Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 Tài 2.5 (6 mục tiêu) ✔ Chính xác
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Có ✔ Chính xác
- 1X2 Salford City Vẽ tranh ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2, 0-1 3-3 ✖ Không đúng
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.64
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Draw · Rotherham United 3–3 Salford City
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "ce92f00ea3ba6ca1defdfc879174c025c9c8ad8c8f115e98dabc4a1a6b6a7a47",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.74,
"away_win_prob": 0.4102,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.336,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.664,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2553,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.44,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.92,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.99,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.56,
"home_win_prob": 0.3345,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.641,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.359
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Rotherham United or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Rotherham United"
},
"away_xg": 1.74,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Salford City",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.0265,
"edge_gap": 0.0754,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3836,
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 41.0,
"draw": 25.5,
"home": 33.5
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.49
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.49,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Salford City Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 2.61,
"market_odds": 2.49,
"model_odds": 2.44,
"overround": 4.7,
"prob_edge": 0.8,
"value_pct": 2.0,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 2,
"away_played": 5,
"away_score_rate": 82.4,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 5,
"home_score_rate": 79.0,
"no_prob": 33.6,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 66.4,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 66.4
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.74,
"home_expected": 1.56,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 6.4
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Rotherham United or Draw",
"prob": 59.0
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Rotherham United or Salford City",
"prob": 74.5
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Salford City",
"prob": 66.5
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Rotherham United or Salford City",
"pick_prob": 74.5
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 41.0,
"draw_pct": 25.5,
"home_pct": 33.5,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Salford City"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 3.3,
"away_avg_scored": 0.8,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 1.2,
"over_prob": 64.1,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 64.1,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 3.3,
"under_prob": 35.9
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 2.1,
"implied_prob": 40.2,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Salford City Win",
"model_prob": 41.0,
"odds": 2.49
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Salford City",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 38.36,
"draw": 25.47,
"home": 36.18
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE5",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-12 14:03:27",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-12 13:38:50",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Rotherham United",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 36.18,
"gap_pp": -2.71,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 33.47
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.47,
"gap_pp": 0.06,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 25.53
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 38.36,
"gap_pp": 2.65,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 41.01
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 54.03,
"gap_pp": 10.07,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 64.1
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.97,
"gap_pp": -10.07,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 35.9
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.64,
"early": 2.64,
"implied_closing_pct": 36.18,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 36.18,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.75,
"early": 3.75,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.47,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.47,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.49,
"early": 2.49,
"implied_closing_pct": 38.36,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 38.36,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.77,
"early": 1.77,
"implied_closing_pct": 54.03,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 54.03,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.08,
"early": 2.08,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.97,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 45.97,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.1,
"kind": "ou_o"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -3.7,
"ev": -0.27,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.3,
"market_prob": 0.137,
"market_prob_pct": 13.7,
"model_prob": 0.1,
"model_prob_pct": 10.0,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.7
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"label": "2-2",
"prob": 6.8
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 6.4
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.56,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2084,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0219,
"edge_pp": 2.2,
"market_prob": 0.5358,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.641,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2084,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0219,
"ev": -0.024,
"implied_prob": 0.5358,
"model_prob": 0.641,
"p_final": 0.5577
},
"p_final": 0.5577,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 10.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1218,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.024,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1895,
"best_odd": 2.02,
"edge": -0.0199,
"ev": -0.1026,
"implied_prob": 0.4642,
"model_prob": 0.359,
"p_final": 0.4443
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.141,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 14.1,
"text": "+14.1%"
},
"ev_under": -0.2533,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -25.3,
"text": "-25.3%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.141,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 64.1,
"sort_key": 10276.9,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 35.9,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2163,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.59,
"edge": 0.0182,
"edge_pp": 1.8,
"market_prob": 0.5799,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.664,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"best_odd": 2.195,
"edge": -0.0165,
"ev": -0.1142,
"implied_prob": 0.4201,
"model_prob": 0.336,
"p_final": 0.4035
},
"p_final": 0.5981,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0558,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.049,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2163,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.049,
