Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Universitario de Popayán Barranquilla FC ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Correcto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.93
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Barranquilla FC win · Barranquilla FC 2–1 Universitario de Popayán
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "1ad6256e08d0409933e6e93e4709d5e172bc7db7854782c4b45f3fd562403a24",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.35,
"away_win_prob": 0.3754,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2961,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.66,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.04,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.25,
"home_win_prob": 0.3285,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n"
},
"away_xg": 1.35,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1339,
"edge_gap": 0.047,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2418,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 37.6,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 32.9
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.84
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.84,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 4.14,
"market_odds": 3.84,
"model_odds": 2.66,
"overround": 7.7,
"prob_edge": 11.6,
"value_pct": 44.4,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 4,
"away_failed_to_score": 6,
"away_played": 19,
"away_score_rate": 74.1,
"home_clean_sheet": 7,
"home_failed_to_score": 7,
"home_played": 25,
"home_score_rate": 71.3,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.35,
"home_expected": 1.25,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.8
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Barranquilla FC or Draw",
"prob": 62.5
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Barranquilla FC or Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"prob": 67.1
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Barranquilla FC or Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 37.5,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 32.9,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.9,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.2,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 44.4,
"implied_prob": 26.0,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n Win",
"model_prob": 37.6,
"odds": 3.84
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 24.18,
"draw": 27.72,
"home": 48.11
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-01 22:29:09",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-01 21:59:17",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Barranquilla FC",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.11,
"gap_pp": -15.24,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 32.87
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.72,
"gap_pp": 1.85,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.56
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 24.18,
"gap_pp": 13.39,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 37.57
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 46.86,
"gap_pp": 1.34,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 53.14,
"gap_pp": -1.34,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.93,
"early": 1.93,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.11,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.11,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.35,
"early": 3.35,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.72,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.72,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.84,
"early": 3.84,
"implied_closing_pct": 24.18,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 24.18,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.03,
"early": 2.03,
"implied_closing_pct": 46.86,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 46.86,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.79,
"early": 1.79,
"implied_closing_pct": 53.14,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 53.14,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 13.4,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.8,
"ev": -0.125,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.8
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.25,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"consensus_odds": 3.84,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.0517,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.2,
"text": "+5.2%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0517,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.2,
"text": "+5.2%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4427,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+44.3%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"sort_key": 10196.53,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"decision": "no_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 2050.0,
"tier": "pass",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "7/11",
"alert_breadth_note": "7/11 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +25.0%",
"alert_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 15.3,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -15.26,
"hero_label": "Barranquilla FC",
"market_prob_pct": 24.2,
"market_team": "Barranquilla FC",
"model_prob_pct": 37.5,
"model_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 67,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.3,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.3,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4425,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Universitario de Popay\u00e1n at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.2%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Universitario de Popay\u00e1n as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.4,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Universitario de Popay\u00e1n \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.84 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +44% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549612 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.84 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +44% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.84,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2604166666666667,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4427,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+44.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "7/11",
"breadth_ratio": 0.6363636363636364,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (15 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 17.4,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 6.4,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 55,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 15.26,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 15.26,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.35,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.25,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.35,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.25 \u00b7 Away xG 1.35 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +0%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 25.0,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +25.0%",
