Estadísticas / Fútbol / Argentina. Liga Profesional Argentina / Rosario Central vs Independiente Rivadavia

Rosario Central vs Independiente Rivadavia Statistics & Analysis

Oct 11, 2026 - 20:00
5 1.00
0 1.07
xG Accuracy: 25%
Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse

Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo

Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.

  • Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
  • Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (5 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
  • Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No No ✔ Correcto
  • 1X2 Independiente Rivadavia Rosario Central ✖ Incorrecto
  • Perspectivas de marcador exacto 0-1, 1-1, 0-0, 1-0, 0-2 5-0 ✖ Incorrecto

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Oct 05, 2026 · 03:28 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-13236935

Closing Odds 1.96
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Rosario Central win · Rosario Central 5–0 Independiente Rivadavia
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Inteligencia de mercado

Lectura de apoyo tras la elección principal: cómo se movió el feed de cierre priorizado frente al modelo.

Briefing de mercado

El mercado se mantuvo estable antes del inicio. No se detectó un cambio implícito relevante entre PRE20 y PRE1 en la captura priorizada.

A pesar del movimiento tardío limitado, el modelo sigue tasando Dibujar (1X2),Independiente Rivadavia (1X2) claramente por encima de lo implícito en esas capturas de cierre: es una lectura estática de «modelo vs precio», no de persecución tardía.

El modelo aún supera la implícita de cierre en Independiente Rivadavia (1X2) en unos 9.6 puntos porcentuales — la señal de desajuste más clara de esta página.

Modelo vs implícita de cierre

Mercado Modelo % Implícita cierre % Brecha (pp)
Rosario Central (1X2) 35.9 48.0 -12.1
Dibujar (1X2) 32.8 30.3 +2.5
Independiente Rivadavia (1X2) 31.4 21.7 +9.6
Qué significa

En simple: el modelo ronda el 31.4% en Independiente Rivadavia (1X2), mientras la captura de cierre implicaba unos 21.7%. La diferencia —unos 9.6 puntos porcentuales— es la mayor brecha modelo-mercado destacada aquí.

Definiciones rápidas: «implícita de cierre» es la probabilidad implícita en las cuotas finales capturadas (tras un de-vig simple). «Brecha (pp)» = porcentaje del modelo menos esa implícita, en puntos porcentuales (pp).

Movimiento de cuota antes del inicio

Una casa prioritaria por instantáneo (no todas). Ruta de capturas: PRE20 → PRE1 · Casa: bet365

Entre paréntesis en columnas: Cierre = primera captura disponible en PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Temprano = primera en PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 distinta de Cierre.

Las cuotas detalladas están plegadas abajo — el movimiento implícito fue insignificante.

Ver tabla completa línea a línea
Mercado Temprano (PRE20) Cierre (PRE1) Δ implícita (pp)
Rosario Central (1X2) 1.96 1.96 0.0
Dibujar (1X2) 3.1 3.1 0.0
Independiente Rivadavia (1X2) 4.33 4.33 0.0

