Estadísticas / Fútbol / Argentina. Primera Nacional / Atlético Mitre vs Chaco For Ever

Atlético Mitre vs Chaco For Ever Statistics & Analysis

Sep 13, 2026 - 19:00
0 1.27
0 1.33
xG Accuracy: 49%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Menos de 2.5 (0 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí No ✖ Incorrecto
  • 1X2 Chaco For Ever Dibujar ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 0-0 ✖ Incorrecto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 02:17 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7458246

Closing Odds 3.9
AI Fair Odds
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Atlético Mitre 0–0 Chaco For Ever
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mercado se mantuvo estable antes del inicio. No se detectó un cambio implícito relevante entre PRE30 y PRE1 en la captura priorizada.

A pesar del movimiento tardío limitado, el modelo sigue tasando Chaco For Ever (1X2),Más de 2,5 goles claramente por encima de lo implícito en esas capturas de cierre: es una lectura estática de «modelo vs precio», no de persecución tardía.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en Más de 2,5 goles en unos 15.8 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
Atlético Mitre (1X2) 33.8 43.3 -9.5
Dibujar (1X2) 29.6 32.3 -2.6
Chaco For Ever (1X2) 36.6 24.4 +12.2
Más de 2,5 goles 48.2 32.4 +15.8
Menos de 2,5 goles 51.8 67.6 -15.8
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 48.2% en Más de 2,5 goles, mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 32.4%. La diferencia —unos 15.8 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE30 → PRE1 · Casa: Pinnacle

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Las cuotas detalladas están plegadas abajo — el movimiento implícito fue insignificante.

Ver tabla completa línea a línea
Mercado Temprano (PRE30) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
Atlético Mitre (1X2) 2.2 2.2 0.0
Dibujar (1X2) 2.95 2.95 0.0
Chaco For Ever (1X2) 3.9 3.9 0.0
Más de 2,5 goles 2.92 2.92 0.0
Menos de 2,5 goles 1.4 1.4 0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "76920a09ec7ad8e541558632e0725ff0cdb528b0cbcb02a237510bb3ab6f62e9",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.33,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3659,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.455,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2964,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.73,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.96,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.27,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3377,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : Atl\u00e9tico Mitre or draw and -3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.33,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Chaco For Ever",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.1218,
        "edge_gap": 0.0284,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.2442,
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 36.6,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 33.8
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 3.9
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 3.9,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Chaco For Ever Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 4.09,
        "market_odds": 3.9,
        "model_odds": 2.73,
        "overround": 5.0,
        "prob_edge": 11.0,
        "value_pct": 42.9,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 10,
        "away_failed_to_score": 10,
        "away_played": 28,
        "away_score_rate": 73.6,
        "home_clean_sheet": 10,
        "home_failed_to_score": 9,
        "home_played": 28,
        "home_score_rate": 71.9,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.5,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.33,
        "home_expected": 1.27,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.9
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.4
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.3
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.0
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre or Draw",
            "prob": 63.4
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre or Chaco For Ever",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Chaco For Ever",
            "prob": 66.2
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre or Chaco For Ever",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 36.6,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 33.8,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Chaco For Ever"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "-3.5",
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.9,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 1.0,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Over 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 42.9,
        "implied_prob": 25.6,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Chaco For Ever Win",
        "model_prob": 36.6,
        "odds": 3.9
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Chaco For Ever",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 24.42,
        "draw": 32.29,
        "home": 43.29
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-13 18:59:23",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-13 18:30:36",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 43.29,
          "gap_pp": -9.54,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 33.75
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.29,
          "gap_pp": -2.64,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.65
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 24.42,
          "gap_pp": 12.18,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 36.6
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.41,
          "gap_pp": 15.79,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 67.59,
          "gap_pp": -15.79,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.2,
          "early": 2.2,
          "implied_closing_pct": 43.29,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 43.29,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.95,
          "early": 2.95,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.29,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.29,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.9,
          "early": 3.9,
          "implied_closing_pct": 24.42,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 24.42,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.92,
          "early": 2.92,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.41,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.41,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.4,
          "early": 1.4,
          "implied_closing_pct": 67.59,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 67.59,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 15.8,
        "kind": "ou_o"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -4.2,
        "ev": -0.25,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 6.0,
        "market_prob": 0.1667,
        "market_prob_pct": 16.7,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 9,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.9
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 9.4
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 8.3
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.0
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.27,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.148,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.75,