"steam_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.3,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.3,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4425,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Universitario de Popay\u00e1n at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.2%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Universitario de Popay\u00e1n as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.4,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Universitario de Popay\u00e1n \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.84 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +44% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549612 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.84 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +44% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.84,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2604166666666667,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4427,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+44.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Barranquilla FC 1.25 xG vs Universitario de Popay\u00e1n 1.35 \u2192 Universitario de Popay\u00e1n 37.5%",
"Market: Barranquilla FC ~24.2% implied",
"Market Drift: Universitario de Popay\u00e1n odds \u2191 +25.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -15.26,
"fair_prob": 32.85,
"label": "Barranquilla FC",
"market_prob": 48.11,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.89,
"fair_prob": 29.61,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 27.72,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.36,
"fair_prob": 37.54,
"label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"market_prob": 24.18,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -15.26,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.85,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Barranquilla FC",
"market_prob_pct": 48.11,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Barranquilla FC\u0027s win probability at 48.1%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 32.9%, a difference of 15.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 15.26,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 24.2,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 13.3,
"model_prob_pct": 37.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+13.3 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 13.3,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 55,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Barranquilla FC 1.25 xG vs Universitario de Popay\u00e1n 1.35 \u2192 Universitario de Popay\u00e1n 37.5%",
"Market: Barranquilla FC ~24.2% implied",
"Market Drift: Universitario de Popay\u00e1n odds \u2191 +25.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -15.26,
"hero_label": "Barranquilla FC",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n odds lengthened \u2191 +25.0%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Universitario de Popay\u00e1n has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 25.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Barranquilla FC than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n \u2014 odds lengthened by 25.0% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Barranquilla FC than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Universitario de Popay\u00e1n has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 25.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n \u2014 odds lengthened by 25.0% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Barranquilla FC more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Universitario de Popay\u00e1n has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 25.0%, suggesting weakening support."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 15.26,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 4.7 pp (at 37.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 4.7,
"max_prob_pct": 37.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Barranquilla FC",
"largest_gap_pp": -15.3,
"lead": "The closing market prices Barranquilla FC higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 15.3,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -15.26,
"edge_pp": -15.26,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.85,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Barranquilla FC",
"market_prob_pct": 48.11,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 1.89,
"edge_pp": 1.89,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.61,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 27.72,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 13.36,
"edge_pp": 13.36,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.54,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"market_prob_pct": 24.18,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n \u2014 odds lengthened by 25.0% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Barranquilla FC (24.2%).",
"However, Universitario de Popay\u00e1n has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +25.0%, 7/11) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, Market \u2192 Barranquilla FC, while Universitario de Popay\u00e1n odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 51.81,
"closing_odds": 1.93,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 51.81,
"entry_odds": 1.93,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 7,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +25.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 25.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +7.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 7.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.1
}
],
"books_total": 11,
"breadth_display": "7/11",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 4.0,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +25.0%",
"move_pct_abs": 25.0,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 25h 44m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book drift on Universitario de Popay\u00e1n (25.0%, 7/11) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 25.0,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.00",
"3.60",
"3.20"
],
"display": "4.00 \u2192 3.06 \u2192 4.00",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 25h 44m",
"pick_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.06"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.00"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.2,
3.84,
4.0
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,3.6 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.20"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.20"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.00"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.2,
"page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Universitario de Popay\u00e1n odds \u2191 +25.0% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Universitario de Popay\u00e1n odds \u2191 +25.0% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\u2198",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 4.0,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +25.0%",
"open_odds": 3.2,
"summary": "Market moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "market_drift",
"signal_label": "Drift",
"steam_score": 67,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "7/11",
"current_odds": 4.0,
"move_display": "\u2191 +25.0%",
"open_odds": 3.2,
"pick_team": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"steam_score": 67,
"steam_team_name": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"steam_tier": "A"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 15.3,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"away_team_id": 1460,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1460.webp",
