Estadísticas / Fútbol / Argentina. Primera C / Leones de Rosario vs Luján

Leones de Rosario vs Luján Statistics & Analysis

Sep 28, 2026 - 18:00
0 1.23
1 1.37
xG Accuracy: 64%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (1 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
  • 1X2 Luján Luján ✔ Correcto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-1 ✔ Correcto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 03:04 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10119759

Closing Odds Pending
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Luján win · Leones de Rosario 0–1 Luján
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "bc601f5f50d6b22f3bf11916da39ba6fc93623d53dbd311982a898156741d775",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.37,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3849,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.456,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2957,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.6,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 3.13,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.23,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3194,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : draw or Luj\u00e1n",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "45%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "10%",
      "winner_name": "Luj\u00e1n"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.37,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Luj\u00e1n",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.0529,
        "edge_gap": 0.0651,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.3317,
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 38.5,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 32.0
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.68
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.68,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Luj\u00e1n Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 3.01,
        "market_odds": 2.68,
        "model_odds": 2.6,
        "overround": 12.5,
        "prob_edge": 1.1,
        "value_pct": 3.1,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 13,
        "away_failed_to_score": 8,
        "away_played": 29,
        "away_score_rate": 74.6,
        "home_clean_sheet": 14,
        "home_failed_to_score": 10,
        "home_played": 29,
        "home_score_rate": 70.8,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.4,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.37,
        "home_expected": 1.23,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.1
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.6
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 7.7
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Leones de Rosario or Draw",
            "prob": 61.5
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Leones de Rosario or Luj\u00e1n",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Luj\u00e1n",
            "prob": 68.1
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Leones de Rosario or Luj\u00e1n",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 38.5,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 31.9,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Luj\u00e1n"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.5,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.9,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Over 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 3.2,
        "implied_prob": 37.3,
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Luj\u00e1n Win",
        "model_prob": 38.5,
        "odds": 2.68
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Luj\u00e1n",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 33.17,
        "draw": 35.85,
        "home": 30.98
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-28 17:59:27",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-28 17:29:28",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Leones de Rosario",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 30.98,
          "gap_pp": 0.97,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 31.95
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 35.85,
          "gap_pp": -6.26,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.59
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 33.17,
          "gap_pp": 5.29,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 38.46
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 30.39,
          "gap_pp": 17.81,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 69.61,
          "gap_pp": -17.81,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.87,
          "early": 2.87,
          "implied_closing_pct": 30.98,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 30.98,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.48,
          "early": 2.48,
          "implied_closing_pct": 35.85,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 35.85,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.68,
          "early": 2.68,
          "implied_closing_pct": 33.17,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 33.17,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.0,
          "early": 3.0,
          "implied_closing_pct": 30.39,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 30.39,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.31,
          "early": 1.31,
          "implied_closing_pct": 69.61,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 69.61,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 17.8,
        "kind": "ou_o"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -4.2,
        "ev": -0.25,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 6.0,
        "market_prob": 0.1667,
        "market_prob_pct": 16.7,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 5,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 10.2
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 9.1
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 8.6
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 7.7
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.23,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.1347,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.88,
          "edge": 0.0226,
          "edge_pp": 2.3,
          "market_prob": 0.3143,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "n_bookmakers": 5,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.1347,
            "best_odd": 2.88,
            "edge": 0.0226,
            "ev": -0.0298,
            "implied_prob": 0.3143,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.3369
          },
          "p_final": 0.3369,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 16.8,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.3882,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0298,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.1852,
            "best_odd": 1.32,
            "edge": -0.0311,
            "ev": -0.1359,
            "implied_prob": 0.6857,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.6546
          },
          "value_side": "over"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": 0.446,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": true,
          "raw_pct": 44.6,
          "text": "+25%+"
        },
        "ev_under": -0.2748,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -27.5,
          "text": "-27.5%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.446,