          "edge": 0.0214,
          "edge_pp": 2.2,
          "market_prob": 0.3373,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "n_bookmakers": 9,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.148,
            "best_odd": 2.75,
            "edge": 0.0214,
            "ev": -0.0134,
            "implied_prob": 0.3373,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.3588
          },
          "p_final": 0.3588,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 14.5,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.3255,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0134,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.2035,
            "best_odd": 1.4,
            "edge": -0.0294,
            "ev": -0.1135,
            "implied_prob": 0.6627,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.6332
          },
          "value_side": "over"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": 0.4074,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": true,
          "raw_pct": 40.7,
          "text": "+25%+"
        },
        "ev_under": -0.2696,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -27.0,
          "text": "-27.0%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.4074,
        "n_bookmakers": 9,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10516.66,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "over"
      },
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.151,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.25,
          "edge": 0.0202,
          "edge_pp": 2.0,
          "market_prob": 0.411,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.545,
          "n_bookmakers": 9,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.2076,
            "best_odd": 1.57,
            "edge": -0.0278,
            "ev": -0.1189,
            "implied_prob": 0.589,
            "model_prob": 0.455,
            "p_final": 0.5612
          },
          "p_final": 0.4312,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 13.4,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2263,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0297,
          "value_side": "yes",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.151,
            "best_odd": 2.25,
            "edge": 0.0202,
            "ev": -0.0297,
            "implied_prob": 0.411,
            "model_prob": 0.545,
            "p_final": 0.4312
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": -0.2629,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -26.3,
          "text": "-26.3%"
        },
        "ev_yes": 0.2372,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 23.7,
          "text": "+23.7%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.2372,
        "n_bookmakers": 9,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "sort_key": 10213.48,
        "tier": "best",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
        "consensus_odds": 3.9,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": 0.0689,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 6.9,
          "text": "+6.9%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.2442,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0689,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 6.9,
          "text": "+6.9%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.4274,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.7%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Chaco For Ever",
        "sort_key": 10062.01,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "1/12",
        "alert_breadth_note": "1/12 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +2.7%",
        "alert_team": "Chaco For Ever",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 12.2,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": 12.17,
        "hero_label": "Chaco For Ever",
        "market_prob_pct": 24.4,
        "market_team": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre",
        "model_prob_pct": 36.6,
        "model_team": "Chaco For Ever",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 0,
        "steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
        "steam_tier": "C",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.4074,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.4273,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 18,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Chaco For Ever at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.4%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Chaco For Ever as the value side (36.6%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Chaco For Ever",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "drift_against_model",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +40.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Reliability below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +40.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +40.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "53 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "18 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+40.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 5,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 53,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0689,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+6.9%",
            "consensus_odds": 3.9,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.2442,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.366,
            "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.25641025641025644,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.4274,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.7%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -1.5,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.06
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "1/12",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.08333333333333333,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 70,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 18.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 0.8,
            "steam_coherence": 2.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 53,
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 12.17,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.17,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.33,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.27,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.33,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.27 \u00b7 Away xG 1.33 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 2.7,
        "steam_conflicts": true,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
        "steam_team": "Chaco For Ever",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 18,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 13,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 36,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 13,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 12.2,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
