The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).
The model had projected 奥胡斯 at 48.0%, but the full-time result went the other way.
追踪市场 vs 全场赛果
每行对比赛前模型倾向与全场赛果。
- 市场 预测 赛果 结果
- 大小球 2.5 大 2.5 大 2.5 (4 球) ✔ 正确
- 双方进球 BTTS 是 是 ✔ 正确
- 1X2 奥胡斯 平局 ✖ 错误
- 比分洞察(波胆) 1-1, 2-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-0 2-2 ✖ 错误
模型 vs 收盘市场
| 赛果 | 模型 | 收盘市场 | 差异 | 信号 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 奥胡斯 | 48.0% | 53.4% | -5.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 24.9% | 23.4% | +1.5 pp | Aligned |
| 欧登塞 | 27.1% | 23.1% | +3.9 pp | Aligned |
The closing market estimates 奥胡斯's win probability at 53.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 48.0%, a difference of 5.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
全场结束后,赛果为 Draw 2–2。
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on 奥胡斯. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
赛后洞察
有效之处
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.28) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
失误之处
- 1X2: model leaned 奥胡斯; match finished Draw
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
市场启示
The closing market differed from the model on 奥胡斯 by 5.5 percentage points (53.5% vs model 48.0%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
预测时间线
从预测生成到全场复盘的过程。
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 19:17 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · 奥胡斯 48.1% · Draw 24.9% · 欧登塞 27.0%
- xG · 奥胡斯 1.89 — 欧登塞 1.39
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 11:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · 奥胡斯 1.81 · Draw 4.13 · 欧登塞 4.18
- Implied 1X2 · 奥胡斯 53.4% · Draw 23.4% · 欧登塞 23.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · 奥胡斯 1.81 · Draw 4.13 · 欧登塞 4.18
- Implied 1X2 · 奥胡斯 53.4% · Draw 23.4% · 欧登塞 23.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 23, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
历史快照
开球时冻结 — 反映比赛开始前模型的原始输出。
赛前指标(历史参考)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
验证报告
Immutable Snapshot模型绩效
本场预测计入:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
复盘 FAQ
- 这次预测有多准确?
- 本页将方向性市场(1X2、大小 2.5、双方进球)与全场赛果对照评分。预测评级反映有多少追踪市场与实际结果一致。
- xG 吻合度衡量什么?
- xG 吻合度比较模型赛前预期进球画像与实际比分 — 不等于每个市场都命中。方向复盘表现好可以与中等 xG 吻合度并存。
- 为什么没有预测到精确比分?
- 即使模型正确读取比赛画像,精确比分仍是低概率尾部结果。我们展示 Top 比分区间供参考;未中精确比分并不否定方向复盘。
- 这会更新 AI 战绩吗?
- 每场完赛比赛都会记入验证流水线。汇总命中率与 CLV 研究单独发布 — 本页是逐场审计记录。
预测仅供参考,请理性投注、量力而行。历史表现不代表未来结果。
丹麦超级联赛 — 积分榜
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 胜 | 平 | 负 | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 哥本哈根足球俱乐部 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 24 |
| 2 | 米迪兰特FC | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 19 |
| 3 | 维堡 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 | 北西兰FC | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 5 | 布隆德比 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 6 | 霍森斯 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 7 | 锡尔克堡 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 8 | 兰德斯FC | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 9 | 欧登塞 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 10 | 林比 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 11 | 奥胡斯 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 12 | 桑德捷斯基 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 进球 | 失球 | +/- | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 哥本哈根足球俱乐部 | 9 | 23 | 8 | +15 | 24 |
| 2 | 米迪兰特FC | 9 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 19 |
| 3 | 维堡 | 9 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 17 |
| 4 | 霍森斯 | 9 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 11 |
| 5 | 北西兰FC | 9 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 17 |
| 6 | 锡尔克堡 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 7 | 布隆德比 | 9 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 13 |
| 8 | 桑德捷斯基 | 9 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 5 |
| 9 | 兰德斯FC | 9 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 10 | 奥胡斯 | 9 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 5 |
| 11 | 林比 | 9 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 7 |
| 12 | 欧登塞 | 9 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 9 |
| # | 球队 | 场次 | xG | xGC | +/- | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 北西兰FC | 9 | 15.9 | 7.0 | +8.9 | 17 |
| 2 | 林比 | 9 | 12.2 | 8.1 | +4.1 | 7 |
| 3 | 维堡 | 9 | 9.7 | 6.4 | +3.3 | 17 |
| 4 | 米迪兰特FC | 9 | 9.3 | 6.3 | +3.0 | 19 |
| 5 | 奥胡斯 | 9 | 8.5 | 6.3 | +2.2 | 5 |
| 6 | 哥本哈根足球俱乐部 | 9 | 6.6 | 6.3 | +0.3 | 24 |
| 7 | 布隆德比 | 9 | 8.9 | 9.8 | -0.9 | 13 |
| 8 | 欧登塞 | 9 | 8.7 | 9.7 | -1.0 | 9 |
| 9 | 锡尔克堡 | 9 | 6.2 | 9.8 | -3.6 | 10 |
| 10 | 霍森斯 | 9 | 7.3 | 11.3 | -4.0 | 11 |
| 11 | 兰德斯FC | 9 | 5.8 | 11.6 | -5.8 | 10 |
| 12 | 桑德捷斯基 | 9 | 5.9 | 12.2 | -6.3 | 5 |