        "n_bookmakers": 5,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10551.4,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "over"
      },
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.1428,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.25,
          "edge": 0.0197,
          "edge_pp": 2.0,
          "market_prob": 0.4063,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "n_bookmakers": 6,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.1964,
            "best_odd": 1.54,
            "edge": -0.027,
            "ev": -0.1274,
            "implied_prob": 0.5937,
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "p_final": 0.5666
          },
          "p_final": 0.426,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 13.8,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.224,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0415,
          "value_side": "yes",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.1428,
            "best_odd": 2.25,
            "edge": 0.0197,
            "ev": -0.0415,
            "implied_prob": 0.4063,
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "p_final": 0.426
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": -0.2841,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -28.4,
          "text": "-28.4%"
        },
        "ev_yes": 0.2512,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": true,
          "raw_pct": 25.1,
          "text": "+25%+"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.2512,
        "n_bookmakers": 6,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "sort_key": 10226.08,
        "tier": "best",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.68,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": -0.0522,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -5.2,
          "text": "-5.2%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.3317,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": -0.0522,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -5.2,
          "text": "-5.2%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "raw_edge_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 5.3,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.0307,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+3.1%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Luj\u00e1n",
        "sort_key": 1786.95,
        "tier": "bad_ev"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "",
        "alert_breadth_note": "",
        "alert_move": "",
        "alert_team": "",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 6.3,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": -6.28,
        "hero_label": "Draw",
        "market_prob_pct": 33.2,
        "market_team": "Draw",
        "model_prob_pct": 38.5,
        "model_team": "Luj\u00e1n",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "\u2713",
        "status_key": "aligned",
        "status_label": "Reliable prediction",
        "status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
        "steam_score": null,
        "steam_subtitle": "",
        "steam_tier": "",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 6.3,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 6.3,
          "summary": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 6.3,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 6.3,
            "summary": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.9,
          "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
          "decision_strength_v2": 4.9,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 37,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Luj\u00e1n at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 33.2%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Luj\u00e1n as the value side (38.5%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 5.3,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Luj\u00e1n",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "probability_gap",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +44.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +44.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +44.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "84 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "37 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+44.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 6,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
            "Decision strength: 3.9/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 84,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.0522,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-5.2%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.68,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.3317,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3846,
            "raw_edge_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 5.3,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.3731343283582089,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.0307,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+3.1%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": 1.5,
            "reasons": [
              "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "low",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": -10,
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.14
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "8/8",
        "breadth_ratio": 1.0,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 75,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam detected",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation passed",
              "status": "pass"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Pass",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 21.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 10.0,
            "steam_coherence": 5.0,
            "validation": 30.0
          },
          "score": 84,
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 6.28,
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "max_gap_pp": 6.28,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.37,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.23,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.37,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.23 \u00b7 Away xG 1.37 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "pass",
        "odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
        "steam_conflicts": null,
        "steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
        "steam_team": "Leones de Rosario",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 37,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Market Compatibility",
            "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
            "score": 25,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 38,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Market Compatibility",
            "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
            "score": 25,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 6.3,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 6.3,
            "summary": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 6.3,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 6.3,
              "summary": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.9,
            "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
