Estadísticas / Fútbol / Alemania. 3. Liga / SSV Jahn Regensburg vs FC Saarbrücken

SSV Jahn Regensburg vs FC Saarbrücken Statistics & Analysis

Aug 16, 2026 - 14:30
0 1.92
1 1.58
xG Accuracy: 50%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (1 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
  • 1X2 SSV Jahn Regensburg FC Saarbrücken ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 1-0 0-1 ✖ Incorrecto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 11, 2026 · 01:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3607980

Closing Odds 2.7
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result FC Saarbrücken win · SSV Jahn Regensburg 0–1 FC Saarbrücken
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mercado se mantuvo estable antes del inicio. No se detectó un cambio implícito relevante entre PRE30 y PRE1 en la captura priorizada.

A pesar del movimiento tardío limitado, el modelo sigue tasando SSV Jahn Regensburg (1X2),Más de 2,5 goles claramente por encima de lo implícito en esas capturas de cierre: es una lectura estática de «modelo vs precio», no de persecución tardía.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en SSV Jahn Regensburg (1X2) en unos 9.5 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
SSV Jahn Regensburg (1X2) 44.8 35.3 +9.5
Dibujar (1X2) 24.3 25.3 -1.0
FC Saarbrücken (1X2) 30.9 39.4 -8.5
Más de 2,5 goles 67.9 61.1 +6.8
Menos de 2,5 goles 32.1 38.9 -6.8
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 44.8% en SSV Jahn Regensburg (1X2), mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 35.3%. La diferencia —unos 9.5 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE30 → PRE1 · Casa: Pinnacle

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Las cuotas detalladas están plegadas abajo — el movimiento implícito fue insignificante.

Ver tabla completa línea a línea
Mercado Temprano (PRE30) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
SSV Jahn Regensburg (1X2) 2.7 2.7 0.0
Dibujar (1X2) 3.76 3.76 0.0
FC Saarbrücken (1X2) 2.42 2.42 0.0
Más de 2,5 goles 1.56 1.56 0.0
Menos de 2,5 goles 2.45 2.45 0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "b9ffc3b2c0296fa18aa214ebb78e4eda372573235c8b6f9f0fe0dd8572a2e067",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.58,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3088,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.311,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.69,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2435,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 3.24,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 4.11,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.23,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.92,
      "home_win_prob": 0.4477,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.679,
      "prediction_confidence": "low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.321
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or FC Saarbr\u00fccken and +3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "45%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "10%",
      "winner_name": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.58,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.0954,
        "edge_gap": 0.1397,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.3529,
        "model_prob": 0.4483,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 30.9,
          "draw": 24.3,
          "home": 44.8
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.7
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.7,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "SSV Jahn Regensburg Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.83,
        "market_odds": 2.7,
        "model_odds": 2.23,
        "overround": 5.0,
        "prob_edge": 7.8,
        "value_pct": 21.1,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 0,
        "away_failed_to_score": 0,
        "away_played": 1,
        "away_score_rate": 79.4,
        "home_clean_sheet": 0,
        "home_failed_to_score": 0,
        "home_played": 1,
        "home_score_rate": 85.3,
        "no_prob": 31.1,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 69.0,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 69.0
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.58,
        "home_expected": 1.92,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 9.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.8
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 7.2
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-2",
            "prob": 6.9
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 5.8
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg or Draw",
            "prob": 69.1
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg or FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
            "prob": 75.7
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
            "prob": 55.2
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg or FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
        "pick_prob": 75.7
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 30.9,
        "draw_pct": 24.3,
        "home_pct": 44.8,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "+3.5",
        "avg_total": 3.5,
        "away_avg_scored": 5.0,
        "confidence": "high",
        "home_avg_scored": 5.0,
        "over_prob": 67.9,
        "pick": "Over 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 67.9,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 3.5,
        "under_prob": 32.1
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 21.1,
        "implied_prob": 37.0,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market": "SSV Jahn Regensburg Win",
        "model_prob": 44.8,
        "odds": 2.7
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 39.37,
        "draw": 25.34,
        "home": 35.29
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 14:30:34",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 14:02:02",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 35.29,
          "gap_pp": 9.54,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 44.83
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 25.34,
          "gap_pp": -1.02,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 24.32
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 39.37,
          "gap_pp": -8.52,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 30.85
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 61.1,
          "gap_pp": 6.8,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 67.9
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 38.9,
          "gap_pp": -6.8,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 32.1
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.7,
          "early": 2.7,
          "implied_closing_pct": 35.29,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 35.29,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.76,
          "early": 3.76,
          "implied_closing_pct": 25.34,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 25.34,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.42,
          "early": 2.42,
          "implied_closing_pct": 39.37,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 39.37,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.56,
          "early": 1.56,
          "implied_closing_pct": 61.1,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 61.1,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.45,
          "early": 2.45,
          "implied_closing_pct": 38.9,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 38.9,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 9.5,
        "kind": "1x2_h"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -3.6,
        "ev": -0.2824,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 7.8,
        "market_prob": 0.1282,
        "market_prob_pct": 12.8,
        "model_prob": 0.092,
        "model_prob_pct": 9.2,
        "n_bookmakers": 10,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 9.2
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 9.2
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.8
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 7.2
        },
        {
          "label": "2-2",
          "prob": 6.9
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 5.8
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.92,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.7,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": 0.0521,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 5.2,
          "text": "+5.2%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.3529,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0521,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 5.2,
          "text": "+5.2%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.4483,
        "raw_edge_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 9.5,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.2104,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+21.0%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "sort_key": 10196.89,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "over_prob": 67.9,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "under_prob": 32.1,
        "value_side": "over"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "no_prob": 31.1,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 69.0
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 807.6,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 9.2
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "",
        "alert_breadth_note": "",
        "alert_move": "",
        "alert_team": "",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 9.5,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": 9.48,
        "hero_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "market_prob_pct": 35.3,
        "market_team": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
        "model_prob_pct": 44.8,
        "model_team": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "\u2713",
        "status_key": "aligned",
        "status_label": "Reliable prediction",
        "status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
