Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 VSK Århus Brabrand ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-2 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
Pending
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Brabrand win · VSK Århus 0–2 Brabrand
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "a5ada518f21dbc71bbba21eac5eca9502f39daaa20395e34b3fd0a8e47961502",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.21,
"away_win_prob": 0.3103,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.457,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.543,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2951,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.22,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.39,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.53,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.39,
"home_win_prob": 0.3946,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Brabrand",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Brabrand"
},
"away_xg": 1.21,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0684,
"edge_gap": 0.0846,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4633,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 31.0,
"draw": 29.5,
"home": 39.5
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.93
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.93,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "VSK \u00c5rhus Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.16,
"market_odds": 1.93,
"model_odds": 2.53,
"overround": 11.8,
"prob_edge": -12.3,
"value_pct": -23.7,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 2,
"away_played": 8,
"away_score_rate": 70.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 4,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 8,
"home_score_rate": 75.1,
"no_prob": 45.7,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.3,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.3
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.21,
"home_expected": 1.39,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.6
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "VSK \u00c5rhus or Draw",
"prob": 69.0
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "VSK \u00c5rhus or Brabrand",
"prob": 70.5
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Brabrand",
"prob": 60.5
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus or Brabrand",
"pick_prob": 70.5
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 31.0,
"draw_pct": 29.5,
"home_pct": 39.5,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.1,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 1.2,
"implied_prob": 29.2,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market": "Draw",
"model_prob": 29.5,
"odds": 3.43
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Brabrand",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 27.6,
"draw": 26.07,
"home": 46.33
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-02 17:00:58",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-10-02 16:31:19",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 46.33,
"gap_pp": -6.84,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 39.49
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.07,
"gap_pp": 3.41,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.47
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.6,
"gap_pp": 3.43,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 31.03
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 51.88,
"gap_pp": -3.68,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.12,
"gap_pp": 3.68,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.93,
"early": 1.93,
"implied_closing_pct": 46.33,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 46.33,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.43,
"early": 3.43,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.07,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 26.07,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.24,
"early": 3.24,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.6,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.6,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.79,
"early": 1.79,
"implied_closing_pct": 51.88,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 51.88,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.93,
"early": 1.93,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.12,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.12,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 3.7,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 0.2,
"ev": 0.0125,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 8.1,
"market_prob": 0.1235,
"market_prob_pct": 12.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.3
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.6
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.39,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2105,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0091,
"edge_pp": 0.9,
"market_prob": 0.475,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2315,
"best_odd": 1.755,
"edge": -0.01,
"ev": -0.0961,
"implied_prob": 0.525,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5151
},
"p_final": 0.484,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.3,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0049,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.061,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2105,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0091,
"ev": -0.061,
"implied_prob": 0.475,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.484
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1276,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -12.8,
"text": "-12.8%"
},
"ev_under": 0.036,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 3.6,
"text": "+3.6%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.036,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10032.4,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.219,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0039,
"edge_pp": 0.4,
"market_prob": 0.4393,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.457,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.219,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.0694,
"implied_prob": 0.4393,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"p_final": 0.4431
},
"p_final": 0.4431,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 1.8,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0403,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0694,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2409,
"best_odd": 1.645,
"edge": -0.0043,
"ev": -0.0846,
"implied_prob": 0.5607,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"p_final": 0.5565
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0174,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -1.7,
"text": "-1.7%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.0932,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -9.3,
"text": "-9.3%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": -0.0174,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 45.7,
"sort_key": 1795.65,
"tier": "bad_ev",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.3
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"consensus_odds": 1.93,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1769,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -17.7,