El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "04554c40bd30ee2d7a8a60c8be13d69beba9f01787de3bad3792d532512eb4d5",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "afp_away_win_prob": 0.3137,
      "afp_draw_prob": 0.3278,
      "afp_home_win_prob": 0.3585,
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.07,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3137,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": 0.3137,
      "bayes_applied": 1,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.567,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.433,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.3278,
      "draw_prob_posterior": 0.3278,
      "fair_odds_away": 3.19,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": 3.19,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.05,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": 3.05,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.79,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": 2.79,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.0,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3585,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": 0.3585,
      "over_25_prob": 0.342,
      "prediction_confidence": "high",
      "under_25_prob": 0.658
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : Rosario Central or draw",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Rosario Central"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.07,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Rosario Central",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": -0.1211,
        "edge_gap": 0.0306,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.4796,
        "model_prob": 0.3585,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 31.4,
          "draw": 32.8,
          "home": 35.9
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "bet365",
          "odd": 1.96
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 1.96,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "bet365",
        "display_market": "Rosario Central Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.08,
        "market_odds": 1.96,
        "model_odds": 2.79,
        "overround": 6.4,
        "prob_edge": -15.2,
        "value_pct": -29.7,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 7,
        "away_failed_to_score": 5,
        "away_played": 28,
        "away_score_rate": 65.7,
        "home_clean_sheet": 9,
        "home_failed_to_score": 6,
        "home_played": 29,
        "home_score_rate": 63.2,
        "no_prob": 56.7,
        "pick": "No",
        "pick_prob": 56.7,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "yes_prob": 43.3
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.07,
        "home_expected": 1.0,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 13.5
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 13.5
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-0",
            "prob": 12.6
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 12.6
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-2",
            "prob": 7.2
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Rosario Central or Draw",
            "prob": 68.7
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Rosario Central or Independiente Rivadavia",
            "prob": 67.3
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Independiente Rivadavia",
            "prob": 64.2
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "1X",
        "pick_label": "Rosario Central or Draw",
        "pick_prob": 68.7
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 31.4,
        "draw_pct": 32.8,
        "home_pct": 35.9,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Rosario Central"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.07,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.6,
        "confidence": "high",
        "home_avg_scored": 1.2,
        "over_prob": 34.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 65.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.07,
        "under_prob": 65.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "bet365",
        "edge": 36.0,
        "implied_prob": 23.1,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Independiente Rivadavia Win",
        "model_prob": 31.4,
        "odds": 4.33
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 21.71,
        "draw": 30.33,
        "home": 47.96
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "bet365",
      "closing_capture": "PRE10",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-11 19:50:43",
      "closing_source": "official",
      "early_bookmaker": "bet365",
      "early_capture": "PRE20",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-10-11 19:39:55",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Rosario Central",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 47.96,
          "gap_pp": -12.11,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 35.85
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 30.33,
          "gap_pp": 2.47,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 32.79
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 21.71,
          "gap_pp": 9.64,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 31.36
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 1.96,
          "early": 1.96,
          "implied_closing_pct": 47.96,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 47.96,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.1,
          "early": 3.1,
          "implied_closing_pct": 30.33,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 30.33,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 4.33,
          "early": 4.33,
          "implied_closing_pct": 21.71,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 21.71,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 9.6,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": {
        "best_bookmaker": "Bet365",
        "best_odds": 10.0,
        "edge": 3.5,
        "ev": 35.0,
        "label": "0-1",
        "probability": 13.5
      },
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": 3.5,
        "ev": 0.35,
        "has_edge": true,
        "label": "0-1",
        "market_odds": 10.0,
        "market_prob": 0.1,
        "market_prob_pct": 10.0,
        "model_prob": 0.135,
        "model_prob_pct": 13.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "status_key": "positive_edge"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "0-1",
        "prob": 13.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 13.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 13.5
        },
        {
          "label": "0-0",
          "prob": 12.6
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 12.6
        },
        {
          "label": "0-2",
          "prob": 7.2
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.0,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.5452,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 1.6,
          "edge": 0.0366,
          "edge_pp": 3.7,
          "market_prob": 0.5908,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.658,
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.3965,
            "best_odd": 2.31,
            "edge": -0.0267,
            "ev": -0.1163,
            "implied_prob": 0.4092,
            "model_prob": 0.342,
            "p_final": 0.3826
          },
          "p_final": 0.6274,
          "prediction_confidence": "high",
          "raw_edge_pp": 6.7,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.0528,
          "risk_adj_ev": 0.0039,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.5452,
            "best_odd": 1.6,
            "edge": 0.0366,
            "ev": 0.0039,
            "implied_prob": 0.5908,
            "model_prob": 0.658,
            "p_final": 0.6274
          },
          "value_side": "under"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": -0.186,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -18.6,
          "text": "-18.6%"
        },
        "ev_under": 0.0857,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 8.6,
          "text": "+8.6%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.0857,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "over_prob": 34.2,
        "sort_key": 10227.13,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 65.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "decision": "small_edge",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.5508,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 1.73,