              "summary": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.4074,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.4273,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 18,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Chaco For Ever at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.4%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Chaco For Ever as the value side (36.6%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Chaco For Ever",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "drift_against_model",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +40.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Reliability below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +40.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +40.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "53 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "18 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+40.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 5,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 53,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0689,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+6.9%",
              "consensus_odds": 3.9,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.2442,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.366,
              "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.25641025641025644,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.4274,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.7%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -1.5,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.06
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Atl\u00e9tico Mitre 1.27 xG vs Chaco For Ever 1.33 \u2192 Chaco For Ever 36.6%",
            "Market: Atl\u00e9tico Mitre ~24.4% implied",
            "Market Drift: Chaco For Ever odds \u2191 +2.7%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model favours Chaco For Ever, but the market has moved away from Chaco For Ever.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -9.52,
          "fair_prob": 33.77,
          "label": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre",
          "market_prob": 43.29,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -2.65,
          "fair_prob": 29.64,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 32.29,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 12.17,
          "fair_prob": 36.59,
          "label": "Chaco For Ever",
          "market_prob": 24.42,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 14.93,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 33.27,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -14.93,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 66.73,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 13.15,
          "fair_prob": 54.5,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 41.35,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -13.15,
          "fair_prob": 45.5,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 58.65,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 12.17,
        "fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "Chaco For Ever",
        "market_prob_pct": 24.42,
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "steam_team_name": "Chaco For Ever"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Chaco For Ever\u0027s win probability at 36.6%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 24.4%, a difference of 12.2 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.17,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Chaco For Ever",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 24.4,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "model_prob_pct": 36.6,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "!",
          "reliability_score": 53,
          "reliability_tier": "limited",
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 18,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 13,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 36,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 13,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Atl\u00e9tico Mitre 1.27 xG vs Chaco For Ever 1.33 \u2192 Chaco For Ever 36.6%",
              "Market: Atl\u00e9tico Mitre ~24.4% implied",
              "Market Drift: Chaco For Ever odds \u2191 +2.7%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model favours Chaco For Ever, but the market has moved away from Chaco For Ever.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 12.17,
        "hero_label": "Chaco For Ever",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "Chaco For Ever odds lengthened \u2191 +2.7%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "Confirmation remains limited (1/12 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Chaco For Ever.",
          "note": "",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Chaco For Ever.",
            "Confirmation remains limited (1/12 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate favors Chaco For Ever more strongly than current market pricing.",
            "Recent line movement on Chaco For Ever (\u2191 +2.7%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
            "Market confirmation remains limited (1/12), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.17,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
          "max_prob_pct": 36.6,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Chaco For Ever",
          "largest_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "lead": "The model rates Chaco For Ever considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -9.52,
            "edge_pp": -9.52,
            "fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre",
            "market_prob_pct": 43.29,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -2.65,
            "edge_pp": -2.65,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 32.29,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 12.17,
            "edge_pp": 12.17,
            "fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Chaco For Ever",
            "market_prob_pct": 24.42,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
        "steam_note": "",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Atl\u00e9tico Mitre (24.4%).",
          "Chaco For Ever odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +2.7%, 1/12) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Chaco For Ever, Market \u2192 Atl\u00e9tico Mitre, while Chaco For Ever odds drifted longer (market fade).",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 25.64,
        "closing_odds": 3.9,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 25.64,
        "entry_odds": 3.9,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 1,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.7
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 12,
        "breadth_display": "1/12",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 3.8,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest closing-window shift",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
        "move_pct_abs": 2.7,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 129h 15m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Volatile two-way pricing on Chaco For Ever (swing 3.90 \u2192 3.26 \u2192 3.80) \u2014 net 2.7% but intraday chop is elevated.",
          "Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 2.7,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "3.90",
            "3.80",
            "3.70"
          ],
          "display": "3.90 \u2192 3.26 \u2192 3.80",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 129h 15m",
          "pick_team": "Chaco For Ever",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.90"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.26"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.80"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            3.7,
            3.9,
            3.8
