Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (5 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 Pumas UNAM Atlético San Luis ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 2-3 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
Pending
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Atlético San Luis win · Pumas UNAM 2–3 Atlético San Luis
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "0dff2c66b1046c776171c6356cefb9c275211b418b49e6b3e6c2a455152c2f4a",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.13,
"away_win_prob": 0.321,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.506,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.494,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.3139,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.12,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.19,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.74,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.22,
"home_win_prob": 0.3651,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.417,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.583
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Pumas UNAM or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Pumas UNAM"
},
"away_xg": 1.13,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Pumas UNAM",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1159,
"edge_gap": 0.0445,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4813,
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 32.1,
"draw": 31.4,
"home": 36.5
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.01
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.01,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Pumas UNAM Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.08,
"market_odds": 2.01,
"model_odds": 2.74,
"overround": 3.4,
"prob_edge": -13.3,
"value_pct": -26.6,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 4,
"away_played": 9,
"away_score_rate": 67.7,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 4,
"home_played": 9,
"home_score_rate": 70.5,
"no_prob": 50.6,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 50.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 49.4
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.13,
"home_expected": 1.22,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.1
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 11.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.8
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Pumas UNAM or Draw",
"prob": 67.9
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Pumas UNAM or Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"prob": 68.6
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"prob": 63.5
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Pumas UNAM or Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"pick_prob": 68.6
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 32.1,
"draw_pct": 31.4,
"home_pct": 36.5,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Pumas UNAM"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.35,
"away_avg_scored": 1.2,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 1.3,
"over_prob": 41.7,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 58.3,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.35,
"under_prob": 58.3
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 18.4,
"implied_prob": 27.1,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis Win",
"model_prob": 32.1,
"odds": 3.69
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 26.22,
"draw": 25.66,
"home": 48.13
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 18:00:31",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 17:30:28",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"largest_move_kind": "1x2_h",
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.77,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.13,
"gap_pp": -11.59,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.53
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.66,
"gap_pp": 5.72,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 31.38
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.22,
"gap_pp": 5.87,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 32.08
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 54.99,
"gap_pp": -13.29,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 41.7
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.01,
"gap_pp": 13.29,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 58.3
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.01,
"early": 2.04,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.13,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.77,
"implied_early_pct": 47.35,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.77,
"early": 3.7,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.66,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.45,
"implied_early_pct": 26.11,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.69,
"early": 3.64,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.22,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.32,
"implied_early_pct": 26.54,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.76,
"early": 1.78,
"implied_closing_pct": 54.99,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.63,
"implied_early_pct": 54.36,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.15,
"early": 2.12,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.01,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.63,
"implied_early_pct": 45.64,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": false,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": {
"best_bookmaker": "Bet365",
"best_odds": 13.0,
"edge": 3.1,
"ev": 40.1,
"label": "0-1",
"probability": 10.8
},
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.4,
"ev": -0.0306,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.4,
"market_prob": 0.1351,
"market_prob_pct": 13.5,
"model_prob": 0.131,
"model_prob_pct": 13.1,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.1
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.1
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 11.6
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.8
},
{
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.22,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4454,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.06,
"edge": 0.057,
"edge_pp": 5.7,
"market_prob": 0.455,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.583,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.49,
