Estadísticas / Fútbol / Argentina. Torneo Federal A / Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay vs Tucumán Central

Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay vs Tucumán Central Statistics & Analysis

Aug 02, 2026 - 18:30
4 1.27
0 1.33
xG Accuracy: 33%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
  • 1X2 Tucumán Central Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 4-0 ✖ Incorrecto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 30, 2026 · 01:38 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-2470690

Closing Odds 1.48
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay win · Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay 4–0 Tucumán Central
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mercado se mantuvo estable antes del inicio. No se detectó un cambio implícito relevante entre PRE30 y PRE1 en la captura priorizada.

A pesar del movimiento tardío limitado, el modelo sigue tasando Dibujar (1X2),Tucumán Central (1X2),Más de 2,5 goles claramente por encima de lo implícito en esas capturas de cierre: es una lectura estática de «modelo vs precio», no de persecución tardía.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en Tucumán Central (1X2) en unos 24.1 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay (1X2) 33.8 60.0 -26.2
Dibujar (1X2) 29.6 27.5 +2.2
Tucumán Central (1X2) 36.6 12.5 +24.1
Más de 2,5 goles 48.2 32.8 +15.4
Menos de 2,5 goles 51.8 67.2 -15.4
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 36.6% en Tucumán Central (1X2), mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 12.5%. La diferencia —unos 24.1 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE30 → PRE1 · Casa: Pinnacle

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Las cuotas detalladas están plegadas abajo — el movimiento implícito fue insignificante.

Ver tabla completa línea a línea
Mercado Temprano (PRE30) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay (1X2) 1.48 1.48 0.0
Dibujar (1X2) 3.23 3.23 0.0
Tucumán Central (1X2) 7.09 7.09 0.0
Más de 2,5 goles 2.79 2.79 0.0
Menos de 2,5 goles 1.36 1.36 0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "294b263904afee85b89b577bbcd85cd5ade19ac64b8aa58fb2a477e41c9ea85e",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.33,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3659,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.455,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2964,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.73,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.96,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.27,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3377,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay or draw and -3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.33,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.2408,
        "edge_gap": 0.0284,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.1252,
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 36.6,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 33.8
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 7.09
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 7.09,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Tucum\u00e1n Central Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 7.99,
        "market_odds": 7.09,
        "model_odds": 2.73,
        "overround": 12.6,
        "prob_edge": 22.5,
        "value_pct": 159.7,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 5,
        "away_failed_to_score": 6,
        "away_played": 16,
        "away_score_rate": 73.6,
        "home_clean_sheet": 9,
        "home_failed_to_score": 8,
        "home_played": 18,
        "home_score_rate": 71.9,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.5,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.33,
        "home_expected": 1.27,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.9
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.4
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.3
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.0
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay or Draw",
            "prob": 63.4
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay or Tucum\u00e1n Central",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Tucum\u00e1n Central",
            "prob": 66.2
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay or Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 36.6,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 33.8,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "-3.5",
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.9,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.7,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 159.7,
        "implied_prob": 14.1,
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Tucum\u00e1n Central Win",
        "model_prob": 36.6,
        "odds": 7.09
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 12.52,
        "draw": 27.49,
        "home": 59.99
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-02 18:29:31",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-08-02 18:02:45",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 59.99,
          "gap_pp": -26.24,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 33.75
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 27.49,
          "gap_pp": 2.16,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.65
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 12.52,
          "gap_pp": 24.08,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 36.6
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.77,
          "gap_pp": 15.43,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 67.23,
          "gap_pp": -15.43,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 1.48,
          "early": 1.48,
          "implied_closing_pct": 59.99,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 59.99,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.23,
          "early": 3.23,
          "implied_closing_pct": 27.49,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 27.49,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 7.09,
          "early": 7.09,
          "implied_closing_pct": 12.52,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 12.52,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.79,
          "early": 2.79,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.77,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.77,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.36,
          "early": 1.36,
          "implied_closing_pct": 67.23,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 67.23,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 24.1,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      }
    },
    "home_xg": 1.27,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "wait",