          "edge": 0.017,
          "edge_pp": 1.7,
          "market_prob": 0.5362,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.567,
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.5508,
            "best_odd": 1.73,
            "edge": 0.017,
            "ev": -0.043,
            "implied_prob": 0.5362,
            "model_prob": 0.567,
            "p_final": 0.5532
          },
          "p_final": 0.5532,
          "prediction_confidence": "high",
          "raw_edge_pp": 3.1,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.0191,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.043,
          "value_side": "no",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.5007,
            "best_odd": 2.0,
            "edge": -0.0154,
            "ev": -0.1032,
            "implied_prob": 0.4638,
            "model_prob": 0.433,
            "p_final": 0.4484
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": 0.0206,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 2.1,
          "text": "+2.1%"
        },
        "ev_yes": -0.0907,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -9.1,
          "text": "-9.1%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.0206,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "no_prob": 56.7,
        "sort_key": 5216.48,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 43.3
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
        "consensus_odds": 1.96,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": -0.1765,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -17.6,
          "text": "-17.6%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.4796,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0115,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 1.1,
          "text": "+1.1%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3585,
        "raw_edge_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -12.1,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.2973,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.7%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Rosario Central",
        "sort_key": 5209.2,
        "tier": "lean"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 820.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "0-1",
        "top_prob": 13.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "3/10",
        "alert_breadth_note": "3/10 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +13.9%",
        "alert_team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 12.1,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": -12.11,
        "hero_label": "Rosario Central",
        "market_prob_pct": 48.0,
        "market_team": "Rosario Central",
        "model_prob_pct": 35.9,
        "model_team": "Rosario Central",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 49,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.1,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central)."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.1,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.1,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central)."
          },
          "alignment_key": "agree",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0857,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.3577,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.9,
          "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 5.9,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 50,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Rosario Central at 35.9%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.0%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Rosario Central as the value side (35.9%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 12.1,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Rosario Central",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "calibration_risk",
                "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
                "name": "Calibration Risk",
                "short": "Calibration Risk",
                "tone": "danger"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "calibration_risk",
              "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
              "name": "Calibration Risk",
              "short": "Calibration Risk",
              "tone": "danger"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Rosario Central \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.06 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +36% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493177 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.06 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +8.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Reliability below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "63 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "50 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "agree"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+8.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 6,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
            "Decision strength: 3.9/10",
            "Reliability below 65",
            "Outlier price +36% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 63,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Market aligns with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.1765,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-17.6%",
            "consensus_odds": 1.96,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.4796,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3585,
            "raw_edge_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": -12.1,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.5102040816326531,
            "raw_signal_ev": -0.2973,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.7%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -20.7,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.07 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.07
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "3/10",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.3,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 68,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift aligns with model",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 18.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 3.0,
            "steam_coherence": 10.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 63,
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.07,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -21.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.0,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.07,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.00 \u00b7 Away xG 1.07 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -21%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 13.9,
        "steam_conflicts": false,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +13.9%",
        "steam_team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Betting Confidence",
            "score": 50,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 39,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 35,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 39,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.1,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.1,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central)."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 12.1,
              "key": "agree",
              "label": "Agree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 12.1,
              "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central)."
            },
            "alignment_key": "agree",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0857,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.3577,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.9,
            "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 5.9,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 50,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Rosario Central at 35.9%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.0%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Rosario Central as the value side (35.9%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 12.1,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Rosario Central",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "calibration_risk",
