The model missed the final outcome (水原FC win 1–2).
The model had projected 大邱FC at 52.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.
追踪市场 vs 全场赛果
每行对比赛前模型倾向与全场赛果。
- 市场 预测 赛果 结果
- 大小球 2.5 大 2.5 大 2.5 (3 球) ✔ 正确
- 双方进球 BTTS 是 是 ✔ 正确
- 1X2 大邱FC 水原FC ✖ 错误
- 比分洞察(波胆) 2-1, 1-1, 2-0, 1-0, 3-1 1-2 ✖ 错误
模型 vs 收盘市场
| 赛果 | 模型 | 收盘市场 | 差异 | 信号 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 大邱FC | 52.4% | 48.4% | +4.0 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 23.9% | 23.3% | +0.6 pp | Aligned |
| 水原FC | 23.7% | 28.3% | -4.6 pp | Aligned |
The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
全场结束后,赛果为 水原FC win 1–2。
Market Assessment
The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.
- Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.
赛后洞察
有效之处
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.33) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
失误之处
- 1X2: model leaned 大邱FC; match finished 水原FC
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
市场启示
The full-time result was 水原FC win 1–2, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.
预测时间线
从预测生成到全场复盘的过程。
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 20:12 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · 大邱FC 52.4% · Draw 23.9% · 水原FC 23.7%
- xG · 大邱FC 2.04 — 水原FC 1.29
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 10:03 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · 大邱FC 1.97 · Draw 4.09 · 水原FC 3.37
- Implied 1X2 · 大邱FC 48.4% · Draw 23.3% · 水原FC 28.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 10:30 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · 大邱FC 1.97 · Draw 4.09 · 水原FC 3.37
- Implied 1X2 · 大邱FC 48.4% · Draw 23.3% · 水原FC 28.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 10:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result 水原FC win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
历史快照
开球时冻结 — 反映比赛开始前模型的原始输出。
赛前指标(历史参考)
- Validation: Pass
- High xG deviation from league baseline (51%+)
- Moderate model lean
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
验证报告
Immutable Snapshot模型绩效
本场预测计入:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
复盘 FAQ
- 这次预测有多准确?
- 本页将方向性市场(1X2、大小 2.5、双方进球)与全场赛果对照评分。预测评级反映有多少追踪市场与实际结果一致。
- xG 吻合度衡量什么?
- xG 吻合度比较模型赛前预期进球画像与实际比分 — 不等于每个市场都命中。方向复盘表现好可以与中等 xG 吻合度并存。
- 为什么没有预测到精确比分?
- 即使模型正确读取比赛画像,精确比分仍是低概率尾部结果。我们展示 Top 比分区间供参考;未中精确比分并不否定方向复盘。
- 这会更新 AI 战绩吗?
- 每场完赛比赛都会记入验证流水线。汇总命中率与 CLV 研究单独发布 — 本页是逐场审计记录。
预测仅供参考,请理性投注、量力而行。历史表现不代表未来结果。
探索更多预测内容
韩国K联赛2 — 积分榜
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 胜 | 平 | 负 | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 水原三星蓝翼 | 25 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 53 |
| 2 | 水原FC | 25 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 48 |
| 3 | 首尔衣恋FC | 26 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 48 |
| 4 | 大邱FC | 26 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 46 |
| 5 | 华城FC | 26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 44 |
| 6 | 釜山IPark | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 7 | 金浦市民 | 25 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 35 |
| 8 | 牙山木槿花 | 25 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 34 |
| 9 | 庆南FC | 25 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 34 |
| 10 | 城南FC | 25 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 31 |
| 11 | 清州FC | 26 | 5 | 14 | 7 | 29 |
| 12 | 坡州市民 | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 29 |
| 13 | 龙仁城 | 25 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 27 |
| 14 | 天安城 | 26 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 23 |
| 15 | 安山绿人 | 26 | 6 | 4 | 16 | 22 |
| 16 | 全南天龙 | 25 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 21 |
| 17 | 金海城 | 25 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 13 |
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 进球 | 失球 | +/- | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 水原FC | 25 | 50 | 29 | +21 | 48 |
| 2 | 大邱FC | 26 | 48 | 35 | +13 | 46 |
| 3 | 首尔衣恋FC | 26 | 45 | 30 | +15 | 48 |
| 4 | 华城FC | 26 | 41 | 27 | +14 | 44 |
| 5 | 釜山IPark | 26 | 41 | 34 | +7 | 41 |
| 6 | 水原三星蓝翼 | 25 | 39 | 20 | +19 | 53 |
| 7 | 牙山木槿花 | 25 | 34 | 31 | +3 | 34 |
| 8 | 金浦市民 | 25 | 31 | 30 | +1 | 35 |
| 9 | 庆南FC | 25 | 31 | 30 | +1 | 34 |
| 10 | 龙仁城 | 25 | 31 | 35 | -4 | 27 |
| 11 | 清州FC | 26 | 31 | 41 | -10 | 29 |
| 12 | 天安城 | 26 | 30 | 37 | -7 | 23 |
| 13 | 城南FC | 25 | 28 | 30 | -2 | 31 |
| 14 | 全南天龙 | 25 | 28 | 43 | -15 | 21 |
| 15 | 安山绿人 | 26 | 27 | 49 | -22 | 22 |
| 16 | 坡州市民 | 25 | 24 | 28 | -4 | 29 |
| 17 | 金海城 | 25 | 19 | 49 | -30 | 13 |