Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 San Marcos de Arica San Marcos de Arica ✔ Correcto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-0 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.81
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
San Marcos de Arica win · San Marcos de Arica 3–0 Curicó Unido
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
B-
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "8cdd91e5d09b92ba1bb7a65961342b4b5922368976c92b2c300d9d90c32ebbf0",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.21,
"away_win_prob": 0.3103,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.457,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.543,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2951,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.22,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.39,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.53,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.39,
"home_win_prob": 0.3946,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Curic\u00f3 Unido"
},
"away_xg": 1.21,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1102,
"edge_gap": 0.0846,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.5051,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 31.0,
"draw": 29.5,
"home": 39.5
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.81
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.81,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "San Marcos de Arica Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 1.98,
"market_odds": 1.81,
"model_odds": 2.53,
"overround": 9.4,
"prob_edge": -15.7,
"value_pct": -28.5,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 8,
"away_failed_to_score": 8,
"away_played": 23,
"away_score_rate": 70.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 7,
"home_failed_to_score": 6,
"home_played": 23,
"home_score_rate": 75.1,
"no_prob": 45.7,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.3,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.3
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.21,
"home_expected": 1.39,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.6
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "San Marcos de Arica or Draw",
"prob": 69.0
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "San Marcos de Arica or Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"prob": 70.5
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"prob": 60.5
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "San Marcos de Arica or Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"pick_prob": 70.5
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 31.0,
"draw_pct": 29.5,
"home_pct": 39.5,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "San Marcos de Arica"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.9,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.2,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 31.1,
"implied_prob": 23.6,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Curic\u00f3 Unido Win",
"model_prob": 31.0,
"odds": 4.23
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 21.61,
"draw": 27.87,
"home": 50.51
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-13 17:59:43",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-13 17:30:53",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "San Marcos de Arica",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 50.51,
"gap_pp": -11.02,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 39.49
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.87,
"gap_pp": 1.6,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.47
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 21.61,
"gap_pp": 9.42,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 31.03
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.08,
"gap_pp": 5.12,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 56.92,
"gap_pp": -5.12,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.81,
"early": 1.81,
"implied_closing_pct": 50.51,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 50.51,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.28,
"early": 3.28,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.87,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.87,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 4.23,
"early": 4.23,
"implied_closing_pct": 21.61,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 21.61,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.18,
"early": 2.18,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.08,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.08,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.65,
"early": 1.65,
"implied_closing_pct": 56.92,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 56.92,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 9.4,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.8,
"ev": -0.125,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.3
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.6
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.39,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2014,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0141,
"edge_pp": 1.4,
"market_prob": 0.473,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.543,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2215,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": -0.0155,
"ev": -0.1048,
"implied_prob": 0.527,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"p_final": 0.5115
},
"p_final": 0.4871,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 7.0,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0589,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0502,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2014,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0141,
"ev": -0.0502,
"implied_prob": 0.473,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"p_final": 0.4871
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1637,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -16.4,
"text": "-16.4%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.0588,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.9,
"text": "+5.9%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0588,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no_prob": 45.7,
"sort_key": 10202.92,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.3
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.12,
"edge": 0.0095,
"edge_pp": 1.0,
"market_prob": 0.4369,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"best_odd": 2.12,
"edge": 0.0095,
"ev": -0.0537,
"implied_prob": 0.4369,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4464
},
"p_final": 0.4464,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0218,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0537,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2308,
"best_odd": 1.645,
"edge": -0.0104,
"ev": -0.0908,
"implied_prob": 0.5631,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5527
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0508,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.1,
"text": "+5.1%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1194,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.9,
"text": "-11.9%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0508,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10045.72,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"consensus_odds": 1.81,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1856,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.6,
"text": "-18.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0173,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -1.7,
