Casa de apuestas premium stake: los nuevos usuarios pueden usar el código promoFHn2uDc1 FHn2uDc1. Registrarse
Mercados rastreados versus resultado de tiempo completo
Cada fila compara el modelo previo al partido con el resultado de tiempo completo.
- Mercado Predicción Resultado Resultado
- Más / Menos 2.5 Más de 2.5 Más de 2.5 (3 objetivos) ✔ Correcto
- Ambos Equipos Marcarán BTTS Sí Sí ✔ Correcto
- 1X2 Bahia Athletico Paranaense ✖ Incorrecto
- Perspectivas de marcador exacto 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Correcto
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
3.32
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Athletico Paranaense win · Athletico Paranaense 2–1 Bahia
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
El informe IA aún no está disponible para este partido. Vuelva a ejecutar «Generación masiva de cuotas» tras actualizar el servidor para generar el resumen.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "e13f0676fc28a8bb5a4960a69a234bc4d6f09b538f6d80a8af94bcad51d68e3d",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.68,
"away_win_prob": 0.4624,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.407,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.593,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2695,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.16,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.71,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.73,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.24,
"home_win_prob": 0.2681,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.559,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.441
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Bahia",
"main_pick_display": "Winner : Bahia",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Bahia"
},
"away_xg": 1.68,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Bahia",
"confidence": 46.3,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "Winner : Bahia",
"edge": 0.1714,
"edge_gap": 0.1933,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2913,
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"pick_type": "winner",
"probabilities": {
"away": 46.3,
"draw": 26.9,
"home": 26.8
},
"reason": "",
"selection": "away",
"selection_name": "Bahia"
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.32
}
],
"risk_color": "#f44336",
"risk_key": "high_risk",
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.32,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Bahia Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 3.43,
"market_odds": 3.32,
"model_odds": 2.16,
"overround": 3.4,
"prob_edge": 16.2,
"value_pct": 53.7,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 8,
"away_failed_to_score": 3,
"away_played": 26,
"away_score_rate": 81.4,
"home_clean_sheet": 8,
"home_failed_to_score": 6,
"home_played": 27,
"home_score_rate": 71.1,
"no_prob": 40.7,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 59.3,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 59.3
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.68,
"home_expected": 1.24,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.2
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.1
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Athletico Paranaense or Draw",
"prob": 53.8
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Athletico Paranaense or Bahia",
"prob": 73.0
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Bahia",
"prob": 73.2
}
],
"pick_key": "X2",
"pick_label": "Draw or Bahia",
"pick_prob": 73.2
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 46.2,
"draw_pct": 27.0,
"home_pct": 26.8,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Bahia"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.92,
"away_avg_scored": 1.5,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 1.5,
"over_prob": 55.9,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 55.9,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.92,
"under_prob": 44.1
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 53.7,
"implied_prob": 30.1,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Bahia Win",
"model_prob": 46.3,
"odds": 3.32
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Bahia",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 29.13,
"draw": 28.45,
"home": 42.42
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 22:29:01",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 21:59:05",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 42.42,
"gap_pp": -15.63,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 26.79
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 28.45,
"gap_pp": -1.51,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 26.94
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.13,
"gap_pp": 17.14,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 46.27
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 50.0,
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 55.9
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 50.0,
"gap_pp": -5.9,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 44.1
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.28,
"early": 2.28,
"implied_closing_pct": 42.42,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 42.42,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.4,
"early": 3.4,
"implied_closing_pct": 28.45,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 28.45,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.32,
"early": 3.32,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.13,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.13,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.94,
"early": 1.94,
"implied_closing_pct": 50.0,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 50.0,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.94,
"early": 1.94,
"implied_closing_pct": 50.0,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 50.0,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -3.5,
"ev": -0.2384,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.8,
"market_prob": 0.1471,
"market_prob_pct": 14.7,
"model_prob": 0.112,
"model_prob_pct": 11.2,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.2
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.2
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.1
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.6
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.24,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"best_odds": 3.34,
"confidence": "lean",
"display_label": "Away Bahia",
"edge": 16.3,
"ev": 54.6,
"probability": 46.3
},
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0285,
"edge_pp": 2.8,
"market_prob": 0.5026,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.559,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"best_odd": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0285,
"ev": 0.009,
"implied_prob": 0.5026,
"model_prob": 0.559,
"p_final": 0.5311
},
"p_final": 0.5311,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0621,
"risk_adj_ev": 0.009,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"best_odd": 1.92,
"edge": -0.0285,
"ev": -0.0997,
"implied_prob": 0.4974,
"model_prob": 0.441,
"p_final": 0.4689
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0845,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.5,
"text": "+8.5%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1401,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -14.0,
"text": "-14.0%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0845,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over_prob": 55.9,
"sort_key": 10226.05,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 44.1,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"authority_action": "value_alert",
"authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"consensus_odds": 3.32,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.094,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 9.4,
"text": "+9.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.094,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 9.4,
"text": "+9.4%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.1,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5362,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+53.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Bahia",
