Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Kfar Saba 1928 Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-2 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
Pending
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Draw · Kfar Saba 1928 2–2 Hapoel Marmorek
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "a498acf49a38ed3983e63c79b153f3f4c5237c5a09cccc026100be70a13f9506",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.27,
"away_win_prob": 0.3377,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2964,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.96,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.73,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.33,
"home_win_prob": 0.3659,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : Kfar Saba 1928 or draw and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "30%",
"percent_draw": "35%",
"percent_home": "35%",
"winner_name": "Kfar Saba 1928"
},
"away_xg": 1.27,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0918,
"edge_gap": 0.0284,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4577,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 33.8,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 36.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.94
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.94,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Kfar Saba 1928 Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.18,
"market_odds": 1.94,
"model_odds": 2.73,
"overround": 12.6,
"prob_edge": -14.9,
"value_pct": -28.9,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 2,
"away_played": 4,
"away_score_rate": 71.9,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 73.6,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.27,
"home_expected": 1.33,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Kfar Saba 1928 or Draw",
"prob": 66.2
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Kfar Saba 1928 or Hapoel Marmorek",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Hapoel Marmorek",
"prob": 63.4
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Kfar Saba 1928 or Hapoel Marmorek",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 33.8,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.6,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Kfar Saba 1928"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.5,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 20.0,
"implied_prob": 28.2,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Hapoel Marmorek Win",
"model_prob": 33.8,
"odds": 3.55
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 25.01,
"draw": 29.21,
"home": 45.77
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-01 16:29:11",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-10-01 16:01:35",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.77,
"gap_pp": -9.18,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.21,
"gap_pp": 0.44,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.65
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.01,
"gap_pp": 8.74,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 33.75
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 44.5,
"gap_pp": 3.7,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 55.5,
"gap_pp": -3.7,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.94,
"early": 1.94,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.77,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 45.77,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.04,
"early": 3.04,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.21,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.21,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.55,
"early": 3.55,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.01,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.01,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.07,
"early": 2.07,
"implied_closing_pct": 44.5,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 44.5,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.66,
"early": 1.66,
"implied_closing_pct": 55.5,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 55.5,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.7,
"ev": -0.05,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.6,
"market_prob": 0.1316,
"market_prob_pct": 13.2,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.33,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.84,
"edge": 0.0101,
"edge_pp": 1.0,
"market_prob": 0.4966,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.815,
"edge": -0.0101,
"ev": -0.1046,
"implied_prob": 0.5034,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4933
},
"p_final": 0.5067,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0028,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0677,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": 0.0101,
"ev": -0.0677,
"implied_prob": 0.4966,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5067
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.131,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -13.1,
"text": "-13.1%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.041,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.1,
"text": "+4.1%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.041,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10036.9,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2122,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.065,
"edge": 0.008,
"edge_pp": 0.8,
"market_prob": 0.4441,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2122,
"best_odd": 2.065,
"edge": 0.008,
"ev": -0.0663,
"implied_prob": 0.4441,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4522
},
"p_final": 0.4522,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.8,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0047,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0663,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2334,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.0088,
"ev": -0.0974,
"implied_prob": 0.5559,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.547
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0122,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 1.2,
"text": "+1.2%"
},
"ev_under": -0.0987,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -9.9,
"text": "-9.9%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0122,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 5209.76,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.2041,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -20.4,
"text": "-20.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0311,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.1,
"text": "-3.1%"
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.2,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"sort_key": 1792.225,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "5/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "5/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"alert_team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 9.2,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -9.18,
"hero_label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"market_prob_pct": 45.8,
"market_team": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"model_team": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 69,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.041,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1983,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 33,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Kfar Saba 1928 at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.8%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Kfar Saba 1928 as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"edge_low",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Kfar Saba 1928 \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.27 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +20% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1621623 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.27 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +4.1% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "weak_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +4.1% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
"ok": false
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +4.1% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +4.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "74 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "33 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": false,
"value": "+4.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +20% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 74,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2041,
