Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Menos de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 objetivos) ✖ Incorrecto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS No Sí ✖ Incorrecto
- 1X2 Unión de Santa Fe Independiente ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 0-0, 1-0, 0-1, 1-1, 2-0 1-2 ✖ Incorrecto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
3.07
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Independiente win · Unión de Santa Fe 1–2 Independiente
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "f1cf19ee674deb4ba23076e5bdaba36af069813fd9be59af3c6ac275157b283f",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"afp_away_win_prob": 0.2712,
"afp_draw_prob": 0.3499,
"afp_home_win_prob": 0.3788,
"away_predicted_xg": 0.77,
"away_win_prob": 0.2712,
"away_win_prob_posterior": 0.2712,
"bayes_applied": 1,
"btts_no_prob": 0.646,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.355,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.3499,
"draw_prob_posterior": 0.3499,
"fair_odds_away": 3.69,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": 3.69,
"fair_odds_draw": 2.86,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": 2.86,
"fair_odds_home": 2.64,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": 2.64,
"home_predicted_xg": 0.99,
"home_win_prob": 0.3788,
"home_win_prob_posterior": 0.3788,
"over_25_prob": 0.259,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.741
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "30%",
"percent_draw": "35%",
"percent_home": "35%",
"winner_name": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe"
},
"away_xg": 0.77,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0005,
"edge_gap": 0.0292,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3795,
"model_prob": 0.379,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 27.1,
"draw": 35.0,
"home": 37.9
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.55
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.55,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.64,
"market_odds": 2.55,
"model_odds": 2.64,
"overround": 3.3,
"prob_edge": -1.3,
"value_pct": -3.4,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 8,
"away_failed_to_score": 5,
"away_played": 25,
"away_score_rate": 53.7,
"home_clean_sheet": 5,
"home_failed_to_score": 7,
"home_played": 27,
"home_score_rate": 62.8,
"no_prob": 64.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 64.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 35.4
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 0.77,
"home_expected": 0.99,
"scores": [
{
"away": 0,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 17.2
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 17.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 13.2
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.1
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-0",
"prob": 8.4
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe or Draw",
"prob": 72.9
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe or Independiente",
"prob": 65.0
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Independiente",
"prob": 62.1
}
],
"pick_key": "1X",
"pick_label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe or Draw",
"pick_prob": 72.9
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 27.1,
"draw_pct": 35.0,
"home_pct": 37.9,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 1.76,
"away_avg_scored": 1.3,
"confidence": "high",
"home_avg_scored": 1.6,
"over_prob": 25.9,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 74.1,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 1.76,
"under_prob": 74.1
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 7.4,
"implied_prob": 32.6,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Draw",
"market": "Draw",
"model_prob": 35.0,
"odds": 3.07
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Independiente",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 30.53,
"draw": 31.52,
"home": 37.95
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 19:44:01",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 19:14:02",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.95,
"gap_pp": -0.05,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 37.9
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.52,
"gap_pp": 3.46,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 34.98
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 30.53,
"gap_pp": -3.41,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 27.12
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 39.26,
"gap_pp": -13.36,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 25.9
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 60.74,
"gap_pp": 13.36,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 74.1
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.55,
"early": 2.55,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.95,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.95,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.07,
"early": 3.07,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.52,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 31.52,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.17,
"early": 3.17,
"implied_closing_pct": 30.53,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 30.53,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.46,
"early": 2.46,
"implied_closing_pct": 39.26,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 39.26,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.59,
"early": 1.59,
"implied_closing_pct": 60.74,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 60.74,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 13.4,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": {
"best_bookmaker": "BetVictor",
"best_odds": 8.5,
"edge": 5.4,
"ev": 46.2,
"label": "0-0",
"probability": 17.2
},
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 5.4,
"ev": 0.462,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "0-0",
"market_odds": 8.5,
"market_prob": 0.1176,
"market_prob_pct": 11.8,
"model_prob": 0.172,
"model_prob_pct": 17.2,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 17.2
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 17.2
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 17.0
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 13.2
},
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.1
},
{
"label": "2-0",
"prob": 8.4
}
]
},
"home_xg": 0.99,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4562,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.57,
"edge": 0.0639,
"edge_pp": 6.4,
"market_prob": 0.601,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.741,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3318,
"best_odd": 2.365,
"edge": -0.0464,
"ev": -0.1663,
"implied_prob": 0.399,
"model_prob": 0.259,
"p_final": 0.3525
},
"p_final": 0.6649,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 14.0,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1634,
"risk_adj_ev": 0.0439,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.4562,
"best_odd": 1.57,
"edge": 0.0639,
"ev": 0.0439,
"implied_prob": 0.601,
"model_prob": 0.741,
"p_final": 0.6649
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.3603,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -36.0,
"text": "-36.0%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1782,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 17.8,
"text": "+17.8%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1782,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 25.9,
"sort_key": 10310.38,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 74.1,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4753,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0561,
"edge_pp": 5.6,
"market_prob": 0.527,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.645,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4753,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0561,