"sort_key": 10084.6,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.5443,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.67,
"edge": 0.0209,
"edge_pp": 2.1,
"market_prob": 0.5547,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.593,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4948,
"best_odd": 2.08,
"edge": -0.019,
"ev": -0.1132,
"implied_prob": 0.4453,
"model_prob": 0.407,
"p_final": 0.4264
},
"p_final": 0.5755,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.8,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0097,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0389,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5443,
"best_odd": 1.67,
"edge": 0.0209,
"ev": -0.0389,
"implied_prob": 0.5547,
"model_prob": 0.593,
"p_final": 0.5755
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1453,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -14.5,
"text": "-14.5%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.0259,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 2.6,
"text": "+2.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0259,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 40.7,
"sort_key": 5220.72,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 59.3
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 813.6,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 11.2
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "9/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "9/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"alert_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 17.1,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 17.11,
"hero_label": "Bahia",
"market_prob_pct": 29.1,
"market_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"model_prob_pct": 46.2,
"model_team": "Bahia",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 46,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 17.1,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "value_alert",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 17.1,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5361,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 53,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Bahia at 46.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 29.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Bahia as the value side (46.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Bahia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Bahia \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.75 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +54% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1492380 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.75 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +9.4% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.4% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.4% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.4% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "67 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "53 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.4% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp.",
"Decision strength: 6.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +54% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 67,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.094,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.32,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.30120481927710846,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5362,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+53.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 24.4,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.44"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.44
}
}
},
"bet_status": "value_alert",
"books_breadth_display": "9/9",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 80,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "Statistical edge detected",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (17 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 16.4,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 67,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 17.11,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 17.11,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.68,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 24.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.24,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.68,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.24 \u00b7 Away xG 1.68 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +24%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.5,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"steam_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 53,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 46,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "value_alert",
"label": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 17.1,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "value_alert",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 17.1,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5361,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 53,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Bahia at 46.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 29.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Bahia as the value side (46.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Bahia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Bahia \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.75 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +54% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1492380 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.75 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +9.4% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.4% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.4% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.4% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "67 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "53 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.4% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp.",
"Decision strength: 6.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +54% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 67,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.094,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.32,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.30120481927710846,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5362,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+53.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 24.4,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.44"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.44
}
}
},
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"tier": "lean"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Athletico Paranaense 1.24 xG vs Bahia 1.68 \u2192 Bahia 46.2%",
"Market: Athletico Paranaense ~29.1% implied",
"Market Drift: Athletico Paranaense odds \u2191 +12.5%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Bahia, but market pricing diverges by 17 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -15.61,
"fair_prob": 26.81,
"label": "Athletico Paranaense",
"market_prob": 42.42,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.5,
"fair_prob": 26.95,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 28.45,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 17.11,
"fair_prob": 46.24,
"label": "Bahia",
"market_prob": 29.13,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.54,
"fair_prob": 55.9,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 50.36,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.54,
"fair_prob": 44.1,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 49.64,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.04,
"fair_prob": 59.3,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 55.26,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.04,
"fair_prob": 40.7,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 44.74,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": 17.11,