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,9.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "flat",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "Stable",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.70"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.70"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "3.90"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.80"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 3.7,
        "page_alert_line": "",
        "phase_label": "Volatile",
        "phase_tip": "High disagreement or chop \u2014 low reliability for directional bets.",
        "pick_team": "Chaco For Ever",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "warn",
        "signal_icon": "\u26a0\ufe0f",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 3.8,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
          "open_odds": 3.7,
          "summary": "Market moved away from Chaco For Ever while the model still favours another side.",
          "team": "Chaco For Ever",
          "tone": "against"
        },
        "signal_key": "volatile_market",
        "signal_label": "Volatile market",
        "steam_score": 0,
        "steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
        "steam_tier": "C",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "1/12",
        "current_odds": 3.8,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
        "open_odds": 3.7,
        "pick_team": "Chaco For Ever",
        "steam_score": 0,
        "steam_team_name": "Chaco For Ever",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 12.2,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "chaco-for-ever",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Chaco For Ever",
      "away_team_id": 1946,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1946.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Chaco For Ever",
      "away_team_public_id": "4QDtXMX8ePVsWb",
      "away_team_slug": "chaco-for-ever",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1498798,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre",
      "home_team_id": 466,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/466.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre",
      "home_team_public_id": "2jqaraZ9AfZsNx",
      "home_team_slug": "atletico-mitre",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "atletico-mitre",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Primera Nacional",
      "league_id": 129,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/129.webp",
      "league_name": "Primera Nacional",
      "league_public_id": "1KcpmJJ27Hbo5G",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-13 19:00:00",
      "public_id": "5VkjWcAw2ANjfi",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Santiago del Estero",
      "venue_name": "Estadio Aurinegro"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.2452,
            "best_odd": 3.9,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0299,
            "ev": 0.0689,
            "implied_prob": 0.2442,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2442,
              "draw": 0.3229,
              "home": 0.4329
            },
            "model_prob": 0.366,
            "p_final": 0.2741
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.4322,
            "best_odd": 2.95,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0114,
            "ev": -0.0812,
            "implied_prob": 0.3229,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2442,
              "draw": 0.3229,
              "home": 0.4329
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2965,
            "p_final": 0.3115
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3856,
            "best_odd": 2.2,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0368,
            "ev": -0.1285,
            "implied_prob": 0.4329,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2442,
              "draw": 0.3229,
              "home": 0.4329
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3375,
            "p_final": 0.3961
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 3.9,
            "edge": 0.1096,
            "ev": 0.4273,
            "implied_prob": 0.2564,
            "model_prob": 0.366
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 2.95,
            "edge": -0.0425,
            "ev": -0.1254,
            "implied_prob": 0.339,
            "model_prob": 0.2965
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.2,
            "edge": -0.117,
            "ev": -0.2574,
            "implied_prob": 0.4545,
            "model_prob": 0.3375
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.2076,
          "alpha_yes": 0.151,
          "best_no_odd": 1.62,
          "best_yes_odd": 2.27,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": -0.1315,
          "edge_yes": 0.1315,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": -0.2629,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1189,
          "ev_yes": 0.2372,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0297,
          "implied_no": 0.5865,
          "implied_yes": 0.4135,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 9,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2076,
              "best_odd": 1.57,
              "edge": -0.0278,
              "ev": -0.1189,
              "implied_prob": 0.589,
              "model_prob": 0.455,
              "p_final": 0.5612
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.151,
              "best_odd": 2.25,
              "edge": 0.0202,
              "ev": -0.0297,
              "implied_prob": 0.411,
              "model_prob": 0.545,
              "p_final": 0.4312
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 9,
          "p_final_no": 0.5612,
          "p_final_yes": 0.4312,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.148,
          "alpha_under": 0.2035,
          "best_over_odd": 2.92,
          "best_under_odd": 1.41,
          "consensus_over_odd": 2.75,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.4,
          "edge_over": 0.1493,
          "edge_under": -0.1493,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": 0.4074,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0134,
          "ev_under": -0.2696,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1135,
          "implied_over": 0.3327,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.3373,
          "implied_under": 0.6673,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.6627,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 9,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.148,
              "best_odd": 2.75,
              "edge": 0.0214,
              "ev": -0.0134,
              "implied_prob": 0.3373,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3588
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2035,
              "best_odd": 1.4,
              "edge": -0.0294,
              "ev": -0.1135,
              "implied_prob": 0.6627,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6332
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 9,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.3588,
          "p_final_under": 0.6332,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.4074,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.4273,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.4074,
      "confidence": 6.5,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.7,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.7