"best_odd": 1.72,
"edge": -0.0627,
"ev": -0.1705,
"implied_prob": 0.545,
"model_prob": 0.417,
"p_final": 0.4823
},
"p_final": 0.512,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.201,
"risk_adj_ev": 0.0548,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.4454,
"best_odd": 2.06,
"edge": 0.057,
"ev": 0.0548,
"implied_prob": 0.455,
"model_prob": 0.583,
"p_final": 0.512
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2577,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -25.8,
"text": "-25.8%"
},
"ev_under": 0.2709,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 27.1,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.2709,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over_prob": 41.7,
"sort_key": 10393.81,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 58.3,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.366,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0314,
"edge_pp": 3.1,
"market_prob": 0.4203,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.506,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.366,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0314,
"ev": -0.0063,
"implied_prob": 0.4203,
"model_prob": 0.506,
"p_final": 0.4517
},
"p_final": 0.4517,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1132,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0063,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5033,
"best_odd": 1.595,
"edge": -0.0431,
"ev": -0.1442,
"implied_prob": 0.5797,
"model_prob": 0.494,
"p_final": 0.5366
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.1385,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 13.9,
"text": "+13.9%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1997,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -20.0,
"text": "-20.0%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.1385,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 50.6,
"sort_key": 10124.65,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 49.4
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1193,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.9,
"text": "-11.9%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0266,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 2.7,
"text": "+2.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2657,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Pumas UNAM",
"sort_key": 5221.28,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 819.3,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 13.1
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "4/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "4/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +4.7%",
"alert_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 11.6,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.62,
"hero_label": "Pumas UNAM",
"market_prob_pct": 48.1,
"market_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"model_prob_pct": 36.5,
"model_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 29,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2709,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2709,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Pumas UNAM at 36.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Pumas UNAM as the value side (36.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Pumas UNAM",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +27.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +27.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +27.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+27.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1193,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.49751243781094534,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2657,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -9.6,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.09 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.09
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "4/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.4444444444444444,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.2,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 4.4,
"steam_coherence": 2.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 57,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 11.62,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 11.62,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.13,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -10.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.22,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.22,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.22 \u00b7 Away xG 1.13 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -10%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.7,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +4.7%",
"steam_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2709,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2709,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Pumas UNAM at 36.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Pumas UNAM as the value side (36.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Pumas UNAM",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +27.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +27.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +27.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+27.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1193,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.49751243781094534,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2657,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -9.6,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.09 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.09
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Pumas UNAM 1.22 xG vs Atl\u00e9tico San Luis 1.13 \u2192 Pumas UNAM 36.5%",
"Market: Pumas UNAM ~48.1% implied",
"Market Drift: Pumas UNAM odds \u2191 +4.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Pumas UNAM, but the market has moved away from Pumas UNAM.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -11.62,
"fair_prob": 36.51,
"label": "Pumas UNAM",
"market_prob": 48.13,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.73,
"fair_prob": 31.39,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 25.66,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.88,
"fair_prob": 32.1,
"label": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"market_prob": 26.22,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -13.04,