        "authority_note": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
        "consensus_odds": 7.09,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Strong",
        "disagreement_level": "strong",
        "ev": 0.106,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 10.6,
          "text": "+10.6%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.1252,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.106,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 10.6,
          "text": "+10.6%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "raw_edge_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 24.1,
        "raw_signal_ev": 1.5949,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+159.5%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "sort_key": 10245.4,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      {
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 2050.0,
        "tier": "pass",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "10/13",
        "alert_breadth_note": "10/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +9.1%",
        "alert_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 26.2,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -26.22,
        "hero_label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
        "market_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "market_team": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
        "model_prob_pct": 36.6,
        "model_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 51,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 26.2,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 26.2,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "wait",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 26.2,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 26.2,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.106,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.015948,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
          "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
          "execution_confidence": 14,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The AI model sees Tucum\u00e1n Central at 36.6% vs market 12.5%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "AI identifies Tucum\u00e1n Central as the stronger side (36.6%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced by xG uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 24.1,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u23f8",
          "label": "Wait for validation",
          "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "drift_against_model",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +10.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Reliability below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "51 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "14 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+10.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "false"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 4,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 51,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "wait",
          "validation_ok": false,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.106,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+10.6%",
            "consensus_odds": 7.09,
            "disagreement_label": "Strong",
            "disagreement_level": "strong",
            "implied_prob": 0.1252,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.366,
            "raw_edge_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 24.1,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.14104372355430184,
            "raw_signal_ev": 1.5949,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+159.5%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -1.5,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.06
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "wait",
        "books_breadth_display": "10/13",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.7692307692307693,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 57,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (26 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 11.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 7.7,
            "steam_coherence": 0.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 51,
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 26.22,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 26.22,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.33,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.27,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.33,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.27 \u00b7 Away xG 1.33 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 9.1,
        "steam_conflicts": true,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
        "steam_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "suppress_execution": true,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 14,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 0,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 40,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 0,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "wait",
            "label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 26.2,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 26.2,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "wait",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 26.2,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": false,
              "pricing_key": "low",
              "probability_gap_pp": 26.2,
              "summary": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.106,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.015948,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
            "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
            "execution_confidence": 14,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The AI model sees Tucum\u00e1n Central at 36.6% vs market 12.5%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "AI identifies Tucum\u00e1n Central as the stronger side (36.6%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced by xG uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 24.1,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u23f8",
            "label": "Wait for validation",
            "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "drift_against_model",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +10.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Reliability below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "51 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "14 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+10.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "false"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 4,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 51,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "wait",