"text": "-1.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.0,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2852,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-28.5%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"sort_key": 1795.675,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "4/10",
"alert_breadth_note": "4/10 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"alert_team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 11.1,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.05,
"hero_label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"market_prob_pct": 50.5,
"market_team": "San Marcos de Arica",
"model_prob_pct": 39.5,
"model_team": "San Marcos de Arica",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 31,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0588,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3126,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates San Marcos de Arica at 39.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies San Marcos de Arica as the value side (39.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "San Marcos de Arica",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side San Marcos de Arica \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.42 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +31% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1511695 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.42 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.9% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +31% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1856,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.81,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5524861878453039,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2852,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-28.5%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "4/10",
"breadth_ratio": 0.4,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (11 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.5,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 4.0,
"steam_coherence": 2.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 56,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 11.05,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 11.05,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.21,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.39,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.39,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.39 \u00b7 Away xG 1.21 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +3%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.7,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"steam_team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0588,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3126,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates San Marcos de Arica at 39.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies San Marcos de Arica as the value side (39.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "San Marcos de Arica",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side San Marcos de Arica \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.42 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +31% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1511695 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.42 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.9% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +31% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1856,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.81,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5524861878453039,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2852,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-28.5%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: San Marcos de Arica 1.39 xG vs Curic\u00f3 Unido 1.21 \u2192 San Marcos de Arica 39.5%",
"Market: San Marcos de Arica ~50.5% implied",
"Market Steam: Curic\u00f3 Unido \u2193 -6.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours San Marcos de Arica, but sharp money moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -11.05,
"fair_prob": 39.46,
"label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"market_prob": 50.51,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.64,
"fair_prob": 29.51,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 27.87,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 9.42,
"fair_prob": 31.03,
"label": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"market_prob": 21.61,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.1,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 44.1,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.1,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 55.9,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.56,
"fair_prob": 54.3,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 47.74,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -6.56,
"fair_prob": 45.7,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 52.26,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -11.05,
"fair_prob_pct": 39.46,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "San Marcos de Arica",
"market_prob_pct": 50.51,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Curic\u00f3 Unido"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates San Marcos de Arica\u0027s win probability at 50.5%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 39.5%, a difference of 11.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 11.05,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 50.5,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -11.0,
"model_prob_pct": 39.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -11.0,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 56,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 15,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: San Marcos de Arica 1.39 xG vs Curic\u00f3 Unido 1.21 \u2192 San Marcos de Arica 39.5%",
"Market: San Marcos de Arica ~50.5% implied",
"Market Steam: Curic\u00f3 Unido \u2193 -6.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours San Marcos de Arica, but sharp money moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.05,
"hero_label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Curic\u00f3 Unido odds shortened \u2193 -6.7%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Curic\u00f3 Unido, with odds shortening by 6.7%. Confirmation remains limited (4/10 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about San Marcos de Arica than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Buying interest on Curic\u00f3 Unido \u2014 odds shortened by 6.7%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about San Marcos de Arica than the current fair estimate.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Curic\u00f3 Unido, with odds shortening by 6.7%. Confirmation remains limited (4/10 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"Buying interest on Curic\u00f3 Unido \u2014 odds shortened by 6.7%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors San Marcos de Arica more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Curic\u00f3 Unido has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 6.7%.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (4/10), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 11.05,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 8.4 pp (at 39.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 8.4,
"max_prob_pct": 39.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"largest_gap_pp": -11.1,
