Estadísticas / Fútbol / Argentina. Torneo Federal A / Guillermo Brown vs San Martín de Mendoza

Guillermo Brown vs San Martín de Mendoza Statistics & Analysis

Sep 06, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.38
1 1.22
xG Accuracy: 85%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
  • 1X2 Guillermo Brown Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Correcto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 31, 2026 · 08:26 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6374432

Closing Odds 3.91
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Guillermo Brown 1–1 San Martín de Mendoza
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mayor swing implícito tardío en este feed fue de unos 0.88 puntos porcentuales en Guillermo Brown (1X2) entre PRE30 y PRE1.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en Más de 2,5 goles en unos 15.3 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
Guillermo Brown (1X2) 39.0 44.5 -5.5
Dibujar (1X2) 29.5 32.5 -3.0
San Martín de Mendoza (1X2) 31.5 23.0 +8.5
Más de 2,5 goles 48.2 32.9 +15.3
Menos de 2,5 goles 51.8 67.2 -15.3
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 48.2% en Más de 2,5 goles, mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 32.9%. La diferencia —unos 15.3 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE30 → PRE1 · Casa: Pinnacle

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Mercado Temprano (PRE30) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
Guillermo Brown (1X2) 2.04 2.02 +0.9
Dibujar (1X2) 2.7 2.76 -0.4
San Martín de Mendoza (1X2) 3.79 3.91 -0.5
Más de 2,5 goles 2.78 2.8 0.0
Menos de 2,5 goles 1.36 1.37 -0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "9bef1af8b0bd923ed5676ee1ce92a49316eded928a64fe501e0af5802588a141",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.22,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3148,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.456,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2954,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 3.18,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.39,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.57,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.38,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3897,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : Guillermo Brown or draw and -3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Guillermo Brown"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.22,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Guillermo Brown",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": -0.0551,
        "edge_gap": 0.0747,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.4447,
        "model_prob": 0.3897,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 31.5,
          "draw": 29.5,
          "home": 39.0
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.02
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.02,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Guillermo Brown Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.25,
        "market_odds": 2.02,
        "model_odds": 2.57,
        "overround": 11.3,
        "prob_edge": -10.6,
        "value_pct": -21.4,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 10,
        "away_failed_to_score": 9,
        "away_played": 22,
        "away_score_rate": 70.5,
        "home_clean_sheet": 8,
        "home_failed_to_score": 11,
        "home_played": 22,
        "home_score_rate": 74.8,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.4,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.22,
        "home_expected": 1.38,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.1
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.6
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 7.6
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Guillermo Brown or Draw",
            "prob": 68.5
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Guillermo Brown or San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
            "prob": 70.5
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
            "prob": 61.0
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Guillermo Brown or San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "pick_prob": 70.5
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 31.5,
        "draw_pct": 29.5,
        "home_pct": 39.0,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Guillermo Brown"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "-3.5",
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.8,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.8,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Over 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 23.2,
        "implied_prob": 25.6,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza Win",
        "model_prob": 31.5,
        "odds": 3.91
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 22.98,
        "draw": 32.55,
        "home": 44.47
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-06 18:00:42",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-06 17:31:01",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Guillermo Brown",
      "largest_move_kind": "1x2_h",
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.88,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 44.47,
          "gap_pp": -5.51,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 38.97
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.55,
          "gap_pp": -3.01,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.54
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 22.98,
          "gap_pp": 8.52,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 31.49
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.85,
          "gap_pp": 15.35,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 67.15,
          "gap_pp": -15.35,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.02,
          "early": 2.04,
          "implied_closing_pct": 44.47,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.88,
          "implied_early_pct": 43.6,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.76,
          "early": 2.7,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.55,
          "implied_delta_pp": -0.39,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.94,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.91,
          "early": 3.79,
          "implied_closing_pct": 22.98,
          "implied_delta_pp": -0.49,
          "implied_early_pct": 23.47,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.8,
          "early": 2.78,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.85,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.85,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.37,
          "early": 1.36,
          "implied_closing_pct": 67.15,
          "implied_delta_pp": -0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 67.15,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": false,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 15.3,
        "kind": "ou_o"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -4.2,
        "ev": -0.25,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 6.0,
        "market_prob": 0.1667,
        "market_prob_pct": 16.7,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 5,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 10.2
