Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 FC Bacău Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-2 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.79
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Draw · FC Bacău 2–2 Cetatea Suceava
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "a5535410181dd18ba17674f84b4330e4ee3d5b64dc810b5fd6997df550d97c84",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.28,
"away_win_prob": 0.3424,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.92,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.77,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.32,
"home_win_prob": 0.3611,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : FC Bac\u0103u or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "FC Bac\u0103u"
},
"away_xg": 1.28,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1442,
"edge_gap": 0.0185,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.5052,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 34.2,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 36.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.79
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.79,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "FC Bac\u0103u Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 1.98,
"market_odds": 1.79,
"model_odds": 2.77,
"overround": 10.6,
"prob_edge": -19.8,
"value_pct": -35.4,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 3,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 7,
"away_score_rate": 72.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 3,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 6,
"home_score_rate": 73.3,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.28,
"home_expected": 1.32,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "FC Bac\u0103u or Draw",
"prob": 65.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "FC Bac\u0103u or Cetatea Suceava",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Cetatea Suceava",
"prob": 63.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "FC Bac\u0103u or Cetatea Suceava",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 34.2,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "FC Bac\u0103u"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.9,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 2.7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 25.5,
"implied_prob": 27.2,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Cetatea Suceava Win",
"model_prob": 34.2,
"odds": 3.67
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 24.64,
"draw": 24.84,
"home": 50.52
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 07:59:31",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 07:29:54",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 50.52,
"gap_pp": -14.42,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.09
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 24.84,
"gap_pp": 4.82,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.67
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 24.64,
"gap_pp": 9.6,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 34.24
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 58.9,
"gap_pp": -10.7,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.1,
"gap_pp": 10.7,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.79,
"early": 1.79,
"implied_closing_pct": 50.52,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 50.52,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.64,
"early": 3.64,
"implied_closing_pct": 24.84,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 24.84,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.67,
"early": 3.67,
"implied_closing_pct": 24.64,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 24.64,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.57,
"early": 1.57,
"implied_closing_pct": 58.9,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 58.9,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.25,
"early": 2.25,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.1,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 41.1,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.7,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.8,
"ev": -0.0625,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.32,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.152,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.225,
"edge": 0.0157,
"edge_pp": 1.6,
"market_prob": 0.4145,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2091,
"best_odd": 1.575,
"edge": -0.0216,
"ev": -0.1119,
"implied_prob": 0.5855,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5639
},
"p_final": 0.4302,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 10.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1526,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0428,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.152,
"best_odd": 2.225,
"edge": 0.0157,
"ev": -0.0428,
"implied_prob": 0.4145,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4302
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2192,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -21.9,
"text": "-21.9%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1655,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 16.6,
"text": "+16.6%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1655,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10298.95,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1669,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0081,
"edge_pp": 0.8,
"market_prob": 0.4063,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1669,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0081,
"ev": -0.0675,
"implied_prob": 0.4063,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4145
},
"p_final": 0.4145,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0237,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0675,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2294,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0112,
"ev": -0.1029,
"implied_prob": 0.5937,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5825
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0465,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.7,
"text": "+4.7%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -14.4,
"text": "-14.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0465,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10041.85,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"consensus_odds": 1.79,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.2171,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -21.7,
"text": "-21.7%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0053,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -0.5,
"text": "-0.5%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -14.4,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.354,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-35.4%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"sort_key": 1798.675,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -16.7%",
"alert_team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 14.4,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -14.41,
"hero_label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"market_prob_pct": 50.5,