"text": "-17.7%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0726,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -7.3,
"text": "-7.3%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -6.8,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2378,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"sort_key": 1781.85,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "8/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "8/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -20.7%",
"alert_team": "Brabrand",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 6.9,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -6.87,
"hero_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"market_prob_pct": 46.3,
"market_team": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"model_prob_pct": 39.5,
"model_team": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 99,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.1,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates VSK \u00c5rhus at 39.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 46.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies VSK \u00c5rhus as the value side (39.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 6.8,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"edge_low",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "weak_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +3.6% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
"ok": false
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +3.6% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +3.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": false,
"value": "+3.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1769,
"consensus_ev_display": "-17.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.93,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -6.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5181347150259068,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2378,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "8/8",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 21.6,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 79,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 6.87,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 6.87,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.21,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.39,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.39,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.39 \u00b7 Away xG 1.21 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +3%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.7,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -20.7%",
"steam_team": "Brabrand",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 23,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 23,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.1,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates VSK \u00c5rhus at 39.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 46.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies VSK \u00c5rhus as the value side (39.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 6.8,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"edge_low",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "weak_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +3.6% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
"ok": false
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +3.6% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +3.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": false,
"value": "+3.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1769,
"consensus_ev_display": "-17.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.93,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -6.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5181347150259068,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2378,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: VSK \u00c5rhus 1.39 xG vs Brabrand 1.21 \u2192 VSK \u00c5rhus 39.5%",
"Market: VSK \u00c5rhus ~46.3% implied",
"Market Steam: Brabrand \u2193 -20.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours VSK \u00c5rhus, but sharp money moved toward Brabrand.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -6.87,
"fair_prob": 39.46,
"label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"market_prob": 46.33,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.44,
"fair_prob": 29.51,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 26.07,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.43,
"fair_prob": 31.03,
"label": "Brabrand",
"market_prob": 27.6,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.23,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 52.43,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.23,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 47.57,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.62,
"fair_prob": 54.3,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 55.92,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.62,
"fair_prob": 45.7,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 44.08,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -6.87,
"fair_prob_pct": 39.46,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"market_prob_pct": 46.33,
"status": "market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Brabrand"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates VSK \u00c5rhus\u0027s win probability at 46.3%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 39.5%, a difference of 6.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 6.87,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 46.3,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -6.8,
"model_prob_pct": 39.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -6.8,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 79,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 23,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 23,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: VSK \u00c5rhus 1.39 xG vs Brabrand 1.21 \u2192 VSK \u00c5rhus 39.5%",
"Market: VSK \u00c5rhus ~46.3% implied",
"Market Steam: Brabrand \u2193 -20.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours VSK \u00c5rhus, but sharp money moved toward Brabrand.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -6.87,
"hero_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Brabrand odds shortened \u2193 -20.7%.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Brabrand, with odds shortening by 20.7%.",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The market and model broadly agree on VSK \u00c5rhus. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"note": "Buying interest on Brabrand \u2014 odds shortened by 20.7%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model broadly agree on VSK \u00c5rhus. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Brabrand, with odds shortening by 20.7%.",
"Buying interest on Brabrand \u2014 odds shortened by 20.7%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market still prices VSK \u00c5rhus above the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Brabrand has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 20.7%.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (8/8) supports the current market view on Brabrand."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 6.87,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 8.4 pp (at 39.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 8.4,
