Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (2 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 Bristol Rovers Bristol Rovers ✔ Correcto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 1-0 2-0 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.92
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Bristol Rovers win · Bristol Rovers 2–0 Colchester United
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "10f7e2adb1dfd3b0cd5b9a56caddea1acd526b7dd34d4cab952c4014caf255dd",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.63,
"away_win_prob": 0.3634,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.334,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.666,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2563,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.75,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.9,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.63,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.67,
"home_win_prob": 0.3803,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.641,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.359
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Winner : Bristol Rovers and +4.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Bristol Rovers"
},
"away_xg": 1.63,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Bristol Rovers",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1163,
"edge_gap": 0.0166,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4964,
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 36.4,
"draw": 25.6,
"home": 38.0
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.92
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.92,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Bristol Rovers Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.01,
"market_odds": 1.92,
"model_odds": 2.63,
"overround": 4.9,
"prob_edge": -14.1,
"value_pct": -27.0,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 2,
"away_score_rate": 80.4,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 2,
"home_score_rate": 81.2,
"no_prob": 33.4,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 66.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 66.6
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.63,
"home_expected": 1.67,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.8
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 6.2
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Bristol Rovers or Draw",
"prob": 63.6
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Bristol Rovers or Colchester United",
"prob": 74.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Colchester United",
"prob": 61.9
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Bristol Rovers or Colchester United",
"pick_prob": 74.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 36.3,
"draw_pct": 25.6,
"home_pct": 38.0,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Bristol Rovers"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "+4.5",
"avg_total": 3.3,
"away_avg_scored": 2.0,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 3.5,
"over_prob": 64.1,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 64.1,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 3.3,
"under_prob": 35.9
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 36.9,
"implied_prob": 26.5,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Colchester United Win",
"model_prob": 36.3,
"odds": 3.77
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Colchester United",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 25.28,
"draw": 25.08,
"home": 49.64
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-01 18:44:44",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-01 18:14:36",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Bristol Rovers",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 49.64,
"gap_pp": -11.63,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 38.01
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.08,
"gap_pp": 0.55,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 25.63
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.28,
"gap_pp": 11.07,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 36.35
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 53.65,
"gap_pp": 10.45,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 64.1
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 46.35,
"gap_pp": -10.45,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 35.9
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.92,
"early": 1.92,
"implied_closing_pct": 49.64,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 49.64,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.8,
"early": 3.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.08,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.08,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.77,
"early": 3.77,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.28,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.28,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.78,
"early": 1.78,
"implied_closing_pct": 53.65,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 53.65,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.06,
"early": 2.06,
"implied_closing_pct": 46.35,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 46.35,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -3.3,
"ev": -0.25,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.1,
"model_prob_pct": 10.0,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.8
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 6.2
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.67,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"consensus_odds": 1.92,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1575,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -15.8,
"text": "-15.8%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0575,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.8,
"text": "+5.8%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2702,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.0%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Bristol Rovers",
"sort_key": 5396.0,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 64.1,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 35.9,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 33.4,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 66.6
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 810.0,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 10.0
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/13",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"alert_team": "Colchester United",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 11.6,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.61,
"hero_label": "Bristol Rovers",
"market_prob_pct": 49.6,
"market_team": "Bristol Rovers",
"model_prob_pct": 38.0,
"model_team": "Bristol Rovers",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 47,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0575,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3705,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Bristol Rovers at 38.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 49.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Bristol Rovers as the value side (38.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Bristol Rovers",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Colchester United \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.77 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1563720 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.77 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1575,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.8%",
"consensus_odds": 1.92,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5208333333333334,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2702,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 23.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "6/13",
"breadth_ratio": 0.46153846153846156,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.2,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 4.6,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 55,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 11.61,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 11.61,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.63,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 24.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.67,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.67,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.67 \u00b7 Away xG 1.63 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +24%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.0,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"steam_team": "Colchester United",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 38,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0575,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3705,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Bristol Rovers at 38.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 49.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Bristol Rovers as the value side (38.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Bristol Rovers",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Colchester United \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.77 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1563720 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.77 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1575,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.8%",
