AI correctly predicted the 安养FC win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
追踪市场 vs 全场赛果
每行对比赛前模型倾向与全场赛果。
- 市场 预测 赛果 结果
- 大小球 2.5 大 2.5 大 2.5 (3 球) ✔ 正确
- 双方进球 BTTS 是 是 ✔ 正确
- 1X2 安养FC 安养FC ✔ 正确
- 比分洞察(波胆) 2-1, 1-1, 2-0, 1-0, 3-1 2-1 ✔ 正确
模型 vs 收盘市场
| 赛果 | 模型 | 收盘市场 | 差异 | 信号 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 安养FC | 50.0% | 23.7% | +26.3 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 26.0% | 29.8% | -3.8 pp | Aligned |
| 江原FC | 24.0% | 46.5% | -22.5 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates 安养FC's win probability at 50.0%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 23.7%, a difference of 26.3 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
全场结束后,模型方向判断与赛果一致(安养FC win 2–1)。
赛后洞察
有效之处
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.15) — 3 goals materialised
- 安养FC attacking xG significantly stronger (2.03 vs 1.12)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
市场启示
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced 安养FC more conservatively (23.7% vs model 50.0%, 26.3 pp), but the model's lean was validated (安养FC win 2–1).
预测时间线
从预测生成到全场复盘的过程。
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 19:23 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · 安养FC 50.0% · Draw 26.0% · 江原FC 24.0%
- xG · 安养FC 2.03 — 江原FC 1.12
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 10:00 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · 安养FC 4.08 · Draw 3.25 · 江原FC 2.08
- Implied 1X2 · 安养FC 23.7% · Draw 29.8% · 江原FC 46.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 10:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · 安养FC 4.08 · Draw 3.25 · 江原FC 2.08
- Implied 1X2 · 安养FC 23.7% · Draw 29.8% · 江原FC 46.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 10:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result 安养FC win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
历史快照
开球时冻结 — 反映比赛开始前模型的原始输出。
历史标签: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
赛前指标(历史参考)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (26 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (50%+)
- Statistical edge detected
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation warning
验证报告
Immutable Snapshot概率校准
- 期望概率: 57.1%
- 历史概率桶: 55–60% — 样本积累中
模型绩效
本场预测计入:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
复盘 FAQ
- 这次预测有多准确?
- 本页将方向性市场(1X2、大小 2.5、双方进球)与全场赛果对照评分。预测评级反映有多少追踪市场与实际结果一致。
- xG 吻合度衡量什么?
- xG 吻合度比较模型赛前预期进球画像与实际比分 — 不等于每个市场都命中。方向复盘表现好可以与中等 xG 吻合度并存。
- 为什么没有预测到精确比分?
- 即使模型正确读取比赛画像,精确比分仍是低概率尾部结果。我们展示 Top 比分区间供参考;未中精确比分并不否定方向复盘。
- 这会更新 AI 战绩吗?
- 每场完赛比赛都会记入验证流水线。汇总命中率与 CLV 研究单独发布 — 本页是逐场审计记录。
预测仅供参考,请理性投注、量力而行。历史表现不代表未来结果。
探索更多预测内容
韩国K联赛1 — 积分榜
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 胜 | 平 | 负 | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 首尔FC | 30 | 19 | 5 | 6 | 62 |
| 2 | 蔚山现代 | 30 | 14 | 5 | 11 | 47 |
| 3 | 济州联FC | 30 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 46 |
| 4 | 全北现代 | 30 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 44 |
| 5 | 江原FC | 29 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 42 |
| 6 | 大田市民 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 40 |
| 7 | 浦项制铁 | 30 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 40 |
| 8 | 安养FC | 30 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 38 |
| 9 | 仁川联 | 29 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 38 |
| 10 | 金泉尚武FC | 30 | 5 | 18 | 7 | 33 |
| 11 | 富川FC 1995 | 30 | 7 | 11 | 12 | 32 |
| 12 | 光州FC | 30 | 1 | 12 | 17 | 15 |
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 进球 | 失球 | +/- | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 首尔FC | 30 | 56 | 25 | +31 | 62 |
| 2 | 大田市民 | 30 | 46 | 37 | +9 | 40 |
| 3 | 蔚山现代 | 30 | 45 | 40 | +5 | 47 |
| 4 | 全北现代 | 30 | 38 | 28 | +10 | 44 |
| 5 | 安养FC | 30 | 38 | 47 | -9 | 38 |
| 6 | 江原FC | 29 | 36 | 28 | +8 | 42 |
| 7 | 仁川联 | 29 | 36 | 33 | +3 | 38 |
| 8 | 济州联FC | 30 | 35 | 29 | +6 | 46 |
| 9 | 富川FC 1995 | 30 | 31 | 40 | -9 | 32 |
| 10 | 金泉尚武FC | 30 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 33 |
| 11 | 浦项制铁 | 30 | 28 | 34 | -6 | 40 |
| 12 | 光州FC | 30 | 21 | 63 | -42 | 15 |
| # | 球队 | 场次 | xG | xGC | +/- | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 仁川联 | 29 | 2.3 | 0.7 | +1.6 | 38 |
| 2 | 浦项制铁 | 30 | 1.6 | 0.6 | +1.0 | 40 |
| 3 | 蔚山现代 | 30 | 2.0 | 1.3 | +0.7 | 47 |
| 4 | 金泉尚武FC | 30 | 2.0 | 1.4 | +0.6 | 33 |
| 5 | 江原FC | 29 | 0.9 | 0.5 | +0.4 | 42 |
| 6 | 济州联FC | 30 | 0.9 | 0.7 | +0.2 | 46 |
| 7 | 大田市民 | 30 | 0.7 | 0.9 | -0.2 | 40 |
| 8 | 首尔FC | 30 | 0.5 | 0.9 | -0.4 | 62 |
| 9 | 富川FC 1995 | 30 | 1.4 | 2.0 | -0.6 | 32 |
| 10 | 全北现代 | 30 | 1.3 | 2.0 | -0.7 | 44 |
| 11 | 光州FC | 30 | 0.6 | 1.6 | -1.0 | 15 |
| 12 | 安养FC | 30 | 0.7 | 2.3 | -1.6 | 38 |