"lead": "The closing market prices San Marcos de Arica higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 11.1,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -11.05,
"edge_pp": -11.05,
"fair_prob_pct": 39.46,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "San Marcos de Arica",
"market_prob_pct": 50.51,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 1.64,
"edge_pp": 1.64,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.51,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 27.87,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 9.42,
"edge_pp": 9.42,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.03,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"market_prob_pct": 21.61,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Curic\u00f3 Unido \u2014 odds shortened by 6.7%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers San Marcos de Arica (50.5%).",
"Curic\u00f3 Unido has attracted notable multi-book line movement (\u2193 -6.7%, 4/10).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 San Marcos de Arica, Market \u2192 San Marcos de Arica, Recent sharp money \u2192 Curic\u00f3 Unido.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 55.25,
"closing_odds": 1.81,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 55.25,
"entry_odds": 1.81,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 4,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -13.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -13.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -12.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -12.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.7
}
],
"books_total": 10,
"breadth_display": "4/10",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 4.2,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 6.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 12h 33m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Volatile two-way pricing on Curic\u00f3 Unido (swing 5.00 \u2192 3.80 \u2192 4.20) \u2014 net 6.7% but intraday chop is elevated.",
"Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -6.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.50",
"4.35",
"4.20"
],
"display": "5.00 \u2192 3.80 \u2192 4.20",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 12h 33m",
"pick_team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "5.00"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.80"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.20"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
4.5,
4.23,
4.2
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,16.2 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.50"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "4.20"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.50"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.20"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 4.5,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Volatile",
"phase_tip": "High disagreement or chop \u2014 low reliability for directional bets.",
"pick_team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Pinnacle",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "warn",
"signal_icon": "\u26a0\ufe0f",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 4.2,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"open_odds": 4.5,
"summary": "Market moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "volatile_market",
"signal_label": "Volatile market",
"steam_score": 31,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "4/10",
"current_odds": 4.2,
"move_display": "\u2193 -6.7%",
"open_odds": 4.5,
"pick_team": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"steam_score": 31,
"steam_team_name": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 11.1,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "curico-unido",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"away_team_id": 2316,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/2316.webp",
"away_team_name": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"away_team_public_id": "0vrFoiZTEjoq5b",
"away_team_slug": "curico-unido",
"country_code": "CL",
"country_display_name": "Chile",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/cl.svg",
"country_id": 31,
"country_name": "Chile",
"fixture_id": 1511695,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Chile",
"home_team_display_name": "San Marcos de Arica",
"home_team_id": 2345,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/2345.webp",
"home_team_name": "San Marcos de Arica",
"home_team_public_id": "2BF6GoXVhUJXMH",
"home_team_slug": "san-marcos-de-arica",
"ht.home_team_slug": "san-marcos-de-arica",
"league_country": "Chile",
"league_country_display": "Chile",
"league_display_name": "Primera B de Chile",
"league_id": 266,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/266.webp",
"league_name": "Primera B de Chile",
"league_public_id": "2foiaznMsuMyxQ",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-13 18:00:00",
"public_id": "5uiEQ2fOiuIvgg",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Arica",
"venue_name": "Estadio Carlos Dittborn"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.1717,
"best_odd": 4.23,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0162,
"ev": -0.0173,
"implied_prob": 0.2161,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2161,
"draw": 0.2787,
"home": 0.5051
},
"model_prob": 0.3103,
"p_final": 0.2323
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2928,
"best_odd": 3.28,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0047,
"ev": -0.0704,
"implied_prob": 0.2787,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2161,
"draw": 0.2787,
"home": 0.5051
},
"model_prob": 0.2947,
"p_final": 0.2834
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.5008,
"best_odd": 1.81,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0552,
"ev": -0.1856,
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2161,
"draw": 0.2787,
"home": 0.5051
},
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"p_final": 0.4499
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 4.23,
"edge": 0.0739,
"ev": 0.3126,
"implied_prob": 0.2364,
"model_prob": 0.3103
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.28,
"edge": -0.0101,
"ev": -0.0332,
"implied_prob": 0.3049,
"model_prob": 0.2947
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.81,
"edge": -0.1575,
"ev": -0.2852,
"implied_prob": 0.5525,
"model_prob": 0.3949
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2215,
"alpha_yes": 0.2014,
"best_no_odd": 1.83,
"best_yes_odd": 1.95,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0656,
"edge_yes": 0.0656,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1637,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1048,
"ev_yes": 0.0588,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0502,
"implied_no": 0.5226,
"implied_yes": 0.4774,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2215,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": -0.0155,
"ev": -0.1048,
"implied_prob": 0.527,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"p_final": 0.5115
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2014,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0141,
"ev": -0.0502,
"implied_prob": 0.473,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"p_final": 0.4871
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"p_final_no": 0.5115,
"p_final_yes": 0.4871,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2098,
"alpha_under": 0.2308,
"best_over_odd": 2.18,
"best_under_odd": 1.7,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.12,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.645,
"edge_over": 0.041,
