Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Unionistas de Salamanca Unionistas de Salamanca ✔ Correcto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-1 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.75
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Unionistas de Salamanca win · Unionistas de Salamanca 3–1 UD Ourense
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
A
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "ea751ad3901e640b989633d6aaaaf8031b0bace2436116325106476dfc913e41",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.25,
"away_win_prob": 0.3285,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2961,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.04,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.66,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.35,
"home_win_prob": 0.3754,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Winner : Unionistas de Salamanca",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"away_xg": 1.25,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0005,
"edge_gap": 0.047,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3761,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 32.9,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 37.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"odd": 2.38
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.38,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"display_market": "Unionistas de Salamanca Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.66,
"market_odds": 2.38,
"model_odds": 2.66,
"overround": 11.7,
"prob_edge": -4.4,
"value_pct": -10.5,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 3,
"away_played": 3,
"away_score_rate": 71.3,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 74.1,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.25,
"home_expected": 1.35,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.8
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca or Draw",
"prob": 67.1
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca or UD Ourense",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or UD Ourense",
"prob": 62.5
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca or UD Ourense",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 32.9,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 37.5,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.3,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"edge": -10.5,
"implied_prob": 42.0,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market": "Unionistas de Salamanca Win",
"model_prob": 37.6,
"odds": 2.38
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "UD Ourense",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 32.55,
"draw": 29.84,
"home": 37.61
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Bet365",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 11:00:54",
"early_bookmaker": "Bet365",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 10:31:11",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.61,
"gap_pp": -0.05,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 37.57
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.84,
"gap_pp": -0.27,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.56
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 32.55,
"gap_pp": 0.32,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 32.87
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.86,
"gap_pp": 6.34,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 58.14,
"gap_pp": -6.34,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.52,
"gap_pp": 5.98,
"kind": "btts_y",
"model_pct": 54.5
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 51.48,
"gap_pp": -5.98,
"kind": "btts_n",
"model_pct": 45.5
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.38,
"early": 2.38,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.61,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.61,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.0,
"early": 3.0,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.84,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.84,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.75,
"early": 2.75,
"implied_closing_pct": 32.55,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 32.55,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.25,
"early": 2.25,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.86,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 41.86,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.62,
"early": 1.62,
"implied_closing_pct": 58.14,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 58.14,
"kind": "ou_u"
},
{
"closing": 1.91,
"early": 1.91,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.52,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.52,
"kind": "btts_y"
},
{
"closing": 1.8,
"early": 1.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 51.48,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 51.48,
"kind": "btts_n"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 6.3,
"kind": "ou_o"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -4.2,
"ev": -0.25,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.0,
"market_prob": 0.1667,
"market_prob_pct": 16.7,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.8
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.35,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"edge_pp": 1.2,
"market_prob": 0.4229,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0561,
"implied_prob": 0.4229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.435
},
"p_final": 0.435,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0459,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0561,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2255,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": -0.0133,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5771,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5638
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0845,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.5,
"text": "+8.5%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1608,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -16.1,
"text": "-16.1%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0845,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10226.05,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"edge_pp": 1.1,
"market_prob": 0.4905,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1031,
"implied_prob": 0.5095,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4983
},
"p_final": 0.5017,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0192,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0618,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"ev": -0.0618,
"implied_prob": 0.4905,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5017
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1673,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -16.7,
"text": "-16.7%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.041,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.1,
"text": "+4.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.041,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10036.9,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.1053,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.5,
"text": "-10.5%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.1009,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.1,
"text": "-10.1%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"sort_key": 1774.775,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "5/5",
"alert_breadth_note": "5/5 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"alert_team": "UD Ourense",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 0.3,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 0.3,
"hero_label": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob_pct": 37.6,
"market_team": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"model_prob_pct": 37.5,