"ev": 0.0204,
"implied_prob": 0.527,
"model_prob": 0.645,
"p_final": 0.5831
},
"p_final": 0.5831,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1288,
"risk_adj_ev": 0.0204,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.4313,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": -0.0513,
"ev": -0.1778,
"implied_prob": 0.473,
"model_prob": 0.354,
"p_final": 0.4217
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.161,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 16.1,
"text": "+16.1%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.2743,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -27.4,
"text": "-27.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.161,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 64.5,
"sort_key": 10144.9,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 35.4
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.0328,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.3,
"text": "-3.3%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.002,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -0.2,
"text": "-0.2%"
},
"model_prob": 0.379,
"raw_edge_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.1,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0336,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-3.4%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"sort_key": 2199.84,
"tier": "pass"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 831.6,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "0-0",
"top_prob": 17.2
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "8/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "8/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +15.9%",
"alert_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 3.5,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 3.47,
"hero_label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 38.0,
"market_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"model_prob_pct": 37.9,
"model_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 56,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 3.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 3.5,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 3.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 3.5,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1782,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1782,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe at 37.9%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe as the value side (37.9%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +17.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +17.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +17.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+17.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0328,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.379,
"raw_edge_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0336,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-3.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -26.7,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.22
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "8/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.8888888888888888,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 23.3,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 8.9,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 79,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 3.47,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 3.47,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 0.77,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -27.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 0.99,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 0.99,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 0.99 \u00b7 Away xG 0.77 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -27%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": 15.9,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +15.9%",
"steam_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 34,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 34,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 3.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 3.5,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 3.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 3.5,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1782,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1782,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe at 37.9%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe as the value side (37.9%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +17.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +17.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +17.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+17.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0328,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.379,
"raw_edge_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0336,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-3.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -26.7,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.22
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe 0.99 xG vs Independiente 0.77 \u2192 Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe 37.9%",
"Market: Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe ~38.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe odds \u2191 +15.9%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -0.07,
"fair_prob": 37.88,
"label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"market_prob": 37.95,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.47,
"fair_prob": 34.99,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 31.52,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": -3.41,
"fair_prob": 27.12,
"label": "Independiente",
"market_prob": 30.53,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -13.84,
"fair_prob": 25.9,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 39.74,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.84,
"fair_prob": 74.1,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 60.26,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -11.53,
"fair_prob": 35.4,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 46.93,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 11.43,
"fair_prob": 64.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 53.07,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "aligned",
"edge_pp": 3.47,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.99,
"hero_side": "draw",
"hero_team_name": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 31.52,
"status": "aligned",
"steam_team_name": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 3.47,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "Aligned",
"edge_label_key": "aligned",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 38.0,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -0.1,
"model_prob_pct": 37.9,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -0.1,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 79,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 34,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 34,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe 0.99 xG vs Independiente 0.77 \u2192 Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe 37.9%",
"Market: Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe ~38.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe odds \u2191 +15.9%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 3.47,
"hero_label": "Draw",
"hero_side": "draw",
"market_activity": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe odds lengthened \u2191 +15.9%.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Current pricing remains close to the model baseline."