        "steam_score": null,
        "steam_subtitle": "",
        "steam_tier": "",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 9.5,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 9.5,
          "summary": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 9.5,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 9.5,
            "summary": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0521,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.2103,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.7,
          "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 36,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates SSV Jahn Regensburg at 44.8%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 35.3%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies SSV Jahn Regensburg as the value side (44.8%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 9.5,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": null,
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "probability_gap",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side SSV Jahn Regensburg \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.70 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +21% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1583959 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.70 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.7/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "ok"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "81 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "36 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 6,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
            "Decision strength: 3.7/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65",
            "Outlier price +21% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 81,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0521,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.7,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.3529,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.4483,
            "raw_edge_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 9.5,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.37037037037037035,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.2104,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+21.0%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "ok",
            "deviation_pct": 42.2,
            "reasons": [],
            "recommended_action": "ok",
            "strength_delta": 0.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "ok",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": 0,
              "strength_delta": 0.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.34
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "11/12",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.9166666666666666,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 88,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam detected",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation passed",
              "status": "pass"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Pass",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 20.3,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 9.2,
            "steam_coherence": 5.0,
            "validation": 30.0
          },
          "score": 81,
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 9.48,
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "max_gap_pp": 9.48,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.58,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 42.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.92,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.92,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.92 \u00b7 Away xG 1.58 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +42%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "pass",
        "odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
        "steam_conflicts": null,
        "steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
        "steam_team": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 36,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 18,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 44,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 18,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 9.5,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 9.5,
            "summary": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 9.5,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 9.5,
              "summary": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0521,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.2103,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.7,
            "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 36,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates SSV Jahn Regensburg at 44.8%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 35.3%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies SSV Jahn Regensburg as the value side (44.8%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 9.5,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": null,
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "probability_gap",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side SSV Jahn Regensburg \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.70 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +21% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1583959 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.70 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.7/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "81 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "36 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 6,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
              "Decision strength: 3.7/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65",
              "Outlier price +21% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 81,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0521,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.7,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.3529,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.4483,
              "raw_edge_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 9.5,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.37037037037037035,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.2104,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+21.0%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "ok",
              "deviation_pct": 42.2,
              "reasons": [],
              "recommended_action": "ok",
              "strength_delta": 0.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "ok",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": 0,
                "strength_delta": 0.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.34
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: SSV Jahn Regensburg 1.92 xG vs FC Saarbr\u00fccken 1.58 \u2192 SSV Jahn Regensburg 44.8%",
            "Market: FC Saarbr\u00fccken ~35.3% implied",
            "Market Steam: SSV Jahn Regensburg +0.0%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model and market both lean SSV Jahn Regensburg with no major conflict.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": 9.48,
          "fair_prob": 44.77,
          "label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
          "market_prob": 35.29,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -0.99,
          "fair_prob": 24.35,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 25.34,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -8.49,
          "fair_prob": 30.88,
          "label": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
          "market_prob": 39.37,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 67.9,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 32.1,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 69.0,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 31.1,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 9.48,
        "fair_prob_pct": 44.77,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "market_prob_pct": 35.29,
        "status": "mild_value",
        "steam_team_name": "SSV Jahn Regensburg"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates SSV Jahn Regensburg\u0027s win probability at 44.8%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 35.3%, a difference of 9.5 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "moderate",
          "edge_status": "mild_value",
          "max_gap_pp": 9.48,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "moderate",
        "divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
        "divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
        "divergence_tier": "moderate",
        "edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 35.3,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 9.5,
          "model_prob_pct": 44.8,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 9.5,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "High reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 81,
          "reliability_tier": "high",
          "summary": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Pass",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 36,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 18,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 44,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 18,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: SSV Jahn Regensburg 1.92 xG vs FC Saarbr\u00fccken 1.58 \u2192 SSV Jahn Regensburg 44.8%",
              "Market: FC Saarbr\u00fccken ~35.3% implied",
              "Market Steam: SSV Jahn Regensburg +0.0%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model and market both lean SSV Jahn Regensburg with no major conflict.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 9.48,
        "hero_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "",
          "gap_tier": "mild",
          "lead": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "note": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on SSV Jahn Regensburg."