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.1
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.6
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 7.6
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.38,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.1434,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.245,
          "edge": 0.0194,
          "edge_pp": 2.0,
          "market_prob": 0.4084,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.1972,
            "best_odd": 1.55,
            "edge": -0.0267,
            "ev": -0.1245,
            "implied_prob": 0.5916,
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "p_final": 0.5648
          },
          "p_final": 0.4279,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 13.6,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2213,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0394,
          "value_side": "yes",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.1434,
            "best_odd": 2.245,
            "edge": 0.0194,
            "ev": -0.0394,
            "implied_prob": 0.4084,
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "p_final": 0.4279
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": -0.2841,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -28.4,
          "text": "-28.4%"
        },
        "ev_yes": 0.224,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 22.4,
          "text": "+22.4%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.224,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "sort_key": 10351.6,
        "tier": "best",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.1421,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.62,
          "edge": 0.0199,
          "edge_pp": 2.0,
          "market_prob": 0.3417,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "n_bookmakers": 6,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.1421,
            "best_odd": 2.62,
            "edge": 0.0199,
            "ev": -0.0525,
            "implied_prob": 0.3417,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.3616
          },
          "p_final": 0.3616,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 14.0,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2628,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0525,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.1954,
            "best_odd": 1.36,
            "edge": -0.0274,
            "ev": -0.142,
            "implied_prob": 0.6583,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.6309
          },
          "value_side": "over"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": 0.34,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": true,
          "raw_pct": 34.0,
          "text": "+25%+"
        },
        "ev_under": -0.2541,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -25.4,
          "text": "-25.4%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.34,
        "n_bookmakers": 6,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10306.0,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "over"
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.02,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": -0.1476,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -14.8,
          "text": "-14.8%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.4447,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": -0.0145,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -1.5,
          "text": "-1.5%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3897,
        "raw_edge_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -5.5,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.2128,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-21.3%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Guillermo Brown",
        "sort_key": 1796.375,
        "tier": "bad_ev"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "2/11",
        "alert_breadth_note": "2/11 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2193 -8.1%",
        "alert_team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 8.5,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": 8.5,
        "hero_label": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "market_prob_pct": 44.5,
        "market_team": "Guillermo Brown",
        "model_prob_pct": 39.0,
        "model_team": "Guillermo Brown",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "\u2713",
        "status_key": "aligned",
        "status_label": "Reliable prediction",
        "status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
        "steam_score": 30,
        "steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
        "steam_tier": "C",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 8.5,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
          "summary": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 8.5,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
            "summary": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.34,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.34,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.5,
          "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
          "decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 32,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Guillermo Brown at 39.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 44.5%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Guillermo Brown as the value side (39.0%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 5.5,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Guillermo Brown",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "drift_against_model",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +34.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +34.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +34.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.5/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "72 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "32 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+34.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 6,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
            "Decision strength: 3.5/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 72,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.1476,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-14.8%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.02,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.4447,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3897,
            "raw_edge_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": -5.5,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.49504950495049505,
            "raw_signal_ev": -0.2128,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "-21.3%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": 2.2,
            "reasons": [
              "Thin xG separation gap=0.16"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "low",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": -10,
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.16
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "2/11",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.18181818181818182,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 80,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation passed",
