The model missed the final outcome (斯凯兹莫 win 1–3).
The model had projected 康斯文格二队 at 37.3%, but the full-time result went the other way.
追踪市场 vs 全场赛果
每行对比赛前模型倾向与全场赛果。
- 市场 预测 赛果 结果
- 大小球 2.5 小 2.5 大 2.5 (4 球) ✖ 错误
- 双方进球 BTTS 是 是 ✔ 正确
- 1X2 康斯文格二队 斯凯兹莫 ✖ 错误
- 比分洞察(波胆) 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-3 ✖ 错误
模型 vs 收盘市场
| 赛果 | 模型 | 收盘市场 | 差异 | 信号 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 康斯文格二队 | 37.3% | 33.3% | +4.0 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 28.0% | 24.0% | +4.0 pp | Aligned |
| 斯凯兹莫 | 34.7% | 42.7% | -8.1 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates 斯凯兹莫's win probability at 42.7%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.7%, a difference of 8.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
全场结束后,赛果为 斯凯兹莫 win 1–3。
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on 斯凯兹莫. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
赛后洞察
有效之处
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
失误之处
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned 康斯文格二队; match finished 斯凯兹莫
市场启示
The closing market differed from the model on 康斯文格二队 by 8.1 percentage points (45.4% vs model 37.3%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
预测时间线
从预测生成到全场复盘的过程。
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 19:24 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · 康斯文格二队 37.3% · Draw 28.0% · 斯凯兹莫 34.7%
- xG · 康斯文格二队 1.38 — 斯凯兹莫 1.22
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 16:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · 康斯文格二队 2.67 · Draw 3.71 · 斯凯兹莫 2.08
- Implied 1X2 · 康斯文格二队 33.3% · Draw 24.0% · 斯凯兹莫 42.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · 康斯文格二队 2.67 · Draw 3.71 · 斯凯兹莫 2.08
- Implied 1X2 · 康斯文格二队 33.3% · Draw 24.0% · 斯凯兹莫 42.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result 斯凯兹莫 win · 1–3
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
历史快照
开球时冻结 — 反映比赛开始前模型的原始输出。
赛前指标(历史参考)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
验证报告
Immutable Snapshot模型绩效
本场预测计入:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
复盘 FAQ
- 这次预测有多准确?
- 本页将方向性市场(1X2、大小 2.5、双方进球)与全场赛果对照评分。预测评级反映有多少追踪市场与实际结果一致。
- xG 吻合度衡量什么?
- xG 吻合度比较模型赛前预期进球画像与实际比分 — 不等于每个市场都命中。方向复盘表现好可以与中等 xG 吻合度并存。
- 为什么没有预测到精确比分?
- 即使模型正确读取比赛画像,精确比分仍是低概率尾部结果。我们展示 Top 比分区间供参考;未中精确比分并不否定方向复盘。
- 这会更新 AI 战绩吗?
- 每场完赛比赛都会记入验证流水线。汇总命中率与 CLV 研究单独发布 — 本页是逐场审计记录。
预测仅供参考,请理性投注、量力而行。历史表现不代表未来结果。
探索更多预测内容
挪威丙级联赛第5组 — 积分榜
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 胜 | 平 | 负 | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 斯凯兹莫 | 21 | 16 | 1 | 4 | 49 |
| 2 | 哈尔斯塔 | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 39 |
| 3 | 弗洛亚 | 21 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 39 |
| 4 | 阿尔塔 | 21 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 39 |
| 5 | 芬斯内斯 | 21 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 35 |
| 6 | 谢滕 | 21 | 10 | 3 | 8 | 33 |
| 7 | 福斯克斯普林特 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 31 |
| 8 | 利勒斯特罗姆二队 | 21 | 9 | 0 | 12 | 27 |
| 9 | 康斯文格二队 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 11 | 26 |
| 10 | 谢尔沃伊 | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 24 |
| 11 | 特罗姆瑟二队 | 21 | 6 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| 12 | 斯特罗姆加斯特二队 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 23 |
| 13 | 博塞科普 | 21 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 19 |
| 14 | 乌尔夫斯廷德 | 21 | 4 | 2 | 15 | 14 |
| # | 球队 | 场次 | 进球 | 失球 | +/- | 积分 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 利勒斯特罗姆二队 | 21 | 68 | 53 | +15 | 27 |
| 2 | 哈尔斯塔 | 21 | 67 | 33 | +34 | 39 |
| 3 | 福斯克斯普林特 | 21 | 58 | 68 | -10 | 31 |
| 4 | 弗洛亚 | 21 | 56 | 33 | +23 | 39 |
| 5 | 阿尔塔 | 21 | 54 | 31 | +23 | 39 |
| 6 | 谢滕 | 21 | 52 | 42 | +10 | 33 |
| 7 | 斯凯兹莫 | 21 | 50 | 25 | +25 | 49 |
| 8 | 斯特罗姆加斯特二队 | 21 | 41 | 48 | -7 | 23 |
| 9 | 特罗姆瑟二队 | 21 | 40 | 38 | +2 | 23 |
| 10 | 芬斯内斯 | 21 | 39 | 34 | +5 | 35 |
| 11 | 康斯文格二队 | 21 | 38 | 58 | -20 | 26 |
| 12 | 乌尔夫斯廷德 | 21 | 36 | 77 | -41 | 14 |
| 13 | 博塞科普 | 21 | 34 | 70 | -36 | 19 |
| 14 | 谢尔沃伊 | 21 | 33 | 56 | -23 | 24 |