          ],
          "quiet_market": true,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate still sits above current market pricing on SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
            "Pricing has been stable with broad sportsbook participation, suggesting settled consensus."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 9.48,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
          "status": "pass"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 13.9 pp (at 44.8%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 13.9,
          "max_prob_pct": 44.8,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "medium",
          "tier_label": "Medium"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "moderate",
          "largest_gap_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
          "largest_gap_pp": 9.5,
          "lead": "The model rates SSV Jahn Regensburg considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "moderate",
          "max_gap_pp": 9.5,
          "title": "Moderate Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": 9.48,
            "edge_pp": 9.48,
            "fair_prob_pct": 44.77,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
            "market_prob_pct": 35.29,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -0.99,
            "edge_pp": -0.99,
            "fair_prob_pct": 24.35,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 25.34,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -8.49,
            "edge_pp": -8.49,
            "fair_prob_pct": 30.88,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
            "market_prob_pct": 39.37,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "mild_value",
        "status_label": "Mild Value",
        "steam_note": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers FC Saarbr\u00fccken (35.3%).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 SSV Jahn Regensburg, Market \u2192 FC Saarbr\u00fccken, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 37.04,
        "closing_odds": 2.7,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 37.04,
        "entry_odds": 2.7,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "model_validation_status": "pass",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "show": false
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "11/12",
        "current_odds": 2.55,
        "move_display": "+0.0%",
        "open_odds": 2.55,
        "pick_team": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "steam_score": 28,
        "steam_team_name": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 9.5,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
      "away_team_id": 1639,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1639.webp",
      "away_team_name": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
      "away_team_slug": "fc-saarbrucken",
      "country_code": "DE",
      "country_display_name": "Germany",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/de.svg",
      "country_id": 60,
      "country_name": "Germany",
      "fixture_id": 1583959,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Germany",
      "home_team_display_name": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
      "home_team_id": 177,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/177.webp",
      "home_team_name": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
      "home_team_slug": "ssv-jahn-regensburg",
      "league_country": "Germany",
      "league_country_display": "Germany",
      "league_display_name": "3. Liga",
      "league_id": 80,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/80.webp",
      "league_name": "3. Liga",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-08-16 14:30:00",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Regensburg",
      "venue_name": "Jahnstadion Regensburg"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.5
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.3925,
            "best_odd": 2.42,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0334,
            "ev": -0.1281,
            "implied_prob": 0.3937,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3937,
              "draw": 0.2534,
              "home": 0.3529
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3085,
            "p_final": 0.3603
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2954,
            "best_odd": 3.76,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.003,
            "ev": -0.0585,
            "implied_prob": 0.2534,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3937,
              "draw": 0.2534,
              "home": 0.3529
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2432,
            "p_final": 0.2504
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3856,
            "best_odd": 2.7,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0368,
            "ev": 0.0521,
            "implied_prob": 0.3529,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3937,
              "draw": 0.2534,
              "home": 0.3529
            },
            "model_prob": 0.4483,
            "p_final": 0.3897
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 2.42,
            "edge": -0.1047,
            "ev": -0.2534,
            "implied_prob": 0.4132,
            "model_prob": 0.3085
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.76,
            "edge": -0.0227,
            "ev": -0.0855,
            "implied_prob": 0.266,
            "model_prob": 0.2432
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.7,
            "edge": 0.0779,
            "ev": 0.2103,
            "implied_prob": 0.3704,
            "model_prob": 0.4483
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 3.5,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0521,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.2103,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0521,
      "confidence": 5.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV"
        ],
        "score": 3.7,
        "score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.7,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV"
        ],
        "score": 3.7,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.7
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "B",