            "decision_strength_v2": 4.9,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 37,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Luj\u00e1n at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 33.2%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Luj\u00e1n as the value side (38.5%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 5.3,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Luj\u00e1n",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "probability_gap",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +44.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +44.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +44.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "84 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "37 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+44.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 6,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
              "Decision strength: 3.9/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 84,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.0522,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-5.2%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.68,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.3317,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3846,
              "raw_edge_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 5.3,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.3731343283582089,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.0307,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+3.1%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": 1.5,
              "reasons": [
                "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "low",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": -10,
                "strength_delta": -1.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.14
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Leones de Rosario 1.23 xG vs Luj\u00e1n 1.37 \u2192 Luj\u00e1n 38.5%",
            "Market: Draw ~33.2% implied",
            "Market Steam: Leones de Rosario +0.0%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Luj\u00e1n with no major conflict.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": 0.96,
          "fair_prob": 31.94,
          "label": "Leones de Rosario",
          "market_prob": 30.98,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -6.28,
          "fair_prob": 29.57,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 35.85,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 5.32,
          "fair_prob": 38.49,
          "label": "Luj\u00e1n",
          "market_prob": 33.17,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 16.4,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 31.8,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -16.4,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 68.2,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 13.47,
          "fair_prob": 54.4,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 40.93,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -13.47,
          "fair_prob": 45.6,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 59.07,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -6.28,
        "fair_prob_pct": 29.57,
        "hero_side": "draw",
        "hero_team_name": "Draw",
        "market_prob_pct": 35.85,
        "status": "market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Leones de Rosario"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Draw\u0027s win probability at 35.9%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 29.6%, a difference of 6.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "moderate",
          "edge_status": "market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 6.28,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "moderate",
        "divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
        "divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
        "divergence_tier": "moderate",
        "edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Luj\u00e1n",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 33.2,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 5.3,
          "model_prob_pct": 38.5,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 5.3,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "High reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 84,
          "reliability_tier": "high",
          "summary": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Pass",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 37,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Market Compatibility",
              "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
              "score": 25,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 38,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Market Compatibility",
              "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
              "score": 25,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Leones de Rosario 1.23 xG vs Luj\u00e1n 1.37 \u2192 Luj\u00e1n 38.5%",
              "Market: Draw ~33.2% implied",
              "Market Steam: Leones de Rosario +0.0%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Luj\u00e1n with no major conflict.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -6.28,
        "hero_label": "Draw",
        "hero_side": "draw",
        "market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Leones de Rosario has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
          "gap_tier": "mild",
          "lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Draw. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
          "note": "Market activity is currently concentrated on Leones de Rosario.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market and model broadly agree on Draw. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
            "However, Leones de Rosario has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Market activity is currently concentrated on Leones de Rosario."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market still prices Draw above the current fair estimate.",
            "At the same time, Leones de Rosario has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (8/8) supports the current market view on Leones de Rosario."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 6.28,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
          "status": "pass"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 6.6 pp (at 38.5%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 6.6,
          "max_prob_pct": 38.5,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "medium",
          "tier_label": "Medium"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "moderate",
          "largest_gap_label": "Draw",
          "largest_gap_pp": -6.3,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Draw higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "moderate",
          "max_gap_pp": 6.3,
          "title": "Moderate Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": 0.96,
            "edge_pp": 0.96,
            "fair_prob_pct": 31.94,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Leones de Rosario",
            "market_prob_pct": 30.98,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -6.28,
            "edge_pp": -6.28,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.57,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 35.85,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 5.32,