"market_team": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"model_team": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 83,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 14.4,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 14.4,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1655,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2566,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Bac\u0103u at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Bac\u0103u as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side FC Bac\u0103u \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.43 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +26% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1602490 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.43 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +16.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +16.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +16.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +16.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+16.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +26% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2171,
"consensus_ev_display": "-21.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -14.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5586592178770949,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.354,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-35.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "6/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.75,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (14 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 17.8,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.5,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 56,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 14.41,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 14.41,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.28,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -2.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.32,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.32,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.32 \u00b7 Away xG 1.28 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -2%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": -16.7,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -16.7%",
"steam_team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 9,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 9,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 14.4,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 14.4,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1655,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2566,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Bac\u0103u at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Bac\u0103u as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side FC Bac\u0103u \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.43 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +26% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1602490 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.43 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +16.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +16.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +16.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +16.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+16.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +26% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2171,
"consensus_ev_display": "-21.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -14.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5586592178770949,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.354,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-35.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: FC Bac\u0103u 1.32 xG vs Cetatea Suceava 1.28 \u2192 FC Bac\u0103u 36.1%",
"Market: FC Bac\u0103u ~50.5% implied",
"Market Steam: Cetatea Suceava \u2193 -16.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours FC Bac\u0103u, but sharp money moved toward Cetatea Suceava.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -14.41,
"fair_prob": 36.11,
"label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"market_prob": 50.52,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.81,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 24.84,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 9.6,
"fair_prob": 34.24,
"label": "Cetatea Suceava",
"market_prob": 24.64,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -10.14,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 58.34,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 10.14,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 41.66,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.8,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 59.3,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.8,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 40.7,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -14.41,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"market_prob_pct": 50.52,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Cetatea Suceava"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates FC Bac\u0103u\u0027s win probability at 50.5%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 36.1%, a difference of 14.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 14.41,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 50.5,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -14.4,
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -14.4,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 56,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 9,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 9,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: FC Bac\u0103u 1.32 xG vs Cetatea Suceava 1.28 \u2192 FC Bac\u0103u 36.1%",
"Market: FC Bac\u0103u ~50.5% implied",
"Market Steam: Cetatea Suceava \u2193 -16.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours FC Bac\u0103u, but sharp money moved toward Cetatea Suceava.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -14.41,
"hero_label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Cetatea Suceava odds shortened \u2193 -16.7%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Cetatea Suceava, with odds shortening by 16.7%.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about FC Bac\u0103u than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Buying interest on Cetatea Suceava \u2014 odds shortened by 16.7%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about FC Bac\u0103u than the current fair estimate.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Cetatea Suceava, with odds shortening by 16.7%.",
"Buying interest on Cetatea Suceava \u2014 odds shortened by 16.7%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors FC Bac\u0103u more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Cetatea Suceava has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 16.7%.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (6/8) supports the current market view on Cetatea Suceava."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 14.41,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 1.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 1.9,
"max_prob_pct": 36.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"largest_gap_pp": -14.4,
"lead": "The closing market prices FC Bac\u0103u higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 14.4,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -14.41,
"edge_pp": -14.41,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"market_prob_pct": 50.52,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 4.81,
"edge_pp": 4.81,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 24.84,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 9.6,
"edge_pp": 9.6,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Cetatea Suceava",
"market_prob_pct": 24.64,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Cetatea Suceava \u2014 odds shortened by 16.7%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers FC Bac\u0103u (50.5%).",
