajduk Split than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 5.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa \u2014 odds lengthened by 5.9% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors HNK Hajduk Split more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 5.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (11/14) supports the current market view on Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 16.23,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 11.2 pp (at 40.9%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 11.2,
"max_prob_pct": 40.9,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"largest_gap_pp": -16.2,
"lead": "The closing market prices HNK Hajduk Split higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 16.2,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -16.23,
"edge_pp": -16.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.69,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"market_prob_pct": 45.92,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.59,
"edge_pp": 0.59,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.4,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 28.81,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 15.64,
"edge_pp": 15.64,
"fair_prob_pct": 40.91,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"market_prob_pct": 25.27,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa \u2014 odds lengthened by 5.9% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers HNK Hajduk Split (25.3%).",
"Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +5.9%, 11/14) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, Market \u2192 HNK Hajduk Split, while Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 49.5,
"closing_odds": 2.02,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 49.5,
"entry_odds": 2.02,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 11,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 1,
"bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 34,
"bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.6
}
],
"books_total": 14,
"breadth_display": "11/14",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"move_pct_abs": 5.9,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 28h 21m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Betfair led repricing on Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa (5.9%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"A meaningful move led by sharper sportsbooks, with moderate market confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.9,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.67",
"3.54",
"3.40"
],
"display": "3.88 \u2192 3.11 \u2192 3.60",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 28h 21m",
"pick_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.88"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.11"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.60"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.4,
3.67,
3.6
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,4.7",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.67"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.60"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.4,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 11/14 sportsbooks on Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.6,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"summary": "Market moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 48,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "11/14",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"move_display": "\u2191 +5.9%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"pick_team": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"steam_score": 48,
"steam_team_name": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 16.2,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"away_team_id": 3491,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/3491.webp",
"away_team_name": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"away_team_public_id": "31RDKBuhNLNmZd",
"away_team_slug": "rakow-czestochowa",
"country_code": null,
"country_display_name": "World",
"country_flag": null,
"country_id": 168,
"country_name": "World",
"fixture_id": 1623393,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Croatia",
"home_team_display_name": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"home_team_id": 608,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/608.webp",
"home_team_name": "HNK Hajduk Split",
"home_team_public_id": "4bvOWkbtvstyCh",
"home_team_slug": "hnk-hajduk-split",
"league_country": "World",
"league_country_display": "World",
"league_display_name": "Liga Conferencia de la UEFA",
"league_id": 848,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/848.webp",
"league_name": "Liga Conferencia de la UEFA",
"league_public_id": "59WRvky68q32lN",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-08-20 19:00:00",
"public_id": "38ZGRu2SUYzhYt",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Split",
"venue_name": "Stadion Poljud"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2294,
"best_odd": 3.67,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.036,
"ev": 0.0596,
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2527,
"draw": 0.2881,
"home": 0.4592
},
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"p_final": 0.2887
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2974,
"best_odd": 3.22,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0017,
"ev": -0.0668,
"implied_prob": 0.2881,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2527,
"draw": 0.2881,
"home": 0.4592
},
"model_prob": 0.2939,
"p_final": 0.2898
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3402,
"best_odd": 2.02,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0553,
"ev": -0.1842,
"implied_prob": 0.4592,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2527,
"draw": 0.2881,
"home": 0.4592
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.4039
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.67,
"edge": 0.1371,
"ev": 0.5031,
"implied_prob": 0.2725,
"model_prob": 0.4096
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.22,
"edge": -0.0166,
"ev": -0.0536,
"implied_prob": 0.3106,
"model_prob": 0.2939
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.02,
"edge": -0.1985,
"ev": -0.401,
"implied_prob": 0.495,
"model_prob": 0.2965
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5031,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0596,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.2,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5031,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa at 41.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 25.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa as the value side (41.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 15.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.67 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +50% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1623393 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.67 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +50% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa, but the model still strongly favours Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.0%",
"consensus_odds": 3.67,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"raw_edge_display": "+15.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 15.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2724795640326976,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5032,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+50.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 5.2,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.24
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.541,
"draw_prob": 0.2939,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4096,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.24
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.67,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.036,
"ev": 0.0596,
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.541,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "no_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1623393,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0596,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4096,
"draw": 0.2939,
"home": 0.2965
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"home": "HNK Hajduk Split"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.026853,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0596,
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Rak\u00f3w Cz\u0119stochowa",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0596,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.0%",
"consensus_odds": 3.67,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2527,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4096,
"raw_edge_display": "+15.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 15.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2724795640326976,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5032,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+50.3%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1623393,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-08-20T18:59:57.555114+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para HNK Hajduk Split & Raków Częstochowa!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga Conferencia de la UEFA — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aarhus GF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Ajax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Atalanta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Borac Banja Luka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | SC Braga | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Brann | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | FC Copenhague | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Estrella Roja | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | CSKA Sofia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Egnatia Rrogozhinë | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | SC Friburgo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Gent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | Getafe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | HNK Hajduk Split | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | Heart of Midlothian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | Saburtalo Tiflis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | Inter Club d'Escaldes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | FK Jablonec | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | Kairat Almaty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | Kauno Žalgiris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | KuPS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | Lincoln Red Imps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | FC Lugano | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | FC Midtjylland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | Mjällby AIF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | Mónaco | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | FC Nordsjælland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | Pafos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | Panathinaikos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | Riga FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | St. Truiden | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | FC Thun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | Trabzonspor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | Twente | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | Universitatea Craiova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aarhus GF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Ajax | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Atalanta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Borac Banja Luka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | SC Braga | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Brann | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | FC Copenhague | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | Estrella Roja | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | CSKA Sofia | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | Egnatia Rrogozhinë | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | SC Friburgo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | Gent | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | Getafe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | HNK Hajduk Split | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | Heart of Midlothian | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | Saburtalo Tiflis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | Inter Club d'Escaldes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | FK Jablonec | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | Kairat Almaty | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | Kauno Žalgiris | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | KuPS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | Lincoln Red Imps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | FC Lugano | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | FC Midtjylland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | Mjällby AIF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | Mónaco | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | FC Nordsjælland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | Pafos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | Panathinaikos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | Riga FC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | St. Truiden | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | FC Thun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | Trabzonspor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | Twente | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | Universitatea Craiova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