              "status": "pass"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Pass",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Steam conflicts with model",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 20.8,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 1.8,
            "steam_coherence": 2.0,
            "validation": 30.0
          },
          "score": 72,
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 8.5,
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "max_gap_pp": 8.5,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.22,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 2.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.38,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.38,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.38 \u00b7 Away xG 1.22 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +2%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "pass",
        "odds_delta_pct": -8.1,
        "steam_conflicts": true,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2193 -8.1%",
        "steam_team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 32,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Market Compatibility",
            "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
            "score": 25,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 38,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Market Compatibility",
            "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
            "score": 25,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 8.5,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
            "summary": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 8.5,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
              "summary": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.34,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.34,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.5,
            "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
            "decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 32,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Guillermo Brown at 39.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 44.5%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Guillermo Brown as the value side (39.0%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 5.5,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Guillermo Brown",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "drift_against_model",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +34.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +34.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +34.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.5/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "72 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "32 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+34.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 6,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
              "Decision strength: 3.5/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 72,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.1476,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-14.8%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.02,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.4447,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3897,
              "raw_edge_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": -5.5,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.49504950495049505,
              "raw_signal_ev": -0.2128,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "-21.3%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": 2.2,
              "reasons": [
                "Thin xG separation gap=0.16"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "low",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": -10,
                "strength_delta": -1.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.16
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Guillermo Brown 1.38 xG vs San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza 1.22 \u2192 Guillermo Brown 39.0%",
            "Market: Guillermo Brown ~44.5% implied",
            "Market Steam: San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza \u2193 -8.1%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model favours Guillermo Brown, but sharp money moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -5.5,
          "fair_prob": 38.97,
          "label": "Guillermo Brown",
          "market_prob": 44.47,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -3.01,
          "fair_prob": 29.54,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 32.55,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 8.5,
          "fair_prob": 31.48,
          "label": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
          "market_prob": 22.98,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 14.02,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 34.18,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -14.02,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 65.82,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 13.43,
          "fair_prob": 54.4,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 40.97,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -13.43,
          "fair_prob": 45.6,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 59.03,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 8.5,
        "fair_prob_pct": 31.48,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "market_prob_pct": 22.98,
        "status": "mild_value",
        "steam_team_name": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza\u0027s win probability at 31.5%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 23.0%, a difference of 8.5 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "moderate",
          "edge_status": "mild_value",
          "max_gap_pp": 8.5,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "moderate",
        "divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
        "divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
        "divergence_tier": "moderate",
        "edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Guillermo Brown",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 44.5,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": -5.5,
          "model_prob_pct": 39.0,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": -5.5,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 72,
          "reliability_tier": "moderate",
          "summary": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Pass",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 32,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Market Compatibility",
              "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
              "score": 25,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 38,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Market Compatibility",
              "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
              "score": 25,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Guillermo Brown 1.38 xG vs San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza 1.22 \u2192 Guillermo Brown 39.0%",