"away_team_name": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"away_team_public_id": "1VYOeqPSura9sS",
"away_team_slug": "popayan",
"country_code": "CO",
"country_display_name": "Colombia",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/co.svg",
"country_id": 34,
"country_name": "Colombia",
"fixture_id": 1549612,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Colombia",
"home_team_display_name": "Barranquilla FC",
"home_team_id": 1466,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1466.webp",
"home_team_name": "Barranquilla FC",
"home_team_public_id": "4fHDacKAaswIu3",
"home_team_slug": "barranquilla",
"league_country": "Colombia",
"league_country_display": "Colombia",
"league_display_name": "Primera B de Colombia",
"league_id": 240,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/240.webp",
"league_name": "Primera B de Colombia",
"league_public_id": "1UzUWXxQJJ2nW3",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-01 22:30:00",
"public_id": "5RBfzOzr1Oy5wu",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Barranquilla FC",
"venue_name": "Estadio Romelio Martinez"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2398,
"best_odd": 3.84,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0321,
"ev": 0.0517,
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2418,
"draw": 0.2772,
"home": 0.4811
},
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"p_final": 0.2739
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2917,
"best_odd": 3.35,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0054,
"ev": -0.0535,
"implied_prob": 0.2772,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2418,
"draw": 0.2772,
"home": 0.4811
},
"model_prob": 0.2956,
"p_final": 0.2825
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4629,
"best_odd": 1.93,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0705,
"ev": -0.2077,
"implied_prob": 0.4811,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2418,
"draw": 0.2772,
"home": 0.4811
},
"model_prob": 0.3287,
"p_final": 0.4105
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.84,
"edge": 0.1152,
"ev": 0.4425,
"implied_prob": 0.2604,
"model_prob": 0.3757
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.35,
"edge": -0.0029,
"ev": -0.0096,
"implied_prob": 0.2985,
"model_prob": 0.2956
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.93,
"edge": -0.1894,
"ev": -0.3656,
"implied_prob": 0.5181,
"model_prob": 0.3287
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4425,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0517,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.3,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4425,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Universitario de Popay\u00e1n at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.2%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Universitario de Popay\u00e1n as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.4,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Universitario de Popay\u00e1n \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.84 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +44% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549612 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.84 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "55 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +44% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 55,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Universitario de Popay\u00e1n, but the model still strongly favours Universitario de Popay\u00e1n.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.84,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2604166666666667,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4427,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+44.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2956,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3757,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.1
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.84,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0321,
"ev": 0.0517,
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "no_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1549612,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0517,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3757,
"draw": 0.2956,
"home": 0.3287
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"home": "Barranquilla FC"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.021366,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0517,
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "weak",
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Universitario de Popay\u00e1n",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": true
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0517,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.84,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2418,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.4 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.4,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2604166666666667,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4427,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+44.3%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1549612,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-01T22:29:11.299186+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Barranquilla FC & Universitario de Popayán!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Primera B de Colombia — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Internacional Palmira | 30 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 56 |
| 2 | Real Cartagena | 32 | 15 | 9 | 8 | 54 |
| 3 | Envigado | 32 | 15 | 9 | 8 | 54 |
| 4 | Quindío | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 51 |
| 5 | Unión Magdalena | 29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 48 |
| 6 | Tigres FC | 31 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 42 |
| 7 | Bogotá FC | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 37 |
| 8 | Independiente Yumbo | 24 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 36 |
| 9 | Patriotas Boyacá | 25 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 34 |
| 10 | Barranquilla FC | 31 | 9 | 7 | 15 | 34 |
| 11 | Real Soacha | 25 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 33 |
| 12 | Universitario de Popayán | 24 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 27 |
| 13 | Orsomarso SC | 23 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 26 |
| 14 | Depor FC | 25 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 23 |
| 15 | Real Santander | 25 | 3 | 10 | 12 | 19 |
| 16 | Leones FC | 24 | 4 | 7 | 13 | 19 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Cartagena | 32 | 50 | 35 | +15 | 54 |
| 2 | Envigado | 32 | 43 | 28 | +15 | 54 |
| 3 | Unión Magdalena | 29 | 40 | 28 | +12 | 48 |
| 4 | Internacional Palmira | 30 | 39 | 27 | +12 | 56 |
| 5 | Barranquilla FC | 31 | 36 | 42 | -6 | 34 |
| 6 | Quindío | 30 | 31 | 21 | +10 | 51 |
| 7 | Tigres FC | 31 | 31 | 26 | +5 | 42 |
| 8 | Real Soacha | 25 | 31 | 28 | +3 | 33 |
| 9 | Patriotas Boyacá | 25 | 30 | 33 | -3 | 34 |
| 10 | Universitario de Popayán | 24 | 29 | 31 | -2 | 27 |
| 11 | Bogotá FC | 30 | 25 | 31 | -6 | 37 |
| 12 | Depor FC | 25 | 24 | 38 | -14 | 23 |
| 13 | Independiente Yumbo | 24 | 23 | 17 | +6 | 36 |
| 14 | Real Santander | 25 | 21 | 38 | -17 | 19 |
| 15 | Orsomarso SC | 23 | 17 | 23 | -6 | 26 |
| 16 | Leones FC | 24 | 15 | 39 | -24 | 19 |
