Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (4 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Comerciantes Unidos Comerciantes Unidos ✔ Correcto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 2-1, 1-1, 2-0, 1-0, 3-1 3-1 ✔ Correcto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.51
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Comerciantes Unidos win · Comerciantes Unidos 3–1 Cusco FC
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
A
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "e8bc7ad734f8c5837e3380a62f58dff428cc0f5ad3bec2c2cff40dadedf1375f",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.24,
"away_win_prob": 0.2034,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.361,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.639,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2288,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 4.92,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 4.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 1.76,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 2.14,
"home_win_prob": 0.5678,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.656,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under_25_prob": 0.344
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Cusco FC",
"main_pick_display": "Winner : Comerciantes Unidos",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Cusco FC"
},
"away_xg": 1.24,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"confidence": 56.8,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "high",
"display_text": "Winner : Comerciantes Unidos",
"edge": 0.1987,
"edge_gap": 0.3393,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3693,
"model_prob": 0.568,
"pick_type": "winner",
"probabilities": {
"away": 20.3,
"draw": 22.9,
"home": 56.8
},
"reason": "",
"selection": "home",
"selection_name": "Comerciantes Unidos"
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.51
}
],
"risk_color": "#f44336",
"risk_key": "high_risk",
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.51,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Comerciantes Unidos Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.71,
"market_odds": 2.51,
"model_odds": 1.76,
"overround": 7.9,
"prob_edge": 17.0,
"value_pct": 42.6,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 3,
"away_failed_to_score": 4,
"away_played": 19,
"away_score_rate": 71.1,
"home_clean_sheet": 5,
"home_failed_to_score": 5,
"home_played": 19,
"home_score_rate": 88.2,
"no_prob": 36.1,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 63.9,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 63.9
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.24,
"home_expected": 2.14,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-0",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 7.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 3,
"label": "3-1",
"prob": 6.9
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Comerciantes Unidos or Draw",
"prob": 79.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Comerciantes Unidos or Cusco FC",
"prob": 77.1
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Cusco FC",
"prob": 43.2
}
],
"pick_key": "1X",
"pick_label": "Comerciantes Unidos or Draw",
"pick_prob": 79.7
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 20.3,
"draw_pct": 22.9,
"home_pct": 56.8,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Comerciantes Unidos"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 3.38,
"away_avg_scored": 1.4,
"confidence": "high",
"home_avg_scored": 1.2,
"over_prob": 65.6,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 65.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 3.38,
"under_prob": 34.4
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 42.6,
"implied_prob": 39.8,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market": "Comerciantes Unidos Win",
"model_prob": 56.8,
"odds": 2.51
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Cusco FC",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 34.98,
"draw": 28.09,
"home": 36.93
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-07 20:14:02",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-08-07 19:44:02",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"largest_move_kind": "1x2_h",
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.28,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 36.93,
"gap_pp": 19.87,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 56.8
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 28.09,
"gap_pp": -5.21,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 22.88
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.98,
"gap_pp": -14.66,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 20.32
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.29,
"gap_pp": 17.31,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 65.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 51.71,
"gap_pp": -17.31,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 34.4
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.51,
"early": 2.53,
"implied_closing_pct": 36.93,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.28,
"implied_early_pct": 36.65,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.3,
"early": 3.3,
"implied_closing_pct": 28.09,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.01,
"implied_early_pct": 28.1,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.65,
"early": 2.63,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.98,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.28,
"implied_early_pct": 35.25,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.97,
"early": 1.97,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.29,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.29,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.84,
"early": 1.84,
"implied_closing_pct": 51.71,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 51.71,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"kind": "1x2_h"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.3,
"ev": -0.03,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "2-1",
"market_odds": 10.0,
"market_prob": 0.1,
"market_prob_pct": 10.0,
"model_prob": 0.097,
"model_prob_pct": 9.7,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"label": "2-0",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 7.3
},
{
"label": "3-1",
"prob": 6.9
}
]
},
"home_xg": 2.14,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "SBO",
"best_odds": 2.68,
"confidence": "moderate",
"display_label": "Home Comerciantes Unidos",
"edge": 19.5,
"ev": 52.3,
"probability": 56.8
},
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "value_alert",
"authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"consensus_odds": 2.51,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.0845,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.5,
"text": "+8.5%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0845,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.5,
"text": "+8.5%"
},
"model_prob": 0.568,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4257,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"sort_key": 10226.05,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 65.6,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 34.4,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 36.1,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 63.9
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 809.1,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "2-1",
"top_prob": 9.7
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "11/14",