"implied_prob": 0.5799,
"model_prob": 0.664,
"p_final": 0.5981
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2272,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -22.7,
"text": "-22.7%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.0757,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 7.6,
"text": "+7.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0757,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 33.6,
"sort_key": 10068.13,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 66.4
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"consensus_odds": 2.49,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.0164,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -1.6,
"text": "-1.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0164,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -1.6,
"text": "-1.6%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"raw_edge_display": "+2.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.7,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0211,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+2.1%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Salford City",
"sort_key": 1795.9,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 810.0,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 10.0
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "9/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "9/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +32.4%",
"alert_team": "Salford City",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 2.7,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -2.73,
"hero_label": "Rotherham United",
"market_prob_pct": 38.4,
"market_team": "Salford City",
"model_prob_pct": 41.0,
"model_team": "Salford City",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 71,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.7,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.7,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.141,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.141,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Salford City at 41.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Salford City as the value side (41.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Salford City",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "81 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"Decision strength: 3.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 81,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0164,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.49,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"raw_edge_display": "+2.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0211,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+2.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 28.9,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "9/9",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 23.6,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 81,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 2.73,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 2.73,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.74,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 29.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.56,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.74,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.56 \u00b7 Away xG 1.74 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +29%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": 32.4,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +32.4%",
"steam_team": "Salford City",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.7,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.7,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.141,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.141,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Salford City at 41.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Salford City as the value side (41.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Salford City",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "81 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"Decision strength: 3.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 81,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0164,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.49,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"raw_edge_display": "+2.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0211,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+2.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 28.9,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Rotherham United 1.56 xG vs Salford City 1.74 \u2192 Salford City 41.0%",
"Market: Salford City ~38.4% implied",
"Market Drift: Salford City odds \u2191 +32.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Salford City, but the market has moved away from Salford City.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -2.73,
"fair_prob": 33.45,
"label": "Rotherham United",
"market_prob": 36.18,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.06,
"fair_prob": 25.53,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 25.47,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.66,
"fair_prob": 41.02,
"label": "Salford City",
"market_prob": 38.36,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 10.27,
"fair_prob": 64.1,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 53.83,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -10.27,
"fair_prob": 35.9,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 46.17,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.28,
"fair_prob": 66.4,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 58.12,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.28,
"fair_prob": 33.6,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 41.88,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "aligned",
"edge_pp": -2.73,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.45,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Rotherham United",
"market_prob_pct": 36.18,
"status": "market_efficient",
"steam_team_name": "Salford City"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE5",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "market_efficient",
"max_gap_pp": 2.73,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "Aligned",
"edge_label_key": "aligned",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Salford City",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 38.4,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+2.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 2.6,
"model_prob_pct": 41.0,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+2.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 2.6,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "High reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 81,
"reliability_tier": "high",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 30,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Rotherham United 1.56 xG vs Salford City 1.74 \u2192 Salford City 41.0%",
"Market: Salford City ~38.4% implied",
"Market Drift: Salford City odds \u2191 +32.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Salford City, but the market has moved away from Salford City.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -2.73,
"hero_label": "Rotherham United",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Salford City odds lengthened \u2191 +32.4%.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Current pricing remains close to the model baseline."
