Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (0 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Heilongjiang Lava Spring Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-0 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.95
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Draw · Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0–0 Meizhou Kejia
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "0b156a8ee0b67a9233f6eeb98f58ccef2419a5a5a4c5c55d76776e4e3a1d50b3",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.27,
"away_win_prob": 0.3377,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2964,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.96,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.73,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.33,
"home_win_prob": 0.3659,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Heilongjiang Lava Spring or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring"
},
"away_xg": 1.27,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1114,
"edge_gap": 0.0284,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4774,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 33.8,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 36.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.94
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.94,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.09,
"market_odds": 1.94,
"model_odds": 2.73,
"overround": 8.0,
"prob_edge": -14.9,
"value_pct": -28.9,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 3,
"away_failed_to_score": 7,
"away_played": 24,
"away_score_rate": 71.9,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 3,
"home_played": 24,
"home_score_rate": 73.6,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.27,
"home_expected": 1.33,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring or Draw",
"prob": 66.2
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring or Meizhou Kejia",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Meizhou Kejia",
"prob": 63.4
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring or Meizhou Kejia",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 33.8,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.6,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.5,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 21.0,
"implied_prob": 27.9,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Meizhou Kejia Win",
"model_prob": 33.8,
"odds": 3.58
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"has_data": false
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.8,
"ev": -0.0625,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.33,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.115,
"edge": 0.0166,
"edge_pp": 1.7,
"market_prob": 0.4337,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2162,
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.0182,
"ev": -0.1122,
"implied_prob": 0.5663,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.548
},
"p_final": 0.4503,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0956,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0476,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"best_odd": 2.115,
"edge": 0.0166,
"ev": -0.0476,
"implied_prob": 0.4337,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4503
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1951,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -19.5,
"text": "-19.5%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1448,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 14.5,
"text": "+14.5%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1448,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10280.32,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1677,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.22,
"edge": 0.0076,
"edge_pp": 0.8,
"market_prob": 0.4096,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1677,
"best_odd": 2.22,
"edge": 0.0076,
"ev": -0.0738,
"implied_prob": 0.4096,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4172
},
"p_final": 0.4172,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0101,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0738,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2306,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0105,
"ev": -0.1069,
"implied_prob": 0.5904,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5799
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0465,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.7,
"text": "+4.7%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1171,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.7,
"text": "-11.7%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0465,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10041.85,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1818,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.2,
"text": "-18.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0008,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.1,
"text": "+0.1%"
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.1,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"sort_key": 5200.64,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "8/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "8/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -15.0%",
"alert_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 0.0,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": null,
"hero_label": "",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"market_team": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"model_team": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 86,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2084,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 26,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Heilongjiang Lava Spring at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 47.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Heilongjiang Lava Spring as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Heilongjiang Lava Spring \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.33 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +21% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1528723 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.33 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +14.5% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "59 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "26 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +21% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 59,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1818,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "8/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.8888888888888888,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation pending",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pending",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 25.0,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 8.9,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 8.0
},
"score": 59,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 0.0,
"market_agreement": "unknown",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.27,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.33,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.33,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.33 \u00b7 Away xG 1.27 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pending",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.0,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -15.0%",
"steam_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 26,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2084,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 26,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Heilongjiang Lava Spring at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 47.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Heilongjiang Lava Spring as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Heilongjiang Lava Spring \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.33 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +21% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1528723 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.33 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +14.5% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "59 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "26 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +21% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 59,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1818,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.33 xG vs Meizhou Kejia 1.27 \u2192 Heilongjiang Lava Spring 36.6%",