"consensus_odds": 1.92,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5208333333333334,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2702,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 23.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Bristol Rovers 1.67 xG vs Colchester United 1.63 \u2192 Bristol Rovers 38.0%",
"Market: Bristol Rovers ~49.6% implied",
"Market Steam: Colchester United \u2193 -10.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Bristol Rovers, but sharp money moved toward Colchester United.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -11.61,
"fair_prob": 38.03,
"label": "Bristol Rovers",
"market_prob": 49.64,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.55,
"fair_prob": 25.63,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 25.08,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 11.06,
"fair_prob": 36.34,
"label": "Colchester United",
"market_prob": 25.28,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 64.1,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 35.9,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 66.6,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 33.4,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -11.61,
"fair_prob_pct": 38.03,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Bristol Rovers",
"market_prob_pct": 49.64,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Colchester United"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Bristol Rovers\u0027s win probability at 49.6%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 38.0%, a difference of 11.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 11.61,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Bristol Rovers",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 49.6,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -11.6,
"model_prob_pct": 38.0,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -11.6,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 55,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 38,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Bristol Rovers 1.67 xG vs Colchester United 1.63 \u2192 Bristol Rovers 38.0%",
"Market: Bristol Rovers ~49.6% implied",
"Market Steam: Colchester United \u2193 -10.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Bristol Rovers, but sharp money moved toward Colchester United.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.61,
"hero_label": "Bristol Rovers",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Colchester United odds shortened \u2193 -10.0%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Colchester United, with odds shortening by 10.0%. Confirmation remains limited (6/13 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Bristol Rovers than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Buying interest on Colchester United \u2014 odds shortened by 10.0%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Bristol Rovers than the current fair estimate.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Colchester United, with odds shortening by 10.0%. Confirmation remains limited (6/13 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"Buying interest on Colchester United \u2014 odds shortened by 10.0%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Bristol Rovers more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Colchester United has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 10.0%.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (6/13), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 11.61,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 1.7 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 1.7,
"max_prob_pct": 38.0,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Bristol Rovers",
"largest_gap_pp": -11.6,
"lead": "The closing market prices Bristol Rovers higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 11.6,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -11.61,
"edge_pp": -11.61,
"fair_prob_pct": 38.03,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Bristol Rovers",
"market_prob_pct": 49.64,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.55,
"edge_pp": 0.55,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.63,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 25.08,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 11.06,
"edge_pp": 11.06,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.34,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Colchester United",
"market_prob_pct": 25.28,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Colchester United \u2014 odds shortened by 10.0%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Bristol Rovers (49.6%).",
"Colchester United has attracted notable multi-book line movement (\u2193 -10.0%, 6/13).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Bristol Rovers, Market \u2192 Bristol Rovers, Recent sharp money \u2192 Colchester United.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 52.08,
"closing_odds": 1.92,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 52.08,
"entry_odds": 1.92,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -7.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -5.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -5.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -2.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 34,
"bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -2.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -2.4
}
],
"books_total": 13,
"breadth_display": "6/13",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"move_pct_abs": 10.0,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 60h 5m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Bet365 led repricing on Colchester United (10.0%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"Sharper sportsbooks initiated the move, but wider market participation remains limited."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.0,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.00",
"3.80",
"3.60"
],
"display": "4.20 \u2192 3.38 \u2192 3.60",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 60h 5m",
"pick_team": "Colchester United",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.20"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.38"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.60"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
4.0,
3.77,
3.6
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,10.4 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.60"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.60"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 4.0,
"page_alert_line": "Strong steam move across 6/13 sportsbooks on Colchester United",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Colchester United",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.6,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"open_odds": 4.0,
"summary": "Market moved toward Colchester United while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Colchester United",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 47,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/13",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"move_display": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"open_odds": 4.0,
"pick_team": "Colchester United",
"steam_score": 47,
"steam_team_name": "Colchester United",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 11.6,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Colchester United",
"away_team_id": 1361,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1361.webp",
"away_team_name": "Colchester United",
"away_team_public_id": "4YsTqQSpgfktmQ",
"away_team_slug": "colchester",
"country_code": "GB-ENG",
"country_display_name": "England",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/gb-eng.svg",
"country_id": 49,
"country_name": "England",
"fixture_id": 1563720,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "England",
"home_team_display_name": "Bristol Rovers",
"home_team_id": 1334,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1334.webp",
"home_team_name": "Bristol Rovers",
"home_team_public_id": "4u0vJof1oL5m2W",
"home_team_slug": "bristol-rovers",
"league_country": "England",
"league_country_display": "England",
"league_display_name": "League Two",
"league_id": 42,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/42.webp",
"league_name": "League Two",
"league_public_id": "20ois23TghHC4h",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-01 18:45:00",
"public_id": "0eTUBzBJapbeMp",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Bristol",
"venue_name": "Memorial Stadium"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2502,
"best_odd": 3.77,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0277,
"ev": 0.0575,
"implied_prob": 0.2528,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2528,
"draw": 0.2508,
"home": 0.4964
},
"model_prob": 0.3635,
"p_final": 0.2805
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2975,