        "stake_factor": 0.5
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 9.5,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 9.5,
          "summary": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0521,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.2103,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.7,
        "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 36,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates SSV Jahn Regensburg at 44.8%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 35.3%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies SSV Jahn Regensburg as the value side (44.8%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 9.5,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": null,
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "probability_gap",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side SSV Jahn Regensburg \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.70 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +21% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1583959 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.70 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.7/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "ok"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "81 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "36 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 6,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
          "Decision strength: 3.7/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65",
          "Outlier price +21% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 81,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has repriced SSV Jahn Regensburg, but the model still strongly favours SSV Jahn Regensburg.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0521,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.7,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.3529,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.4483,
          "raw_edge_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 9.5,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.37037037037037035,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2104,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+21.0%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 42.2,
          "reasons": [],
          "recommended_action": "ok",
          "strength_delta": 0.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "ok",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": 0,
            "strength_delta": 0.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.34
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "high_scoring",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.69,
          "draw_prob": 0.2432,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.4483,
          "over_prob": 0.679,
          "total_xg": 3.5,
          "under_prob": 0.321,
          "xg_diff": 0.34
        },
        "type": "high_scoring",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.7,
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0368,
          "ev": 0.0521,
          "implied_prob": 0.3529,
          "max_ev_side": "home",
          "model_prob": 0.4483,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.69,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.679,
          "side": "over",
          "value_side": "over"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1583959,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0521,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3085,
        "draw": 0.2432,
        "home": 0.4483
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "high_total_goals"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "FC Saarbr\u00fccken",
        "home": "SSV Jahn Regensburg"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.018685,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0521,
        "implied_prob": 0.3529,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.4483,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "medium",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "home",
        "side_label": "SSV Jahn Regensburg",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0521,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.7,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.3529,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.4483,
        "raw_edge_display": "+9.5 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 9.5,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.37037037037037035,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.2104,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+21.0%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1583959,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-16T14:30:37.204404+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para SSV Jahn Regensburg & FC Saarbrücken!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
3. Liga 3. Liga — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 MSV Duisburg 7 6 0 1 18
2 FC Viktoria Köln 7 5 0 2 15
3 Rot-Weiß Essen 7 4 2 1 14
4 FC Saarbrücken 7 4 1 2 13
5 Hoffenheim II 7 4 1 2 13
6 Hansa Rostock 7 3 3 1 12
7 Alemannia Aachen 7 3 2 2 11
8 Preußen Münster 7 3 2 2 11
9 Waldhof Mannheim 7 3 1 3 10
10 Fortuna Düsseldorf 7 3 1 3 10
11 Verl 7 3 1 3 10
12 Fortuna Köln 7 2 3 2 9
13 SG Sonnenhof Großaspach 7 2 2 3 8
14 FC Ingolstadt 04 7 2 2 3 8
15 Stuttgart II 7 2 1 4 7
16 Würzburger Kickers 7 2 1 4 7
17 SV Meppen 7 2 0 5 6
18 SSV Jahn Regensburg 7 1 2 4 5
19 SV Wehen Wiesbaden 7 1 2 4 5
20 Havelse 7 1 1 5 4
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 MSV Duisburg 7 19 7 +12 18
2 FC Viktoria Köln 7 19 9 +10 15
3 FC Saarbrücken 7 19 12 +7 13
4 Hansa Rostock 7 15 15 0 12
5 Hoffenheim II 7 14 8 +6 13
6 Rot-Weiß Essen 7 13 9 +4 14
7 SSV Jahn Regensburg 7 13 17 -4 5
8 Preußen Münster 7 12 13 -1 11
9 Stuttgart II 7 12 15 -3 7
10 Alemannia Aachen 7 11 8 +3 11
11 Waldhof Mannheim 7 11 10 +1 10
12 Würzburger Kickers 7 11 15 -4 7
13 Verl 7 10 13 -3 10
14 Havelse 7 10 15 -5 4
15 Fortuna Köln 7 8 8 0 9
16 SV Meppen 7 8 15 -7 6
17 FC Ingolstadt 04 7 7 11 -4 8
18 Fortuna Düsseldorf 7 6 7 -1 10
19 SG Sonnenhof Großaspach 7 6 9 -3 8
20 SV Wehen Wiesbaden 7 5 13 -8 5