"alert_breadth_note": "11/14 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +17.4%",
"alert_team": "Cusco FC",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 19.9,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 19.85,
"hero_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"market_prob_pct": 36.9,
"market_team": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"model_prob_pct": 56.8,
"model_team": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 61,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "value_alert",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4258,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.6,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.1,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 46,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Comerciantes Unidos at 56.8%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 36.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Comerciantes Unidos as the value side (56.8%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Comerciantes Unidos \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.51 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +43% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549439 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.51 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.5% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.6/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.6/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "46 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp.",
"Decision strength: 6.6/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +43% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.51,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.568,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.39840637450199207,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4257,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 58.5,
"reasons": [
"Elevated xG deviation 58%",
"Clear xG separation gap=0.9"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.9
}
}
},
"bet_status": "value_alert",
"books_breadth_display": "11/14",
"breadth_ratio": 0.7857142857142857,
"evidence": {
"score": 86,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "Statistical edge detected",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (20 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "High xG deviation from league baseline (59%+)",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 15.1,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.9,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 58,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 19.85,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 19.85,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.24,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 59.0,
"elevated": true,
"home_xg": 2.14,
"impact_note": "Elevated xG vs league baseline \u2014 treat totals leans cautiously; prefer smaller discretionary stakes if you act.",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 2.14,
"status_label": "High deviation from league baseline",
"summary": "Home xG 2.14 \u00b7 Away xG 1.24 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +59%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.4,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +17.4%",
"steam_team": "Cusco FC",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 46,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 56,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "value_alert",
"label": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "value_alert",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4258,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.6,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.1,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 46,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Comerciantes Unidos at 56.8%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 36.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Comerciantes Unidos as the value side (56.8%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Comerciantes Unidos \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.51 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +43% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549439 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.51 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.5% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.6/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.6/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "46 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp.",
"Decision strength: 6.6/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +43% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.51,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.568,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.39840637450199207,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4257,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 58.5,
"reasons": [
"Elevated xG deviation 58%",
"Clear xG separation gap=0.9"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.9
}
}
},
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"tier": "lean"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Comerciantes Unidos 2.14 xG vs Cusco FC 1.24 \u2192 Comerciantes Unidos 56.8%",
"Market: Comerciantes Unidos ~36.9% implied",
"Market Drift: Cusco FC odds \u2191 +17.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Comerciantes Unidos, but market pricing diverges by 20 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": 19.85,
"fair_prob": 56.78,
"label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"market_prob": 36.93,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.21,
"fair_prob": 22.88,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 28.09,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": -14.64,
"fair_prob": 20.34,
"label": "Cusco FC",
"market_prob": 34.98,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 65.6,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 34.4,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 63.9,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 36.1,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": 19.85,
"fair_prob_pct": 56.78,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"market_prob_pct": 36.93,
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"steam_team_name": "Cusco FC"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Comerciantes Unidos\u0027s win probability at 56.8%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 36.9%, a difference of 19.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
"max_gap_pp": 19.85,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
"favourite_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "high",
"headline": "Slight edge match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 36.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 19.9,
"model_prob_pct": 56.8,
"outcome_separation_tier": "high",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 58,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "Comerciantes Unidos \u2014 market direction supports the model, but pricing still diverges (+19.9 pp).",
"tier": "slight_edge",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 46,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 56,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "value_alert",
"label": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Comerciantes Unidos 2.14 xG vs Cusco FC 1.24 \u2192 Comerciantes Unidos 56.8%",