"best_odd": 3.8,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0016,
"ev": -0.0407,
"implied_prob": 0.2508,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2528,
"draw": 0.2508,
"home": 0.4964
},
"model_prob": 0.2563,
"p_final": 0.2525
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4954,
"best_odd": 1.92,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0576,
"ev": -0.1575,
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2528,
"draw": 0.2508,
"home": 0.4964
},
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"p_final": 0.4388
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.77,
"edge": 0.0983,
"ev": 0.3705,
"implied_prob": 0.2653,
"model_prob": 0.3635
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.8,
"edge": -0.0068,
"ev": -0.0259,
"implied_prob": 0.2632,
"model_prob": 0.2563
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.92,
"edge": -0.1407,
"ev": -0.2702,
"implied_prob": 0.5208,
"model_prob": 0.3801
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.3,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0575,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3705,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0575,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0575,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3705,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Bristol Rovers at 38.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 49.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Bristol Rovers as the value side (38.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Bristol Rovers",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Colchester United \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.77 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +37% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1563720 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.77 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +37% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Colchester United, but the model still strongly favours Bristol Rovers.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1575,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.8%",
"consensus_odds": 1.92,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5208333333333334,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2702,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 23.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.666,
"draw_prob": 0.2563,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3801,
"over_prob": 0.641,
"total_xg": 3.3,
"under_prob": 0.359,
"xg_diff": 0.04
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.92,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0576,
"ev": -0.1575,
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Bristol Rovers"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.666,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.641,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1563720,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0575,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3635,
"draw": 0.2563,
"home": 0.3801
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2",
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Colchester United",
"home": "Bristol Rovers"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.016721,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0575,
"implied_prob": 0.2528,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.3635,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "weak",
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Colchester United",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": true
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1575,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.8%",
"consensus_odds": 1.92,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4964,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3801,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5208333333333334,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2702,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.0%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1563720,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-01T18:44:46.399740+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Bristol Rovers & Colchester United!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
League Two — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bristol Rovers | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| 2 | Swindon Town | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| 3 | Barnet | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 | Tranmere Rovers | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 5 | Walsall | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 6 | Fleetwood Town | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 7 | Crewe Alexandra | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| 8 | Cheltenham Town | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 9 | York City | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 10 | Oldham | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 11 | Grimsby Town | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| 12 | Colchester United | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 13 | Gillingham | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 14 | Northampton | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 15 | Salford City | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 |
| 16 | Exeter City | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 17 | Chesterfield | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 18 | Rotherham United | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 19 | Accrington Stanley | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 20 | Newport County | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 21 | Crawley Town | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 22 | Rochdale | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 23 | Shrewsbury Town | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 24 | Port Vale | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bristol Rovers | 5 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 12 |
| 2 | Barnet | 5 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 9 |
| 3 | Cheltenham Town | 5 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 8 |
| 4 | Tranmere Rovers | 5 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 9 |
| 5 | York City | 5 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 8 |
| 6 | Newport County | 5 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 4 |
| 7 | Accrington Stanley | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 5 |
| 8 | Walsall | 5 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 9 |
| 9 | Swindon Town | 5 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 10 |
| 10 | Oldham | 5 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 7 |
| 11 | Grimsby Town | 5 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 7 |
| 12 | Fleetwood Town | 5 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 9 |
| 13 | Gillingham | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 14 | Chesterfield | 5 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 15 | Rotherham United | 5 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 5 |
| 16 | Colchester United | 5 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 7 |
| 17 | Crewe Alexandra | 5 | 5 | 3 | +2 | 9 |
| 18 | Crawley Town | 5 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 4 |
| 19 | Rochdale | 5 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 3 |
| 20 | Exeter City | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | Salford City | 5 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 6 |
| 22 | Northampton | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | Port Vale | 5 | 2 | 7 | -5 | 2 |
| 24 | Shrewsbury Town | 5 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 3 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Accrington Stanley | 5 | 3.0 | 0.5 | +2.5 | 5 |
| 2 | Walsall | 5 | 3.5 | 1.8 | +1.7 | 9 |
| 3 | Rotherham United | 5 | 2.2 | 0.7 | +1.5 | 5 |
| 4 | Northampton | 5 | 1.6 | 0.3 | +1.3 | 6 |
| 5 | Barnet | 5 | 2.8 | 1.8 | +1.0 | 9 |
| 6 | Shrewsbury Town | 5 | 2.1 | 1.2 | +0.9 | 3 |
| 7 | Crewe Alexandra | 5 | 1.7 | 0.8 | +0.9 | 9 |
| 8 | Grimsby Town | 5 | 1.9 | 1.1 | +0.8 | 7 |
| 9 | Oldham | 5 | 1.5 | 0.9 | +0.6 | 7 |
| 10 | Bristol Rovers | 5 | 2.0 | 1.6 | +0.4 | 12 |
| 11 | Fleetwood Town | 5 | 1.9 | 1.5 | +0.4 | 9 |
| 12 | York City | 5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | -0.4 | 8 |
| 13 | Chesterfield | 5 | 1.5 | 1.9 | -0.4 | 5 |
| 14 | Port Vale | 5 | 0.9 | 1.5 | -0.6 | 2 |
| 15 | Exeter City | 5 | 1.1 | 1.9 | -0.8 | 5 |
| 16 | Tranmere Rovers | 5 | 1.2 | 2.1 | -0.9 | 9 |
| 17 | Crawley Town | 5 | 0.8 | 1.7 | -0.9 | 4 |
| 18 | Salford City | 5 | 1.8 | 2.8 | -1.0 | 6 |
| 19 | Swindon Town | 5 | 0.3 | 1.6 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 20 | Cheltenham Town | 5 | 0.7 | 2.2 | -1.5 | 8 |
| 21 | Gillingham | 5 | 1.8 | 3.5 | -1.7 | 6 |
| 22 | Colchester United | 5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | -2.5 | 7 |
| 23 | Newport County | 5 | — | — | — | 4 |
| 24 | Rochdale | 5 | — | — | — | 3 |