],
"follow_up": "However, Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "aligned",
"lead": "The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"note": "Drift away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.9% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"However, Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.9% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"Market pricing and the fair estimate remain broadly aligned.",
"At the same time, Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.9%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (8/9) supports the current market view on Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 3.47,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 2.9,
"max_prob_pct": 37.9,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "Draw",
"largest_gap_pp": 3.5,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 3.5,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -0.07,
"edge_pp": -0.07,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.88,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"market_prob_pct": 37.95,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.47,
"edge_pp": 3.47,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.99,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 31.52,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -3.41,
"edge_pp": -3.41,
"fair_prob_pct": 27.12,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Independiente",
"market_prob_pct": 30.53,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "aligned",
"status_label": "Aligned",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.9% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe (38.0%).",
"However, Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +15.9%, 8/9) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, Market \u2192 Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, while Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 32.57,
"closing_odds": 3.07,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 32.57,
"entry_odds": 3.07,
"match_phase": "live",
"match_phase_detail": "1H",
"match_phase_display": "Live \u00b7 1H",
"match_phase_label": "Live",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 8,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +15.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 15.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.2
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "8/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.55,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +15.9%",
"move_pct_abs": 15.9,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 136h 2m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"8/9 books lengthened Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe together (15.9% drift, score 56) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 15.9,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.55",
"2.38",
"2.20"
],
"display": "2.55 \u2192 2.20 \u2192 2.55",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 136h 2m",
"pick_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.55"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.20"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.55"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.2,
2.55
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.20"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.20"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.55"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.55"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.2,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 8/9 sportsbooks on Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.55,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +15.9%",
"open_odds": 2.2,
"summary": "Market moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 56,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "8/9",
"current_odds": 2.55,
"move_display": "\u2191 +15.9%",
"open_odds": 2.2,
"pick_team": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"steam_score": 56,
"steam_team_name": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 3.5,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "independiente",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": 0,
"away_team_display_name": "Independiente",
"away_team_id": 453,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/453.webp",
"away_team_name": "Independiente",
"away_team_public_id": "3SJmJghQ1A8bWb",
"away_team_slug": "independiente",
"country_code": "AR",
"country_display_name": "Argentina",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
"country_id": 6,
"country_name": "Argentina",
"fixture_id": 1493150,
"goals_away": 0,
"goals_home": 0,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": 0,
"home_team_country": "Argentina",
"home_team_display_name": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"home_team_id": 441,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/441.webp",
"home_team_name": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"home_team_public_id": "05DSPNBhsNdokh",
"home_team_slug": "union-santa-fe",
"ht.home_team_slug": "union-santa-fe",
"league_country": "Argentina",
"league_country_display": "Argentina",
"league_display_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
"league_id": 128,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/128.webp",
"league_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
"league_public_id": "3OCeIb3vl8JGVi",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-19 19:45:00",
"public_id": "0JaAIZZ1uJJBE1",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "First Half",
"status_short": "1H",
"venue_city": "Santa Fe",
"venue_name": "Estadio 15 de Abril"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev",