"fair_prob": 41.7,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 54.74,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.04,
"fair_prob": 58.3,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 45.26,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.58,
"fair_prob": 49.4,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 57.98,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.58,
"fair_prob": 50.6,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 42.02,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -11.62,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.51,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Pumas UNAM",
"market_prob_pct": 48.13,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Pumas UNAM"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Pumas UNAM\u0027s win probability at 48.1%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 36.5%, a difference of 11.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 11.62,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Pumas UNAM",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 48.1,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -11.6,
"model_prob_pct": 36.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -11.6,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 57,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Pumas UNAM 1.22 xG vs Atl\u00e9tico San Luis 1.13 \u2192 Pumas UNAM 36.5%",
"Market: Pumas UNAM ~48.1% implied",
"Market Drift: Pumas UNAM odds \u2191 +4.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Pumas UNAM, but the market has moved away from Pumas UNAM.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.62,
"hero_label": "Pumas UNAM",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Pumas UNAM odds lengthened \u2191 +4.7%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "Confirmation remains limited (4/9 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Pumas UNAM than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Pumas UNAM than the current fair estimate.",
"Confirmation remains limited (4/9 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Pumas UNAM more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"Recent line movement on Pumas UNAM (\u2191 +4.7%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (4/9), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 11.62,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 4.4 pp (at 36.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 4.4,
"max_prob_pct": 36.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Pumas UNAM",
"largest_gap_pp": -11.6,
"lead": "The closing market prices Pumas UNAM higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 11.6,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -11.62,
"edge_pp": -11.62,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.51,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Pumas UNAM",
"market_prob_pct": 48.13,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 5.73,
"edge_pp": 5.73,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.39,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 25.66,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 5.88,
"edge_pp": 5.88,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.1,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"market_prob_pct": 26.22,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Pumas UNAM (48.1%).",
"Pumas UNAM odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +4.7%, 4/9) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Pumas UNAM, Market \u2192 Pumas UNAM, while Pumas UNAM odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 49.75,
"closing_odds": 2.01,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 49.75,
"entry_odds": 2.01,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 4,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.1
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "4/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.0,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Highest consensus move",
"move_display": "\u2191 +4.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 4.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 129h 36m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Volatile two-way pricing on Pumas UNAM (swing 2.04 \u2192 1.91 \u2192 2.00) \u2014 net 4.7% but intraday chop is elevated.",
"Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.04",
"1.98",
"1.91"
],
"display": "2.04 \u2192 1.91 \u2192 2.00",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 129h 36m",
"pick_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.04"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "1.91"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.00"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
1.91,
2.01,
2.04,
2.0
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 18.7,4.2 37.3,0.0 56.0,5.5",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "1.91"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "1.91"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.04"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.00"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 1.91,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Volatile",
"phase_tip": "High disagreement or chop \u2014 low reliability for directional bets.",
"pick_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "warn",
"signal_icon": "\u26a0\ufe0f",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.0,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +4.7%",
"open_odds": 1.91,
"summary": "Market moved away from Pumas UNAM while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Pumas UNAM",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "volatile_market",
"signal_label": "Volatile market",
"steam_score": 29,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "4/9",
"current_odds": 2.0,
"move_display": "\u2191 +4.7%",
"open_odds": 1.91,
"pick_team": "Pumas UNAM",
"steam_score": 29,
"steam_team_name": "Pumas UNAM",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 11.6,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "atletico-san-luis",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"away_team_id": 2314,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/2314.webp",
"away_team_name": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"away_team_public_id": "2sxB3EPP1HK2UM",
"away_team_slug": "atletico-san-luis",
"country_code": "MX",