],
"follow_up": "However, Salford City has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 32.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "aligned",
"lead": "The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"note": "Drift away from Salford City \u2014 odds lengthened by 32.4% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"However, Salford City has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 32.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Salford City \u2014 odds lengthened by 32.4% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"Market pricing and the fair estimate remain broadly aligned.",
"At the same time, Salford City has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 32.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (9/9) supports the current market view on Salford City."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 2.73,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 7.6 pp (at 41.0%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 7.6,
"max_prob_pct": 41.0,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "Rotherham United",
"largest_gap_pp": -2.7,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 2.7,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -2.73,
"edge_pp": -2.73,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.45,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Rotherham United",
"market_prob_pct": 36.18,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.06,
"edge_pp": 0.06,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.53,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 25.47,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 2.66,
"edge_pp": 2.66,
"fair_prob_pct": 41.02,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Salford City",
"market_prob_pct": 38.36,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_efficient",
"status_label": "Market Efficient",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Salford City \u2014 odds lengthened by 32.4% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Salford City (38.4%).",
"However, Salford City has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +32.4%, 9/9) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Salford City, Market \u2192 Salford City, while Salford City odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 37.88,
"closing_odds": 2.64,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 37.88,
"entry_odds": 2.64,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE5",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 9,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +32.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 32.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +21.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 21.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +19.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 19.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +16.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 16.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.0
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.45,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +32.4%",
"move_pct_abs": 32.4,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 151h 10m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"9/9 books lengthened Salford City together (32.4% drift, score 71) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 32.4,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.49",
"2.17",
"1.85"
],
"display": "2.50 \u2192 1.85 \u2192 2.45",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 151h 10m",
"pick_team": "Salford City",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.50"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "1.85"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.45"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
1.85,
2.49,
2.45
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,1.1",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "1.85"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "1.85"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.49"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.45"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 1.85,
"page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Salford City odds \u2191 +32.4% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Salford City",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Salford City odds \u2191 +32.4% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.45,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +32.4%",
"open_odds": 1.85,
"summary": "Market moved away from Salford City while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Salford City",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 71,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"current_odds": 2.45,
"move_display": "\u2191 +32.4%",
"open_odds": 1.85,
"pick_team": "Salford City",
"steam_score": 71,
"steam_team_name": "Salford City",
"steam_tier": "A"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 2.7,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "salford-city",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Salford City",
"away_team_id": 1844,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1844.webp",
"away_team_name": "Salford City",
"away_team_public_id": "025v1UZbVAfhjP",
"away_team_slug": "salford-city",
"country_code": "GB-ENG",
"country_display_name": "England",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/gb-eng.svg",
"country_id": 49,
"country_name": "England",
"fixture_id": 1563751,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "England",
"home_team_display_name": "Rotherham United",
"home_team_id": 73,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/73.webp",
"home_team_name": "Rotherham United",
"home_team_public_id": "2nLslqgnzdmozf",
"home_team_slug": "rotherham",
"ht.home_team_slug": "rotherham",
"league_country": "England",
"league_country_display": "England",
"league_display_name": "League Two",
"league_id": 42,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/42.webp",
"league_name": "League Two",
"league_public_id": "20ois23TghHC4h",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-12 14:00:00",
"public_id": "2zw81kTDfEnCKN",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Rotherham United",
"venue_name": "Aesseal New York Stadium"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4321,
"best_odd": 2.49,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0115,
"ev": -0.0164,
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3836,
"draw": 0.2547,