"fair_prob_pct": 46.24,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Bahia",
"market_prob_pct": 29.13,
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"steam_team_name": "Athletico Paranaense"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Bahia\u0027s win probability at 46.2%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 29.1%, a difference of 17.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
"max_gap_pp": 17.11,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
"favourite_label": "Bahia",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "medium",
"headline": "Slight edge match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 29.1,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 17.1,
"model_prob_pct": 46.2,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 67,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "Bahia \u2014 market direction supports the model, but pricing still diverges (+17.1 pp).",
"tier": "slight_edge",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 53,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 46,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 14,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "value_alert",
"label": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Athletico Paranaense 1.24 xG vs Bahia 1.68 \u2192 Bahia 46.2%",
"Market: Athletico Paranaense ~29.1% implied",
"Market Drift: Athletico Paranaense odds \u2191 +12.5%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Bahia, but market pricing diverges by 17 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "A lead outcome exists, but the match is not one-sided in the model.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Medium",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 17.11,
"hero_label": "Bahia",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Athletico Paranaense odds lengthened \u2191 +12.5%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, Athletico Paranaense has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 12.5%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Bahia.",
"note": "Drift away from Athletico Paranaense \u2014 odds lengthened by 12.5% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Bahia.",
"However, Athletico Paranaense has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 12.5%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Athletico Paranaense \u2014 odds lengthened by 12.5% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate favors Bahia more strongly than current market pricing.",
"At the same time, Athletico Paranaense has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 12.5%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (9/9) supports the current market view on Athletico Paranaense."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 17.11,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 19.3 pp (at 46.2%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 19.3,
"max_prob_pct": 46.2,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Bahia",
"largest_gap_pp": 17.1,
"lead": "The model rates Bahia considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 17.1,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -15.61,
"edge_pp": -15.61,
"fair_prob_pct": 26.81,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Athletico Paranaense",
"market_prob_pct": 42.42,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -1.5,
"edge_pp": -1.5,
"fair_prob_pct": 26.95,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 28.45,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 17.11,
"edge_pp": 17.11,
"fair_prob_pct": 46.24,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Bahia",
"market_prob_pct": 29.13,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Athletico Paranaense \u2014 odds lengthened by 12.5% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Athletico Paranaense (29.1%).",
"Athletico Paranaense odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +12.5%, 9/9) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Bahia, Market \u2192 Athletico Paranaense, while Athletico Paranaense odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 30.12,
"closing_odds": 3.32,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 30.12,
"entry_odds": 3.32,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 9,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +7.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 7.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.4
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.25,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"move_pct_abs": 12.5,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 157h 59m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book drift on Athletico Paranaense (12.5%, 9/9) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.5,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.28",
"2.14",
"2.00"
],
"display": "2.28 \u2192 2.00 \u2192 2.25",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 157h 59m",
"pick_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.28"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.25"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.0,
2.28,
2.25
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,1.9",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.00"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.00"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.28"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.25"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.0,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 9/9 sportsbooks on Athletico Paranaense",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\u2198",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.25,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"open_odds": 2.0,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "market_drift",
"signal_label": "Drift",
"steam_score": 46,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"current_odds": 2.25,
"move_display": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"open_odds": 2.0,
"pick_team": "Athletico Paranaense",
"steam_score": 46,
"steam_team_name": "Athletico Paranaense",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 17.1,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "bahia",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Bahia",
"away_team_id": 118,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/118.webp",
"away_team_name": "Bahia",
"away_team_public_id": "1QMvPlZYgYKxNv",
"away_team_slug": "bahia",
"country_code": "BR",
"country_display_name": "Brazil",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/br.svg",
"country_id": 24,
"country_name": "Brazil",
"fixture_id": 1492380,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Brazil",
"home_team_display_name": "Athletico Paranaense",
"home_team_id": 134,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/134.webp",
"home_team_name": "Athletico Paranaense",
"home_team_public_id": "4PvGbDJnML5mhQ",
"home_team_slug": "atletico-paranaense",
"ht.home_team_slug": "atletico-paranaense",
"league_country": "Brazil",
"league_country_display": "Brazil",
"league_display_name": "Serie A de Brasil",
"league_id": 71,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/71.webp",
"league_name": "Serie A de Brasil",
"league_public_id": "0wg055kq66Q9K5",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-20 22:30:00",
"public_id": "2gCGk9aTLy97SL",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Curitiba",
"venue_name": "Arena da Baixada"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2229,
"best_odd": 3.32,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0382,
"ev": 0.094,
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2913,
"draw": 0.2845,
"home": 0.4242
},
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"p_final": 0.3295
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2932,
"best_odd": 3.4,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0044,
"ev": -0.0478,
"implied_prob": 0.2845,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2913,
"draw": 0.2845,
"home": 0.4242
},
"model_prob": 0.2694,
"p_final": 0.28