            "validation_ok": false,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.106,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+10.6%",
              "consensus_odds": 7.09,
              "disagreement_label": "Strong",
              "disagreement_level": "strong",
              "implied_prob": 0.1252,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.366,
              "raw_edge_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 24.1,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.14104372355430184,
              "raw_signal_ev": 1.5949,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+159.5%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -1.5,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.06
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u23f8",
          "label": "Wait for validation",
          "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
          "tier": "wait"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay 1.27 xG vs Tucum\u00e1n Central 1.33 \u2192 Tucum\u00e1n Central 36.6%",
            "Market: Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay ~12.5% implied",
            "Market Drift: Tucum\u00e1n Central odds \u2191 +9.1%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model favours Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -26.22,
          "fair_prob": 33.77,
          "label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
          "market_prob": 59.99,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 2.15,
          "fair_prob": 29.64,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 27.49,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 24.07,
          "fair_prob": 36.59,
          "label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
          "market_prob": 12.52,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 54.5,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 45.5,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "extreme_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -26.22,
        "fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
        "market_prob_pct": 59.99,
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Tucum\u00e1n Central"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay\u0027s win probability at 60.0%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 33.8%, a difference of 26.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "extreme",
          "edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 26.22,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": true
        },
        "divergence_label": "Extreme model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "extreme",
        "divergence_level_label": "Extreme divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs substantially from current market pricing. Large divergences can occur when rating inputs are incomplete, team-strength estimates are uncertain, or the market incorporates information not present in the model. Interpret with caution.",
        "divergence_tier": "extreme",
        "edge_label": "Extreme disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "extreme_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 12.5,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 24.1,
          "model_prob_pct": 36.6,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 24.1,
            "label": "Low convergence",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "!",
          "reliability_score": 51,
          "reliability_tier": "limited",
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 14,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 0,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 40,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 0,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "wait",
              "label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay 1.27 xG vs Tucum\u00e1n Central 1.33 \u2192 Tucum\u00e1n Central 36.6%",
              "Market: Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay ~12.5% implied",
              "Market Drift: Tucum\u00e1n Central odds \u2191 +9.1%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model favours Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -26.22,
        "hero_label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "Tucum\u00e1n Central odds lengthened \u2191 +9.1%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {},
        "market_narrative": {},
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 26.22,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
          "max_prob_pct": 36.6,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "extreme",
          "largest_gap_label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
          "largest_gap_pp": -26.2,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "extreme",
          "max_gap_pp": 26.2,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -26.22,
            "edge_pp": -26.22,
            "fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
            "market_prob_pct": 59.99,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 2.15,
            "edge_pp": 2.15,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 27.49,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 24.07,
            "edge_pp": 24.07,
            "fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
            "market_prob_pct": 12.52,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay (12.5%).",
          "However, Tucum\u00e1n Central has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +9.1%, 10/13) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Tucum\u00e1n Central, Market \u2192 Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay, while Tucum\u00e1n Central odds drifted longer (market fade).",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 67.57,
        "closing_odds": 1.48,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 67.57,
        "entry_odds": 1.48,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 10,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +25.0%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 25.0
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +21.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 21.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 9,
            "bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +19.4%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 19.4
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +19.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 19.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +16.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 16.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +16.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 16.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 34,