"Market Steam: Meizhou Kejia \u2193 -15.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring, but sharp money moved toward Meizhou Kejia.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 36.59,
"label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 29.64,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 33.77,
"label": "Meizhou Kejia",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.39,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 56.59,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.39,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 43.41,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.21,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 58.71,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.21,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 41.29,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations.",
"comparison_available": false,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "unknown",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "",
"edge_label_key": "",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "\u2014",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 47.7,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -11.1,
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -11.1,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 59,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pending",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 26,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1.33 xG vs Meizhou Kejia 1.27 \u2192 Heilongjiang Lava Spring 36.6%",
"Market Steam: Meizhou Kejia \u2193 -15.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring, but sharp money moved toward Meizhou Kejia.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": false,
"hero_edge_pp": null,
"hero_label": "",
"hero_side": null,
"market_activity": "Meizhou Kejia odds shortened \u2193 -15.0%.",
"market_agreement": "unknown",
"market_agreement_label": "\u2014",
"market_interpretation": {},
"market_narrative": {},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pending",
"status": "pending"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pending",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
"max_prob_pct": 36.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "",
"largest_gap_pp": null,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
},
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
},
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Meizhou Kejia",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
}
],
"status": "unknown",
"status_label": "\u2014",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical model leans Heilongjiang Lava Spring (36.6%).",
"However, Meizhou Kejia has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -15.0%, 8/9).",
"The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": null,
"closing_odds": null,
"closing_reason": "Expected before kickoff",
"closing_status": "waiting",
"closing_status_label": "Waiting",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": null,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "market_monitoring",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Market monitoring",
"entry_implied_pct": 29.41,
"entry_odds": 3.4,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pending",
"model_validation_status": "pending",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 8,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -15.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -15.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -10.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -9.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -9.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -9.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -9.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -2.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -2.9
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "8/9",
"clv_label": "Ready to validate",
"clv_status": "ready",
"current_odds": 3.4,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -15.0%",
"move_pct_abs": 15.0,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 17h 44m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"8/9 books synchronized on Meizhou Kejia (15.0% steam, score 86) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -15.0,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.00",
"3.70",
"3.40"
],
"display": "4.00 \u2192 2.96 \u2192 3.40",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 17h 44m",
"pick_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.96"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.40"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
4.0,
3.58,
3.4
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,12.6 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.40"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 4.0,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: Meizhou Kejia \u2193 -15.0% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: Meizhou Kejia \u2193 -15.0% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.4,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -15.0%",
"open_odds": 4.0,
"summary": "Market moved toward Meizhou Kejia while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Meizhou Kejia",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 86,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "8/9",
"current_odds": 3.4,
"move_display": "\u2193 -15.0%",
"open_odds": 4.0,
"pick_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
"steam_score": 86,
"steam_team_name": "Meizhou Kejia",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "meizhou-kejia",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Meizhou Kejia",
"away_team_id": 1439,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1439.webp",
"away_team_name": "Meizhou Kejia",
"away_team_public_id": "2bh9VglAnrqlhU",
"away_team_slug": "meizhou-kejia",
"country_code": "CN",
"country_display_name": "China",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/cn.svg",
"country_id": 32,
"country_name": "China",
"fixture_id": 1528723,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "China",
"home_team_display_name": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"home_team_id": 1445,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1445.webp",
"home_team_name": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"home_team_public_id": "2yskHa16SSuJpX",
"home_team_slug": "heilongjiang-lava-spring",
"ht.home_team_slug": "heilongjiang-lava-spring",
"league_country": "China",
"league_country_display": "China",
"league_display_name": "Liga Uno China",
"league_id": 170,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/170.webp",
"league_name": "Liga Uno China",
"league_public_id": "0Z8NZOcuHfzq60",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-06 11:30:00",
"public_id": "24iLKRXEKEy87s",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Dingnan",
"venue_name": "Dingnan Football Youth Training Center"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2645,
"best_odd": 3.58,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0209,
"ev": 0.0008,
"implied_prob": 0.2587,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2587,
"draw": 0.2639,
"home": 0.4774
},
"model_prob": 0.3375,
"p_final": 0.2796
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2853,
"best_odd": 3.51,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0093,
"ev": -0.0412,
"implied_prob": 0.2639,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2587,
"draw": 0.2639,
"home": 0.4774
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.2732
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4997,
"best_odd": 1.94,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0557,
"ev": -0.1818,
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2587,
"draw": 0.2639,
"home": 0.4774
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"p_final": 0.4217
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.58,