"pred_conf_md_draw_above_30"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)"
],
"score": 5.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2846,
"best_odd": 3.17,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0097,
"ev": -0.0631,
"implied_prob": 0.3053,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3053,
"draw": 0.3152,
"home": 0.3795
},
"model_prob": 0.2712,
"p_final": 0.2956
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2844,
"best_odd": 3.07,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0098,
"ev": -0.002,
"implied_prob": 0.3152,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3053,
"draw": 0.3152,
"home": 0.3795
},
"model_prob": 0.3498,
"p_final": 0.3251
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4497,
"best_odd": 2.55,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0002,
"ev": -0.0328,
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3053,
"draw": 0.3152,
"home": 0.3795
},
"model_prob": 0.379,
"p_final": 0.3793
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.17,
"edge": -0.0443,
"ev": -0.1404,
"implied_prob": 0.3155,
"model_prob": 0.2712
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.07,
"edge": 0.0241,
"ev": 0.074,
"implied_prob": 0.3257,
"model_prob": 0.3498
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.55,
"edge": -0.0132,
"ev": -0.0336,
"implied_prob": 0.3922,
"model_prob": 0.379
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.4753,
"alpha_yes": 0.4313,
"best_no_odd": 1.8,
"best_yes_odd": 2.05,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.1143,
"edge_yes": -0.1153,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.161,
"ev_no_risk_adj": 0.0204,
"ev_yes": -0.2743,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1778,
"implied_no": 0.5307,
"implied_yes": 0.4693,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4753,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0561,
"ev": 0.0204,
"implied_prob": 0.527,
"model_prob": 0.645,
"p_final": 0.5831
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.4313,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": -0.0513,
"ev": -0.1778,
"implied_prob": 0.473,
"model_prob": 0.354,
"p_final": 0.4217
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.5831,
"p_final_yes": 0.4217,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.3318,
"alpha_under": 0.4562,
"best_over_odd": 2.47,
"best_under_odd": 1.59,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.365,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.57,
"edge_over": -0.1384,
"edge_under": 0.1384,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.3603,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1663,
"ev_under": 0.1782,
"ev_under_risk_adj": 0.0439,
"implied_over": 0.3974,
"implied_over_mf": 0.399,
"implied_under": 0.6026,
"implied_under_mf": 0.601,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3318,
"best_odd": 2.365,
"edge": -0.0464,
"ev": -0.1663,
"implied_prob": 0.399,
"model_prob": 0.259,
"p_final": 0.3525
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.4562,
"best_odd": 1.57,
"edge": 0.0639,
"ev": 0.0439,
"implied_prob": 0.601,
"model_prob": 0.741,
"p_final": 0.6649
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.3525,
"p_final_under": 0.6649,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 1.76,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1782,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1782,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1782,
"confidence": 6.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_draw_above_30",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 4.5,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.5,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 4.5,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.5
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 3.5,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 3.5,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1782,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1782,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe at 37.9%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe as the value side (37.9%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +17.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +17.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +17.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "79 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+17.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 79,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe, but the model still strongly favours Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0328,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.379,
"raw_edge_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0336,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-3.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -26.7,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.22
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u6781\u7aef\u9632\u5b88\uff08\u4f4e\u8fdb\u7403\uff09",
"scoring_type": "defensive",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.354,
"draw_prob": 0.3498,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.379,
"over_prob": 0.259,
"total_xg": 1.76,
"under_prob": 0.741,
"xg_diff": 0.22
},
"type": "defensive",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0002,
"ev": -0.0328,
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"max_ev_side": "draw",
"model_prob": 0.379,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4753,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0561,
"market_prob": 0.527,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.645,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4753,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0561,
"ev": 0.0204,
"implied_prob": 0.527,
