Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 (4 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Có ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 Hallescher FC Hallescher FC ✔ Chính xác
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-3 ✖ Không đúng
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.97
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Hallescher FC win · FSV Zwickau 1–3 Hallescher FC
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "bd5534f3f2a4780b8c8532aa0522e29b0407ef13e766f858747fbeca17168005",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.31,
"away_win_prob": 0.3564,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.81,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.88,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.29,
"home_win_prob": 0.347,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Hallescher FC and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Hallescher FC"
},
"away_xg": 1.31,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Hallescher FC",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1089,
"edge_gap": 0.0087,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4648,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 35.6,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 34.7
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.97
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.97,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Hallescher FC Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 2.15,
"market_odds": 1.97,
"model_odds": 2.81,
"overround": 9.2,
"prob_edge": -15.2,
"value_pct": -29.9,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 4,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 7,
"away_score_rate": 73.0,
"home_clean_sheet": 2,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 7,
"home_score_rate": 72.5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.31,
"home_expected": 1.29,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.1
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "FSV Zwickau or Draw",
"prob": 64.3
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "FSV Zwickau or Hallescher FC",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Hallescher FC",
"prob": 65.2
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "FSV Zwickau or Hallescher FC",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 35.6,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 34.7,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Hallescher FC"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.3,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.1,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 13.1,
"implied_prob": 30.7,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market": "FSV Zwickau Win",
"model_prob": 34.7,
"odds": 3.26
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Hallescher FC",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 46.48,
"draw": 25.43,
"home": 28.09
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-18 17:01:36",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-18 16:32:45",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "FSV Zwickau",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 28.09,
"gap_pp": 6.64,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 34.73
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.43,
"gap_pp": 4.24,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.68
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 46.48,
"gap_pp": -10.89,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 35.59
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 57.55,
"gap_pp": -9.35,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 42.45,
"gap_pp": 9.35,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 3.26,
"early": 3.26,
"implied_closing_pct": 28.09,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 28.09,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.6,
"early": 3.6,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.43,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.43,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 1.97,
"early": 1.97,
"implied_closing_pct": 46.48,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 46.48,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.63,
"early": 1.63,
"implied_closing_pct": 57.55,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 57.55,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.21,
"early": 2.21,
"implied_closing_pct": 42.45,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 42.45,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 9.3,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -2.8,
"ev": -0.181,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.5,
"market_prob": 0.1538,
"market_prob_pct": 15.4,
"model_prob": 0.126,
"model_prob_pct": 12.6,
"n_bookmakers": 3,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.1
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.29,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1957,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.13,
"edge": 0.017,
"edge_pp": 1.7,
"market_prob": 0.4312,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2153,
"best_odd": 1.615,
"edge": -0.0187,
"ev": -0.1116,
"implied_prob": 0.5688,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5501
},
"p_final": 0.4482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.7,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1033,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0453,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1957,
"best_odd": 2.13,
"edge": 0.017,
"ev": -0.0453,
"implied_prob": 0.4312,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4482
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2143,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -21.4,
"text": "-21.4%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1448,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 14.5,
"text": "+14.5%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1448,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10280.32,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.167,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.245,
"edge": 0.008,
"edge_pp": 0.8,
"market_prob": 0.4069,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.167,
"best_odd": 2.245,
"edge": 0.008,
"ev": -0.0685,
"implied_prob": 0.4069,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4149
},
"p_final": 0.4149,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0215,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0685,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2296,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0111,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5931,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5821
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.042,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.2,
"text": "+4.2%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -14.4,
"text": "-14.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.042,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10037.8,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"consensus_odds": 1.97,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.192,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -19.2,
"text": "-19.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0259,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -2.6,
"text": "-2.6%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -10.9,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2989,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.9%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Hallescher FC",
"sort_key": 1793.525,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "",
"alert_breadth_note": "",
"alert_move": "",
"alert_team": "",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 10.9,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -10.84,
"hero_label": "Hallescher FC",
"market_prob_pct": 46.5,
"market_team": "Hallescher FC",
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"model_team": "Hallescher FC",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": null,
"steam_subtitle": "",
"steam_tier": "",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.9,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.9,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1448,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 46,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hallescher FC at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 46.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hallescher FC as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hallescher FC",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "46 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.192,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.97,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -10.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5076142131979695,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2989,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.9%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "0/5",