"country_display_name": "Mexico",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/mx.svg",
"country_id": 107,
"country_name": "Mexico",
"fixture_id": 1550981,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Mexico",
"home_team_display_name": "Pumas UNAM",
"home_team_id": 2286,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/2286.webp",
"home_team_name": "Pumas UNAM",
"home_team_public_id": "4Jte9oA2b8bjZw",
"home_team_slug": "u-n-a-m-pumas",
"ht.home_team_slug": "u-n-a-m-pumas",
"league_country": "Mexico",
"league_country_display": "Mexico",
"league_display_name": "Liga MX",
"league_id": 262,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/262.webp",
"league_name": "Liga MX",
"league_public_id": "1IBdnK76JUhbx1",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-27 18:00:00",
"public_id": "3XSsNQIloISg8E",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Mexico City",
"venue_name": "Estadio Ol\u00edmpico Universitario"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev",
"pred_conf_md_draw_above_30"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)"
],
"score": 5.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2736,
"best_odd": 3.69,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0161,
"ev": 0.0266,
"implied_prob": 0.2622,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2622,
"draw": 0.2566,
"home": 0.4813
},
"model_prob": 0.3208,
"p_final": 0.2782
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2743,
"best_odd": 3.77,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0157,
"ev": 0.0265,
"implied_prob": 0.2566,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2622,
"draw": 0.2566,
"home": 0.4813
},
"model_prob": 0.3138,
"p_final": 0.2723
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3718,
"best_odd": 2.01,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0431,
"ev": -0.1193,
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2622,
"draw": 0.2566,
"home": 0.4813
},
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"p_final": 0.4382
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.69,
"edge": 0.0498,
"ev": 0.1839,
"implied_prob": 0.271,
"model_prob": 0.3208
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.77,
"edge": 0.0486,
"ev": 0.1831,
"implied_prob": 0.2653,
"model_prob": 0.3138
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.01,
"edge": -0.1322,
"ev": -0.2657,
"implied_prob": 0.4975,
"model_prob": 0.3653
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.366,
"alpha_yes": 0.5033,
"best_no_odd": 2.25,
"best_yes_odd": 1.62,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0858,
"edge_yes": -0.0858,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.1385,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0063,
"ev_yes": -0.1997,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1442,
"implied_no": 0.4202,
"implied_yes": 0.5798,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.366,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0314,
"ev": -0.0063,
"implied_prob": 0.4203,
"model_prob": 0.506,
"p_final": 0.4517
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5033,
"best_odd": 1.595,
"edge": -0.0431,
"ev": -0.1442,
"implied_prob": 0.5797,
"model_prob": 0.494,
"p_final": 0.5366
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4517,
"p_final_yes": 0.5366,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.49,
"alpha_under": 0.4454,
"best_over_odd": 1.78,
"best_under_odd": 2.18,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.72,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.06,
"edge_over": -0.1304,
"edge_under": 0.1304,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2577,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1705,
"ev_under": 0.2709,
"ev_under_risk_adj": 0.0548,
"implied_over": 0.5474,
"implied_over_mf": 0.545,
"implied_under": 0.4526,
"implied_under_mf": 0.455,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.49,
"best_odd": 1.72,
"edge": -0.0627,
"ev": -0.1705,
"implied_prob": 0.545,
"model_prob": 0.417,
"p_final": 0.4823
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.4454,
"best_odd": 2.06,
"edge": 0.057,
"ev": 0.0548,
"implied_prob": 0.455,
"model_prob": 0.583,
"p_final": 0.512
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4823,
"p_final_under": 0.512,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.35,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2709,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2709,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.2709,
"confidence": 6.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_draw_above_30",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.7,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.7
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2709,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2709,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Pumas UNAM at 36.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Pumas UNAM as the value side (36.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Pumas UNAM",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +27.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +27.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +27.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+27.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Pumas UNAM, but the model still strongly favours Pumas UNAM.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1193,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.49751243781094534,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2657,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -9.6,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.09 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.09
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.494,
"draw_prob": 0.3138,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3653,
"over_prob": 0.417,
"total_xg": 2.35,
"under_prob": 0.583,
"xg_diff": 0.09
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"ev": 0.0266,
"implied_prob": 0.2622,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.3208,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "longshot",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"slot": "longshot"
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"ev": 0.0265,
"implied_prob": 0.2566,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.3138,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "longshot",
"side": "draw",
"side_label": "draw",
"slot": "longshot"
}
],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0431,
"ev": -0.1193,