"Market: Comerciantes Unidos ~36.9% implied",
"Market Drift: Cusco FC odds \u2191 +17.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Comerciantes Unidos, but market pricing diverges by 20 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "One outcome clearly leads the model 1X2 grid.",
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "High",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 19.85,
"hero_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Cusco FC odds lengthened \u2191 +17.4%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, Cusco FC has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 17.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Comerciantes Unidos.",
"note": "Drift away from Cusco FC \u2014 odds lengthened by 17.4% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Comerciantes Unidos.",
"However, Cusco FC has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 17.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Cusco FC \u2014 odds lengthened by 17.4% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate favors Comerciantes Unidos more strongly than current market pricing.",
"At the same time, Cusco FC has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 17.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (11/14) supports the current market view on Cusco FC."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 19.85,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 33.9 pp (at 56.8%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 33.9,
"max_prob_pct": 56.8,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "High",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"largest_gap_pp": 19.9,
"lead": "The model rates Comerciantes Unidos considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 19.9,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": 19.85,
"edge_pp": 19.85,
"fair_prob_pct": 56.78,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"market_prob_pct": 36.93,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
},
{
"difference_pp": -5.21,
"edge_pp": -5.21,
"fair_prob_pct": 22.88,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 28.09,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -14.64,
"edge_pp": -14.64,
"fair_prob_pct": 20.34,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Cusco FC",
"market_prob_pct": 34.98,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Cusco FC \u2014 odds lengthened by 17.4% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": false,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Comerciantes Unidos (36.9%).",
"However, Cusco FC has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +17.4%, 11/14) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"Comerciantes Unidos \u2014 market direction supports the model, but pricing still diverges (+19.9 pp)."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 39.84,
"closing_odds": 2.51,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 39.84,
"entry_odds": 2.51,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 11,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +17.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 34,
"bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 16,
"bookmaker_name": "Unibet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 1,
"bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +7.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 7.1
}
],
"books_total": 14,
"breadth_display": "11/14",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.7,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +17.4%",
"move_pct_abs": 17.4,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 117h 42m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"11/14 books lengthened Cusco FC together (17.4% drift, score 61) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.4,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.70",
"2.50",
"2.30"
],
"display": "2.80 \u2192 2.18 \u2192 2.70",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 117h 42m",
"pick_team": "Cusco FC",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.80"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.18"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.70"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.3,
2.65,
2.63,
2.7
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 18.7,2.3 37.3,3.2 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.30"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.30"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.70"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.70"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.3,
"page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Cusco FC odds \u2191 +17.4% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Cusco FC",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Cusco FC odds \u2191 +17.4% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.7,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +17.4%",
"open_odds": 2.3,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Cusco FC",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 61,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "11/14",
"current_odds": 2.7,
"move_display": "\u2191 +17.4%",
"open_odds": 2.3,
"pick_team": "Cusco FC",
"steam_score": 61,
"steam_team_name": "Cusco FC",
"steam_tier": "A"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 19.9,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Cusco FC",
"away_team_id": 10013,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/10013.webp",
"away_team_name": "Cusco FC",
"away_team_slug": "cusco",
"country_code": "PE",
"country_display_name": "Peru",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/pe.svg",
"country_id": 126,
"country_name": "Peru",
"fixture_id": 1549439,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Peru",
"home_team_display_name": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"home_team_id": 2558,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/2558.webp",
"home_team_name": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"home_team_slug": "comerciantes-unidos",
"league_country": "Peru",
"league_country_display": "Peru",
"league_display_name": "Primera Divisi\u00f3n de Per\u00fa",
"league_id": 281,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/281.webp",
"league_name": "Primera Divisi\u00f3n de Per\u00fa",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-08-07 20:15:00",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Cutervo",
"venue_name": "Estadio Juan Maldonado Gamarra"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 8.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.351,
"best_odd": 2.65,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0515,
"ev": -0.2094,
"implied_prob": 0.3498,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3498,
"draw": 0.2809,
"home": 0.3693
},
"model_prob": 0.2032,
"p_final": 0.2983
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2765,
"best_odd": 3.3,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0144,
"ev": -0.1206,
"implied_prob": 0.2809,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3498,
"draw": 0.2809,
"home": 0.3693
},
"model_prob": 0.2288,
"p_final": 0.2665
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3159,
"best_odd": 2.51,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0628,
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3498,
"draw": 0.2809,
"home": 0.3693
},
"model_prob": 0.568,
"p_final": 0.4321
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.65,
"edge": -0.1742,
"ev": -0.4615,