"breadth_ratio": 0.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (11 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.6,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 0.0,
"steam_coherence": 7.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 58,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 10.84,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 10.84,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.31,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.29,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.31,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.29 \u00b7 Away xG 1.31 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -3%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 0.8,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +0.8%",
"steam_team": "Draw",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 46,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 45,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 45,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.9,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.9,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1448,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 46,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hallescher FC at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 46.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hallescher FC as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hallescher FC",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "46 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.192,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.97,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -10.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5076142131979695,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2989,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.9%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: FSV Zwickau 1.29 xG vs Hallescher FC 1.31 \u2192 Hallescher FC 35.6%",
"Market: Hallescher FC ~46.5% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +0.8%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Hallescher FC with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": 6.61,
"fair_prob": 34.7,
"label": "FSV Zwickau",
"market_prob": 28.09,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.22,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 25.43,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": -10.84,
"fair_prob": 35.64,
"label": "Hallescher FC",
"market_prob": 46.48,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.55,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 56.75,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.55,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 43.25,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.6,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 59.1,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.6,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 40.9,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -10.84,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Hallescher FC",
"market_prob_pct": 46.48,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Draw"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Hallescher FC\u0027s win probability at 46.5%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 35.6%, a difference of 10.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 10.84,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Hallescher FC",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 46.5,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -10.9,
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -10.9,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 58,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "Hallescher FC \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 46,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 45,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 45,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: FSV Zwickau 1.29 xG vs Hallescher FC 1.31 \u2192 Hallescher FC 35.6%",
"Market: Hallescher FC ~46.5% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +0.8%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Hallescher FC with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -10.84,
"hero_label": "Hallescher FC",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Draw odds lengthened \u2191 +0.8%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.8%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (0/5 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Hallescher FC than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Hallescher FC than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.8%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (0/5 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Hallescher FC more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Draw has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.8%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (0/5), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 10.84,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
"max_prob_pct": 35.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Hallescher FC",
"largest_gap_pp": -10.8,
"lead": "The closing market prices Hallescher FC higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 10.8,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": 6.61,
"edge_pp": 6.61,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "FSV Zwickau",
"market_prob_pct": 28.09,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 4.22,
"edge_pp": 4.22,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 25.43,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -10.84,
"edge_pp": -10.84,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Hallescher FC",
"market_prob_pct": 46.48,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": false,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Hallescher FC (46.5%).",
"Hallescher FC \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 50.76,
"closing_odds": 1.97,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 50.76,
"entry_odds": 1.97,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"show": false
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "0/5",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"move_display": "\u2191 +0.8%",
"open_odds": 3.57,
"pick_team": "Draw",
"steam_score": 0,
"steam_team_name": "Draw",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 10.8,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "hallescher-fc",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Hallescher FC",
"away_team_id": 1316,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1316.webp",
"away_team_name": "Hallescher FC",
"away_team_public_id": "3IXuWRW4p1Iy75",
"away_team_slug": "hallescher-fc",
"country_code": "DE",
"country_display_name": "Germany",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/de.svg",
"country_id": 60,
"country_name": "Germany",
"fixture_id": 1586877,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Germany",
"home_team_display_name": "FSV Zwickau",
"home_team_id": 1315,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1315.webp",
"home_team_name": "FSV Zwickau",
"home_team_public_id": "1N2R3EOYJtSa5u",
"home_team_slug": "fsv-zwickau",
"ht.home_team_slug": "fsv-zwickau",
"league_country": "Germany",
"league_country_display": "Germany",
"league_display_name": "Regionalliga Nordost",
"league_id": 85,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/85.webp",
"league_name": "Regionalliga Nordost",
"league_public_id": "1WJdi4c2f3zSMM",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-18 17:00:00",
"public_id": "1QyYbV79sBJt8z",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Zwickau",
"venue_name": "GGZ-Arena Zwickau"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.502,
"best_odd": 1.97,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0546,
"ev": -0.192,
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4648,
"draw": 0.2543,
"home": 0.2809
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"p_final": 0.4101
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2809,
"best_odd": 3.6,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0119,
"ev": -0.0414,
"implied_prob": 0.2543,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4648,
"draw": 0.2543,
"home": 0.2809
},
"model_prob": 0.2968,
"p_final": 0.2663
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.2701,
"best_odd": 3.26,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0179,
"ev": -0.0259,
"implied_prob": 0.2809,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4648,
"draw": 0.2543,
"home": 0.2809
},
"model_prob": 0.3473,
"p_final": 0.2988
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 1.97,
"edge": -0.1517,
"ev": -0.2988,
"implied_prob": 0.5076,
"model_prob": 0.3559
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.6,
"edge": 0.019,
"ev": 0.0684,
"implied_prob": 0.2778,
"model_prob": 0.2968
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 3.26,
"edge": 0.0405,
"ev": 0.1321,
"implied_prob": 0.3067,
"model_prob": 0.3473
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.167,
"alpha_yes": 0.2296,
"best_no_odd": 2.29,
"best_yes_odd": 1.57,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.046,
