Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 (2 mục tiêu) ✔ Chính xác
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Không ✔ Chính xác
- 1X2 Baník Ostrava II Ústí nad Labem ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-2 ✖ Không đúng
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.16
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Ústí nad Labem win · Baník Ostrava II 0–2 Ústí nad Labem
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "6bd37ccd5d799a217cd30ac645eb1a13dd4d9470500cf8e39d6d113519602d2b",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.26,
"away_win_prob": 0.3331,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2963,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.0,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.7,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.34,
"home_win_prob": 0.3706,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem"
},
"away_xg": 1.26,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0592,
"edge_gap": 0.0371,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4297,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 33.3,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 37.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.16
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.16,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.33,
"market_odds": 2.16,
"model_odds": 2.7,
"overround": 7.7,
"prob_edge": -9.3,
"value_pct": -20.0,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 3,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 8,
"away_score_rate": 71.6,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 8,
"home_score_rate": 73.8,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.26,
"home_expected": 1.34,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.9
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II or Draw",
"prob": 66.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II or \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"prob": 62.9
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II or \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 33.3,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 37.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.6,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.9,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 6.6,
"implied_prob": 27.8,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Draw",
"market": "Draw",
"model_prob": 29.6,
"odds": 3.6
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 31.25,
"draw": 25.78,
"home": 42.97
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 12:29:44",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 12:03:43",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"largest_move_kind": "ou_o",
"max_abs_move_pp": 2.56,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 42.97,
"gap_pp": -5.92,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 37.05
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.78,
"gap_pp": 3.82,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.25,
"gap_pp": 2.1,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 33.35
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 58.76,
"gap_pp": -10.56,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.24,
"gap_pp": 10.56,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.16,
"early": 2.11,
"implied_closing_pct": 42.97,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.41,
"implied_early_pct": 43.37,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.6,
"early": 3.62,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.78,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.5,
"implied_early_pct": 25.28,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.97,
"early": 2.92,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.25,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.09,
"implied_early_pct": 31.34,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.6,
"early": 1.52,
"implied_closing_pct": 58.76,
"implied_delta_pp": -2.56,
"implied_early_pct": 61.32,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.28,
"early": 2.41,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.24,
"implied_delta_pp": 2.56,
"implied_early_pct": 38.68,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": false,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.6,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.8,
"ev": -0.0625,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.9
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.34,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.146,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.325,
"edge": 0.0184,
"edge_pp": 1.8,
"market_prob": 0.3922,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"best_odd": 1.5,
"edge": -0.0253,
"ev": -0.1261,
"implied_prob": 0.6078,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5826
},
"p_final": 0.4105,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2044,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0455,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.146,
"best_odd": 2.325,
"edge": 0.0184,
"ev": -0.0455,
"implied_prob": 0.3922,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4105
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2433,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -24.3,
"text": "-24.3%"
},
"ev_under": 0.2691,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 26.9,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.2691,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10392.19,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1558,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0139,
"edge_pp": 1.4,
"market_prob": 0.3655,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1558,
"best_odd": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0139,
"ev": -0.0514,
"implied_prob": 0.3655,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3794
},
"p_final": 0.3794,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 9.0,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1375,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0514,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2143,
"best_odd": 1.44,
"edge": -0.0192,
"ev": -0.1139,
"implied_prob": 0.6345,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.6153
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.1966,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 19.7,
"text": "+19.7%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1825,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.2,
"text": "-18.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.1966,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10176.94,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"consensus_odds": 2.16,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1243,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -12.4,
"text": "-12.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.033,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -3.3,
"text": "-3.3%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -5.9,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1997,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.0%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"sort_key": 1791.75,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -7.1%",
"alert_team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 5.9,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -5.91,
"hero_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"market_prob_pct": 43.0,
"market_team": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"model_prob_pct": 37.1,
"model_team": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 50,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 5.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 5.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2691,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2691,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.6,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 34,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Ban\u00edk Ostrava II at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Ban\u00edk Ostrava II as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +26.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +26.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +26.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "77 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "34 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+26.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 77,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1243,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.4%",
"consensus_odds": 2.16,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -5.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4629629629629629,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1997,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "6/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.75,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 22.0,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.5,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 77,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 5.91,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 5.91,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.26,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.34,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.34,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.34 \u00b7 Away xG 1.26 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.1,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -7.1%",