            "bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.8%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 13.8
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 9.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 21,
            "bookmaker_name": "888Sport",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 6.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 6.7
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 13,
        "breadth_display": "10/13",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 6.0,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
        "move_pct_abs": 9.1,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 23h 42m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Multi-book drift on Tucum\u00e1n Central (9.1%, 10/13) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 9.1,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "7.09",
            "6.29",
            "5.50"
          ],
          "display": "8.10 \u2192 5.50 \u2192 6.00",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 23h 42m",
          "pick_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "8.10"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "5.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "6.00"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            5.5,
            7.09,
            6.0
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,12.3",
          "sparkline_trend": "volatile",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "V-shape swing",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "5.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "5.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "7.09"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "6.00"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 5.5,
        "page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 10/13 sportsbooks on Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "phase_label": "Market drift",
        "phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
        "pick_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Betfair",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "fade",
        "signal_icon": "\u2198",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 6.0,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
          "open_odds": 5.5,
          "summary": "Market moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central while the model still favours another side.",
          "team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
          "tone": "against"
        },
        "signal_key": "market_drift",
        "signal_label": "Drift",
        "steam_score": 51,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "10/13",
        "current_odds": 6.0,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
        "open_odds": 5.5,
        "pick_team": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "steam_score": 51,
        "steam_team_name": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 26.2,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
      "away_team_id": 27573,
      "away_team_logo": null,
      "away_team_name": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
      "away_team_slug": "tucuman-central",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1606433,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
      "home_team_id": 3945,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/3945.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay",
      "home_team_slug": "gimnasia-concepcion",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Torneo Federal A",
      "league_id": 134,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/134.webp",
      "league_name": "Torneo Federal A",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-08-02 18:30:00",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": null,
      "venue_name": "Estadio Manuel y Ramon Nunez"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.1278,
            "best_odd": 7.09,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0308,
            "ev": 0.106,
            "implied_prob": 0.1252,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.1252,
              "draw": 0.2749,
              "home": 0.5999
            },
            "model_prob": 0.366,
            "p_final": 0.156
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2903,
            "best_odd": 3.23,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0063,
            "ev": -0.0919,
            "implied_prob": 0.2749,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.1252,
              "draw": 0.2749,
              "home": 0.5999
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2965,
            "p_final": 0.2811
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3639,
            "best_odd": 1.48,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0955,
            "ev": -0.2534,
            "implied_prob": 0.5999,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.1252,
              "draw": 0.2749,
              "home": 0.5999
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3375,
            "p_final": 0.5044
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 7.09,
            "edge": 0.2249,
            "ev": 1.5948,
            "implied_prob": 0.141,
            "model_prob": 0.366
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.23,
            "edge": -0.0131,
            "ev": -0.0424,
            "implied_prob": 0.3096,
            "model_prob": 0.2965
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 1.48,
            "edge": -0.3381,
            "ev": -0.5004,
            "implied_prob": 0.6757,
            "model_prob": 0.3375
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.106,
      "best_outlier_ev": 1.5948,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.106,
      "confidence": 6.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "guard_capped": true,
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_before_guard": 6.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 3.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.0
      },
      "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "B",
        "stake_factor": 0.5
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "wait",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "wait",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 26.2,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 26.2,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.106,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.015948,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
        "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