                  "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
                  "name": "Calibration Risk",
                  "short": "Calibration Risk",
                  "tone": "danger"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "calibration_risk",
                "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
                "name": "Calibration Risk",
                "short": "Calibration Risk",
                "tone": "danger"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Rosario Central \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.06 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +36% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493177 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.06 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +8.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Reliability below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "63 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "50 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "agree"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+8.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 6,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
              "Decision strength: 3.9/10",
              "Reliability below 65",
              "Outlier price +36% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 63,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Market aligns with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.1765,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-17.6%",
              "consensus_odds": 1.96,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.4796,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3585,
              "raw_edge_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": -12.1,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.5102040816326531,
              "raw_signal_ev": -0.2973,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.7%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -20.7,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.07 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.07
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Rosario Central 1.00 xG vs Independiente Rivadavia 1.07 \u2192 Rosario Central 35.9%",
            "Market: Rosario Central ~48.0% implied",
            "Market Drift: Independiente Rivadavia odds \u2191 +13.9%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Rosario Central with no major conflict.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -12.11,
          "fair_prob": 35.85,
          "label": "Rosario Central",
          "market_prob": 47.96,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 2.45,
          "fair_prob": 32.78,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 30.33,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 9.66,
          "fair_prob": 31.37,
          "label": "Independiente Rivadavia",
          "market_prob": 21.71,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -6.83,
          "fair_prob": 34.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 41.03,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 6.83,
          "fair_prob": 65.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 58.97,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -3.19,
          "fair_prob": 43.3,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 46.49,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 3.19,
          "fair_prob": 56.7,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 53.51,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -12.11,
        "fair_prob_pct": 35.85,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "Rosario Central",
        "market_prob_pct": 47.96,
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Independiente Rivadavia"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE10",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Rosario Central\u0027s win probability at 48.0%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 35.9%, a difference of 12.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Rosario Central",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Supports model direction",
            "positive": true
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 48.0,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": -12.1,
          "model_prob_pct": 35.9,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": -12.1,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "!",
          "reliability_score": 63,
          "reliability_tier": "limited",
          "summary": "Rosario Central \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Betting Confidence",
              "score": 50,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 39,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 35,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 39,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Rosario Central 1.00 xG vs Independiente Rivadavia 1.07 \u2192 Rosario Central 35.9%",
              "Market: Rosario Central ~48.0% implied",
              "Market Drift: Independiente Rivadavia odds \u2191 +13.9%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Rosario Central with no major conflict.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -12.11,
        "hero_label": "Rosario Central",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "Independiente Rivadavia odds lengthened \u2191 +13.9%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
            "Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Independiente Rivadavia has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.9%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (3/10 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Rosario Central than the current fair estimate.",
          "note": "Drift away from Independiente Rivadavia \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.9% (weakening support).",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market is materially more optimistic about Rosario Central than the current fair estimate.",
            "However, Independiente Rivadavia has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.9%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (3/10 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
            "Drift away from Independiente Rivadavia \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.9% (weakening support)."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market favors Rosario Central more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
            "At the same time, Independiente Rivadavia has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Market confirmation remains limited (3/10), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 3.1 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 3.1,
          "max_prob_pct": 35.9,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Rosario Central",
          "largest_gap_pp": -12.1,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Rosario Central higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -12.11,
            "edge_pp": -12.11,
            "fair_prob_pct": 35.85,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Rosario Central",
            "market_prob_pct": 47.96,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 2.45,
            "edge_pp": 2.45,
            "fair_prob_pct": 32.78,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 30.33,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 9.66,
            "edge_pp": 9.66,
            "fair_prob_pct": 31.37,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Independiente Rivadavia",
            "market_prob_pct": 21.71,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "Drift away from Independiente Rivadavia \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.9% (weakening support).",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": false,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Rosario Central (48.0%).",
          "Independiente Rivadavia odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +13.9%, 3/10) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Rosario Central \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 51.02,