"steam_team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 34,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 5.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 5.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2691,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2691,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.6,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 34,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Ban\u00edk Ostrava II at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Ban\u00edk Ostrava II as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +26.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +26.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +26.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "77 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "34 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+26.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 77,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1243,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.4%",
"consensus_odds": 2.16,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -5.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4629629629629629,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1997,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Ban\u00edk Ostrava II 1.34 xG vs \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem 1.26 \u2192 Ban\u00edk Ostrava II 37.1%",
"Market: Ban\u00edk Ostrava II ~43.0% implied",
"Market Steam: \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem \u2193 -7.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II, but sharp money moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -5.91,
"fair_prob": 37.06,
"label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"market_prob": 42.97,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.85,
"fair_prob": 29.63,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 25.78,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.06,
"fair_prob": 33.31,
"label": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"market_prob": 31.25,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -12.61,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 60.81,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 12.61,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 39.19,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.81,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 63.31,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.81,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 36.69,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -5.91,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.06,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"market_prob_pct": 42.97,
"status": "market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Ban\u00edk Ostrava II\u0027s win probability at 43.0%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 37.1%, a difference of 5.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 5.91,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 43.0,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -5.9,
"model_prob_pct": 37.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -5.9,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 77,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 34,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 24,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Ban\u00edk Ostrava II 1.34 xG vs \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem 1.26 \u2192 Ban\u00edk Ostrava II 37.1%",
"Market: Ban\u00edk Ostrava II ~43.0% implied",
"Market Steam: \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem \u2193 -7.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II, but sharp money moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -5.91,
"hero_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem odds shortened \u2193 -7.1%.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, with odds shortening by 7.1%.",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Ban\u00edk Ostrava II. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"note": "Buying interest on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem \u2014 odds shortened by 7.1%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model broadly agree on Ban\u00edk Ostrava II. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, with odds shortening by 7.1%.",
"Buying interest on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem \u2014 odds shortened by 7.1%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market still prices Ban\u00edk Ostrava II above the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 7.1%.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (6/8) supports the current market view on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 5.91,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 3.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 3.8,
"max_prob_pct": 37.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"largest_gap_pp": -5.9,
"lead": "The closing market prices Ban\u00edk Ostrava II higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 5.9,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -5.91,
"edge_pp": -5.91,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.06,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"market_prob_pct": 42.97,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.85,
"edge_pp": 3.85,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.63,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 25.78,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 2.06,
"edge_pp": 2.06,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.31,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"market_prob_pct": 31.25,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_ahead",
"status_label": "Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem \u2014 odds shortened by 7.1%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Ban\u00edk Ostrava II (43.0%).",
"However, \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -7.1%, 6/8).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Ban\u00edk Ostrava II, Market \u2192 Ban\u00edk Ostrava II, Recent sharp money \u2192 \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 46.3,
"closing_odds": 2.16,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 46.3,
"entry_odds": 2.16,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -7.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -4.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -4.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -3.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -3.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -3.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -3.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -3.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -3.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -3.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": -3.3
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "6/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.88,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -7.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 7.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 99h 30m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Bet365 led repricing on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem (7.1%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"A meaningful move led by sharper sportsbooks, with moderate market confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -7.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.10",
"2.99",
"2.88"
],
"display": "3.10 \u2192 2.80 \u2192 2.88",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 99h 30m",
"pick_team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.80"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.88"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.1,
2.97,
2.92,
2.88
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 18.7,10.6 37.3,14.7 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.88"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.88"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.1,
"page_alert_line": "Strong steam move across 6/8 sportsbooks on \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.88,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -7.1%",
"open_odds": 3.1,
"summary": "Market moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 50,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/8",
"current_odds": 2.88,
"move_display": "\u2193 -7.1%",
"open_odds": 3.1,
"pick_team": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"steam_score": 50,
"steam_team_name": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 5.9,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "usti-nad-labem",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"away_team_id": 3735,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/3735.webp",
