Thống kê / Bóng đá / Saudi-Arabia. Pro League / Al Shabab vs Al Taawon

Al Shabab vs Al Taawon Statistics & Analysis

Al Shabab Al Shabab
May 03, 2026 - 16:00
1 2.04
5 1.41
xG Accuracy: 28%
Al Taawon Al Taawon
Nhà cái cao cấp 1xBet: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi 1x_3342271. Đăng ký ngay

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Trên / Dưới 2.5 Trên 2.5 Trên 2.5 (6 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Có ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al Shabab Al Taawon ✖ Incorrect
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 2-1 1-5 ✖ Incorrect

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Pro League
  • Fixture: Al Shabab vs Al Taawon
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 17:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 51.0% · Draw 23.7% · Away 25.3%
  • xG (showing): Al Shabab 2.04 — Al Taawon 1.41 (total xG ≈ 3.45)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Over 2.5 goals
  • Model: 67.0% · Implied: 56.1% · Probability edge: +10.9 pts · Est. EV: +15.2%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 66.9% · No 33.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-1 (9.3%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Kèo tốt nhất và lý do

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Over 2.5 goals.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

How should I read EV versus a probability gap?

Probability edge = model probability minus implied probability (reported here in percentage points). EV ≈ model probability × best tracked decimal odds − 1, shown as return per unit stake. They are related but not interchangeable labels.

Yếu tố rủi ro

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Phương pháp

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Cập nhật lần cuối

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

Cách sử dụng cái này
  • Hãy tập trung vào dòng Chính khi bạn muốn có một ý tưởng có thể thực hiện được.
  • Đừng ghép nhiều quân mỏng với nhau;các cạnh không thêm đáng tin cậy.
  • Chỉ coi những cú đánh dài là những lượt chơi tùy chọn, có mức đặt cược cao.

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Al Shabab & Al Taawon!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
Pro League Pro League — Bảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 Al-Nassr 33 27 2 4 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 24 9 0 81
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 24 6 3 78
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 22 8 3 74
5 Al-Ittihad FC 32 16 7 9 55
6 Al Taawon 33 15 8 10 53
7 Al-Ettifaq 33 14 7 12 49
8 NEOM 33 12 8 13 44
9 Al-Hazm 33 10 9 14 39
10 Al-Fayha 33 10 8 15 38
11 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 10 7 16 37
12 Al-Fateh 33 9 9 15 36
13 Al Kholood 33 9 5 19 32
14 Al Shabab 32 7 11 14 32
15 Damac 33 6 11 16 29
16 Al Riyadh 33 6 9 18 27
17 Al Okhdood 33 5 5 23 20
18 Al Najma 33 2 7 24 13
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 Al-Nassr 33 87 27 +60 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 84 27 +57 81
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 78 33 +45 74
4 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 67 24 +43 78
5 Al Taawon 33 59 44 +15 53
6 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 53 58 -5 37
7 Al-Ittihad FC 32 52 40 +12 55
8 Al-Ettifaq 33 50 54 -4 49
9 NEOM 33 42 47 -5 44
10 Al-Fayha 33 41 53 -12 38
11 Al Shabab 32 41 54 -13 32
12 Al-Fateh 33 41 55 -14 36
13 Al Kholood 33 39 61 -22 32
14 Al-Hazm 33 36 57 -21 39
15 Al Riyadh 33 34 63 -29 27
16 Damac 33 31 51 -20 29
17 Al Najma 33 31 76 -45 13
18 Al Okhdood 33 27 69 -42 20
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 Al-Nassr 33 65.9 24.9 +41.0 83
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 33 63.9 24.5 +39.4 81
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 33 54.1 23.6 +30.5 78
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 33 58.8 33.4 +25.4 74
5 Al-Ittihad FC 32 47.6 37.0 +10.6 55
6 NEOM 33 43.5 36.8 +6.7 44
7 Al Shabab 32 43.1 43.3 -0.2 32
8 Al Taawon 33 41.1 42.2 -1.1 53
9 Al Khaleej Saihat 33 39.8 41.3 -1.5 37
10 Al-Fateh 33 40.9 43.5 -2.6 36
11 Al-Fayha 33 33.1 42.3 -9.2 38
12 Al Riyadh 33 40.3 50.0 -9.7 27
13 Damac 33 24.2 37.4 -13.2 29
14 Al-Hazm 33 31.7 46.5 -14.8 39
15 Al Kholood 33 30.9 47.0 -16.1 32
16 Al-Ettifaq 33 38.4 54.9 -16.5 49
17 Al Najma 33 26.8 60.1 -33.3 13
18 Al Okhdood 33 25.0 60.7 -35.7 20
Pro League Saudi-Arabia. Pro League Dự đoán
Các giải đấu phổ biến