        "closing_odds": 1.96,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 51.02,
        "entry_odds": 1.96,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE10",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 3,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.9%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 13.9
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 9.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.6
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 10,
        "breadth_display": "3/10",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 4.33,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +13.9%",
        "move_pct_abs": 13.9,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 153h 9m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Bet365 led repricing on Independiente Rivadavia (13.9%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
          "Sharper sportsbooks initiated the move, but wider market participation remains limited."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 13.9,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "4.33",
            "4.06",
            "3.80"
          ],
          "display": "4.39 \u2192 3.41 \u2192 4.33",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 153h 9m",
          "pick_team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "4.39"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.41"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "4.33"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            3.8,
            4.33
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 56.0,0.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "up",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.80"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.80"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "4.33"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "4.33"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 3.8,
        "page_alert_line": "",
        "phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
        "phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
        "pick_team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "confirm",
        "signal_icon": "\u26a1",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 4.33,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +13.9%",
          "open_odds": 3.8,
          "summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
          "team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
          "tone": "with"
        },
        "signal_key": "sharp_led",
        "signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
        "steam_score": 49,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "3/10",
        "current_odds": 4.33,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +13.9%",
        "open_odds": 3.8,
        "pick_team": "Independiente Rivadavia",
        "steam_score": 49,
        "steam_team_name": "Independiente Rivadavia",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 12.1,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "independ-rivadavia",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Independiente Rivadavia",
      "away_team_id": 473,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/473.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Independiente Rivadavia",
      "away_team_public_id": "26COo6kYlPVeVq",
      "away_team_slug": "independ-rivadavia",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1493177,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Rosario Central",
      "home_team_id": 437,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/437.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Rosario Central",
      "home_team_public_id": "3sp6pFE7i1nl07",
      "home_team_slug": "rosario-central",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "rosario-central",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
      "league_id": 128,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/128.webp",
      "league_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
      "league_public_id": "3OCeIb3vl8JGVi",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-10-11 20:00:00",
      "public_id": "3h4uW3Y0pAExYs",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Rosario",
      "venue_name": "Estadio Dr. Lisandro de la Torre"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev",
          "pred_conf_md_draw_above_30"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)",
          "Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)"
        ],
        "score": 5.5
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.1711,
            "best_odd": 4.33,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0165,
            "ev": 0.0115,
            "implied_prob": 0.2171,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2171,
              "draw": 0.3033,
              "home": 0.4796
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3136,
            "p_final": 0.2336
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2889,
            "best_odd": 3.1,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0071,
            "ev": -0.0378,
            "implied_prob": 0.3033,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2171,
              "draw": 0.3033,
              "home": 0.4796
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3279,
            "p_final": 0.3104
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.491,
            "best_odd": 1.96,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0595,
            "ev": -0.1765,
            "implied_prob": 0.4796,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2171,
              "draw": 0.3033,
              "home": 0.4796
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3585,
            "p_final": 0.4202
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 4.33,
            "edge": 0.0826,
            "ev": 0.3577,
            "implied_prob": 0.2309,
            "model_prob": 0.3136
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.1,
            "edge": 0.0054,
            "ev": 0.0166,
            "implied_prob": 0.3226,
            "model_prob": 0.3279
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 1.96,
            "edge": -0.1517,
            "ev": -0.2973,
            "implied_prob": 0.5102,
            "model_prob": 0.3585
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.5508,
          "alpha_yes": 0.5007,
          "best_no_odd": 1.8,
          "best_yes_odd": 2.1,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": 0.0319,
          "edge_yes": -0.0319,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": 0.0206,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.043,
          "ev_yes": -0.0907,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1032,
          "implied_no": 0.5351,
          "implied_yes": 0.4649,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.5508,
              "best_odd": 1.73,
              "edge": 0.017,
              "ev": -0.043,
              "implied_prob": 0.5362,
              "model_prob": 0.567,
              "p_final": 0.5532
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "high",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.5007,
              "best_odd": 2.0,
              "edge": -0.0154,
              "ev": -0.1032,
              "implied_prob": 0.4638,
              "model_prob": 0.433,
              "p_final": 0.4484
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "p_final_no": 0.5532,
          "p_final_yes": 0.4484,
          "prediction_confidence": "high",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.3965,
          "alpha_under": 0.5452,
          "best_over_odd": 2.38,
          "best_under_odd": 1.65,
          "consensus_over_odd": 2.31,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.6,
          "edge_over": -0.0683,
          "edge_under": 0.0683,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": -0.186,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1163,
          "ev_under": 0.0857,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": 0.0039,
          "implied_over": 0.4103,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.4092,
          "implied_under": 0.5897,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.5908,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.3965,
              "best_odd": 2.31,
              "edge": -0.0267,
              "ev": -0.1163,