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Pumas UNAM"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.366,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0314,
"market_prob": 0.4203,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.506,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.366,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0314,
"ev": -0.0063,
"implied_prob": 0.4203,
"model_prob": 0.506,
"p_final": 0.4517
},
"p_final": 0.4517,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0063,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5033,
"best_odd": 1.595,
"edge": -0.0431,
"ev": -0.1442,
"implied_prob": 0.5797,
"model_prob": 0.494,
"p_final": 0.5366
}
},
"edge": 0.0858,
"ev": 0.1385,
"implied_prob": 0.4202,
"model_prob": 0.506,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4454,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.06,
"edge": 0.057,
"market_prob": 0.455,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.583,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.49,
"best_odd": 1.72,
"edge": -0.0627,
"ev": -0.1705,
"implied_prob": 0.545,
"model_prob": 0.417,
"p_final": 0.4823
},
"p_final": 0.512,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": 0.0548,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.4454,
"best_odd": 2.06,
"edge": 0.057,
"ev": 0.0548,
"implied_prob": 0.455,
"model_prob": 0.583,
"p_final": 0.512
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1304,
"ev": 0.2709,
"implied_prob": 0.4526,
"model_prob": 0.583,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1550981,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.2709,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3208,
"draw": 0.3138,
"home": 0.3653
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2",
"longshot_high_variance"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1385,
"implied_prob": 0.4202,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.506,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1385,
"implied_prob": 0.4202,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.506,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Atl\u00e9tico San Luis",
"home": "Pumas UNAM"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.110554,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2709,
"implied_prob": 0.4526,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.583,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 4,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1193,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.9%",
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4813,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3653,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.49751243781094534,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2657,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1550981,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-27T18:00:34.240508+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Pumas UNAM & Atlético San Luis!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga MX — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toluca | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 |
| 2 | Club América | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20 |
| 3 | Chivas Guadalajara | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 |
| 4 | Querétaro | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 5 | León | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| 6 | Atlas | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| 7 | Cruz Azul | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| 8 | Club Tijuana | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 9 | Puebla | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 |
| 10 | Monterrey | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 11 | Pachuca | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | Pumas UNAM | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 13 | Atlético San Luis | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 14 | Atlante FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 15 | Tigres UANL | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 16 | Santos Laguna | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 17 | Necaxa | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 18 | FC Juárez | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toluca | 10 | 23 | 12 | +11 | 20 |
| 2 | Club América | 9 | 21 | 10 | +11 | 20 |
| 3 | Cruz Azul | 10 | 19 | 18 | +1 | 16 |
| 4 | Chivas Guadalajara | 10 | 17 | 10 | +7 | 18 |
| 5 | Monterrey | 9 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 13 |
| 6 | Atlas | 10 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 17 |
| 7 | Pachuca | 10 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 12 |
| 8 | León | 10 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 17 |
| 9 | Club Tijuana | 9 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 14 |
| 10 | Pumas UNAM | 10 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 12 |
| 11 | Atlético San Luis | 10 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 12 |
| 12 | Querétaro | 9 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 17 |
| 13 | Atlante FC | 10 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 11 |
| 14 | Necaxa | 10 | 12 | 20 | -8 | 8 |
| 15 | Puebla | 10 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 14 |
| 16 | Tigres UANL | 10 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 17 | Santos Laguna | 10 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 10 |
| 18 | FC Juárez | 10 | 7 | 25 | -18 | 3 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Club Tijuana | 9 | 8.2 | 3.2 | +5.0 | 14 |
| 2 | Cruz Azul | 10 | 11.3 | 7.5 | +3.8 | 16 |
| 3 | Monterrey | 9 | 9.8 | 6.2 | +3.6 | 13 |
| 4 | Club América | 9 | 9.7 | 6.1 | +3.6 | 20 |
| 5 | Toluca | 10 | 8.9 | 6.1 | +2.8 | 20 |
| 6 | Tigres UANL | 10 | 9.7 | 7.3 | +2.4 | 10 |
| 7 | Chivas Guadalajara | 10 | 8.1 | 5.8 | +2.3 | 18 |
| 8 | Necaxa | 10 | 6.8 | 6.1 | +0.7 | 8 |
| 9 | Santos Laguna | 10 | 10.1 | 9.7 | +0.4 | 10 |
| 10 | Querétaro | 9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | -0.2 | 17 |
| 11 | León | 10 | 8.7 | 9.4 | -0.7 | 17 |
| 12 | Puebla | 10 | 7.3 | 8.9 | -1.6 | 14 |
| 13 | Pumas UNAM | 10 | 6.4 | 8.0 | -1.6 | 12 |
| 14 | Pachuca | 10 | 7.4 | 9.2 | -1.8 | 12 |
| 15 | Atlas | 10 | 6.6 | 9.5 | -2.9 | 17 |
| 16 | Atlético San Luis | 10 | 7.8 | 11.1 | -3.3 | 12 |
| 17 | Atlante FC | 10 | 6.3 | 10.1 | -3.8 | 11 |
| 18 | FC Juárez | 10 | 4.7 | 13.4 | -8.7 | 3 |