"edge_yes": -0.046,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.042,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0685,
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1036,
"implied_no": 0.409,
"implied_yes": 0.591,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.167,
"best_odd": 2.245,
"edge": 0.008,
"ev": -0.0685,
"implied_prob": 0.4069,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4149
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2296,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0111,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5931,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5821
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"p_final_no": 0.4149,
"p_final_yes": 0.5821,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2153,
"alpha_under": 0.1957,
"best_over_odd": 1.63,
"best_under_odd": 2.21,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.615,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.13,
"edge_over": -0.0855,
"edge_under": 0.0855,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2143,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1116,
"ev_under": 0.1448,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0453,
"implied_over": 0.5675,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5688,
"implied_under": 0.4325,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4312,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2153,
"best_odd": 1.615,
"edge": -0.0187,
"ev": -0.1116,
"implied_prob": 0.5688,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5501
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1957,
"best_odd": 2.13,
"edge": 0.017,
"ev": -0.0453,
"implied_prob": 0.4312,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4482
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5501,
"p_final_under": 0.4482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1448,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1448,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.5,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.5,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.5,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.5
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.9,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1448,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1448,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.5,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 46,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hallescher FC at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 46.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hallescher FC as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 10.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hallescher FC",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.5/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.5/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "58 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "46 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"Decision strength: 4.5/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 58,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Hallescher FC).",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.192,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.97,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -10.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5076142131979695,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2989,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.9%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2968,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3559,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.02
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.97,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0546,
"ev": -0.192,
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"max_ev_side": "home",
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Hallescher FC"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.167,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.245,
"edge": 0.008,
"market_prob": 0.4069,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.167,
"best_odd": 2.245,
"edge": 0.008,
"ev": -0.0685,
"implied_prob": 0.4069,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4149
},
"p_final": 0.4149,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0685,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2296,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"edge": -0.0111,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5931,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5821
}
},
"edge": 0.046,
"ev": 0.042,
"implied_prob": 0.409,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1957,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.13,
"edge": 0.017,
"market_prob": 0.4312,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2153,
"best_odd": 1.615,
"edge": -0.0187,
"ev": -0.1116,
"implied_prob": 0.5688,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5501
},
"p_final": 0.4482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0453,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1957,
"best_odd": 2.13,
"edge": 0.017,
"ev": -0.0453,
"implied_prob": 0.4312,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4482
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0855,
"ev": 0.1448,
"implied_prob": 0.4325,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1586877,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1448,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3559,
"draw": 0.2968,
"home": 0.3473
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Hallescher FC",
"home": "FSV Zwickau"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.052504,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1448,
"implied_prob": 0.4325,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.192,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.2%",
"consensus_odds": 1.97,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4648,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-10.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -10.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5076142131979695,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2989,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.9%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1586877,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-18T17:01:38.674056+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho FSV Zwickau & Hallescher FC!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Regionalliga Nordost — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Rot-Weiß Erfurt | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 27 |
| 2 | Chemnitzer FC | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 26 |
| 3 | Hallescher FC | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 22 |
| 4 | BFC Dynamo | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 21 |
| 5 | Altglienicke | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 21 |
| 6 | Erzgebirge Aue | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 21 |
| 7 | FC Carl Zeiss Jena | 11 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 19 |
| 8 | Greifswalder FC | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 19 |
| 9 | Lokomotive Leipzig | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 15 |
| 10 | FSV Zwickau | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 |
| 11 | Magdeburg II | 11 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 13 |
| 12 | BFC Preussen | 11 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| 13 | SV Babelsberg 03 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 14 | Hertha BSC II | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 15 | BSG Chemie Leipzig | 10 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| 16 | RSV Eintracht | 11 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| 17 | Tasmania Berlin | 11 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 |
| 18 | Luckenwalde | 10 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 3 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Rot-Weiß Erfurt | 11 | 36 | 11 | +25 | 27 |
| 2 | Chemnitzer FC | 11 | 25 | 5 | +20 | 26 |
| 3 | Greifswalder FC | 11 | 23 | 16 | +7 | 19 |
| 4 | Lokomotive Leipzig | 11 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 15 |
| 5 | BFC Dynamo | 11 | 20 | 12 | +8 | 21 |
| 6 | Altglienicke | 11 | 20 | 14 | +6 | 21 |
| 7 | Magdeburg II | 11 | 20 | 23 | -3 | 13 |
| 8 | FC Carl Zeiss Jena | 11 | 19 | 10 | +9 | 19 |
| 9 | Erzgebirge Aue | 10 | 19 | 14 | +5 | 21 |
| 10 | Hallescher FC | 11 | 18 | 9 | +9 | 22 |
| 11 | BFC Preussen | 11 | 14 | 17 | -3 | 10 |
| 12 | RSV Eintracht | 11 | 13 | 29 | -16 | 6 |
| 13 | Tasmania Berlin | 11 | 13 | 36 | -23 | 5 |
| 14 | FSV Zwickau | 10 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 14 |
| 15 | SV Babelsberg 03 | 10 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 9 |
| 16 | BSG Chemie Leipzig | 10 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 6 |
| 17 | Hertha BSC II | 10 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 8 |
| 18 | Luckenwalde | 10 | 7 | 25 | -18 | 3 |