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3445,
"best_odd": 2.28,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0538,
"ev": -0.1556,
"implied_prob": 0.4242,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2913,
"draw": 0.2845,
"home": 0.4242
},
"model_prob": 0.2679,
"p_final": 0.3704
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.32,
"edge": 0.1615,
"ev": 0.5361,
"implied_prob": 0.3012,
"model_prob": 0.4627
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.4,
"edge": -0.0247,
"ev": -0.0841,
"implied_prob": 0.2941,
"model_prob": 0.2694
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.28,
"edge": -0.1707,
"ev": -0.3891,
"implied_prob": 0.4386,
"model_prob": 0.2679
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.4948,
"alpha_yes": 0.5443,
"best_no_odd": 2.1,
"best_yes_odd": 1.73,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0404,
"edge_yes": 0.0404,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1453,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1132,
"ev_yes": 0.0259,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0389,
"implied_no": 0.4474,
"implied_yes": 0.5526,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4948,
"best_odd": 2.08,
"edge": -0.019,
"ev": -0.1132,
"implied_prob": 0.4453,
"model_prob": 0.407,
"p_final": 0.4264
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5443,
"best_odd": 1.67,
"edge": 0.0209,
"ev": -0.0389,
"implied_prob": 0.5547,
"model_prob": 0.593,
"p_final": 0.5755
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4264,
"p_final_yes": 0.5755,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.5046,
"alpha_under": 0.5046,
"best_over_odd": 1.94,
"best_under_odd": 1.95,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.9,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.92,
"edge_over": 0.0554,
"edge_under": -0.0554,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0845,
"ev_over_risk_adj": 0.009,
"ev_under": -0.1401,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0997,
"implied_over": 0.5036,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5026,
"implied_under": 0.4964,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4974,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"best_odd": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0285,
"ev": 0.009,
"implied_prob": 0.5026,
"model_prob": 0.559,
"p_final": 0.5311
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"best_odd": 1.92,
"edge": -0.0285,
"ev": -0.0997,
"implied_prob": 0.4974,
"model_prob": 0.441,
"p_final": 0.4689
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5311,
"p_final_under": 0.4689,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.92,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5361,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.094,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.8,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.3,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.8,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.3
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "value_alert",
"final_decision": {
"action": "value_alert",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 17.1,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.5361,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 53,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Bahia at 46.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 29.1%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Bahia as the value side (46.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 17.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25c6",
"label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Bahia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Bahia \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.75 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +54% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1492380 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.75 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +9.4% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.4% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.4% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.4% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "67 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "53 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.4% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Bahia), but pricing still diverges by 17.1 pp.",
"Decision strength: 6.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +54% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 67,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.094,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.32,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.30120481927710846,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5362,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+53.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 24.4,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.44"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.44
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.593,
"draw_prob": 0.2694,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4627,
"over_prob": 0.559,
"total_xg": 2.92,
"under_prob": 0.441,
"xg_diff": 0.44
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.32,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0382,
"ev": 0.094,
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Bahia"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.5443,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.67,
"edge": 0.0209,
"market_prob": 0.5547,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.593,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4948,
"best_odd": 2.08,
"edge": -0.019,
"ev": -0.1132,
"implied_prob": 0.4453,
"model_prob": 0.407,
"p_final": 0.4264
},
"p_final": 0.5755,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0389,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5443,
"best_odd": 1.67,
"edge": 0.0209,
"ev": -0.0389,
"implied_prob": 0.5547,
"model_prob": 0.593,
"p_final": 0.5755
}
},
"edge": 0.0404,
"ev": 0.0259,
"implied_prob": 0.5526,
"model_prob": 0.593,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0285,
"market_prob": 0.5026,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.559,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"best_odd": 1.9,
"edge": 0.0285,
"ev": 0.009,
"implied_prob": 0.5026,
"model_prob": 0.559,
"p_final": 0.5311
},
"p_final": 0.5311,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": 0.009,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.5046,
"best_odd": 1.92,
"edge": -0.0285,
"ev": -0.0997,
"implied_prob": 0.4974,
"model_prob": 0.441,
"p_final": 0.4689
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.0554,
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.5036,
"model_prob": 0.559,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1492380,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.094,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4627,
"draw": 0.2694,
"home": 0.2679
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Bahia",
"home": "Athletico Paranaense"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.059044,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.5036,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.559,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 3,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.094,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.32,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2913,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4627,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.30120481927710846,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.5362,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+53.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1492380,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-20T22:29:06.020047+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Explora Más Contenido de Predicciones
Obtén predicciones premium para Athletico Paranaense & Bahia!
Desbloquea análisis en profundidad, consejos de apuestas exclusivos y pronósticos de partidos con nuestro servicio de suscripción premium.