              "Market: Guillermo Brown ~44.5% implied",
              "Market Steam: San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza \u2193 -8.1%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model favours Guillermo Brown, but sharp money moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 8.5,
        "hero_label": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza odds shortened \u2193 -8.1%.",
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "Confirmation remains limited (2/11 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
          "gap_tier": "mild",
          "lead": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
          "note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
            "Confirmation remains limited (2/11 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
            "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate still sits above current market pricing on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
            "Recent line movement on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza (\u2193 -8.1%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
            "Market confirmation remains limited (2/11), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 8.5,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
          "status": "pass"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 7.5 pp (at 39.0%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 7.5,
          "max_prob_pct": 39.0,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "medium",
          "tier_label": "Medium"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "moderate",
          "largest_gap_label": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
          "largest_gap_pp": 8.5,
          "lead": "The model rates San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "moderate",
          "max_gap_pp": 8.5,
          "title": "Moderate Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -5.5,
            "edge_pp": -5.5,
            "fair_prob_pct": 38.97,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Guillermo Brown",
            "market_prob_pct": 44.47,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -3.01,
            "edge_pp": -3.01,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.54,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 32.55,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 8.5,
            "edge_pp": 8.5,
            "fair_prob_pct": 31.48,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
            "market_prob_pct": 22.98,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "mild_value",
        "status_label": "Mild Value",
        "steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Guillermo Brown (44.5%).",
          "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza has attracted notable multi-book line movement (\u2193 -8.1%, 2/11).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Guillermo Brown, Market \u2192 Guillermo Brown, Recent sharp money \u2192 San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 25.58,
        "closing_odds": 3.91,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 25.58,
        "entry_odds": 3.91,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "model_validation_status": "pass",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 2,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -8.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -2.7
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 11,
        "breadth_display": "2/11",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 3.4,
        "is_drift": false,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2193 -8.1%",
        "move_pct_abs": 8.1,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 43h 44m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Bet365 led repricing on San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza (8.1%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
          "Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": -8.1,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "3.91",
            "3.66",
            "3.40"
          ],
          "display": "3.80 \u2192 3.40 \u2192 3.40",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 43h 44m",
          "pick_team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.80"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.40"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            3.7,
            3.91,
            3.79,
            3.4
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,7.4 18.7,0.0 37.3,4.2 56.0,18.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "down",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.70"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "3.91"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.40"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 3.7,
        "page_alert_line": "",
        "phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
        "phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
        "pick_team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "confirm",
        "signal_icon": "\u26a1",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 3.4,
          "is_drift": false,
          "label": "Sharp signal",
          "move_display": "\u2193 -8.1%",
          "open_odds": 3.7,
          "summary": "Market moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza while the model still favours another side.",
          "team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
          "tone": "against"
        },
        "signal_key": "sharp_led",
        "signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
        "steam_score": 30,
        "steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
        "steam_tier": "C",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "2/11",
        "current_odds": 3.4,
        "move_display": "\u2193 -8.1%",
        "open_odds": 3.7,
        "pick_team": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "steam_score": 30,
        "steam_team_name": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 8.5,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
      "away_team_id": 21042,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/21042.webp",
      "away_team_name": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
      "away_team_public_id": "2osqGP0cZo44zF",
      "away_team_slug": "san-martin-mendoza",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1606486,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Guillermo Brown",
      "home_team_id": 472,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/472.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Guillermo Brown",
      "home_team_public_id": "2A9YNb5UAIXTUA",
      "home_team_slug": "guillermo-brown",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Torneo Federal A",
      "league_id": 134,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/134.webp",
      "league_name": "Torneo Federal A",
      "league_public_id": "48d0y0pjcpEL9D",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-06 18:00:00",
      "public_id": "1VqElP6a9FkWnY",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Puerto Madryn",
      "venue_name": "Estadio Raul Conti"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.5