"home": 0.3618
},
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"p_final": 0.395
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2997,
"best_odd": 3.75,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0002,
"ev": -0.0443,
"implied_prob": 0.2547,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3836,
"draw": 0.2547,
"home": 0.3618
},
"model_prob": 0.2553,
"p_final": 0.2549
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4317,
"best_odd": 2.64,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0117,
"ev": -0.0758,
"implied_prob": 0.3618,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3836,
"draw": 0.2547,
"home": 0.3618
},
"model_prob": 0.3347,
"p_final": 0.3501
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.49,
"edge": 0.0085,
"ev": 0.0211,
"implied_prob": 0.4016,
"model_prob": 0.4101
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.75,
"edge": -0.0114,
"ev": -0.0428,
"implied_prob": 0.2667,
"model_prob": 0.2553
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.64,
"edge": -0.0441,
"ev": -0.1165,
"implied_prob": 0.3788,
"model_prob": 0.3347
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1966,
"alpha_yes": 0.2163,
"best_no_odd": 2.3,
"best_yes_odd": 1.62,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0828,
"edge_yes": 0.0828,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2272,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1142,
"ev_yes": 0.0757,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.049,
"implied_no": 0.4188,
"implied_yes": 0.5812,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"best_odd": 2.195,
"edge": -0.0165,
"ev": -0.1142,
"implied_prob": 0.4201,
"model_prob": 0.336,
"p_final": 0.4035
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2163,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.049,
"implied_prob": 0.5799,
"model_prob": 0.664,
"p_final": 0.5981
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4035,
"p_final_yes": 0.5981,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2084,
"alpha_under": 0.1895,
"best_over_odd": 1.78,
"best_under_odd": 2.08,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.75,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.02,
"edge_over": 0.1027,
"edge_under": -0.1027,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.141,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.024,
"ev_under": -0.2533,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1026,
"implied_over": 0.5383,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5358,
"implied_under": 0.4617,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4642,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2084,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0219,
"ev": -0.024,
"implied_prob": 0.5358,
"model_prob": 0.641,
"p_final": 0.5577
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1895,
"best_odd": 2.02,
"edge": -0.0199,
"ev": -0.1026,
"implied_prob": 0.4642,
"model_prob": 0.359,
"p_final": 0.4443
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5577,
"p_final_under": 0.4443,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.3,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.141,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.141,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.141,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.8,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.8,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.8,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.8
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 2.7,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.141,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.141,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Salford City at 41.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 38.4%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Salford City as the value side (41.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 2.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Salford City",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.1% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.1% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.1% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "81 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.1% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"Decision strength: 3.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 81,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Salford City, but the model still strongly favours Salford City.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0164,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.49,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"raw_edge_display": "+2.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0211,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+2.1%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 28.9,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.18"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.18
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.664,
"draw_prob": 0.2553,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4101,
"over_prob": 0.641,
"total_xg": 3.3,
"under_prob": 0.359,
"xg_diff": 0.18
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.49,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": 0.0115,
"ev": -0.0164,
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Salford City"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2163,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.59,
"edge": 0.0182,
"market_prob": 0.5799,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.664,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1966,
"best_odd": 2.195,
"edge": -0.0165,
"ev": -0.1142,
"implied_prob": 0.4201,
"model_prob": 0.336,
"p_final": 0.4035
},
"p_final": 0.5981,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.049,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2163,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.049,
"implied_prob": 0.5799,
"model_prob": 0.664,
"p_final": 0.5981
}
},
"edge": 0.0828,
"ev": 0.0757,
"implied_prob": 0.5812,
"model_prob": 0.664,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2084,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0219,
"market_prob": 0.5358,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.641,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2084,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": 0.0219,
"ev": -0.024,
"implied_prob": 0.5358,
"model_prob": 0.641,
"p_final": 0.5577
},
"p_final": 0.5577,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.024,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1895,
