Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Académica de Coimbra Benfica B ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-3 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.17
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Benfica B win · Académica de Coimbra 0–3 Benfica B
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "d228e031acd41e5e137226e8b1d315b0baf8876bae4552b34716065f12d1c472",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.27,
"away_win_prob": 0.3377,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2964,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.96,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.73,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.33,
"home_win_prob": 0.3659,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Benfica B",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Benfica B"
},
"away_xg": 1.27,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0734,
"edge_gap": 0.0284,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4394,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 33.8,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 36.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.17
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.17,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.28,
"market_odds": 2.17,
"model_odds": 2.73,
"overround": 4.9,
"prob_edge": -9.5,
"value_pct": -20.5,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 2,
"away_played": 5,
"away_score_rate": 71.9,
"home_clean_sheet": 2,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 5,
"home_score_rate": 73.6,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.27,
"home_expected": 1.33,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra or Draw",
"prob": 66.2
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra or Benfica B",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Benfica B",
"prob": 63.4
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra or Benfica B",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 33.8,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.6,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.8,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 9.5,
"implied_prob": 30.9,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Benfica B Win",
"model_prob": 33.8,
"odds": 3.24
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Benfica B",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 29.43,
"draw": 26.63,
"home": 43.94
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-11 19:44:02",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-11 19:14:22",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.94,
"gap_pp": -7.34,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.63,
"gap_pp": 3.01,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.65
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.43,
"gap_pp": 4.33,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 33.75
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 54.03,
"gap_pp": -5.83,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.97,
"gap_pp": 5.83,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.17,
"early": 2.17,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.94,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.94,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.58,
"early": 3.58,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.63,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 26.63,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.24,
"early": 3.24,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.43,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.43,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.77,
"early": 1.77,
"implied_closing_pct": 54.03,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 54.03,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.08,
"early": 2.08,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.97,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 45.97,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 5.8,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -2.7,
"ev": -0.175,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.6,
"market_prob": 0.1515,
"market_prob_pct": 15.2,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 9,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.33,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0071,
"edge_pp": 0.7,
"market_prob": 0.4865,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 12,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0071,
"ev": -0.0884,
"implied_prob": 0.5135,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5064
},
"p_final": 0.4936,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0158,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0622,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"best_odd": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0071,
"ev": -0.0622,
"implied_prob": 0.4865,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4936
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.0456,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -4.6,
"text": "-4.6%"
},
"ev_under": 0.0619,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.2,
"text": "+6.2%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0619,
"n_bookmakers": 12,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10055.71,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2301,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.004,
"edge_pp": 0.4,
"market_prob": 0.4378,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2301,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.004,
"ev": -0.0724,
"implied_prob": 0.4378,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4417
},
"p_final": 0.4417,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 1.7,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0445,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0724,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2532,
"best_odd": 1.635,
"edge": -0.0044,
"ev": -0.0879,
"implied_prob": 0.5622,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5579
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.001,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.1,
"text": "+0.1%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.0571,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -5.7,
"text": "-5.7%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.001,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 5200.8,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "Some consensus value may remain, but Primary hard gates are not fully cleared.",
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1103,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.0,
"text": "-11.0%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0072,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -0.7,
"text": "-0.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -7.3,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"sort_key": 1798.2,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "7/14",
"alert_breadth_note": "7/14 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"alert_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 7.3,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -7.35,
"hero_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"market_prob_pct": 43.9,
"market_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"model_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 36,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 7.3,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 7.3,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0619,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0936,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 87,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"gates_failed": [
"No clear Primary pick in unified decision"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.99 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +9% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1576485 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.99 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "No clear Primary pick in unified decision",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "83 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": true,
"value": "87 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra).",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"No clear Primary pick in unified decision",
"Outlier price +9% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 83,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Some consensus value may remain, but Primary hard gates are not fully cleared.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1103,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -7.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4608294930875576,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "7/14",
"breadth_ratio": 0.5,
"evidence": {
"score": 78,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 21.3,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 5.0,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 83,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 7.35,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 7.35,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.27,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.33,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.33,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.33 \u00b7 Away xG 1.27 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.7,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"steam_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 87,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 63,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 63,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Some consensus value may remain, but Primary hard gates are not fully cleared.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 7.3,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 7.3,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0619,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0936,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 87,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"gates_failed": [