"implied_prob": 0.3774,
"model_prob": 0.2032
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.3,
"edge": -0.0743,
"ev": -0.2451,
"implied_prob": 0.303,
"model_prob": 0.2288
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.51,
"edge": 0.1696,
"ev": 0.4258,
"implied_prob": 0.3984,
"model_prob": 0.568
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.38,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4258,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence": 6.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.6,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.1,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.6,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.1
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": true,
"1x2_open_contest": false,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "value_alert",
"final_decision": {
"action": "value_alert",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 19.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4258,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.6,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.1,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 46,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Comerciantes Unidos at 56.8%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 36.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Comerciantes Unidos as the value side (56.8%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 19.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Comerciantes Unidos \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.51 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +43% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549439 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.51 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.5% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.6/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.6/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "46 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Comerciantes Unidos), but pricing still diverges by 19.9 pp.",
"Decision strength: 6.6/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +43% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.51,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.568,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.39840637450199207,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4257,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 58.5,
"reasons": [
"Elevated xG deviation 58%",
"Clear xG separation gap=0.9"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.9
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5f3a\u4fe1\u53f7\uff08\u4f4e\u65b9\u5dee\uff09",
"scoring_type": "strong_signal",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.639,
"draw_prob": 0.2288,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.568,
"over_prob": 0.656,
"total_xg": 3.38,
"under_prob": 0.344,
"xg_diff": 0.9
},
"type": "strong_signal",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.51,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0628,
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"max_ev_side": "home",
"model_prob": 0.568,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Comerciantes Unidos"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.639,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.656,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1549439,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0845,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.2032,
"draw": 0.2288,
"home": 0.568
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Cusco FC",
"home": "Comerciantes Unidos"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.057595,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.568,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Comerciantes Unidos",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.51,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.3693,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.568,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.39840637450199207,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4257,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1549439,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-08-07T20:14:07.641050+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Comerciantes Unidos & Cusco FC!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Primera División de Perú — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alianza Lima | 27 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 56 |
| 2 | Universitario | 27 | 14 | 7 | 6 | 49 |
| 3 | Deportivo Garcilaso | 27 | 14 | 6 | 7 | 48 |
| 4 | FBC Melgar | 27 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 46 |
| 5 | Cusco FC | 27 | 14 | 3 | 10 | 45 |
| 6 | Cultural Santa Rosa | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 7 | Cienciano | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| 8 | Alianza Atlético | 27 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 40 |
| 9 | Sporting Cristal | 27 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 38 |
| 10 | Sport Boys | 27 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 38 |
| 11 | Sport Huancayo | 27 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 35 |
| 12 | Juan Pablo II College | 27 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 34 |
| 13 | Atlético Grau | 27 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 32 |
| 14 | Comerciantes Unidos | 27 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 30 |
| 15 | FC Cajamarca | 27 | 7 | 6 | 14 | 27 |
| 16 | ADT | 27 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 25 |
| 17 | UCV Moquegua | 27 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 25 |
| 18 | UTC | 27 | 4 | 8 | 15 | 15 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sporting Cristal | 27 | 48 | 40 | +8 | 38 |
| 2 | FBC Melgar | 27 | 45 | 29 | +16 | 46 |
| 3 | Cienciano | 26 | 45 | 39 | +6 | 40 |
| 4 | Alianza Lima | 27 | 44 | 18 | +26 | 56 |
| 5 | Universitario | 27 | 43 | 31 | +12 | 49 |
| 6 | Juan Pablo II College | 27 | 42 | 52 | -10 | 34 |
| 7 | FC Cajamarca | 27 | 41 | 52 | -11 | 27 |
| 8 | Alianza Atlético | 27 | 40 | 35 | +5 | 40 |
| 9 | Cusco FC | 27 | 40 | 38 | +2 | 45 |
| 10 | Deportivo Garcilaso | 27 | 39 | 24 | +15 | 48 |
| 11 | Sport Huancayo | 27 | 37 | 44 | -7 | 35 |
| 12 | Comerciantes Unidos | 27 | 35 | 38 | -3 | 30 |
| 13 | Cultural Santa Rosa | 26 | 35 | 44 | -9 | 41 |
| 14 | UTC | 27 | 32 | 50 | -18 | 15 |
| 15 | Sport Boys | 27 | 29 | 26 | +3 | 38 |
| 16 | ADT | 27 | 29 | 42 | -13 | 25 |
| 17 | Atlético Grau | 27 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 32 |
| 18 | UCV Moquegua | 27 | 24 | 41 | -17 | 25 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alianza Lima | 27 | 2.3 | 0.0 | +2.3 | 56 |
| 2 | Deportivo Garcilaso | 27 | 2.3 | 1.4 | +0.9 | 48 |
| 3 | Cusco FC | 27 | 1.4 | 2.3 | -0.9 | 45 |
| 4 | UTC | 27 | 0.0 | 2.3 | -2.3 | 15 |
| 5 | Universitario | 27 | — | — | — | 49 |
| 6 | FBC Melgar | 27 | — | — | — | 46 |
| 7 | Cultural Santa Rosa | 26 | — | — | — | 41 |
| 8 | Cienciano | 26 | — | — | — | 40 |
| 9 | Alianza Atlético | 27 | — | — | — | 40 |
| 10 | Sporting Cristal | 27 | — | — | — | 38 |
| 11 | Sport Boys | 27 | — | — | — | 38 |
| 12 | Sport Huancayo | 27 | — | — | — | 35 |
| 13 | Juan Pablo II College | 27 | — | — | — | 34 |
| 14 | Atlético Grau | 27 | — | — | — | 32 |
| 15 | Comerciantes Unidos | 27 | — | — | — | 30 |
| 16 | FC Cajamarca | 27 | — | — | — | 27 |
| 17 | ADT | 27 | — | — | — | 25 |
| 18 | UCV Moquegua | 27 | — | — | — | 25 |