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.2617,
            "best_odd": 3.91,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0223,
            "ev": -0.0145,
            "implied_prob": 0.2298,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2298,
              "draw": 0.3255,
              "home": 0.4447
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3149,
            "p_final": 0.252
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.4297,
            "best_odd": 2.76,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0129,
            "ev": -0.1373,
            "implied_prob": 0.3255,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2298,
              "draw": 0.3255,
              "home": 0.4447
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2954,
            "p_final": 0.3126
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.4128,
            "best_odd": 2.02,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0227,
            "ev": -0.1476,
            "implied_prob": 0.4447,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2298,
              "draw": 0.3255,
              "home": 0.4447
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3897,
            "p_final": 0.422
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 3.91,
            "edge": 0.0592,
            "ev": 0.2313,
            "implied_prob": 0.2558,
            "model_prob": 0.3149
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 2.76,
            "edge": -0.0669,
            "ev": -0.1847,
            "implied_prob": 0.3623,
            "model_prob": 0.2954
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.02,
            "edge": -0.1054,
            "ev": -0.2129,
            "implied_prob": 0.495,
            "model_prob": 0.3897
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.1972,
          "alpha_yes": 0.1434,
          "best_no_odd": 1.57,
          "best_yes_odd": 2.25,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": -0.1343,
          "edge_yes": 0.1343,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": -0.2841,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1245,
          "ev_yes": 0.224,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0394,
          "implied_no": 0.5903,
          "implied_yes": 0.4097,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.1972,
              "best_odd": 1.55,
              "edge": -0.0267,
              "ev": -0.1245,
              "implied_prob": 0.5916,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.5648
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.1434,
              "best_odd": 2.245,
              "edge": 0.0194,
              "ev": -0.0394,
              "implied_prob": 0.4084,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.4279
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "p_final_no": 0.5648,
          "p_final_yes": 0.4279,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.1421,
          "alpha_under": 0.1954,
          "best_over_odd": 2.78,
          "best_under_odd": 1.44,
          "consensus_over_odd": 2.62,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.36,
          "edge_over": 0.1402,
          "edge_under": -0.1402,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": 0.34,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0525,
          "ev_under": -0.2541,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.142,
          "implied_over": 0.3418,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.3417,
          "implied_under": 0.6582,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.6583,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 6,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.1421,
              "best_odd": 2.62,
              "edge": 0.0199,
              "ev": -0.0525,
              "implied_prob": 0.3417,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3616
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.1954,
              "best_odd": 1.36,
              "edge": -0.0274,
              "ev": -0.142,
              "implied_prob": 0.6583,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6309
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 6,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.3616,
          "p_final_under": 0.6309,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.34,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.34,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.34,
      "confidence": 6.5,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.5,
        "score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.5,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.5,
        "score_pre_penalty": 4.5
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 8.5,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 8.5,
          "summary": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.34,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.34,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.5,
        "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
        "decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 32,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Guillermo Brown at 39.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 44.5%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Guillermo Brown as the value side (39.0%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 5.5,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Guillermo Brown",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "drift_against_model",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +34.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +34.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +34.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.5/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "72 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "32 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+34.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 6,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
          "Decision strength: 3.5/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 72,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has moved toward San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza, but the model still strongly favours Guillermo Brown.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.1476,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-14.8%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.02,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.4447,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3897,
          "raw_edge_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": -5.5,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.49504950495049505,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.2128,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "-21.3%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": 2.2,
          "reasons": [
            "Thin xG separation gap=0.16"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -1.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "low",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": -10,
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.16
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