"model_team": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 96,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Unionistas de Salamanca at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 37.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Unionistas de Salamanca as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "82 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 82,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "5/5",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 24.9,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 82,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 0.3,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.25,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.35,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.35,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.35 \u00b7 Away xG 1.25 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +0%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.1,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"steam_team": "UD Ourense",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Unionistas de Salamanca at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 37.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Unionistas de Salamanca as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "82 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 82,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Unionistas de Salamanca 1.35 xG vs UD Ourense 1.25 \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca 37.5%",
"Market: Unionistas de Salamanca ~37.6% implied",
"Market Steam: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Unionistas de Salamanca, but sharp money moved toward UD Ourense.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -0.07,
"fair_prob": 37.54,
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"market_prob": 37.61,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -0.23,
"fair_prob": 29.61,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 29.84,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.3,
"fair_prob": 32.85,
"label": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob": 32.55,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.9,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 42.3,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.9,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 57.7,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.73,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 48.77,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.73,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 51.23,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "aligned",
"edge_pp": 0.3,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.85,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob_pct": 32.55,
"status": "market_efficient",
"steam_team_name": "UD Ourense"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "market_efficient",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "Aligned",
"edge_label_key": "aligned",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 37.6,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -0.1,
"model_prob_pct": 37.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -0.1,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "High reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 82,
"reliability_tier": "high",
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Unionistas de Salamanca 1.35 xG vs UD Ourense 1.25 \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca 37.5%",
"Market: Unionistas de Salamanca ~37.6% implied",
"Market Steam: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Unionistas de Salamanca, but sharp money moved toward UD Ourense.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 0.3,
"hero_label": "UD Ourense",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "UD Ourense odds shortened \u2193 -19.1%.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Current pricing remains close to the model baseline."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "aligned",
"lead": "The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on UD Ourense.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on UD Ourense."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"Market pricing and the fair estimate remain broadly aligned.",
"Recent line movement on UD Ourense (\u2193 -19.1%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (5/5) supports the current market view on UD Ourense."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 4.7 pp (at 37.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 4.7,
"max_prob_pct": 37.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "UD Ourense",
"largest_gap_pp": 0.3,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -0.07,
"edge_pp": -0.07,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.54,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"market_prob_pct": 37.61,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -0.23,
"edge_pp": -0.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.61,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 29.84,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.3,
"edge_pp": 0.3,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.85,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob_pct": 32.55,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_efficient",
"status_label": "Market Efficient",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on UD Ourense.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Unionistas de Salamanca (37.6%).",
"However, UD Ourense has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -19.1%, 5/5).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca, Market \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca, Recent sharp money \u2192 UD Ourense.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 36.36,
"closing_odds": 2.75,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 36.36,
"entry_odds": 2.75,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 5,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -17.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -17.8
}
],
"books_total": 5,
"breadth_display": "5/5",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.75,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 19.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 22h 14m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"5/5 books synchronized on UD Ourense (19.1% steam, score 96) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.40",
"3.08",
"2.75"
],
"display": "3.70 \u2192 2.70 \u2192 2.75",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 22h 14m",
"pick_team": "UD Ourense",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.70"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.70"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.75"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.4,
2.75
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.75"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.75"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.4,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "UD Ourense",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.75,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"summary": "Market moved toward UD Ourense while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "UD Ourense",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 96,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "5/5",
"current_odds": 2.75,
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"pick_team": "UD Ourense",
"steam_score": 96,
"steam_team_name": "UD Ourense",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 0.3,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "ud-ourense",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "UD Ourense",
"away_team_id": 9617,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/9617.webp",
"away_team_name": "UD Ourense",
"away_team_public_id": "5L0qJyUWkOW3VV",
"away_team_slug": "ud-ourense",
"country_code": "ES",
"country_display_name": "Spain",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/es.svg",
"country_id": 145,
"country_name": "Spain",
"fixture_id": 1570754,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Spain",
"home_team_display_name": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"home_team_id": 5281,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/5281.webp",
"home_team_name": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"home_team_public_id": "0SOkVBtLWOMzhL",
"home_team_slug": "unionistas-de-salamanca",
"ht.home_team_slug": "unionistas-de-salamanca",
"league_country": "Spain",
"league_country_display": "Spain",
"league_display_name": "Primera Federaci\u00f3n - Grupo 1",
"league_id": 435,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/435.webp",
"league_name": "Primera Federaci\u00f3n - Grupo 1",
"league_public_id": "2rWGCckC2HCYNB",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-19 11:00:00",
"public_id": "4GarSDNZPFHicF",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": "Reina Sofia"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4478,
"best_odd": 2.75,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0014,
"ev": -0.1009,