"However, Cetatea Suceava has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -16.7%, 6/8).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 FC Bac\u0103u, Market \u2192 FC Bac\u0103u, Recent sharp money \u2192 Cetatea Suceava.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 55.87,
"closing_odds": 1.79,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 55.87,
"entry_odds": 1.79,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -21.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -21.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -16.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -16.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -11.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -11.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -5.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -5.1
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "6/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.5,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -16.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 16.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 82h 23m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"6/8 books synchronized on Cetatea Suceava (16.7% steam, score 83) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -16.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.20",
"3.85",
"3.50"
],
"display": "4.65 \u2192 3.50 \u2192 3.50",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 82h 23m",
"pick_team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.65"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.50"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.50"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
4.2,
3.67,
3.5
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,13.6 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.20"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.50"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.20"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.50"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 4.2,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: Cetatea Suceava \u2193 -16.7% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: Cetatea Suceava \u2193 -16.7% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.5,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -16.7%",
"open_odds": 4.2,
"summary": "Market moved toward Cetatea Suceava while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 83,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/8",
"current_odds": 3.5,
"move_display": "\u2193 -16.7%",
"open_odds": 4.2,
"pick_team": "Cetatea Suceava",
"steam_score": 83,
"steam_team_name": "Cetatea Suceava",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 14.4,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "cetatea-suceava",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Cetatea Suceava",
"away_team_id": 26674,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/26674.webp",
"away_team_name": "Cetatea Suceava",
"away_team_public_id": "15A6T5B5SBsI1J",
"away_team_slug": "cetatea-suceava",
"country_code": "RO",
"country_display_name": "Romania",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/ro.svg",
"country_id": 131,
"country_name": "Romania",
"fixture_id": 1602490,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Romania",
"home_team_display_name": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"home_team_id": 22000,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/22000.webp",
"home_team_name": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"home_team_public_id": "2WOCggar8MmjvU",
"home_team_slug": "fc-bacau",
"ht.home_team_slug": "fc-bacau",
"league_country": "Romania",
"league_country_display": "Romania",
"league_display_name": "Liga II",
"league_id": 284,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/284.webp",
"league_name": "Liga II",
"league_public_id": "1bA5sDTgN3noN7",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-19 08:00:00",
"public_id": "5uHvd6vAa9qaHW",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": "Baza Sportiva FC Bac\u0103u"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2568,
"best_odd": 3.67,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0247,
"ev": -0.0053,
"implied_prob": 0.2464,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2464,
"draw": 0.2484,
"home": 0.5052
},
"model_prob": 0.3424,
"p_final": 0.271
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2783,
"best_odd": 3.64,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0134,
"ev": -0.0469,
"implied_prob": 0.2484,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2464,
"draw": 0.2484,
"home": 0.5052
},
"model_prob": 0.2967,
"p_final": 0.2619
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4702,
"best_odd": 1.79,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0678,
"ev": -0.2171,
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2464,
"draw": 0.2484,
"home": 0.5052
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"p_final": 0.4374
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.67,
"edge": 0.0699,
"ev": 0.2566,
"implied_prob": 0.2725,
"model_prob": 0.3424
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.64,
"edge": 0.0219,
"ev": 0.0799,
"implied_prob": 0.2747,
"model_prob": 0.2967
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.79,
"edge": -0.1977,
"ev": -0.3539,
"implied_prob": 0.5587,
"model_prob": 0.3609
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1669,
"alpha_yes": 0.2294,
"best_no_odd": 2.3,
"best_yes_odd": 1.57,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.048,
"edge_yes": -0.048,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0465,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0675,
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1029,
"implied_no": 0.407,
"implied_yes": 0.593,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1669,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0081,
"ev": -0.0675,
"implied_prob": 0.4063,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4145
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2294,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0112,
"ev": -0.1029,
"implied_prob": 0.5937,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5825
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"p_final_no": 0.4145,
"p_final_yes": 0.5825,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2091,
"alpha_under": 0.152,
"best_over_odd": 1.62,
"best_under_odd": 2.25,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.575,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.225,
"edge_over": -0.1014,
"edge_under": 0.1014,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2192,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1119,
"ev_under": 0.1655,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0428,
"implied_over": 0.5834,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5855,
"implied_under": 0.4166,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4145,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2091,
"best_odd": 1.575,
"edge": -0.0216,
"ev": -0.1119,
"implied_prob": 0.5855,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5639
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.152,
"best_odd": 2.225,
"edge": 0.0157,
"ev": -0.0428,
"implied_prob": 0.4145,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4302
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5639,
"p_final_under": 0.4302,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1655,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2566,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1655,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.8,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.8