"best_odd": 2.02,
"edge": -0.0199,
"ev": -0.1026,
"implied_prob": 0.4642,
"model_prob": 0.359,
"p_final": 0.4443
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.1027,
"ev": 0.141,
"implied_prob": 0.5383,
"model_prob": 0.641,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1563751,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.141,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4101,
"draw": 0.2553,
"home": 0.3347
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2",
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0757,
"implied_prob": 0.5812,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.664,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0757,
"implied_prob": 0.5812,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.664,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Salford City",
"home": "Rotherham United"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.112976,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.141,
"implied_prob": 0.5383,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.641,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0164,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.49,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3836,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4101,
"raw_edge_display": "+2.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0211,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+2.1%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1563751,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-12T14:03:29.562822+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Rotherham United & Salford City!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
League Two — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnet | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| 2 | Walsall | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| 3 | Grimsby Town | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| 4 | Gillingham | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| 5 | Cheltenham Town | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| 6 | Bristol Rovers | 7 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 |
| 7 | York City | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| 8 | Chesterfield | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| 9 | Crewe Alexandra | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 11 |
| 10 | Tranmere Rovers | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 11 | Fleetwood Town | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 12 | Salford City | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 13 | Swindon Town | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 14 | Rotherham United | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 15 | Colchester United | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 16 | Oldham Athletic | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 17 | Rochdale | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 18 | Shrewsbury Town | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 19 | Newport County | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 20 | Exeter City | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 21 | Accrington Stanley | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 22 | Northampton Town | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 23 | Port Vale | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 24 | Crawley Town | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnet | 7 | 17 | 10 | +7 | 15 |
| 2 | Cheltenham Town | 7 | 14 | 11 | +3 | 12 |
| 3 | York City | 7 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 11 |
| 4 | Bristol Rovers | 7 | 12 | 11 | +1 | 12 |
| 5 | Grimsby Town | 7 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 13 |
| 6 | Gillingham | 7 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 12 |
| 7 | Walsall | 7 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 13 |
| 8 | Chesterfield | 7 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 11 |
| 9 | Rotherham United | 7 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 9 |
| 10 | Newport County | 7 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 6 |
| 11 | Accrington Stanley | 7 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 6 |
| 12 | Tranmere Rovers | 7 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 10 |
| 13 | Fleetwood Town | 7 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 10 |
| 14 | Salford City | 7 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 10 |
| 15 | Oldham Athletic | 7 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 7 |
| 16 | Colchester United | 7 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 9 |
| 17 | Swindon Town | 7 | 8 | 11 | -3 | 10 |
| 18 | Crewe Alexandra | 7 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 11 |
| 19 | Rochdale | 7 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 7 |
| 20 | Crawley Town | 7 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 4 |
| 21 | Shrewsbury Town | 7 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 7 |
| 22 | Exeter City | 7 | 4 | 5 | -1 | 6 |
| 23 | Northampton Town | 7 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 6 |
| 24 | Port Vale | 7 | 3 | 9 | -6 | 5 |
| # | Đội | Tr | xG | xGC | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Accrington Stanley | 7 | 3.0 | 0.5 | +2.5 | 6 |
| 2 | Walsall | 7 | 3.5 | 1.8 | +1.7 | 13 |
| 3 | Rotherham United | 7 | 2.2 | 0.7 | +1.5 | 9 |
| 4 | Northampton Town | 7 | 1.6 | 0.3 | +1.3 | 6 |
| 5 | Barnet | 7 | 2.8 | 1.8 | +1.0 | 15 |
| 6 | Shrewsbury Town | 7 | 2.1 | 1.2 | +0.9 | 7 |
| 7 | Crewe Alexandra | 7 | 1.7 | 0.8 | +0.9 | 11 |
| 8 | Grimsby Town | 7 | 1.9 | 1.1 | +0.8 | 13 |
| 9 | Oldham Athletic | 7 | 1.5 | 0.9 | +0.6 | 7 |
| 10 | Bristol Rovers | 7 | 2.0 | 1.6 | +0.4 | 12 |
| 11 | Fleetwood Town | 7 | 1.9 | 1.5 | +0.4 | 10 |
| 12 | York City | 7 | 1.6 | 2.0 | -0.4 | 11 |
| 13 | Chesterfield | 7 | 1.5 | 1.9 | -0.4 | 11 |
| 14 | Port Vale | 7 | 0.9 | 1.5 | -0.6 | 5 |
| 15 | Exeter City | 7 | 1.1 | 1.9 | -0.8 | 6 |
| 16 | Tranmere Rovers | 7 | 1.2 | 2.1 | -0.9 | 10 |
| 17 | Crawley Town | 7 | 0.8 | 1.7 | -0.9 | 4 |
| 18 | Salford City | 7 | 1.8 | 2.8 | -1.0 | 10 |
| 19 | Swindon Town | 7 | 0.3 | 1.6 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 20 | Cheltenham Town | 7 | 0.7 | 2.2 | -1.5 | 12 |
| 21 | Gillingham | 7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | -1.7 | 12 |
| 22 | Colchester United | 7 | 0.5 | 3.0 | -2.5 | 9 |
| 23 | Rochdale | 7 | — | — | — | 7 |
| 24 | Newport County | 7 | — | — | — | 6 |