              "implied_prob": 0.4092,
              "model_prob": 0.342,
              "p_final": 0.3826
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "high",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.5452,
              "best_odd": 1.6,
              "edge": 0.0366,
              "ev": 0.0039,
              "implied_prob": 0.5908,
              "model_prob": 0.658,
              "p_final": 0.6274
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.3826,
          "p_final_under": 0.6274,
          "prediction_confidence": "high",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.07,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0857,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.3577,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0857,
      "confidence": 5.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_draw_above_30",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.9,
        "score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 5.9,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.9,
        "score_pre_penalty": 5.9
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.1,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central)."
        },
        "alignment_key": "agree",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0857,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.3577,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.9,
        "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 5.9,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 50,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Rosario Central at 35.9%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.0%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Rosario Central as the value side (35.9%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 12.1,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Rosario Central",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "calibration_risk",
              "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
              "name": "Calibration Risk",
              "short": "Calibration Risk",
              "tone": "danger"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "calibration_risk",
            "detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
            "name": "Calibration Risk",
            "short": "Calibration Risk",
            "tone": "danger"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Rosario Central \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.06 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +36% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493177 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.06 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +8.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Reliability below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "63 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "50 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "agree"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+8.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 6,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
          "Decision strength: 3.9/10",
          "Reliability below 65",
          "Outlier price +36% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 63,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Rosario Central).",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.1765,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-17.6%",
          "consensus_odds": 1.96,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.4796,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3585,
          "raw_edge_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": -12.1,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.5102040816326531,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.2973,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.7%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -20.7,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.07 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.07
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u672a\u5206\u578b",
        "scoring_type": "neutral",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.433,
          "draw_prob": 0.3279,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3585,
          "over_prob": 0.342,
          "total_xg": 2.07,
          "under_prob": 0.658,
          "xg_diff": 0.07
        },
        "type": "neutral",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 1.96,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": -0.0595,
          "ev": -0.1765,
          "implied_prob": 0.4796,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.3585,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Rosario Central"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "small_edge",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.5508,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 1.73,
            "edge": 0.017,
            "market_prob": 0.5362,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.567,
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.5508,
              "best_odd": 1.73,
              "edge": 0.017,
              "ev": -0.043,
              "implied_prob": 0.5362,
              "model_prob": 0.567,
              "p_final": 0.5532
            },
            "p_final": 0.5532,
            "prediction_confidence": "high",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.043,
            "value_side": "no",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.5007,
              "best_odd": 2.0,
              "edge": -0.0154,
              "ev": -0.1032,
              "implied_prob": 0.4638,
              "model_prob": 0.433,
              "p_final": 0.4484
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.0319,
          "ev": 0.0206,
          "implied_prob": 0.5351,
          "model_prob": 0.567,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.5452,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 1.6,
            "edge": 0.0366,
            "market_prob": 0.5908,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.658,
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.3965,
              "best_odd": 2.31,
              "edge": -0.0267,
              "ev": -0.1163,
              "implied_prob": 0.4092,
              "model_prob": 0.342,
              "p_final": 0.3826
            },
            "p_final": 0.6274,
            "prediction_confidence": "high",
            "risk_adj_ev": 0.0039,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.5452,
              "best_odd": 1.6,
              "edge": 0.0366,
              "ev": 0.0039,
              "implied_prob": 0.5908,
              "model_prob": 0.658,
              "p_final": 0.6274
            },
            "value_side": "under"
          },
          "edge": 0.0683,
          "ev": 0.0857,
          "implied_prob": 0.5897,
          "model_prob": 0.658,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1493177,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0857,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3136,
        "draw": 0.3279,
        "home": 0.3585
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Independiente Rivadavia",
        "home": "Rosario Central"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.056391,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0857,
        "implied_prob": 0.5897,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.658,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "under",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 2,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.1765,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-17.6%",
        "consensus_odds": 1.96,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.4796,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3585,
        "raw_edge_display": "-12.1 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -12.1,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.5102040816326531,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.2973,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.7%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1493177,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-10-11T19:51:26.702440+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Obtén predicciones premium para Rosario Central & Independiente Rivadavia!

Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.

Suscríbete ahora
Volver a Estadísticas
Liga Profesional Argentina Liga Profesional Argentina — Clasificación
# EQUIPO PJ G E P Pts
1 Estudiantes de La Plata 16 9 4 3 31
2 Boca Juniors 16 8 6 2 30
3 Vélez Sarsfield 16 7 7 2 28
4 Talleres 16 7 5 4 26
5 Independiente 16 6 6 4 24
6 Lanús 16 6 6 4 24
7 San Lorenzo 16 5 7 4 22
8 Unión de Santa Fe 16 5 6 5 21
9 Instituto 16 6 3 7 21
10 Defensa y Justicia 16 4 7 5 19
11 Gimnasia de Mendoza 16 5 4 7 19
12 Platense 16 3 7 6 16
13 Central Córdoba de Santiago 16 4 4 8 16
14 Newell's Old Boys 16 3 6 7 15
15 Deportivo Riestra 16 1 8 7 11
# EQUIPO PJ GF GC +/- Pts
1 Independiente 16 24 20 +4 24
2 Unión de Santa Fe 16 24 20 +4 21
3 Boca Juniors 16 22 9 +13 30
4 Estudiantes de La Plata 16 19 7 +12 31
5 Vélez Sarsfield 16 18 12 +6 28
6 Lanús 16 18 15 +3 24
7 Defensa y Justicia 16 18 21 -3 19
8 Talleres 16 17 13 +4 26
9 Instituto 16 17 17 0 21
10 Newell's Old Boys 16 15 27 -12 15
11 San Lorenzo 16 14 14 0 22
12 Gimnasia de Mendoza 16 14 22 -8 19
13 Central Córdoba de Santiago 16 11 21 -10 16
14 Platense 16 10 15 -5 16
15 Deportivo Riestra 16 5 12 -7 11
# EQUIPO PJ xG xGC +/- Pts
1 Instituto 16 14.9 6.7 +8.2 21
2 Lanús 16 14.5 10.2 +4.3 24
3 Boca Juniors 16 10.9 6.7 +4.2 30
4 Unión de Santa Fe 16 11.5 8.3 +3.2 21
5 Defensa y Justicia 16 14.0 10.9 +3.1 19
6 Deportivo Riestra 16 11.1 8.6 +2.5 11
7 Estudiantes de La Plata 16 14.6 12.8 +1.8 31
8 Independiente 16 8.9 9.4 -0.5 24
9 Newell's Old Boys 16 7.5 8.7 -1.2 15
10 Gimnasia de Mendoza 16 9.0 11.0 -2.0 19
11 Platense 16 7.9 10.6 -2.7 16
12 Talleres 16 10.8 13.8 -3.0 26
13 Central Córdoba de Santiago 16 12.4 15.6 -3.2 16
14 San Lorenzo 16 6.3 10.1 -3.8 22
15 Vélez Sarsfield 16 6.7 11.8 -5.1 28