            "edge_pp": 5.32,
            "fair_prob_pct": 38.49,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Luj\u00e1n",
            "market_prob_pct": 33.17,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "Market activity is currently concentrated on Leones de Rosario.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Draw (33.2%).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Luj\u00e1n, Market \u2192 Draw, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 40.32,
        "closing_odds": 2.48,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 40.32,
        "entry_odds": 2.48,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "model_validation_status": "pass",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "show": false
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "8/8",
        "current_odds": 3.0,
        "move_display": "+0.0%",
        "open_odds": 3.0,
        "pick_team": "Leones de Rosario",
        "steam_score": 30,
        "steam_team_name": "Leones de Rosario",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 6.3,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "lujan",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Luj\u00e1n",
      "away_team_id": 1958,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1958.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Luj\u00e1n",
      "away_team_public_id": "4PlIdPGO0xyqdC",
      "away_team_slug": "lujan",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1500191,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": null,
      "home_team_display_name": "Leones de Rosario",
      "home_team_id": 27282,
      "home_team_logo": null,
      "home_team_name": "Leones de Rosario",
      "home_team_public_id": "1bkIRubrksnlez",
      "home_team_slug": "leones-de-rosario",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "leones-de-rosario",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Primera C",
      "league_id": 132,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/132.webp",
      "league_name": "Primera C",
      "league_public_id": "5iJhpsMWwrB2VM",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-28 18:00:00",
      "public_id": "0nxZyhAD9QOnio",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": null,
      "venue_name": null
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.4143,
            "best_odd": 2.68,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0219,
            "ev": -0.0522,
            "implied_prob": 0.3317,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3317,
              "draw": 0.3585,
              "home": 0.3098
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3846,
            "p_final": 0.3536
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.4077,
            "best_odd": 2.48,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0255,
            "ev": -0.1743,
            "implied_prob": 0.3585,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3317,
              "draw": 0.3585,
              "home": 0.3098
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2959,
            "p_final": 0.333
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.4434,
            "best_odd": 2.87,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0043,
            "ev": -0.0986,
            "implied_prob": 0.3098,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3317,
              "draw": 0.3585,
              "home": 0.3098
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3195,
            "p_final": 0.3141
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 2.68,
            "edge": 0.0115,
            "ev": 0.0308,
            "implied_prob": 0.3731,
            "model_prob": 0.3846
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 2.48,
            "edge": -0.1074,
            "ev": -0.2662,
            "implied_prob": 0.4032,
            "model_prob": 0.2959
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.87,
            "edge": -0.0289,
            "ev": -0.083,
            "implied_prob": 0.3484,
            "model_prob": 0.3195
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.1964,
          "alpha_yes": 0.1428,
          "best_no_odd": 1.57,
          "best_yes_odd": 2.3,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": -0.1347,
          "edge_yes": 0.1347,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": -0.2841,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1274,
          "ev_yes": 0.2512,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0415,
          "implied_no": 0.5907,
          "implied_yes": 0.4093,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 6,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.1964,
              "best_odd": 1.54,
              "edge": -0.027,
              "ev": -0.1274,
              "implied_prob": 0.5937,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.5666
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.1428,
              "best_odd": 2.25,
              "edge": 0.0197,
              "ev": -0.0415,
              "implied_prob": 0.4063,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.426
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 6,
          "p_final_no": 0.5666,
          "p_final_yes": 0.426,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.1347,
          "alpha_under": 0.1852,
          "best_over_odd": 3.0,
          "best_under_odd": 1.4,
          "consensus_over_odd": 2.88,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.32,
          "edge_over": 0.164,
          "edge_under": -0.164,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": 0.446,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0298,
          "ev_under": -0.2748,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1359,
          "implied_over": 0.318,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.3143,
          "implied_under": 0.682,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.6857,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 5,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.1347,
              "best_odd": 2.88,
              "edge": 0.0226,
              "ev": -0.0298,
              "implied_prob": 0.3143,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3369
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.1852,
              "best_odd": 1.32,
              "edge": -0.0311,
              "ev": -0.1359,
              "implied_prob": 0.6857,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6546
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 5,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.3369,
          "p_final_under": 0.6546,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.446,
      "confidence": 6.5,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.9,
        "score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.9,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.9,
        "score_pre_penalty": 4.9
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 6.3,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 6.3,
          "summary": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.9,
        "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