"away_team_name": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"away_team_public_id": "2jRdYl49v0riBP",
"away_team_slug": "usti-nad-labem",
"country_code": "CZ",
"country_display_name": "Czech-Republic",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/cz.svg",
"country_id": 43,
"country_name": "Czech-Republic",
"fixture_id": 1559788,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Czech-Republic",
"home_team_display_name": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"home_team_id": 8621,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/8621.webp",
"home_team_name": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"home_team_public_id": "1SZsjK4ReYGelb",
"home_team_slug": "banik-ostrava-ii",
"ht.home_team_slug": "banik-ostrava-ii",
"league_country": "Czech-Republic",
"league_country_display": "Czech-Republic",
"league_display_name": "FNL",
"league_id": 346,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/346.webp",
"league_name": "FNL",
"league_public_id": "2hGh7vD5mB7NUi",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-20 12:30:00",
"public_id": "46jy2sGVNA5ktn",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Ostrava",
"venue_name": "Mestsky stadion v Ostrave-Vitkovicich"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4358,
"best_odd": 2.97,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0091,
"ev": -0.0447,
"implied_prob": 0.3125,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3125,
"draw": 0.2578,
"home": 0.4297
},
"model_prob": 0.3335,
"p_final": 0.3216
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2828,
"best_odd": 3.6,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0108,
"ev": -0.033,
"implied_prob": 0.2578,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3125,
"draw": 0.2578,
"home": 0.4297
},
"model_prob": 0.296,
"p_final": 0.2686
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4101,
"best_odd": 2.16,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0243,
"ev": -0.1243,
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3125,
"draw": 0.2578,
"home": 0.4297
},
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"p_final": 0.4054
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.97,
"edge": -0.0032,
"ev": -0.0096,
"implied_prob": 0.3367,
"model_prob": 0.3335
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.6,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": 0.0656,
"implied_prob": 0.2778,
"model_prob": 0.296
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.16,
"edge": -0.0924,
"ev": -0.1996,
"implied_prob": 0.463,
"model_prob": 0.3705
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1558,
"alpha_yes": 0.2143,
"best_no_odd": 2.63,
"best_yes_odd": 1.5,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0881,
"edge_yes": -0.0881,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.1966,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0514,
"ev_yes": -0.1825,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1139,
"implied_no": 0.3669,
"implied_yes": 0.6331,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1558,
"best_odd": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0139,
"ev": -0.0514,
"implied_prob": 0.3655,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3794
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2143,
"best_odd": 1.44,
"edge": -0.0192,
"ev": -0.1139,
"implied_prob": 0.6345,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.6153
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.3794,
"p_final_yes": 0.6153,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2008,
"alpha_under": 0.146,
"best_over_odd": 1.57,
"best_under_odd": 2.45,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.5,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.325,
"edge_over": -0.1261,
"edge_under": 0.1261,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2433,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1261,
"ev_under": 0.2691,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0455,
"implied_over": 0.6081,
"implied_over_mf": 0.6078,
"implied_under": 0.3919,
"implied_under_mf": 0.3922,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"best_odd": 1.5,
"edge": -0.0253,
"ev": -0.1261,
"implied_prob": 0.6078,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5826
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.146,
"best_odd": 2.325,
"edge": 0.0184,
"ev": -0.0455,
"implied_prob": 0.3922,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4105
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5826,
"p_final_under": 0.4105,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2691,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2691,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.2691,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.6,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.6
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 5.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2691,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2691,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.6,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 34,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Ban\u00edk Ostrava II at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Ban\u00edk Ostrava II as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 5.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +26.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +26.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +26.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "77 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "34 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+26.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 77,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward \u00dast\u00ed nad Labem, but the model still strongly favours Ban\u00edk Ostrava II.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1243,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.4%",
"consensus_odds": 2.16,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -5.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4629629629629629,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1997,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.0%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.296,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3705,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.08
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.16,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0243,
"ev": -0.1243,
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"max_ev_side": "draw",
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1558,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0139,
"market_prob": 0.3655,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1558,
"best_odd": 2.5,
"edge": 0.0139,
"ev": -0.0514,
"implied_prob": 0.3655,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3794
},
"p_final": 0.3794,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0514,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2143,
"best_odd": 1.44,
"edge": -0.0192,
"ev": -0.1139,
"implied_prob": 0.6345,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.6153
}
},
"edge": 0.0881,
"ev": 0.1966,
"implied_prob": 0.3669,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.146,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.325,
"edge": 0.0184,
"market_prob": 0.3922,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2008,
"best_odd": 1.5,
"edge": -0.0253,
"ev": -0.1261,
"implied_prob": 0.6078,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5826
},
"p_final": 0.4105,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0455,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.146,
"best_odd": 2.325,
"edge": 0.0184,
"ev": -0.0455,
"implied_prob": 0.3922,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4105
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1261,
"ev": 0.2691,
"implied_prob": 0.3919,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1559788,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.2691,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3335,
"draw": 0.296,
"home": 0.3705
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1966,
"implied_prob": 0.3669,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1966,
"implied_prob": 0.3669,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "no",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "\u00dast\u00ed nad Labem",
"home": "Ban\u00edk Ostrava II"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.097576,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2691,
"implied_prob": 0.3919,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1243,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.4%",
"consensus_odds": 2.16,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4297,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-5.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -5.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4629629629629629,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1997,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-20.0%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1559788,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-20T12:29:46.525553+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Baník Ostrava II & Ústí nad Labem!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
