Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 (4 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Không ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 Chapecoense Vitória ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 0-0, 1-2 4-0 ✖ Không đúng
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.53
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Vitória win · Vitória 4–0 Chapecoense
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "799df9dc39f0690c53efdf9613baa9b11e0432ad5df31f3443447d2cd52a28ad",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.28,
"away_win_prob": 0.3669,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.479,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.521,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.3045,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.73,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.28,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.04,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.2,
"home_win_prob": 0.3286,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.451,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under_25_prob": 0.549
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Vit\u00f3ria or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "30%",
"percent_draw": "35%",
"percent_home": "35%",
"winner_name": "Vit\u00f3ria"
},
"away_xg": 1.28,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Chapecoense",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.2059,
"edge_gap": 0.0373,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.1603,
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 36.6,
"draw": 30.5,
"home": 32.9
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 6.21
},
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"odd": 6.2
},
{
"affi_link": "https://reffpa.com/L?tag=d_4682699m_1260c_\u0026site=4682699\u0026ad=1260",
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"odd": 6.04
},
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"odd": 6.0
},
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"odd": 6.0
},
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"odd": 6.0
},
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"odd": 5.85
},
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"odd": 5.5
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 6.21,
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Chapecoense Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 6.24,
"market_odds": 5.86,
"model_odds": 2.73,
"overround": 6.4,
"prob_edge": 20.5,
"value_pct": 127.5,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 2,
"away_failed_to_score": 8,
"away_played": 27,
"away_score_rate": 72.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 10,
"home_failed_to_score": 9,
"home_played": 28,
"home_score_rate": 69.9,
"no_prob": 47.9,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 52.1,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 52.1
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.28,
"home_expected": 1.2,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.9
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.7
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Vit\u00f3ria or Draw",
"prob": 63.3
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Vit\u00f3ria or Chapecoense",
"prob": 69.6
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Chapecoense",
"prob": 67.1
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Vit\u00f3ria or Chapecoense",
"pick_prob": 69.6
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 36.7,
"draw_pct": 30.4,
"home_pct": 32.9,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Chapecoense"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.48,
"away_avg_scored": 1.1,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.0,
"over_prob": 45.1,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 54.9,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.48,
"under_prob": 54.9
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 127.9,
"implied_prob": 16.1,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Chapecoense Win",
"model_prob": 36.7,
"odds": 6.21
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"has_data": false
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": {
"best_bookmaker": "Marathonbet",
"best_odds": 15.25,
"edge": 4.2,
"ev": 63.5,
"label": "0-1",
"probability": 10.7
},
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 0.1,
"ev": 0.0062,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.8,
"market_prob": 0.1282,
"market_prob_pct": 12.8,
"model_prob": 0.129,
"model_prob_pct": 12.9,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.9
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.9
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.7
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.2
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.2,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"best_odds": 5.6,
"confidence": "no_clear_edge",
"display_label": "Away Chapecoense",
"edge": 18.8,
"ev": 0.0,
"probability": 36.6
},
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"consensus_odds": 6.0,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.1144,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 11.4,
"text": "+11.4%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.1144,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 11.4,
"text": "+11.4%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"raw_edge_display": "+20.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 20.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 1.1978,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+119.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Chapecoense",
"sort_key": 10252.96,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0211,
"edge_pp": 2.1,
"market_prob": 0.4855,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.549,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": -0.0211,
"ev": -0.0922,
"implied_prob": 0.5145,
"model_prob": 0.451,
"p_final": 0.4934
},
"p_final": 0.5066,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0706,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0121,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0211,
"ev": -0.0121,
"implied_prob": 0.4855,
"model_prob": 0.549,
"p_final": 0.5066
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1521,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -15.2,
"text": "-15.2%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1145,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 11.5,
"text": "+11.5%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1145,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over_prob": 45.1,
"sort_key": 10103.05,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 54.9,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.85,
"edge": 0.006,
"edge_pp": 0.6,
"market_prob": 0.5034,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.521,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"best_odd": 1.875,
"edge": -0.006,
"ev": -0.0801,
"implied_prob": 0.4966,
"model_prob": 0.479,
"p_final": 0.4906
},
"p_final": 0.5094,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"raw_edge_pp": 1.8,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0361,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0577,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"best_odd": 1.85,
"edge": 0.006,
"ev": -0.0577,
"implied_prob": 0.5034,
"model_prob": 0.521,
"p_final": 0.5094
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0851,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -8.5,
"text": "-8.5%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.0049,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -0.5,
"text": "-0.5%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": -0.0049,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 47.9,
"sort_key": 4049.314,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 52.1
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 818.7,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.9
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "9/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "9/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +26.3%",
"alert_team": "Chapecoense",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 0.0,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": null,
"hero_label": "",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"market_team": "Chapecoense",
"model_prob_pct": 36.7,
"model_team": "Chapecoense",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 69,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.9,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.9,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1145,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.012744,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 27,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Chapecoense at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 15.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Chapecoense as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Chapecoense",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +11.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +11.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +11.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "60 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "27 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+11.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 60,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1144,
"consensus_ev_display": "+11.4%",
"consensus_odds": 6.0,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"raw_edge_display": "+20.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 20.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.16666666666666666,
"raw_signal_ev": 1.1978,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+119.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -5.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "9/9",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation pending",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pending",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 25.0,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 8.0
},
"score": 60,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 0.0,