"edge_under": -0.041,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0508,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0537,
"ev_under": -0.1194,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0908,
"implied_over": 0.441,
"implied_over_mf": 0.4369,
"implied_under": 0.559,
"implied_under_mf": 0.5631,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"best_odd": 2.12,
"edge": 0.0095,
"ev": -0.0537,
"implied_prob": 0.4369,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4464
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2308,
"best_odd": 1.645,
"edge": -0.0104,
"ev": -0.0908,
"implied_prob": 0.5631,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5527
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4464,
"p_final_under": 0.5527,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0588,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3126,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0588,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.1,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0588,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3126,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 19,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates San Marcos de Arica at 39.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies San Marcos de Arica as the value side (39.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "San Marcos de Arica",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side San Marcos de Arica \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.42 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +31% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1511695 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.42 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.9% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "19 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +31% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Curic\u00f3 Unido, but the model still strongly favours San Marcos de Arica.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1856,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.81,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5524861878453039,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2852,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-28.5%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 3.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.543,
"draw_prob": 0.2947,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3949,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.18
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.81,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0552,
"ev": -0.1856,
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "San Marcos de Arica"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2014,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0141,
"market_prob": 0.473,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.543,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2215,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": -0.0155,
"ev": -0.1048,
"implied_prob": 0.527,
"model_prob": 0.457,
"p_final": 0.5115
},
"p_final": 0.4871,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0502,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2014,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0141,
"ev": -0.0502,
"implied_prob": 0.473,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"p_final": 0.4871
}
},
"edge": 0.0656,
"ev": 0.0588,
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"model_prob": 0.543,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.12,
"edge": 0.0095,
"market_prob": 0.4369,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"best_odd": 2.12,
"edge": 0.0095,
"ev": -0.0537,
"implied_prob": 0.4369,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4464
},
"p_final": 0.4464,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0537,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2308,
"best_odd": 1.645,
"edge": -0.0104,
"ev": -0.0908,
"implied_prob": 0.5631,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5527
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.041,
"ev": 0.0508,
"implied_prob": 0.441,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1511695,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0588,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3103,
"draw": 0.2947,
"home": 0.3949
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Curic\u00f3 Unido",
"home": "San Marcos de Arica"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.031928,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0588,
"implied_prob": 0.4774,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.543,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1856,
"consensus_ev_display": "-18.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.81,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.5051,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3949,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5524861878453039,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2852,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-28.5%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1511695,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-13T17:59:45.417371+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para San Marcos de Arica & Curicó Unido!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Primera B de Chile — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santiago Wanderers | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 44 |
| 2 | Cobreloa | 24 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 42 |
| 3 | San Luis de Quillota | 24 | 11 | 8 | 5 | 41 |
| 4 | Magallanes | 25 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 40 |
| 5 | Antofagasta | 25 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 38 |
| 6 | Recoleta | 25 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 38 |
| 7 | San Marcos de Arica | 25 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 36 |
| 8 | Unión Española | 25 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 36 |
| 9 | Deportes Puerto Montt | 25 | 10 | 4 | 11 | 34 |
| 10 | Deportes Temuco | 25 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 32 |
| 11 | Deportes Copiapó | 24 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 31 |
| 12 | Deportes Iquique | 25 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 28 |
| 13 | Curicó Unido | 25 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 27 |
| 14 | Deportes Santa Cruz | 25 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 22 |
| 15 | Unión San Felipe | 23 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 22 |
| 16 | Rangers de Talca | 25 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 18 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antofagasta | 25 | 42 | 26 | +16 | 38 |
| 2 | Cobreloa | 24 | 42 | 27 | +15 | 42 |
| 3 | Magallanes | 25 | 41 | 38 | +3 | 40 |
| 4 | Santiago Wanderers | 24 | 40 | 25 | +15 | 44 |
| 5 | Deportes Temuco | 25 | 40 | 35 | +5 | 32 |
| 6 | San Luis de Quillota | 24 | 38 | 29 | +9 | 41 |
| 7 | Recoleta | 25 | 36 | 33 | +3 | 38 |
| 8 | Deportes Iquique | 25 | 33 | 30 | +3 | 28 |
| 9 | Deportes Copiapó | 24 | 33 | 38 | -5 | 31 |
| 10 | Unión Española | 25 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 36 |
| 11 | San Marcos de Arica | 25 | 31 | 23 | +8 | 36 |
| 12 | Deportes Puerto Montt | 25 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 34 |
| 13 | Deportes Santa Cruz | 25 | 26 | 38 | -12 | 22 |
| 14 | Rangers de Talca | 25 | 23 | 40 | -17 | 18 |
| 15 | Curicó Unido | 25 | 22 | 38 | -16 | 27 |
| 16 | Unión San Felipe | 23 | 15 | 37 | -22 | 22 |