          "draw_prob": 0.2954,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3897,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.16
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.02,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": -0.0227,
          "ev": -0.1476,
          "implied_prob": 0.4447,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.3897,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Guillermo Brown"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.1434,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.245,
            "edge": 0.0194,
            "market_prob": 0.4084,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.1972,
              "best_odd": 1.55,
              "edge": -0.0267,
              "ev": -0.1245,
              "implied_prob": 0.5916,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.5648
            },
            "p_final": 0.4279,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0394,
            "value_side": "yes",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.1434,
              "best_odd": 2.245,
              "edge": 0.0194,
              "ev": -0.0394,
              "implied_prob": 0.4084,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.4279
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.1343,
          "ev": 0.224,
          "implied_prob": 0.4097,
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.1421,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.62,
            "edge": 0.0199,
            "market_prob": 0.3417,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "n_bookmakers": 6,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.1421,
              "best_odd": 2.62,
              "edge": 0.0199,
              "ev": -0.0525,
              "implied_prob": 0.3417,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3616
            },
            "p_final": 0.3616,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0525,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.1954,
              "best_odd": 1.36,
              "edge": -0.0274,
              "ev": -0.142,
              "implied_prob": 0.6583,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6309
            },
            "value_side": "over"
          },
          "edge": 0.1402,
          "ev": 0.34,
          "implied_prob": 0.3418,
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "side": "over",
          "value_side": "over"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1606486,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.34,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3149,
        "draw": 0.2954,
        "home": 0.3897
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.34,
        "implied_prob": 0.3418,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.482,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "risk_band": "medium",
        "risk_tier": "secondary",
        "side": "over",
        "slot": "secondary"
      },
      "secondary_picks": [
        {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "ev": 0.34,
          "implied_prob": 0.3418,
          "market": "ou_2_5",
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "not_dominant": true,
          "risk_band": "medium",
          "risk_tier": "secondary",
          "side": "over",
          "slot": "secondary"
        }
      ],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "San Mart\u00edn de Mendoza",
        "home": "Guillermo Brown"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.121856,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.224,
        "implied_prob": 0.4097,
        "market": "btts",
        "model_prob": 0.544,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "yes",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 2,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.1476,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-14.8%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.02,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.4447,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3897,
        "raw_edge_display": "-5.5 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -5.5,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.49504950495049505,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.2128,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-21.3%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1606486,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-06T18:00:43.911996+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Guillermo Brown & San Martín de Mendoza!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Torneo Federal A Torneo Federal A — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Olimpo de Bahía Blanca 16 8 7 1 31
2 Douglas Haig 18 9 4 5 31
3 Sportivo Belgrano 18 7 9 2 30
4 San Martín de Formosa 16 9 3 4 30
5 Alvarado 16 7 6 3 27
6 Gimnasia de Chivilcoy 18 7 6 5 27
7 Defensores de Belgrano de Villa Ramallo 18 7 6 5 27
8 Kimberley de Mar del Plata 16 6 8 2 26
9 Bartolomé Mitre 16 7 5 4 26
10 Sol de América 16 8 2 6 26
11 Juventud Antoniana 16 7 4 5 25
12 Cipolletti 16 7 4 5 25
13 Sarmiento de La Banda 16 7 4 5 25
14 9 de Julio de Rafaela 18 7 4 7 25
15 Sportivo Las Parejas 18 5 9 4 24
16 Villa Mitre 16 5 8 3 23
17 Argentino de Monte Maíz 16 5 8 3 23
18 Atenas 16 6 5 5 23
19 Huracán Las Heras 16 6 5 5 23
20 Atlético Escobar 18 6 4 8 22
21 Fundación Amigos 16 4 9 3 21
22 Deportivo Rincón 16 5 4 7 19
23 San Martín de Mendoza 16 4 7 5 19
24 Defensores de Vilelas 16 6 1 9 19
25 Independiente de Chivilcoy 18 4 7 7 19
26 El Linqueño 18 5 4 9 19
27 Costa Brava 16 4 6 6 18
28 Sol de Mayo 16 4 6 6 18
29 Boca Unidos 16 5 3 8 18
30 Germinal de Rawson 16 4 6 6 18
31 Juventud Unida Universitario 16 3 8 5 17
32 Tucumán Central 16 5 2 9 17
33 Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay 18 4 5 9 17
34 Guillermo Brown 16 4 5 7 17
35 Sarmiento Resistencia 16 3 6 7 15
36 Santamarina 16 2 7 7 13
37 Círculo Deportivo 16 2 7 7 13
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 9 de Julio de Rafaela 18 28 27 +1 25
2 San Martín de Formosa 16 25 19 +6 30
3 Defensores de Belgrano de Villa Ramallo 18 24 20 +4 27
4 Douglas Haig 18 22 15 +7 31
5 Sportivo Belgrano 18 21 9 +12 30
6 Defensores de Vilelas 16 21 26 -5 19
7 Atlético Escobar 18 21 29 -8 22
8 Alvarado 16 19 7 +12 27
9 Juventud Antoniana 16 19 11 +8 25
10 Sol de América 16 19 14 +5 26
11 Cipolletti 16 19 15 +4 25
12 Boca Unidos 16 19 25 -6 18
13 Gimnasia de Chivilcoy 18 17 12 +5 27
14 Fundación Amigos 16 17 14 +3 21
15 Sarmiento de La Banda 16 17 15 +2 25
16 Argentino de Monte Maíz 16 16 12 +4 23
17 Kimberley de Mar del Plata 16 15 9 +6 26
18 Sol de Mayo 16 15 18 -3 18
19 Independiente de Chivilcoy 18 15 22 -7 19
20 Villa Mitre 16 14 8 +6 23
21 Tucumán Central 16 14 19 -5 17
22 El Linqueño 18 14 21 -7 19
23 Olimpo de Bahía Blanca 16 13 4 +9 31
24 Bartolomé Mitre 16 13 7 +6 26
25 Deportivo Rincón 16 13 16 -3 19
26 Guillermo Brown 16 13 20 -7 17
27 Sportivo Las Parejas 18 12 13 -1 24
28 Atenas 16 12 13 -1 23
29 Costa Brava 16 12 13 -1 18
30 Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay 18 12 18 -6 17
31 Sarmiento Resistencia 16 12 23 -11 15
32 Huracán Las Heras 16 11 13 -2 23
33 San Martín de Mendoza 16 11 15 -4 19
34 Juventud Unida Universitario 16 10 10 0 17
35 Santamarina 16 9 17 -8 13
36 Círculo Deportivo 16 8 16 -8 13
37 Germinal de Rawson 16 7 14 -7 18