"model_prob": 0.645,
"p_final": 0.5831
},
"p_final": 0.5831,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": 0.0204,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.4313,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": -0.0513,
"ev": -0.1778,
"implied_prob": 0.473,
"model_prob": 0.354,
"p_final": 0.4217
}
},
"edge": 0.1143,
"ev": 0.161,
"implied_prob": 0.5307,
"model_prob": 0.645,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4562,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.57,
"edge": 0.0639,
"market_prob": 0.601,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.741,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3318,
"best_odd": 2.365,
"edge": -0.0464,
"ev": -0.1663,
"implied_prob": 0.399,
"model_prob": 0.259,
"p_final": 0.3525
},
"p_final": 0.6649,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": 0.0439,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.4562,
"best_odd": 1.57,
"edge": 0.0639,
"ev": 0.0439,
"implied_prob": 0.601,
"model_prob": 0.741,
"p_final": 0.6649
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1384,
"ev": 0.1782,
"implied_prob": 0.6026,
"model_prob": 0.741,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1493150,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1782,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.2712,
"draw": 0.3498,
"home": 0.379
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.161,
"implied_prob": 0.5307,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.645,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.161,
"implied_prob": 0.5307,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.645,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Independiente",
"home": "Uni\u00f3n de Santa Fe"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.17166,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1782,
"implied_prob": 0.6026,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.741,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0328,
"consensus_ev_display": "-3.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.55,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3795,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.379,
"raw_edge_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3921568627450981,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0336,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-3.4%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1493150,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-19T20:05:34.551871+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Unión de Santa Fe & Independiente!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Liga Profesional Argentina — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estudiantes de La Plata | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 31 |
| 2 | Boca Juniors | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 30 |
| 3 | Vélez Sarsfield | 16 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 28 |
| 4 | Talleres | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 26 |
| 5 | Independiente | 16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| 6 | Lanús | 16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| 7 | San Lorenzo | 16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 22 |
| 8 | Unión de Santa Fe | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 21 |
| 9 | Instituto | 16 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 21 |
| 10 | Defensa y Justicia | 16 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 19 |
| 11 | Gimnasia de Mendoza | 16 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 19 |
| 12 | Platense | 16 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 16 |
| 13 | Central Córdoba de Santiago | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 |
| 14 | Newell's Old Boys | 16 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 15 |
| 15 | Deportivo Riestra | 16 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Independiente | 16 | 24 | 20 | +4 | 24 |
| 2 | Unión de Santa Fe | 16 | 24 | 20 | +4 | 21 |
| 3 | Boca Juniors | 16 | 22 | 9 | +13 | 30 |
| 4 | Estudiantes de La Plata | 16 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 31 |
| 5 | Vélez Sarsfield | 16 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 28 |
| 6 | Lanús | 16 | 18 | 15 | +3 | 24 |
| 7 | Defensa y Justicia | 16 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 19 |
| 8 | Talleres | 16 | 17 | 13 | +4 | 26 |
| 9 | Instituto | 16 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 |
| 10 | Newell's Old Boys | 16 | 15 | 27 | -12 | 15 |
| 11 | San Lorenzo | 16 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| 12 | Gimnasia de Mendoza | 16 | 14 | 22 | -8 | 19 |
| 13 | Central Córdoba de Santiago | 16 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 16 |
| 14 | Platense | 16 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 16 |
| 15 | Deportivo Riestra | 16 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 11 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Instituto | 16 | 14.2 | 5.0 | +9.2 | 21 |
| 2 | Defensa y Justicia | 16 | 11.9 | 8.5 | +3.4 | 19 |
| 3 | Lanús | 16 | 12.8 | 9.6 | +3.2 | 24 |
| 4 | Boca Juniors | 16 | 9.2 | 6.0 | +3.2 | 30 |
| 5 | Unión de Santa Fe | 16 | 9.1 | 6.2 | +2.9 | 21 |
| 6 | Deportivo Riestra | 16 | 9.7 | 7.2 | +2.5 | 11 |
| 7 | Estudiantes de La Plata | 16 | 12.1 | 9.8 | +2.3 | 31 |
| 8 | Gimnasia de Mendoza | 16 | 8.7 | 8.6 | +0.1 | 19 |
| 9 | Independiente | 16 | 8.1 | 9.1 | -1.0 | 24 |
| 10 | Talleres | 16 | 10.4 | 13.0 | -2.6 | 26 |
| 11 | Newell's Old Boys | 16 | 5.1 | 8.3 | -3.2 | 15 |
| 12 | Central Córdoba de Santiago | 16 | 9.4 | 13.1 | -3.7 | 16 |
| 13 | Platense | 16 | 6.3 | 10.2 | -3.9 | 16 |
| 14 | San Lorenzo | 16 | 4.8 | 8.7 | -3.9 | 22 |
| 15 | Vélez Sarsfield | 16 | 6.1 | 10.1 | -4.0 | 28 |