"edge": 0.0582,
"ev": 0.2084,
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"model_prob": 0.3375
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.51,
"edge": 0.0116,
"ev": 0.0406,
"implied_prob": 0.2849,
"model_prob": 0.2965
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.94,
"edge": -0.1495,
"ev": -0.29,
"implied_prob": 0.5155,
"model_prob": 0.366
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1677,
"alpha_yes": 0.2306,
"best_no_odd": 2.3,
"best_yes_odd": 1.62,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0421,
"edge_yes": -0.0421,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0465,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0738,
"ev_yes": -0.1171,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1069,
"implied_no": 0.4129,
"implied_yes": 0.5871,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1677,
"best_odd": 2.22,
"edge": 0.0076,
"ev": -0.0738,
"implied_prob": 0.4096,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4172
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2306,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0105,
"ev": -0.1069,
"implied_prob": 0.5904,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5799
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4172,
"p_final_yes": 0.5799,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2162,
"alpha_under": 0.1966,
"best_over_odd": 1.67,
"best_under_odd": 2.21,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.62,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.115,
"edge_over": -0.0839,
"edge_under": 0.0839,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1951,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1122,
"ev_under": 0.1448,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0476,
"implied_over": 0.5659,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5663,
"implied_under": 0.4341,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4337,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2162,
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.0182,
"ev": -0.1122,
"implied_prob": 0.5663,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.548
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"best_odd": 2.115,
"edge": 0.0166,
"ev": -0.0476,
"implied_prob": 0.4337,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4503
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.548,
"p_final_under": 0.4503,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2084,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1448,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.0
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2084,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 26,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Heilongjiang Lava Spring at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 47.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Heilongjiang Lava Spring as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Heilongjiang Lava Spring \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.33 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +21% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1528723 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.33 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +14.5% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "59 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "26 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +21% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 59,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Heilongjiang Lava Spring.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1818,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.06
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0557,
"ev": -0.1818,
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.366,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1677,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.22,
"edge": 0.0076,
"market_prob": 0.4096,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1677,
"best_odd": 2.22,
"edge": 0.0076,
"ev": -0.0738,
"implied_prob": 0.4096,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4172
},
"p_final": 0.4172,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0738,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2306,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0105,
"ev": -0.1069,
"implied_prob": 0.5904,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5799
}
},
"edge": 0.0421,
"ev": 0.0465,
"implied_prob": 0.4129,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.115,
"edge": 0.0166,
"market_prob": 0.4337,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2162,
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.0182,
"ev": -0.1122,
"implied_prob": 0.5663,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.548
},
"p_final": 0.4503,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0476,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"best_odd": 2.115,
"edge": 0.0166,
"ev": -0.0476,
"implied_prob": 0.4337,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4503
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0839,
"ev": 0.1448,
"implied_prob": 0.4341,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1528723,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1448,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3375,
"draw": 0.2965,
"home": 0.366
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Meizhou Kejia",
"home": "Heilongjiang Lava Spring"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.052504,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1448,
"implied_prob": 0.4341,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1818,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.94,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5154639175257733,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.29,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.0%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1528723,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-06T10:59:53.932460+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Heilongjiang Lava Spring & Meizhou Kejia!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga Uno China — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Hengchen | 24 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 44 |
| 4 | Nantong Zhiyun | 24 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 42 |
| 5 | Shaanxi Union | 24 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 36 |
| 6 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 35 |
| 7 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 32 |
| 8 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 31 |
| 9 | Changchun Yatai | 24 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 29 |
| 10 | Ningbo Professional | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 29 |
| 11 | Dalian Huayi | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 29 |
| 12 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 26 |
| 13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 23 |
| 14 | Nanjing City | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 21 |
| 15 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | Dongguan United | 24 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 13 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 48 | 20 | +28 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Hengchen | 24 | 40 | 26 | +14 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 39 | 25 | +14 | 44 |
| 4 | Shaanxi Union | 24 | 38 | 26 | +12 | 36 |
| 5 | Changchun Yatai | 24 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 29 |
| 6 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 36 | 29 | +7 | 32 |
| 7 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 35 | 46 | -11 | 23 |
| 8 | Nantong Zhiyun | 24 | 33 | 20 | +13 | 42 |
| 9 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 33 | 27 | +6 | 35 |
| 10 | Dalian Huayi | 24 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 29 |
| 11 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 28 | 33 | -5 | 26 |
| 12 | Ningbo Professional | 24 | 27 | 30 | -3 | 29 |
| 13 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 25 | 50 | -25 | 15 |
| 14 | Dongguan United | 24 | 24 | 49 | -25 | 13 |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 22 | 25 | -3 | 31 |
| 16 | Nanjing City | 24 | 20 | 33 | -13 | 21 |