"consensus_ev_display": "-20.4%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "5/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.625,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 20.4,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 6.2,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 74,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 9.18,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 9.18,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.27,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.33,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.33,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.33 \u00b7 Away xG 1.27 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.4,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"steam_team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 18,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 18,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.041,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1983,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 33,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Kfar Saba 1928 at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.8%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Kfar Saba 1928 as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"edge_low",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Kfar Saba 1928 \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.27 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +20% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1621623 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.27 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +4.1% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "weak_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +4.1% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
"ok": false
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +4.1% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +4.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "74 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "33 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": false,
"value": "+4.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +20% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 74,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2041,
"consensus_ev_display": "-20.4%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Kfar Saba 1928 1.33 xG vs Hapoel Marmorek 1.27 \u2192 Kfar Saba 1928 36.6%",
"Market: Kfar Saba 1928 ~45.8% implied",
"Market Steam: Hapoel Marmorek \u2193 -15.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Kfar Saba 1928, but sharp money moved toward Hapoel Marmorek.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -9.18,
"fair_prob": 36.59,
"label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"market_prob": 45.77,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.43,
"fair_prob": 29.64,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 29.21,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.76,
"fair_prob": 33.77,
"label": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"market_prob": 25.01,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.35,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 44.85,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -3.35,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 55.15,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.64,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 49.86,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.64,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 50.14,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -9.18,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"market_prob_pct": 45.77,
"status": "market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Hapoel Marmorek"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Kfar Saba 1928\u0027s win probability at 45.8%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 36.6%, a difference of 9.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 9.18,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 45.8,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -9.2,
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -9.2,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 74,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 18,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 18,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Kfar Saba 1928 1.33 xG vs Hapoel Marmorek 1.27 \u2192 Kfar Saba 1928 36.6%",
"Market: Kfar Saba 1928 ~45.8% implied",
"Market Steam: Hapoel Marmorek \u2193 -15.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Kfar Saba 1928, but sharp money moved toward Hapoel Marmorek.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -9.18,
"hero_label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Hapoel Marmorek odds shortened \u2193 -15.4%.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Hapoel Marmorek, with odds shortening by 15.4%.",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Kfar Saba 1928. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"note": "Buying interest on Hapoel Marmorek \u2014 odds shortened by 15.4%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model broadly agree on Kfar Saba 1928. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Hapoel Marmorek, with odds shortening by 15.4%.",
"Buying interest on Hapoel Marmorek \u2014 odds shortened by 15.4%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market still prices Kfar Saba 1928 above the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Hapoel Marmorek has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 15.4%."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 9.18,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
"max_prob_pct": 36.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"largest_gap_pp": -9.2,
"lead": "The closing market prices Kfar Saba 1928 higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 9.2,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -9.18,
"edge_pp": -9.18,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"market_prob_pct": 45.77,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.43,
"edge_pp": 0.43,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 29.21,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 8.76,
"edge_pp": 8.76,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"market_prob_pct": 25.01,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "market_ahead",
"status_label": "Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Hapoel Marmorek \u2014 odds shortened by 15.4%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Kfar Saba 1928 (45.8%).",
"However, Hapoel Marmorek has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -15.4%, 5/8).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Kfar Saba 1928, Market \u2192 Kfar Saba 1928, Recent sharp money \u2192 Hapoel Marmorek.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 51.55,
"closing_odds": 1.94,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 51.55,
"entry_odds": 1.94,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 5,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -13.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -13.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -11.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -11.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -10.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.6
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "5/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.3,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"move_pct_abs": 15.4,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 43h 59m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book steam on Hapoel Marmorek (15.4%, 5/8) \u2014 aligned shortening, not a single-book blip.",
"Sharper sportsbooks initiated a solid move with growing cross-book confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.4,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.90",
"3.60",
"3.30"
],
"display": "4.28 \u2192 3.10 \u2192 3.30",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 43h 59m",
"pick_team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.28"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.30"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.9,
3.55,
3.3
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,10.5 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.90"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.30"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.90"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.30"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.9,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: Hapoel Marmorek \u2193 -15.4% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: Hapoel Marmorek \u2193 -15.4% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc8",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.3,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"open_odds": 3.9,
"summary": "Market moved toward Hapoel Marmorek while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "market_steam",
"signal_label": "Steam",
"steam_score": 69,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "5/8",
"current_odds": 3.3,
"move_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"open_odds": 3.9,
"pick_team": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"steam_score": 69,
"steam_team_name": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"steam_tier": "A"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 9.2,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "hapoel-marmorek",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"away_team_id": 4498,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/4498.webp",