"implied_prob": 0.3255,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3255,
"draw": 0.2984,
"home": 0.3761
},
"model_prob": 0.3287,
"p_final": 0.3269
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2988,
"best_odd": 3.0,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0008,
"ev": -0.1073,
"implied_prob": 0.2984,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3255,
"draw": 0.2984,
"home": 0.3761
},
"model_prob": 0.2956,
"p_final": 0.2976
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4497,
"best_odd": 2.38,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0002,
"ev": -0.1053,
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3255,
"draw": 0.2984,
"home": 0.3761
},
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"p_final": 0.3759
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.75,
"edge": -0.0349,
"ev": -0.0961,
"implied_prob": 0.3636,
"model_prob": 0.3287
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.0,
"edge": -0.0377,
"ev": -0.1131,
"implied_prob": 0.3333,
"model_prob": 0.2956
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.38,
"edge": -0.0445,
"ev": -0.1059,
"implied_prob": 0.4202,
"model_prob": 0.3757
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2066,
"alpha_yes": 0.2066,
"best_no_odd": 1.83,
"best_yes_odd": 1.91,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0573,
"edge_yes": 0.0573,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1673,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1031,
"ev_yes": 0.041,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0618,
"implied_no": 0.5123,
"implied_yes": 0.4877,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1031,
"implied_prob": 0.5095,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4983
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"ev": -0.0618,
"implied_prob": 0.4905,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5017
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"p_final_no": 0.4983,
"p_final_yes": 0.5017,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.205,
"alpha_under": 0.2255,
"best_over_odd": 2.25,
"best_under_odd": 1.62,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.17,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.59,
"edge_over": 0.059,
"edge_under": -0.059,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0845,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0561,
"ev_under": -0.1608,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1036,
"implied_over": 0.423,
"implied_over_mf": 0.4229,
"implied_under": 0.577,
"implied_under_mf": 0.5771,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0561,
"implied_prob": 0.4229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.435
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2255,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": -0.0133,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5771,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5638
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.435,
"p_final_under": 0.5638,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.2,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.2,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.2,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.2
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Unionistas de Salamanca at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 37.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Unionistas de Salamanca as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "82 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 82,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2956,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3757,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.1
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0002,
"ev": -0.1053,
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"market_prob": 0.4905,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1031,
"implied_prob": 0.5095,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4983
},
"p_final": 0.5017,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0618,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"ev": -0.0618,
"implied_prob": 0.4905,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5017
}
},
"edge": 0.0573,
"ev": 0.041,
"implied_prob": 0.4877,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"market_prob": 0.4229,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0561,
"implied_prob": 0.4229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.435
},
"p_final": 0.435,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0561,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2255,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": -0.0133,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5771,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5638
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.059,
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.423,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1570754,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0845,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3287,
"draw": 0.2956,
"home": 0.3757
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "UD Ourense",
"home": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.02851,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.423,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1570754,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-19T11:00:56.516143+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Unionistas de Salamanca & UD Ourense!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Primera Federación - Grupo 1 — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lugo | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| 2 | Athletic Club B | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| 3 | UD Logroñés | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 4 | Cacereño | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 5 | Deportivo La Coruña B | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 6 | Cultural Leonesa | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 7 | Real Unión | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 8 | Mirandés | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 9 | Pontevedra | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 10 | Ponferradina | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 11 | Zamora CF | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 12 | Racing de Ferrol | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 13 | CD Coria | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 14 | Real Avilés | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 15 | Barakaldo CF | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 16 | Mérida AD | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 17 | Extremadura 1924 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 18 | Unionistas de Salamanca | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 19 | Arenas de Getxo | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| 20 | UD Ourense | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Unión | 5 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 7 |
| 2 | Athletic Club B | 5 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 11 |
| 3 | UD Logroñés | 4 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 10 |
| 4 | Mirandés | 4 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 7 |
| 5 | CD Coria | 5 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 6 | Lugo | 5 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 13 |
| 7 | Deportivo La Coruña B | 5 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 8 |
| 8 | Pontevedra | 4 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 7 |
| 9 | Unionistas de Salamanca | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 10 | Cacereño | 4 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 10 |
| 11 | Zamora CF | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 12 | Racing de Ferrol | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 13 | Real Avilés | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 14 | Cultural Leonesa | 5 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 8 |
| 15 | Mérida AD | 4 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 16 | Ponferradina | 4 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 7 |
| 17 | Arenas de Getxo | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 18 | Barakaldo CF | 4 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 19 | Extremadura 1924 | 5 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 20 | UD Ourense | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
