Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (0 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 Las Palmas Atlético Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-0 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
Pending
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Draw · Las Palmas Atlético 0–0 CD Badajoz
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "0e5dbae81177469b139343d6773d7e6bb46bf786d8d7cda71a56475efae37205",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.28,
"away_win_prob": 0.3424,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.92,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.77,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.32,
"home_win_prob": 0.3611,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or CD Badajoz and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "CD Badajoz"
},
"away_xg": 1.28,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0259,
"edge_gap": 0.0185,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3868,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 34.2,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 36.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.37
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.37,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.59,
"market_odds": 2.37,
"model_odds": 2.77,
"overround": 9.1,
"prob_edge": -6.1,
"value_pct": -14.4,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 3,
"away_score_rate": 72.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 73.3,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.28,
"home_expected": 1.32,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico or Draw",
"prob": 65.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico or CD Badajoz",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or CD Badajoz",
"prob": 63.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico or CD Badajoz",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 34.2,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.3,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 0.3,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": -14.4,
"implied_prob": 42.2,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico Win",
"model_prob": 36.1,
"odds": 2.37
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "CD Badajoz",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 31.94,
"draw": 29.38,
"home": 38.68
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 11:01:34",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 10:32:19",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 38.68,
"gap_pp": -2.59,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.09
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.38,
"gap_pp": 0.29,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.67
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.94,
"gap_pp": 2.3,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 34.24
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.02,
"gap_pp": 0.18,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 51.98,
"gap_pp": -0.18,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.37,
"early": 2.37,
"implied_closing_pct": 38.68,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 38.68,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.12,
"early": 3.12,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.38,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.38,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.87,
"early": 2.87,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.94,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 31.94,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.97,
"early": 1.97,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.02,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.02,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.82,
"early": 1.82,
"implied_closing_pct": 51.98,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 51.98,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 2.3,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -2.9,
"ev": -0.1875,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.5,
"market_prob": 0.1538,
"market_prob_pct": 15.4,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.32,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2174,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0049,
"edge_pp": 0.5,
"market_prob": 0.4596,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2174,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0049,
"ev": -0.0989,
"implied_prob": 0.4596,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4645
},
"p_final": 0.4645,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.2,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0649,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0989,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2392,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.0054,
"ev": -0.1172,
"implied_prob": 0.5404,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.535
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0604,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.0,
"text": "+6.0%"
},
"ev_under": -0.0572,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -5.7,
"text": "-5.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0604,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10054.36,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2377,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.74,
"edge": 0.0063,
"edge_pp": 0.6,
"market_prob": 0.5187,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2161,
"best_odd": 1.875,
"edge": -0.0057,
"ev": -0.1082,
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4756
},
"p_final": 0.5249,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.6,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0517,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0866,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2377,
"best_odd": 1.74,
"edge": 0.0063,
"ev": -0.0866,
"implied_prob": 0.5187,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5249
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1082,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.8,
"text": "-10.8%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.0299,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.0,
"text": "-3.0%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": -0.0299,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 1792.525,
"tier": "bad_ev",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"consensus_odds": 2.37,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.1098,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.0,
"text": "-11.0%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0546,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -5.5,
"text": "-5.5%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -2.6,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1447,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-14.5%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"sort_key": 1786.35,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "7/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "7/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"alert_team": "CD Badajoz",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 2.6,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -2.57,
"hero_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"market_prob_pct": 38.7,
"market_team": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"model_team": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 94,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0604,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0604,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.3,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1098,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.37,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -2.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42194092827004215,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1447,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-14.5%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "7/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.875,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 23.7,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 8.8,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 79,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 2.57,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 2.57,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.28,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -2.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.32,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.32,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.32 \u00b7 Away xG 1.28 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -2%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.0,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"steam_team": "CD Badajoz",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0604,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0604,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.3,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1098,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.37,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -2.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42194092827004215,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1447,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-14.5%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico 1.32 xG vs CD Badajoz 1.28 \u2192 Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico 36.1%",