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 14.4,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1655,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2566,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Bac\u0103u at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Bac\u0103u as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 14.4,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Bac\u0103u",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side FC Bac\u0103u \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.43 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +26% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1602490 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.43 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +16.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +16.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +16.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +16.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+16.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +26% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Cetatea Suceava, but the model still strongly favours FC Bac\u0103u.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2171,
"consensus_ev_display": "-21.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -14.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5586592178770949,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.354,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-35.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2967,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3609,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.04
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.79,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0678,
"ev": -0.2171,
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "FC Bac\u0103u"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1669,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0081,
"market_prob": 0.4063,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1669,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0081,
"ev": -0.0675,
"implied_prob": 0.4063,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4145
},
"p_final": 0.4145,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0675,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2294,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0112,
"ev": -0.1029,
"implied_prob": 0.5937,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5825
}
},
"edge": 0.048,
"ev": 0.0465,
"implied_prob": 0.407,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.152,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.225,
"edge": 0.0157,
"market_prob": 0.4145,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2091,
"best_odd": 1.575,
"edge": -0.0216,
"ev": -0.1119,
"implied_prob": 0.5855,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5639
},
"p_final": 0.4302,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0428,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.152,
"best_odd": 2.225,
"edge": 0.0157,
"ev": -0.0428,
"implied_prob": 0.4145,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4302
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1014,
"ev": 0.1655,
"implied_prob": 0.4166,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1602490,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1655,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3424,
"draw": 0.2967,
"home": 0.3609
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Cetatea Suceava",
"home": "FC Bac\u0103u"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.06001,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1655,
"implied_prob": 0.4166,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.2171,
"consensus_ev_display": "-21.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5052,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-14.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -14.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5586592178770949,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.354,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-35.4%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1602490,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-19T07:59:34.103118+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para FC Bacău & Cetatea Suceava!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga II — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slatina | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 22 |
| 2 | FC Politehnica Timișoara | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 20 |
| 3 | CSM Reșița | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 18 |
| 4 | FC Bacău | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 5 | Chindia Târgoviște | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 6 | Popești-Leordeni | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 7 | Concordia Chiajna | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 8 | Metalul Buzău | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
| 9 | CS Afumați | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
| 10 | Cetatea Suceava | 8 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 12 |
| 11 | Gloria Bistriţa | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | Metaloglobus | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 13 | ASA Târgu Mureș | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 14 | CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 15 | Bihor Oradea | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 16 | Viitorul Şelimbăr | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 17 | Ştefăneşti | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 18 | CSA Steaua București | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| 19 | Unirea Slobozia | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| 20 | CSM Satu Mare | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 21 | Dumbrăviţa | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| 22 | Dinamo Bucarest | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Bacău | 8 | 19 | 8 | +11 | 15 |
| 2 | Popești-Leordeni | 8 | 19 | 14 | +5 | 15 |
| 3 | FC Politehnica Timișoara | 8 | 18 | 7 | +11 | 20 |
| 4 | Slatina | 8 | 17 | 5 | +12 | 22 |
| 5 | Chindia Târgoviște | 8 | 17 | 8 | +9 | 15 |
| 6 | Concordia Chiajna | 8 | 17 | 13 | +4 | 15 |
| 7 | Cetatea Suceava | 8 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 12 |
| 8 | CSM Reșița | 8 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 18 |
| 9 | Bihor Oradea | 8 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 9 |
| 10 | Gloria Bistriţa | 8 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 12 |
| 11 | CS Afumați | 8 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| 12 | ASA Târgu Mureș | 8 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 11 |
| 13 | Metaloglobus | 8 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 11 |
| 14 | Unirea Slobozia | 8 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 4 |
| 15 | CSM Râmnicu Vâlcea | 8 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 11 |
| 16 | Metalul Buzău | 8 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 14 |
| 17 | CSA Steaua București | 8 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 5 |
| 18 | Dinamo Bucarest | 8 | 9 | 27 | -18 | 3 |
| 19 | Viitorul Şelimbăr | 8 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 |
| 20 | Ştefăneşti | 8 | 6 | 15 | -9 | 6 |
| 21 | Dumbrăviţa | 8 | 5 | 16 | -11 | 3 |
| 22 | CSM Satu Mare | 8 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