Suscríbete ahora
Serie A de Brasil — Clasificación
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | G | E | P | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 28 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 60 |
| 2 | Palmeiras | 28 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 57 |
| 3 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 49 |
| 4 | Fluminense | 28 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 48 |
| 5 | Bahia | 28 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 46 |
| 6 | Cruzeiro | 28 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 45 |
| 7 | Atlético Mineiro | 27 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 40 |
| 8 | Santos | 27 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 38 |
| 9 | Coritiba | 28 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 38 |
| 10 | RB Bragantino | 27 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 36 |
| 11 | São Paulo | 27 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 36 |
| 12 | Botafogo | 28 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 35 |
| 13 | Vitória | 28 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 33 |
| 14 | Corinthians | 28 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
| 15 | Mirassol | 28 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
| 16 | Vasco da Gama | 27 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 31 |
| 17 | Grêmio | 28 | 7 | 8 | 13 | 29 |
| 18 | Internacional | 28 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 28 |
| 19 | Remo | 28 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 23 |
| 20 | Chapecoense | 27 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 18 |
| 20 | Chapecoense B | 20 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 10 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | GF | GC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 28 | 55 | 23 | +32 | 60 |
| 2 | Palmeiras | 28 | 47 | 21 | +26 | 57 |
| 3 | Fluminense | 28 | 44 | 36 | +8 | 48 |
| 4 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 43 | 32 | +11 | 49 |
| 5 | Bahia | 28 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 46 |
| 6 | Cruzeiro | 28 | 42 | 40 | +2 | 45 |
| 7 | Santos | 27 | 41 | 40 | +1 | 38 |
| 8 | Botafogo | 28 | 41 | 45 | -4 | 35 |
| 9 | Coritiba | 28 | 37 | 43 | -6 | 38 |
| 10 | Atlético Mineiro | 27 | 36 | 32 | +4 | 40 |
| 11 | Vasco da Gama | 27 | 34 | 41 | -7 | 31 |
| 12 | RB Bragantino | 27 | 33 | 31 | +2 | 36 |
| 13 | Mirassol | 28 | 33 | 42 | -9 | 32 |
| 14 | São Paulo | 27 | 32 | 30 | +2 | 36 |
| 15 | Remo | 28 | 32 | 47 | -15 | 23 |
| 16 | Internacional | 28 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 28 |
| 17 | Grêmio | 28 | 30 | 38 | -8 | 29 |
| 18 | Corinthians | 28 | 29 | 32 | -3 | 32 |
| 19 | Chapecoense | 27 | 29 | 53 | -24 | 18 |
| 20 | Vitória | 28 | 28 | 42 | -14 | 33 |
| 21 | Chapecoense B | 20 | 19 | 41 | -22 | 10 |
| # | EQUIPO | PJ | xG | xGC | +/- | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bahia | 28 | 12.2 | 6.9 | +5.3 | 46 |
| 2 | Santos | 27 | 9.9 | 6.6 | +3.3 | 38 |
| 3 | Flamengo | 28 | 9.0 | 5.7 | +3.3 | 60 |
| 4 | Vasco da Gama | 27 | 9.2 | 6.1 | +3.1 | 31 |
| 5 | Atlético Mineiro | 27 | 5.9 | 2.9 | +3.0 | 40 |
| 6 | Corinthians | 28 | 7.2 | 4.7 | +2.5 | 32 |
| 7 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 10.2 | 8.1 | +2.1 | 49 |
| 8 | Fluminense | 28 | 8.7 | 6.8 | +1.9 | 48 |
| 9 | Palmeiras | 28 | 8.2 | 6.5 | +1.7 | 57 |
| 10 | Botafogo | 28 | 11.0 | 10.9 | +0.1 | 35 |
| 11 | São Paulo | 27 | 4.9 | 4.8 | +0.1 | 36 |
| 12 | RB Bragantino | 27 | 4.9 | 5.7 | -0.8 | 36 |
| 13 | Cruzeiro | 28 | 9.3 | 10.2 | -0.9 | 45 |
| 14 | Mirassol | 28 | 7.1 | 9.0 | -1.9 | 32 |
| 15 | Remo | 28 | 5.6 | 7.7 | -2.1 | 23 |
| 16 | Coritiba | 28 | 4.9 | 7.1 | -2.2 | 38 |
| 17 | Chapecoense | 27 | 7.3 | 9.9 | -2.6 | 18 |
| 18 | Internacional | 28 | 8.8 | 11.5 | -2.7 | 28 |
| 19 | Vitória | 28 | 6.6 | 11.7 | -5.1 | 33 |
| 20 | Grêmio | 28 | 5.3 | 13.5 | -8.2 | 29 |
| 21 | Chapecoense B | 20 | — | — | — | 10 |