"max_prob_pct": 39.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"largest_gap_pp": -6.9,
"lead": "The closing market prices VSK \u00c5rhus higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 6.9,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -6.87,
"edge_pp": -6.87,
"fair_prob_pct": 39.46,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"market_prob_pct": 46.33,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.44,
"edge_pp": 3.44,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.51,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 26.07,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.43,
"edge_pp": 3.43,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.03,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Brabrand",
"market_prob_pct": 27.6,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_ahead",
"status_label": "Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Brabrand \u2014 odds shortened by 20.7%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers VSK \u00c5rhus (46.3%).",
"However, Brabrand has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -20.7%, 8/8).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 VSK \u00c5rhus, Market \u2192 VSK \u00c5rhus, Recent sharp money \u2192 Brabrand.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 51.81,
"closing_odds": 1.93,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 51.81,
"entry_odds": 1.93,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 8,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -29.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -29.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -28.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -28.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -25.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -25.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -21.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -21.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -20.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.7
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "8/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.25,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -20.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 20.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 36h 50m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"8/8 books synchronized on Brabrand (20.7% steam, score 99) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.10",
"3.67",
"3.24"
],
"display": "4.60 \u2192 3.10 \u2192 3.25",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 36h 50m",
"pick_team": "Brabrand",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.60"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.25"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
4.1,
3.24,
3.25
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,18.0 56.0,17.8",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.10"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.24"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.10"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.25"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 4.1,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: Brabrand \u2193 -20.7% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Brabrand",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: Brabrand \u2193 -20.7% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.25,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -20.7%",
"open_odds": 4.1,
"summary": "Market moved toward Brabrand while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Brabrand",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 99,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "8/8",
"current_odds": 3.25,
"move_display": "\u2193 -20.7%",
"open_odds": 4.1,
"pick_team": "Brabrand",
"steam_score": 99,
"steam_team_name": "Brabrand",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 6.9,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "brabrand",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Brabrand",
"away_team_id": 2071,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/2071.webp",
"away_team_name": "Brabrand",
"away_team_public_id": "5YmAIqhmG68uIm",
"away_team_slug": "brabrand",
"country_code": "DK",
"country_display_name": "Denmark",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/dk.svg",
"country_id": 44,
"country_name": "Denmark",
"fixture_id": 1575808,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Denmark",
"home_team_display_name": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"home_team_id": 6064,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/6064.webp",
"home_team_name": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"home_team_public_id": "2W5aRcWvGLDWmx",
"home_team_slug": "vsk-arhus",
"ht.home_team_slug": "vsk-arhus",
"league_country": "Denmark",
"league_country_display": "Denmark",
"league_display_name": "Segunda Divisi\u00f3n de Dinamarca",
"league_id": 122,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/122.webp",
"league_name": "Segunda Divisi\u00f3n de Dinamarca",
"league_public_id": "33l1w2IW44eeLB",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-02 17:00:00",
"public_id": "3TrJn2i5WMoGVB",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2846,
"best_odd": 3.24,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0098,
"ev": -0.0742,
"implied_prob": 0.276,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.276,
"draw": 0.2607,
"home": 0.4633
},
"model_prob": 0.3103,
"p_final": 0.2858
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2847,
"best_odd": 3.43,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0097,
"ev": -0.0726,
"implied_prob": 0.2607,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.276,
"draw": 0.2607,
"home": 0.4633
},
"model_prob": 0.2947,
"p_final": 0.2704
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.5385,
"best_odd": 1.93,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0368,
"ev": -0.1769,
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.276,
"draw": 0.2607,
"home": 0.4633
},
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"p_final": 0.4265
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.24,
"edge": 0.0017,
"ev": 0.0054,
"implied_prob": 0.3086,
"model_prob": 0.3103
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.43,
"edge": 0.0032,
"ev": 0.011,
"implied_prob": 0.2915,
"model_prob": 0.2947
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.93,
"edge": -0.1232,
"ev": -0.2378,
"implied_prob": 0.5181,
"model_prob": 0.3949
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.219,
"alpha_yes": 0.2409,
"best_no_odd": 2.15,
"best_yes_odd": 1.67,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0162,
"edge_yes": -0.0162,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0174,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0694,
"ev_yes": -0.0932,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0846,
"implied_no": 0.4408,
"implied_yes": 0.5592,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.219,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.0694,
"implied_prob": 0.4393,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"p_final": 0.4431
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2409,
"best_odd": 1.645,
"edge": -0.0043,
"ev": -0.0846,
"implied_prob": 0.5607,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"p_final": 0.5565
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4431,
"p_final_yes": 0.5565,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2315,
"alpha_under": 0.2105,