"Market: Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico ~38.7% implied",
"Market Steam: CD Badajoz \u2193 -20.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico, but sharp money moved toward CD Badajoz.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -2.57,
"fair_prob": 36.11,
"label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"market_prob": 38.68,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.27,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 29.38,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.3,
"fair_prob": 34.24,
"label": "CD Badajoz",
"market_prob": 31.94,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.02,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 46.18,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -2.02,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 53.82,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.39,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 52.11,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -2.39,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 47.89,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "aligned",
"edge_pp": -2.57,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"market_prob_pct": 38.68,
"status": "market_efficient",
"steam_team_name": "CD Badajoz"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "market_efficient",
"max_gap_pp": 2.57,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "Aligned",
"edge_label_key": "aligned",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 38.7,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -2.6,
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -2.6,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 79,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico 1.32 xG vs CD Badajoz 1.28 \u2192 Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico 36.1%",
"Market: Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico ~38.7% implied",
"Market Steam: CD Badajoz \u2193 -20.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico, but sharp money moved toward CD Badajoz.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -2.57,
"hero_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "CD Badajoz odds shortened \u2193 -20.0%.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Current pricing remains close to the model baseline."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on CD Badajoz, with odds shortening by 20.0%.",
"gap_tier": "aligned",
"lead": "The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"note": "Buying interest on CD Badajoz \u2014 odds shortened by 20.0%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on CD Badajoz, with odds shortening by 20.0%.",
"Buying interest on CD Badajoz \u2014 odds shortened by 20.0%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"Market pricing and the fair estimate remain broadly aligned.",
"At the same time, CD Badajoz has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 20.0%.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (7/8) supports the current market view on CD Badajoz."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 2.57,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 1.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 1.9,
"max_prob_pct": 36.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"largest_gap_pp": -2.6,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 2.6,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -2.57,
"edge_pp": -2.57,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"market_prob_pct": 38.68,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.27,
"edge_pp": 0.27,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 29.38,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 2.3,
"edge_pp": 2.3,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "CD Badajoz",
"market_prob_pct": 31.94,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_efficient",
"status_label": "Market Efficient",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on CD Badajoz \u2014 odds shortened by 20.0%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico (38.7%).",
"However, CD Badajoz has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -20.0%, 7/8).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico, Market \u2192 Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico, Recent sharp money \u2192 CD Badajoz.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 42.19,
"closing_odds": 2.37,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 42.19,
"entry_odds": 2.37,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 7,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -20.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -20.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -12.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -12.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -11.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -11.4
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "7/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.8,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"move_pct_abs": 20.0,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 99h 30m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"7/8 books synchronized on CD Badajoz (20.0% steam, score 94) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -20.0,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.50",
"3.15",
"2.80"
],
"display": "3.60 \u2192 2.55 \u2192 2.80",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 99h 30m",
"pick_team": "CD Badajoz",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.60"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.55"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.80"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.5,
2.87,
2.8
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,16.2 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.50"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.80"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.50"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.80"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.5,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: CD Badajoz \u2193 -20.0% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "CD Badajoz",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: CD Badajoz \u2193 -20.0% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.8,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"open_odds": 3.5,
"summary": "Market moved toward CD Badajoz while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "CD Badajoz",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 94,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "7/8",
"current_odds": 2.8,
"move_display": "\u2193 -20.0%",
"open_odds": 3.5,
"pick_team": "CD Badajoz",
"steam_score": 94,
"steam_team_name": "CD Badajoz",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 2.6,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "badajoz",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "CD Badajoz",
"away_team_id": 9382,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/9382.webp",
"away_team_name": "CD Badajoz",
"away_team_public_id": "1Kr0rqSnvwHSgj",
"away_team_slug": "badajoz",
"country_code": "ES",
"country_display_name": "Spain",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/es.svg",
"country_id": 145,
"country_name": "Spain",
"fixture_id": 1572980,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Spain",
"home_team_display_name": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"home_team_id": 9574,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/9574.webp",
"home_team_name": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"home_team_public_id": "34uUBrYlGv5aRK",
"home_team_slug": "las-palmas-ii",
"ht.home_team_slug": "las-palmas-ii",
"league_country": "Spain",
"league_country_display": "Spain",
"league_display_name": "Segunda Federaci\u00f3n - Grupo 4",
"league_id": 878,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/878.webp",
"league_name": "Segunda Federaci\u00f3n - Grupo 4",
"league_public_id": "3uGTsqWqb9LWmy",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-27 11:00:00",
"public_id": "5evotZXpqbAhFJ",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4345,
"best_odd": 2.87,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.01,
"ev": -0.0546,
"implied_prob": 0.3194,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3194,
"draw": 0.2938,
"home": 0.3868
},
"model_prob": 0.3424,
"p_final": 0.3294
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2987,
"best_odd": 3.12,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0009,
"ev": -0.0806,
"implied_prob": 0.2938,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3194,
"draw": 0.2938,
"home": 0.3868
},
"model_prob": 0.2967,
"p_final": 0.2947
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4325,
"best_odd": 2.37,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0112,
"ev": -0.1098,
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3194,
"draw": 0.2938,
"home": 0.3868
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"p_final": 0.3756
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.87,
"edge": -0.006,
"ev": -0.0173,