        "decision_strength_v2": 4.9,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 37,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Luj\u00e1n at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 33.2%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Luj\u00e1n as the value side (38.5%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 5.3,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Luj\u00e1n",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "probability_gap",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +44.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +44.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +44.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "84 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "37 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+44.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 6,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
          "Decision strength: 3.9/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 84,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has repriced Leones de Rosario, but the model still strongly favours Luj\u00e1n.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.0522,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-5.2%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.68,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.3317,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3846,
          "raw_edge_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 5.3,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.3731343283582089,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.0307,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+3.1%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": 1.5,
          "reasons": [
            "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -1.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "low",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": -10,
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.14
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
          "draw_prob": 0.2959,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3846,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.14
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.68,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": 0.0219,
          "ev": -0.0522,
          "implied_prob": 0.3317,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.3846,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Luj\u00e1n"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.1428,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.25,
            "edge": 0.0197,
            "market_prob": 0.4063,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "n_bookmakers": 6,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.1964,
              "best_odd": 1.54,
              "edge": -0.027,
              "ev": -0.1274,
              "implied_prob": 0.5937,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.5666
            },
            "p_final": 0.426,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0415,
            "value_side": "yes",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.1428,
              "best_odd": 2.25,
              "edge": 0.0197,
              "ev": -0.0415,
              "implied_prob": 0.4063,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.426
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.1347,
          "ev": 0.2512,
          "implied_prob": 0.4093,
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.1347,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.88,
            "edge": 0.0226,
            "market_prob": 0.3143,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "n_bookmakers": 5,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.1347,
              "best_odd": 2.88,
              "edge": 0.0226,
              "ev": -0.0298,
              "implied_prob": 0.3143,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3369
            },
            "p_final": 0.3369,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0298,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.1852,
              "best_odd": 1.32,
              "edge": -0.0311,
              "ev": -0.1359,
              "implied_prob": 0.6857,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6546
            },
            "value_side": "over"
          },
          "edge": 0.164,
          "ev": 0.446,
          "implied_prob": 0.318,
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "side": "over",
          "value_side": "over"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1500191,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.446,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3846,
        "draw": 0.2959,
        "home": 0.3195
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.2512,
        "implied_prob": 0.4093,
        "market": "btts",
        "model_prob": 0.544,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "secondary",
        "side": "yes",
        "slot": "secondary"
      },
      "secondary_picks": [
        {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "ev": 0.2512,
          "implied_prob": 0.4093,
          "market": "btts",
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "not_dominant": false,
          "risk_band": "strong",
          "risk_tier": "secondary",
          "side": "yes",
          "slot": "secondary"
        }
      ],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Luj\u00e1n",
        "home": "Leones de Rosario"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.15048,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.446,
        "implied_prob": 0.318,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.482,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "medium",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "over",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 2,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.0522,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-5.2%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.68,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.3317,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "raw_edge_display": "+5.3 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 5.3,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.3731343283582089,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.0307,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+3.1%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1500191,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-28T17:59:29.149746+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Leones de Rosario & Luján!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Primera C Primera C — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Berazategui 31 12 12 7 48
2 Centro Español 31 12 11 8 47
3 Sacachispas 31 13 8 10 47
4 Lugano 31 11 13 7 46
5 Juventud Unida 31 12 9 10 45
6 Estrella del Sur 31 11 12 8 45
7 Mercedes 31 11 11 9 44
8 Victoriano Arenas 31 10 14 7 44
9 Puerto Nuevo 31 9 11 11 38
10 Defensores de Cambaceres 31 9 9 13 36
11 JJ Urquiza 31 6 14 11 32
12 Deportivo Paraguayo 31 7 11 13 32
13 Leandro N. Alem 31 8 7 16 31
14 Argentino de Rosario 31 4 15 12 27
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Centro Español 31 42 28 +14 47
2 Juventud Unida 31 38 31 +7 45
3 Berazategui 31 37 24 +13 48
4 Lugano 31 35 28 +7 46
5 Sacachispas 31 32 26 +6 47
6 Estrella del Sur 31 31 29 +2 45
7 Mercedes 31 30 24 +6 44
8 Argentino de Rosario 31 30 41 -11 27
9 Leandro N. Alem 31 30 56 -26 31
10 Puerto Nuevo 31 28 35 -7 38
11 Defensores de Cambaceres 31 25 31 -6 36
12 Victoriano Arenas 31 24 19 +5 44
13 Deportivo Paraguayo 31 23 39 -16 32
14 JJ Urquiza 31 19 26 -7 32