League insights · Top Prediction

AI performance snapshot

Flat-stake closing-line recap on finished Top selections. Transparent rolling window.
2026-04-082026-05-07 UTC

仅统计已完赛且入库快照满足后台「首页推荐」默认条件的 Top Prediction:max_probability 在 60%–100%、confidence_score 在 0.6–2(与后台准确度接口 SQL 筛选一致)。

For research only — not betting advice. Small samples may look noisy; scores prefer leagues with adequate Top rows.

Window 7d 14d 30d
73.7%
1×2 hit rate
30d · finished Top
+26.13%
O/U 2.5 ROI
best closing line
+13.11%
BTTS ROI
best closing line
38
Tracked picks
vs reference closing pool
Full market breakdown table
Market Hit rate Best closing-line ROI
1×2 73.7% · (28/38) 10.29%
O/U 2.5 65.8% · (25✓/13✗) 26.13%
BTTS 63.2% · (24✓/14✗) 13.11%

Tracked Top picks: 38

AI market notes

One-line takeaways for this rolling window.

  • Totals markets are the standout segment so far when ranked by pooled closing-line ROI.

Cumulative equity curve

Cumulative flat-stake units after each settled pick in window order. Zero line marks breakeven on running P/L.

League × market closing-line ROI

Quick scan of best-priced side ROI by market. Darker green = stronger; red = negative; em dash = hidden or insufficient sample.

League 1×2 O/U 2.5 BTTS
Serie A
La Liga
Bundesliga
Ligue 1
Liga I
Premier League
Primeira Liga
Championship
1. Lig
Eerste Divisie
HNL
Eredivisie
Other leagues in this window (12) · includes mixed or negative recent ROI — click to expand
Italy · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 100.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Spain · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Germany · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 50.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 100.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

50.0% (1/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
France · 4 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 25.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 100.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

25.0% (1/4)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

100.0% (4✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Romania · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Ukraine · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Portugal · 4 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 75.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

75.0% (3/4)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (4✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

75.0% (3✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
England · 3 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 66.7% · O/U 66.7% · BTTS 66.7%
Market breakdown

1×2

66.7% (2/3)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

66.7% (2✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

66.7% (2✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/3✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Turkey · 4 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (4/4)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/4✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Netherlands · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 0.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A

HNL

Croatia · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 50.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

50.0% (1/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Netherlands · 2 tracked Top picks
1×2 0.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

0.0% (0/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A

OddsGPT Decision Engine is continuously recalibrated using rolling match outcomes, pricing signals and market-closing data. League-level edge rankings and market diagnostics may adjust over time as new fixtures settle.

Methodology (short)

Flat staking (1 unit per pick); ROI uses the best available closing line for our tracked side where present, compared with a reference bookmaker for diagnostics.

Rolling windows (7 / 14 / 30 days) keep the view close to “current edge”. League cards are grouped from finished Top Prediction rows only.

ROI is hidden when there are fewer than 5 settled price observations for that market slice, to avoid noisy single-bet percentages.

Other leagues in this window (12)
Italy · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 100.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Spain · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Germany · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 50.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 100.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

50.0% (1/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
France · 4 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 25.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 100.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

25.0% (1/4)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

100.0% (4✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Romania · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Ukraine · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Portugal · 4 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 75.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

75.0% (3/4)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (4✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

75.0% (3✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
England · 3 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 66.7% · O/U 66.7% · BTTS 66.7%
Market breakdown

1×2

66.7% (2/3)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

66.7% (2✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

66.7% (2✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/3✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Turkey · 4 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (4/4)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (2✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/4✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Netherlands · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 100.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 0.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

100.0% (2/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A

HNL

Croatia · 2 tracked Top picks
Watchlist
1×2 50.0% · O/U 100.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

50.0% (1/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

100.0% (2✓/0✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A
Netherlands · 2 tracked Top picks
1×2 0.0% · O/U 50.0% · BTTS 50.0%
Market breakdown

1×2

0.0% (0/2)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample · Reference closing-line ROI

O/U 2.5

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample

BTTS

50.0% (1✓/1✗)
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Top-5 correct-score distribution

CS Top5

0.0% (0✓/2✗)
Top5 subset; ROI N/A

League × market closing-line ROI

Quick scan of best-priced side ROI by market. Darker green = stronger; red = negative; em dash = hidden or insufficient sample.

League 1×2 O/U 2.5 BTTS
Serie A
La Liga
Bundesliga
Ligue 1
Liga I
Premier League
Primeira Liga
Championship
1. Lig
Eerste Divisie
HNL
Eredivisie

OddsGPT Decision Engine is continuously recalibrated using rolling match outcomes, pricing signals and market-closing data. League-level edge rankings and market diagnostics may adjust over time as new fixtures settle.

Methodology (short)

Flat staking (1 unit per pick); ROI uses the best available closing line for our tracked side where present, compared with a reference bookmaker for diagnostics.

Rolling windows (7 / 14 / 30 days) keep the view close to “current edge”. League cards are grouped from finished Top Prediction rows only.

ROI is hidden when there are fewer than 5 settled price observations for that market slice, to avoid noisy single-bet percentages.