"implied_prob": 0.3484,
"model_prob": 0.3424
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.12,
"edge": -0.0238,
"ev": -0.0744,
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"model_prob": 0.2967
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.37,
"edge": -0.061,
"ev": -0.1446,
"implied_prob": 0.4219,
"model_prob": 0.3609
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2161,
"alpha_yes": 0.2377,
"best_no_odd": 1.96,
"best_yes_odd": 1.78,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0239,
"edge_yes": 0.0239,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1082,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1082,
"ev_yes": -0.0299,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0866,
"implied_no": 0.4789,
"implied_yes": 0.5211,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2161,
"best_odd": 1.875,
"edge": -0.0057,
"ev": -0.1082,
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4756
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2377,
"best_odd": 1.74,
"edge": 0.0063,
"ev": -0.0866,
"implied_prob": 0.5187,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5249
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"p_final_no": 0.4756,
"p_final_yes": 0.5249,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2174,
"alpha_under": 0.2392,
"best_over_odd": 2.2,
"best_under_odd": 1.82,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.94,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.65,
"edge_over": 0.0202,
"edge_under": -0.0202,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0604,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0989,
"ev_under": -0.0572,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1172,
"implied_over": 0.4618,
"implied_over_mf": 0.4596,
"implied_under": 0.5382,
"implied_under_mf": 0.5404,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2174,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0049,
"ev": -0.0989,
"implied_prob": 0.4596,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4645
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2392,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.0054,
"ev": -0.1172,
"implied_prob": 0.5404,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.535
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4645,
"p_final_under": 0.535,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0604,
"implied_prob": 0.4618,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "alternative",
"side": "over",
"slot": "alternative"
},
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0604,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0604,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0604,
"confidence": 4.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 4.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.3,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.3
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "C",
"stake_factor": 0.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0604,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0604,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.3,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": false,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward CD Badajoz, but the model still strongly favours Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1098,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.37,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -2.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42194092827004215,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1447,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-14.5%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2967,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3609,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.04
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0604,
"hero_display_only": true,
"implied_prob": 0.4618,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "hero_display",
"side": "over",
"slot": "hero_display"
},
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.37,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0112,
"ev": -0.1098,
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2377,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.74,
"edge": 0.0063,
"market_prob": 0.5187,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2161,
"best_odd": 1.875,
"edge": -0.0057,
"ev": -0.1082,
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4756
},
"p_final": 0.5249,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0866,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2377,
"best_odd": 1.74,
"edge": 0.0063,
"ev": -0.0866,
"implied_prob": 0.5187,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5249
}
},
"edge": 0.0239,
"ev": -0.0299,
"implied_prob": 0.5211,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2174,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0049,
"market_prob": 0.4596,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2174,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": 0.0049,
"ev": -0.0989,
"implied_prob": 0.4596,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4645
},
"p_final": 0.4645,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0989,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2392,
"best_odd": 1.65,
"edge": -0.0054,
"ev": -0.1172,
"implied_prob": 0.5404,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.535
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.0202,
"ev": 0.0604,
"implied_prob": 0.4618,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1572980,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0604,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3424,
"draw": 0.2967,
"home": 0.3609
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0604,
"implied_prob": 0.4618,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0604,
"implied_prob": 0.4618,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "CD Badajoz",
"home": "Las Palmas Atl\u00e9tico"
},
"top_pick": null,
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1098,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.37,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3868,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-2.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -2.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42194092827004215,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1447,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-14.5%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1572980,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-27T11:01:36.631945+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Las Palmas Atlético & CD Badajoz!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Segunda Federación - Grupo 4 — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Betis Deportivo | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14 |
| 2 | Recreativo Huelva | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| 3 | Don Benito | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 4 | Tenerife II | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| 5 | Ciudad de Lucena | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 6 | Sevilla Atlético | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 7 | CD Badajoz | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 8 | CD Estepona | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 9 | Linares Deportivo | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 10 | Mijas Las Lagunas | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 11 | Sanluqueño | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 12 | Xerez | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 13 | Atlético Central | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 14 | Marbella | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 15 | Puente Genil | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 16 | Las Palmas Atlético | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 17 | Tamaraceite | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 18 | CD Antoniano | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Recreativo Huelva | 5 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 12 |
| 2 | Mijas Las Lagunas | 5 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | Real Betis Deportivo | 6 | 9 | 1 | +8 | 14 |
| 4 | Tenerife II | 5 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 9 |
| 5 | Sevilla Atlético | 5 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 8 |
| 6 | Don Benito | 5 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 10 |
| 7 | Ciudad de Lucena | 5 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 8 |
| 8 | CD Estepona | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| 9 | Sanluqueño | 5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
| 10 | CD Badajoz | 5 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 8 |
| 11 | Linares Deportivo | 5 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 12 | Atlético Central | 5 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 6 |
| 13 | Marbella | 5 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 14 | Puente Genil | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 15 | Xerez | 6 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 16 | Tamaraceite | 5 | 4 | 11 | -7 | 3 |
| 17 | CD Antoniano | 5 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 2 |
| 18 | Las Palmas Atlético | 5 | 1 | 8 | -7 | 4 |