"away_team_name": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"away_team_public_id": "2mJrthRFQ9DBMH",
"away_team_slug": "hapoel-marmorek",
"country_code": "IL",
"country_display_name": "Israel",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/il.svg",
"country_id": 78,
"country_name": "Israel",
"fixture_id": 1621623,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Israel",
"home_team_display_name": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"home_team_id": 24788,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/24788.webp",
"home_team_name": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"home_team_public_id": "0nilafvGj5i6rX",
"home_team_slug": "kfar-saba-1928",
"ht.home_team_slug": "kfar-saba-1928",
"league_country": "Israel",
"league_country_display": "Israel",
"league_display_name": "Liga Alef",
"league_id": 496,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/496.webp",
"league_name": "Liga Alef",
"league_public_id": "5uA9dViy0RGzXZ",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-01 16:30:00",
"public_id": "38Zhe4sJXhgtAk",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2607,
"best_odd": 3.55,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0228,
"ev": -0.0311,
"implied_prob": 0.2501,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2501,
"draw": 0.2921,
"home": 0.4577
},
"model_prob": 0.3375,
"p_final": 0.2729
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.298,
"best_odd": 3.04,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0013,
"ev": -0.108,
"implied_prob": 0.2921,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2501,
"draw": 0.2921,
"home": 0.4577
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.2934
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.5174,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0475,
"ev": -0.2041,
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2501,
"draw": 0.2921,
"home": 0.4577
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"p_final": 0.4103
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.55,
"edge": 0.0559,
"ev": 0.1983,
"implied_prob": 0.2817,
"model_prob": 0.3375
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.04,
"edge": -0.0325,
"ev": -0.0987,
"implied_prob": 0.3289,
"model_prob": 0.2965
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": -0.1495,
"ev": -0.29,
"implied_prob": 0.5155,
"model_prob": 0.366
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2087,
"alpha_yes": 0.2087,
"best_no_odd": 1.91,
"best_yes_odd": 1.91,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0464,
"edge_yes": 0.0464,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.131,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1046,
"ev_yes": 0.041,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0677,
"implied_no": 0.5014,
"implied_yes": 0.4986,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.815,
"edge": -0.0101,
"ev": -0.1046,
"implied_prob": 0.5034,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4933
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": 0.0101,
"ev": -0.0677,
"implied_prob": 0.4966,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5067
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"p_final_no": 0.4933,
"p_final_yes": 0.5067,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2122,
"alpha_under": 0.2334,
"best_over_odd": 2.1,
"best_under_odd": 1.74,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.065,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.65,
"edge_over": 0.0335,
"edge_under": -0.0335,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0122,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0663,
"ev_under": -0.0987,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0974,
"implied_over": 0.4485,
"implied_over_mf": 0.4441,
"implied_under": 0.5515,
"implied_under_mf": 0.5559,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2122,
"best_odd": 2.065,
"edge": 0.008,
"ev": -0.0663,
"implied_prob": 0.4441,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4522
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2334,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.0088,
"ev": -0.0974,
"implied_prob": 0.5559,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.547
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4522,
"p_final_under": 0.547,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.041,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1983,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.041,
"confidence": 4.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 4.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "C",
"stake_factor": 0.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.2,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.041,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1983,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 33,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Kfar Saba 1928 at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.8%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Kfar Saba 1928 as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 9.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Kfar Saba 1928",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"edge_low",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Kfar Saba 1928 \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.27 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +20% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1621623 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.27 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +4.1% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "weak_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +4.1% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
"ok": false
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +4.1% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +4.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "74 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "33 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": false,
"value": "+4.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +20% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 74,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Hapoel Marmorek, but the model still strongly favours Kfar Saba 1928.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2041,
"consensus_ev_display": "-20.4%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.06
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.041,
"hero_display_only": true,
"implied_prob": 0.4986,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "hero_display",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "hero_display"
},
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0475,
"ev": -0.2041,
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.366,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Kfar Saba 1928"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.84,
"edge": 0.0101,
"market_prob": 0.4966,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.815,
"edge": -0.0101,
"ev": -0.1046,
"implied_prob": 0.5034,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4933
},
"p_final": 0.5067,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0677,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2087,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": 0.0101,
"ev": -0.0677,
"implied_prob": 0.4966,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5067
}
},
"edge": 0.0464,
"ev": 0.041,
"implied_prob": 0.4986,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2122,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.065,
"edge": 0.008,
"market_prob": 0.4441,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2122,
"best_odd": 2.065,
"edge": 0.008,
"ev": -0.0663,
"implied_prob": 0.4441,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4522
},
"p_final": 0.4522,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0663,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2334,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.0088,
"ev": -0.0974,
"implied_prob": 0.5559,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.547
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.0335,
"ev": 0.0122,
"implied_prob": 0.4485,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1621623,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": false,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"max_valid_ev": 0.041,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3375,
"draw": 0.2965,
"home": 0.366
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Hapoel Marmorek",
"home": "Kfar Saba 1928"
},
"top_pick": null,
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2041,
"consensus_ev_display": "-20.4%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4577,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1621623,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-01T16:29:12.879764+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Kfar Saba 1928 & Hapoel Marmorek!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Israel. Liga Alef Predicciones