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.4074,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.4273,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.7,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 18,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Chaco For Ever at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 24.4%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Chaco For Ever as the value side (36.6%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 12.2,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Chaco For Ever",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "drift_against_model",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +40.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Reliability below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +40.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +40.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "53 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "18 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+40.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 5,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 53,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has moved away from Chaco For Ever, but the model still strongly favours Chaco For Ever.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0689,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+6.9%",
          "consensus_odds": 3.9,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.2442,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.366,
          "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.25641025641025644,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.4274,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.7%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -1.5,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.06
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
          "draw_prob": 0.2965,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.06
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 3.9,
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0299,
          "ev": 0.0689,
          "implied_prob": 0.2442,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.366,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Chaco For Ever"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.151,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.25,
            "edge": 0.0202,
            "market_prob": 0.411,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.545,
            "n_bookmakers": 9,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2076,
              "best_odd": 1.57,
              "edge": -0.0278,
              "ev": -0.1189,
              "implied_prob": 0.589,
              "model_prob": 0.455,
              "p_final": 0.5612
            },
            "p_final": 0.4312,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0297,
            "value_side": "yes",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.151,
              "best_odd": 2.25,
              "edge": 0.0202,
              "ev": -0.0297,
              "implied_prob": 0.411,
              "model_prob": 0.545,
              "p_final": 0.4312
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.1315,
          "ev": 0.2372,
          "implied_prob": 0.4135,
          "model_prob": 0.545,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.148,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.75,
            "edge": 0.0214,
            "market_prob": 0.3373,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "n_bookmakers": 9,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.148,
              "best_odd": 2.75,
              "edge": 0.0214,
              "ev": -0.0134,
              "implied_prob": 0.3373,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3588
            },
            "p_final": 0.3588,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0134,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2035,
              "best_odd": 1.4,
              "edge": -0.0294,
              "ev": -0.1135,
              "implied_prob": 0.6627,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6332
            },
            "value_side": "over"
          },
          "edge": 0.1493,
          "ev": 0.4074,
          "implied_prob": 0.3327,
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "side": "over",
          "value_side": "over"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1498798,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.4074,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.366,
        "draw": 0.2965,
        "home": 0.3375
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.2372,
        "implied_prob": 0.4135,
        "market": "btts",
        "model_prob": 0.545,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "secondary",
        "side": "yes",
        "slot": "secondary"
      },
      "secondary_picks": [
        {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "ev": 0.2372,
          "implied_prob": 0.4135,
          "market": "btts",
          "model_prob": 0.545,
          "not_dominant": false,
          "risk_band": "strong",
          "risk_tier": "secondary",
          "side": "yes",
          "slot": "secondary"
        }
      ],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Chaco For Ever",
        "home": "Atl\u00e9tico Mitre"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.137457,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.4074,
        "implied_prob": 0.3327,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.482,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "medium",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "over",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 3,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0689,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+6.9%",
        "consensus_odds": 3.9,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.2442,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.25641025641025644,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.4274,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+42.7%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1498798,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-13T18:59:25.497257+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Atlético Mitre & Chaco For Ever!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Primera Nacional Primera NacionalClasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Deportivo Morón 29 16 7 6 55
2 Ferro Carril Oeste 29 16 7 6 55
3 Godoy Cruz 29 14 7 8 49
4 Deportivo Madryn 29 12 10 7 46
5 Almirante Brown 29 12 10 7 46
6 Colón de Santa Fe 29 12 9 8 45
7 Estudiantes de Buenos Aires 29 10 9 10 39
8 Ciudad de Bolívar 29 9 12 8 39
9 Los Andes 29 8 13 8 37
10 Racing de Córdoba 29 9 8 12 35
11 Chaco For Ever 29 8 9 12 33
12 Defensores de Belgrano 29 7 12 10 33
13 Atlético Mitre 29 6 14 9 32
14 Central Norte 29 6 13 10 31
15 All Boys 29 6 13 10 31
16 San Telmo 29 7 10 12 31
17 San Miguel 29 6 12 11 30
18 Acassuso 29 5 8 16 23
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Deportivo Morón 29 47 27 +20 55
2 Deportivo Madryn 29 42 28 +14 46
3 Godoy Cruz 29 36 25 +11 49
4 Colón de Santa Fe 29 35 25 +10 45
5 Ferro Carril Oeste 29 34 25 +9 55
6 Atlético Mitre 29 27 35 -8 32
7 Estudiantes de Buenos Aires 29 26 25 +1 39
8 Chaco For Ever 29 26 29 -3 33
9 Racing de Córdoba 29 26 34 -8 35
10 Ciudad de Bolívar 29 24 26 -2 39
11 Almirante Brown 29 23 16 +7 46
12 San Telmo 29 23 33 -10 31
13 San Miguel 29 23 33 -10 30
14 Los Andes 29 22 17 +5 37
15 Defensores de Belgrano 29 22 26 -4 33
16 Central Norte 29 19 27 -8 31
17 Acassuso 29 19 34 -15 23
18 All Boys 29 16 25 -9 31