        "execution_confidence": 14,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The AI model sees Tucum\u00e1n Central at 36.6% vs market 12.5%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "AI identifies Tucum\u00e1n Central as the stronger side (36.6%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced by xG uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 24.1,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u23f8",
        "label": "Wait for validation",
        "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "drift_against_model",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +10.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Reliability below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "51 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "14 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+10.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "false"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 4,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has moved away from Tucum\u00e1n Central, but the model still strongly favours Tucum\u00e1n Central.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 51,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "wait",
        "validation_ok": false,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.106,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+10.6%",
          "consensus_odds": 7.09,
          "disagreement_label": "Strong",
          "disagreement_level": "strong",
          "implied_prob": 0.1252,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.366,
          "raw_edge_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 24.1,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.14104372355430184,
          "raw_signal_ev": 1.5949,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+159.5%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -1.5,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.06
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
          "draw_prob": 0.2965,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.06
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "guard_active": true,
      "guard_level": "extreme",
      "guard_message": "Model validation failed \u2014 value signals on 1X2 are not actionable until inputs are verified.",
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 7.09,
          "decision": "guard_blocked",
          "decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0308,
          "ev": 0.106,
          "guard_blocked": true,
          "implied_prob": 0.1252,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.366,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.545,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1606433,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.106,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.366,
        "draw": 0.2965,
        "home": 0.3375
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "home": "Gimnasia de Concepci\u00f3n del Uruguay"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.042676,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.106,
        "implied_prob": 0.1252,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "primary_strength": "weak",
        "risk_band": "speculative",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "away",
        "side_label": "Tucum\u00e1n Central",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": true
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.106,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+10.6%",
        "consensus_odds": 7.09,
        "disagreement_label": "Strong",
        "disagreement_level": "strong",
        "implied_prob": 0.1252,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "raw_edge_display": "+24.1 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 24.1,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.14104372355430184,
        "raw_signal_ev": 1.5949,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+159.5%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1606433,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-02T18:29:34.559021+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay & Tucumán Central!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Torneo Federal A Torneo Federal A — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Olimpo de Bahía Blanca 16 8 7 1 31
2 Douglas Haig 18 9 4 5 31
3 Sportivo Belgrano 18 7 9 2 30
4 San Martín de Formosa 16 9 3 4 30
5 Alvarado 16 7 6 3 27
6 Gimnasia de Chivilcoy 18 7 6 5 27
7 Defensores de Belgrano de Villa Ramallo 18 7 6 5 27
8 Kimberley de Mar del Plata 16 6 8 2 26
9 Bartolomé Mitre 16 7 5 4 26
10 Sol de América 16 8 2 6 26
11 Juventud Antoniana 16 7 4 5 25
12 Cipolletti 16 7 4 5 25
13 Sarmiento de La Banda 16 7 4 5 25
14 9 de Julio de Rafaela 18 7 4 7 25
15 Sportivo Las Parejas 18 5 9 4 24
16 Villa Mitre 16 5 8 3 23
17 Argentino de Monte Maíz 16 5 8 3 23
18 Atenas 16 6 5 5 23
19 Huracán Las Heras 16 6 5 5 23
20 Atlético Escobar 18 6 4 8 22
21 Fundación Amigos 16 4 9 3 21
22 Deportivo Rincón 16 5 4 7 19
23 San Martín de Mendoza 16 4 7 5 19
24 Defensores de Vilelas 16 6 1 9 19
25 Independiente de Chivilcoy 18 4 7 7 19
26 El Linqueño 18 5 4 9 19
27 Costa Brava 16 4 6 6 18
28 Sol de Mayo 16 4 6 6 18
29 Boca Unidos 16 5 3 8 18
30 Germinal de Rawson 16 4 6 6 18
31 Juventud Unida Universitario 16 3 8 5 17
32 Tucumán Central 16 5 2 9 17
33 Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay 18 4 5 9 17
34 Guillermo Brown 16 4 5 7 17
35 Sarmiento Resistencia 16 3 6 7 15
36 Santamarina 16 2 7 7 13
37 Círculo Deportivo 16 2 7 7 13
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 9 de Julio de Rafaela 18 28 27 +1 25
2 San Martín de Formosa 16 25 19 +6 30
3 Defensores de Belgrano de Villa Ramallo 18 24 20 +4 27
4 Douglas Haig 18 22 15 +7 31
5 Sportivo Belgrano 18 21 9 +12 30
6 Defensores de Vilelas 16 21 26 -5 19
7 Atlético Escobar 18 21 29 -8 22
8 Alvarado 16 19 7 +12 27
9 Juventud Antoniana 16 19 11 +8 25
10 Sol de América 16 19 14 +5 26
11 Cipolletti 16 19 15 +4 25
12 Boca Unidos 16 19 25 -6 18
13 Gimnasia de Chivilcoy 18 17 12 +5 27
14 Fundación Amigos 16 17 14 +3 21
15 Sarmiento de La Banda 16 17 15 +2 25
16 Argentino de Monte Maíz 16 16 12 +4 23
17 Kimberley de Mar del Plata 16 15 9 +6 26
18 Sol de Mayo 16 15 18 -3 18
19 Independiente de Chivilcoy 18 15 22 -7 19
20 Villa Mitre 16 14 8 +6 23
21 Tucumán Central 16 14 19 -5 17
22 El Linqueño 18 14 21 -7 19
23 Olimpo de Bahía Blanca 16 13 4 +9 31
24 Bartolomé Mitre 16 13 7 +6 26
25 Deportivo Rincón 16 13 16 -3 19
26 Guillermo Brown 16 13 20 -7 17
27 Sportivo Las Parejas 18 12 13 -1 24
28 Atenas 16 12 13 -1 23
29 Costa Brava 16 12 13 -1 18
30 Gimnasia de Concepción del Uruguay 18 12 18 -6 17
31 Sarmiento Resistencia 16 12 23 -11 15
32 Huracán Las Heras 16 11 13 -2 23
33 San Martín de Mendoza 16 11 15 -4 19
34 Juventud Unida Universitario 16 10 10 0 17
35 Santamarina 16 9 17 -8 13
36 Círculo Deportivo 16 8 16 -8 13
37 Germinal de Rawson 16 7 14 -7 18