"No clear Primary pick in unified decision"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.99 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +9% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1576485 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.99 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "No clear Primary pick in unified decision",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "83 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": true,
"value": "87 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra).",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"No clear Primary pick in unified decision",
"Outlier price +9% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 83,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Some consensus value may remain, but Primary hard gates are not fully cleared.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1103,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -7.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4608294930875576,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "Some consensus value may remain, but Primary hard gates are not fully cleared.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra 1.33 xG vs Benfica B 1.27 \u2192 Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra 36.6%",
"Market: Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra ~43.9% implied",
"Market Steam: Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u2193 -6.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -7.35,
"fair_prob": 36.59,
"label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"market_prob": 43.94,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.01,
"fair_prob": 29.64,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 26.63,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.34,
"fair_prob": 33.77,
"label": "Benfica B",
"market_prob": 29.43,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -2.67,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 50.87,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.67,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 49.13,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.66,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 56.16,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.66,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 43.84,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -7.35,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"market_prob_pct": 43.94,
"status": "market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra\u0027s win probability at 43.9%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 36.6%, a difference of 7.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 7.35,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 43.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -7.3,
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -7.3,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "High reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 83,
"reliability_tier": "high",
"summary": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 87,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 63,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 63,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra 1.33 xG vs Benfica B 1.27 \u2192 Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra 36.6%",
"Market: Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra ~43.9% implied",
"Market Steam: Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u2193 -6.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -7.35,
"hero_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra odds shortened \u2193 -6.7%.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model broadly agree on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market still prices Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra above the current fair estimate.",
"Recent line movement on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra (\u2193 -6.7%) aligns with the pricing gap."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 7.35,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
"max_prob_pct": 36.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"largest_gap_pp": -7.3,
"lead": "The closing market prices Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 7.3,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -7.35,
"edge_pp": -7.35,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"market_prob_pct": 43.94,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.01,
"edge_pp": 3.01,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 26.63,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 4.34,
"edge_pp": 4.34,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Benfica B",
"market_prob_pct": 29.43,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_ahead",
"status_label": "Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": false,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra (43.9%).",
"Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra has attracted notable multi-book line movement (\u2193 -6.7%, 7/14).",
"Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 46.08,
"closing_odds": 2.17,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 46.08,
"entry_odds": 2.17,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 7,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -7.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -7.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -7.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -6.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -2.1
}
],
"books_total": 14,
"breadth_display": "7/14",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.1,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 6.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 49h 37m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Volatile two-way pricing on Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra (swing 2.40 \u2192 2.10 \u2192 2.10) \u2014 net 6.7% but intraday chop is elevated.",
"Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.25",
"2.17",
"2.10"
],
"display": "2.40 \u2192 2.10 \u2192 2.10",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 49h 37m",
"pick_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.40"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.10"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.10"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.25,
2.17,
2.1
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,9.6 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.25"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.10"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.25"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.10"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.25,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Volatile",
"phase_tip": "High disagreement or chop \u2014 low reliability for directional bets.",
"pick_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Pinnacle",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "warn",
"signal_icon": "\u26a0\ufe0f",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.1,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"open_odds": 2.25,
"summary": "Sharp money supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "volatile_market",
"signal_label": "Volatile market",
"steam_score": 36,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "7/14",
"current_odds": 2.1,
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"open_odds": 2.25,
"pick_team": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"steam_score": 36,
"steam_team_name": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 7.3,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "benfica-b",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Benfica B",
"away_team_id": 229,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/229.webp",
"away_team_name": "Benfica B",
"away_team_public_id": "5V57SE9sLQWBDZ",
"away_team_slug": "benfica-b",
"country_code": "PT",
"country_display_name": "Portugal",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/pt.svg",
"country_id": 129,
"country_name": "Portugal",
"fixture_id": 1576485,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Portugal",
"home_team_display_name": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"home_team_id": 239,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/239.webp",
"home_team_name": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"home_team_public_id": "2C3iTyzxeSAgDt",
"home_team_slug": "academica",
"ht.home_team_slug": "academica",
"league_country": "Portugal",
"league_country_display": "Portugal",
"league_display_name": "Segunda Liga",
"league_id": 95,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/95.webp",
"league_name": "Segunda Liga",
"league_public_id": "4K3g7xxdvkF5vX",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-11 19:45:00",
"public_id": "5wTJ9gfubfs2Gf",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Coimbra",
"venue_name": "Estadio EFAPEL Cidade de Coimbra"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2805,
"best_odd": 3.24,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0072,
"implied_prob": 0.2943,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2943,
"draw": 0.2663,
"home": 0.4394
},
"model_prob": 0.3375,
"p_final": 0.3064
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2864,
"best_odd": 3.58,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0086,
"ev": -0.0156,
"implied_prob": 0.2663,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2943,
"draw": 0.2663,
"home": 0.4394
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.275
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4005,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0294,
"ev": -0.1103,
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2943,
"draw": 0.2663,
"home": 0.4394
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"p_final": 0.41