"best_over_odd": 1.81,
"best_under_odd": 2.0,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.755,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.94,
"edge_over": -0.0423,
"edge_under": 0.0423,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1276,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0961,
"ev_under": 0.036,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.061,
"implied_over": 0.5243,
"implied_over_mf": 0.525,
"implied_under": 0.4757,
"implied_under_mf": 0.475,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2315,
"best_odd": 1.755,
"edge": -0.01,
"ev": -0.0961,
"implied_prob": 0.525,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5151
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2105,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0091,
"ev": -0.061,
"implied_prob": 0.475,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.484
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5151,
"p_final_under": 0.484,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.036,
"confidence": 4.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 4.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.1,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.1
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "C",
"stake_factor": 0.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 6.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 6.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.1,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates VSK \u00c5rhus at 39.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 46.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies VSK \u00c5rhus as the value side (39.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 6.8,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "VSK \u00c5rhus",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"edge_low",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "weak_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +3.6% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
"ok": false
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +3.6% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +3.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": false,
"value": "+3.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Thin consensus value",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Brabrand, but the model still strongly favours VSK \u00c5rhus.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1769,
"consensus_ev_display": "-17.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.93,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -6.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5181347150259068,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2378,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.543,
"draw_prob": 0.2947,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3949,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.18
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.036,
"hero_display_only": true,
"implied_prob": 0.4757,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "hero_display",
"side": "under",
"slot": "hero_display"
},
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.93,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0368,
"ev": -0.1769,
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"max_ev_side": "draw",
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "VSK \u00c5rhus"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.219,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0039,
"market_prob": 0.4393,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.457,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.219,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.0694,
"implied_prob": 0.4393,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"p_final": 0.4431
},
"p_final": 0.4431,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0694,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2409,
"best_odd": 1.645,
"edge": -0.0043,
"ev": -0.0846,
"implied_prob": 0.5607,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"p_final": 0.5565
}
},
"edge": 0.0162,
"ev": -0.0174,
"implied_prob": 0.4408,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2105,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0091,
"market_prob": 0.475,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2315,
"best_odd": 1.755,
"edge": -0.01,
"ev": -0.0961,
"implied_prob": 0.525,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5151
},
"p_final": 0.484,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.061,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2105,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0091,
"ev": -0.061,
"implied_prob": 0.475,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.484
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0423,
"ev": 0.036,
"implied_prob": 0.4757,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1575808,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": false,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"max_valid_ev": 0.036,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3103,
"draw": 0.2947,
"home": 0.3949
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Brabrand",
"home": "VSK \u00c5rhus"
},
"top_pick": null,
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1769,
"consensus_ev_display": "-17.7%",
"consensus_odds": 1.93,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4633,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-6.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -6.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5181347150259068,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2378,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-23.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1575808,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-02T17:01:00.765504+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para VSK Århus & Brabrand!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Segunda División de Dinamarca — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nykøbing FC | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 22 |
| 2 | Roskilde | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 21 |
| 3 | VSK Århus | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 |
| 4 | B 93 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
| 5 | Middelfart | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 17 |
| 6 | Naestved | 11 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 16 |
| 7 | Skive | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 14 |
| 8 | Fremad Amager | 11 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 14 |
| 9 | Brabrand | 11 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 12 |
| 10 | HIK | 11 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| 11 | FA 2000 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| 12 | Thisted FC | 11 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nykøbing FC | 10 | 25 | 11 | +14 | 22 |
| 2 | Roskilde | 11 | 21 | 10 | +11 | 21 |
| 3 | Middelfart | 11 | 19 | 13 | +6 | 17 |
| 4 | B 93 | 11 | 19 | 14 | +5 | 18 |
| 5 | Naestved | 11 | 15 | 13 | +2 | 16 |
| 6 | VSK Århus | 10 | 14 | 7 | +7 | 18 |
| 7 | Skive | 11 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 14 |
| 8 | Fremad Amager | 11 | 13 | 16 | -3 | 14 |
| 9 | Brabrand | 11 | 13 | 18 | -5 | 12 |
| 10 | FA 2000 | 11 | 11 | 23 | -12 | 6 |
| 11 | HIK | 11 | 9 | 19 | -10 | 9 |
| 12 | Thisted FC | 11 | 9 | 22 | -13 | 5 |
