Thống kê / Bóng đá / Netherlands. Eredivisie / NEC Nijmegen vs Telstar

NEC Nijmegen vs Telstar Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 19:00
1 2.10
1 1.24
xG Accuracy: 69%
Nhà cái cao cấp 1xBet: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi 1x_3342271. Đăng ký ngay

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Trên / Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 NEC Nijmegen Vẽ tranh ✖ Incorrect
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 2-1 1-1 ✖ Incorrect

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Eredivisie
  • Fixture: NEC Nijmegen vs Telstar
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 19:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 55.9% · Draw 23.3% · Away 20.8%
  • xG (showing): NEC Nijmegen 2.1 — Telstar 1.24 (total xG ≈ 3.34)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 35.1% · Implied: 31.0% · Probability edge: +4.1 pts · Est. EV: +8.8%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 63.6% · No 36.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-1 (9.7%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Kèo tốt nhất và lý do

Primary pick from the decision engine: Under 2.5 goals.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Yếu tố rủi ro

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Phương pháp

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Cập nhật lần cuối

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

Cách sử dụng cái này
  • Hãy tập trung vào dòng Chính khi bạn muốn có một ý tưởng có thể thực hiện được.
  • Đừng ghép nhiều quân mỏng với nhau;các cạnh không thêm đáng tin cậy.
  • Chỉ coi những cú đánh dài là những lượt chơi tùy chọn, có mức đặt cược cao.

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho NEC Nijmegen & Telstar!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
Eredivisie EredivisieBảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 PSV Eindhoven 32 25 3 4 78
2 Feyenoord 32 18 7 7 61
3 NEC Nijmegen 32 15 11 6 56
4 Ajax 32 14 13 5 55
5 Twente 32 14 13 5 55
6 AZ Alkmaar 32 14 8 10 50
7 Heerenveen 32 14 8 10 50
8 Utrecht 32 13 8 11 47
9 Sparta Rotterdam 32 12 7 13 43
10 Groningen 32 12 6 14 42
11 GO Ahead Eagles 32 8 14 10 38
12 PEC Zwolle 32 9 10 13 37
13 Fortuna Sittard 32 10 6 16 36
14 Excelsior 32 9 7 16 34
15 Telstar 32 7 10 15 31
16 FC Volendam 32 8 7 17 31
17 NAC Breda 32 5 10 17 25
18 Heracles 32 5 4 23 19
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 PSV Eindhoven 32 92 43 +49 78
2 NEC Nijmegen 32 74 50 +24 56
3 Feyenoord 32 67 43 +24 61
4 Ajax 32 61 39 +22 55
5 Heerenveen 32 57 51 +6 50
6 Twente 32 54 35 +19 55
7 AZ Alkmaar 32 54 47 +7 50
8 GO Ahead Eagles 32 52 47 +5 38
9 Utrecht 32 51 41 +10 47
10 Fortuna Sittard 32 46 59 -13 36
11 Groningen 32 45 43 +2 42
12 Telstar 32 44 54 -10 31
13 PEC Zwolle 32 42 66 -24 37
14 Excelsior 32 39 53 -14 34
15 Sparta Rotterdam 32 38 55 -17 43
16 Heracles 32 34 80 -46 19
17 FC Volendam 32 33 52 -19 31
18 NAC Breda 32 30 55 -25 25
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 PSV Eindhoven 32 67.2 35.9 +31.3 78
2 Feyenoord 32 63.9 36.5 +27.4 61
3 Twente 32 58.9 33.7 +25.2 55
4 AZ Alkmaar 32 60.5 40.4 +20.1 50
5 NEC Nijmegen 32 57.1 45.6 +11.5 56
6 Groningen 32 56.8 45.6 +11.2 42
7 Heerenveen 32 56.7 47.5 +9.2 50
8 Ajax 32 51.6 44.0 +7.6 55
9 Utrecht 32 47.9 43.9 +4.0 47
10 Sparta Rotterdam 32 40.0 47.1 -7.1 43
11 Telstar 32 45.9 57.2 -11.3 31
12 NAC Breda 32 37.3 48.9 -11.6 25
13 Excelsior 32 43.2 56.6 -13.4 34
14 GO Ahead Eagles 32 41.4 57.9 -16.5 38
15 Fortuna Sittard 32 39.4 56.4 -17.0 36
16 PEC Zwolle 32 35.5 55.4 -19.9 37
17 FC Volendam 32 33.4 57.9 -24.5 31
18 Heracles 32 38.5 64.5 -26.0 19