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.24,
"edge": 0.0289,
"ev": 0.0936,
"implied_prob": 0.3086,
"model_prob": 0.3375
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.58,
"edge": 0.0171,
"ev": 0.0614,
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"model_prob": 0.2965
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": -0.0948,
"ev": -0.2058,
"implied_prob": 0.4608,
"model_prob": 0.366
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2301,
"alpha_yes": 0.2532,
"best_no_odd": 2.2,
"best_yes_odd": 1.73,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0166,
"edge_yes": -0.0166,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.001,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0724,
"ev_yes": -0.0571,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0879,
"implied_no": 0.4384,
"implied_yes": 0.5616,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2301,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.004,
"ev": -0.0724,
"implied_prob": 0.4378,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4417
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2532,
"best_odd": 1.635,
"edge": -0.0044,
"ev": -0.0879,
"implied_prob": 0.5622,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5579
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"p_final_no": 0.4417,
"p_final_yes": 0.5579,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2251,
"alpha_under": 0.2251,
"best_over_odd": 1.98,
"best_under_odd": 2.05,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.8,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.9,
"edge_over": -0.0267,
"edge_under": 0.0267,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.0456,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0884,
"ev_under": 0.0619,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0622,
"implied_over": 0.5087,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5135,
"implied_under": 0.4913,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4865,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 12,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0071,
"ev": -0.0884,
"implied_prob": 0.5135,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5064
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"best_odd": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0071,
"ev": -0.0622,
"implied_prob": 0.4865,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4936
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 12,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5064,
"p_final_under": 0.4936,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0619,
"implied_prob": 0.4913,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "alternative",
"side": "under",
"slot": "alternative"
},
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0619,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0936,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0619,
"confidence": 4.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.5,
"score_v1_legacy": 4.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.5,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.5,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.5
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "C",
"stake_factor": 0.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 7.3,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0619,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0936,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 87,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 7.3,
"gates_failed": [
"No clear Primary pick in unified decision"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.99 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +9% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1576485 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.99 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "No clear Primary pick in unified decision",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "83 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": true,
"value": "87 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra).",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"No clear Primary pick in unified decision",
"Outlier price +9% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 83,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Some consensus value may remain, but Primary hard gates are not fully cleared.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1103,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -7.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4608294930875576,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.06
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0619,
"hero_display_only": true,
"implied_prob": 0.4913,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "hero_display",
"side": "under",
"slot": "hero_display"
},
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0294,
"ev": -0.1103,
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.366,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2301,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.004,
"market_prob": 0.4378,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2301,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.004,
"ev": -0.0724,
"implied_prob": 0.4378,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4417
},
"p_final": 0.4417,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0724,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2532,
"best_odd": 1.635,
"edge": -0.0044,
"ev": -0.0879,
"implied_prob": 0.5622,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5579
}
},
"edge": 0.0166,
"ev": 0.001,
"implied_prob": 0.4384,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0071,
"market_prob": 0.4865,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 12,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0071,
"ev": -0.0884,
"implied_prob": 0.5135,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5064
},
"p_final": 0.4936,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0622,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2251,
"best_odd": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0071,
"ev": -0.0622,
"implied_prob": 0.4865,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4936
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0267,
"ev": 0.0619,
"implied_prob": 0.4913,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1576485,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0619,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3375,
"draw": 0.2965,
"home": 0.366
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0619,
"implied_prob": 0.4913,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0619,
"implied_prob": 0.4913,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Benfica B",
"home": "Acad\u00e9mica de Coimbra"
},
"top_pick": null,
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1103,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4394,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-7.3 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -7.3,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4608294930875576,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1576485,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-11T19:44:06.656843+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Académica de Coimbra & Benfica B!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Segunda Liga — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lusitânia Lourosa | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 |
| 2 | Penafiel | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 3 | Sporting CP B | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| 4 | Vizela | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 5 | Benfica B | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 6 | União de Leiria | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 7 | Leixões | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 8 | Académica de Coimbra | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| 9 | Tondela | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| 10 | Farense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 11 | Portimonense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 12 | AVS | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 13 | Felgueiras 1932 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 14 | Torreense | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 15 | Amarante | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 16 | Chaves | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 17 | FC Porto B | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 18 | Feirense | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Penafiel | 6 | 13 | 5 | +8 | 13 |
| 2 | Lusitânia Lourosa | 6 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 16 |
| 3 | União de Leiria | 6 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 10 |
| 4 | Sporting CP B | 6 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 12 |
| 5 | Leixões | 6 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 10 |
| 6 | Académica de Coimbra | 6 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 9 |
| 7 | Vizela | 6 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 11 |
| 8 | Benfica B | 6 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 10 |
| 9 | Farense | 5 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 8 |
| 10 | Tondela | 6 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 9 |
| 11 | Torreense | 6 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 6 |
| 12 | AVS | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 13 | Felgueiras 1932 | 6 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 6 |
| 14 | Amarante | 6 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 5 |
| 15 | Chaves | 5 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 4 |
| 16 | Portimonense | 6 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 7 |
| 17 | FC Porto B | 6 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 4 |
| 18 | Feirense | 6 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 1 |