"market_agreement": "unknown",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.28,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -5.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.2,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.28,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.20 \u00b7 Away xG 1.28 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -5%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "pending",
"odds_delta_pct": 26.3,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +26.3%",
"steam_team": "Chapecoense",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 27,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.9,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.9,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1145,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.012744,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 27,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Chapecoense at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 15.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Chapecoense as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Chapecoense",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +11.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +11.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +11.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "60 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "27 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+11.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 60,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1144,
"consensus_ev_display": "+11.4%",
"consensus_odds": 6.0,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"raw_edge_display": "+20.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 20.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.16666666666666666,
"raw_signal_ev": 1.1978,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+119.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -5.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Vit\u00f3ria 1.20 xG vs Chapecoense 1.28 \u2192 Chapecoense 36.7%",
"Market Drift: Chapecoense odds \u2191 +26.3%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Chapecoense, but the market has moved away from Chapecoense.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 32.86,
"label": "Vit\u00f3ria",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 30.45,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 36.69,
"label": "Chapecoense",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -6.56,
"fair_prob": 45.1,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 51.66,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.56,
"fair_prob": 54.9,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 48.34,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.79,
"fair_prob": 52.1,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 50.31,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.79,
"fair_prob": 47.9,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 49.69,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations.",
"comparison_available": false,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "unknown",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "",
"edge_label_key": "",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Chapecoense",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "\u2014",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 15.7,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+21.0 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 21.0,
"model_prob_pct": 36.7,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+21.0 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 21.0,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 60,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pending",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 27,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Vit\u00f3ria 1.20 xG vs Chapecoense 1.28 \u2192 Chapecoense 36.7%",
"Market Drift: Chapecoense odds \u2191 +26.3%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Chapecoense, but the market has moved away from Chapecoense.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": false,
"hero_edge_pp": null,
"hero_label": "",
"hero_side": null,
"market_activity": "Chapecoense odds lengthened \u2191 +26.3%.",
"market_agreement": "unknown",
"market_agreement_label": "\u2014",
"market_interpretation": {},
"market_narrative": {},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pending",
"status": "pending"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pending",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 3.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 3.8,
"max_prob_pct": 36.7,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "",
"largest_gap_pp": null,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.86,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Vit\u00f3ria",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
},
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 30.45,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
},
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.69,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Chapecoense",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
}
],
"status": "unknown",
"status_label": "\u2014",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical model leans Chapecoense (36.7%).",
"However, Chapecoense has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +26.3%, 9/9) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": null,
"closing_odds": null,
"closing_reason": "Expected before kickoff",
"closing_status": "waiting",
"closing_status_label": "Waiting",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": null,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "market_monitoring",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Market monitoring",
"entry_implied_pct": 16.67,
"entry_odds": 6.0,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pending",
"model_validation_status": "pending",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 9,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +30.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 30.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +26.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 26.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +22.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 22.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +19.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 19.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +18.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 18.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +18.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 18.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +15.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 15.2
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"clv_label": "Waiting for Close",
"clv_status": "waiting",
"current_odds": 6.0,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +26.3%",
"move_pct_abs": 26.3,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 153h 1m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"9/9 books lengthened Chapecoense together (26.3% drift, score 69) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 26.3,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"6.00",
"5.38",
"4.75"
],
"display": "6.21 \u2192 4.29 \u2192 6.00",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 153h 1m",
"pick_team": "Chapecoense",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "6.21"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "4.29"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "6.00"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
4.75,
6.0
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.75"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "4.75"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "6.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "6.00"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 4.75,
"page_alert_line": "Market drift alert: Chapecoense odds \u2191 +26.3% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Chapecoense",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Market drift alert: Chapecoense odds \u2191 +26.3% \u2014 pricing moves against this side",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 6.0,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +26.3%",
"open_odds": 4.75,
"summary": "Market moved away from Chapecoense while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Chapecoense",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 69,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"current_odds": 6.0,
"move_display": "\u2191 +26.3%",
"open_odds": 4.75,
"pick_team": "Chapecoense",
"steam_score": 69,
"steam_team_name": "Chapecoense",
"steam_tier": "A"
},
"premium_teaser": {},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "chapecoense-sc",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Chapecoense",
"away_team_id": 132,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/132.webp",
"away_team_name": "Chapecoense",
"away_team_public_id": "14FIZ3MPxbsu0Q",
"away_team_slug": "chapecoense-sc",
"country_code": "BR",
"country_display_name": "Brazil",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/br.svg",
"country_id": 24,
"country_name": "Brazil",
"fixture_id": 1492399,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Brazil",
"home_team_display_name": "Vit\u00f3ria",
"home_team_id": 136,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/136.webp",
"home_team_name": "Vit\u00f3ria",
"home_team_public_id": "3CAj4FsVRtGWcF",
"home_team_slug": "vitoria",
"ht.home_team_slug": "vitoria",
"league_country": "Brazil",
"league_country_display": "Brazil",
"league_display_name": "Serie A Brazil",
"league_id": 71,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/71.webp",
"league_name": "Serie A Brazil",
"league_public_id": "0wg055kq66Q9K5",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-07 23:00:00",
"public_id": "17HEpRp3xP854D",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "El Salvador",
"venue_name": "Estadio Manoel Barradas"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev",
"pred_conf_md_xg_borderline",
"pred_conf_md_draw_above_30"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)",
"Total xG in borderline band (high variance) (\u22121.5)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)"
],
"score": 4.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.1372,
"best_odd": 6.0,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0287,
"ev": 0.1144,
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.157,
"draw": 0.2312,
"home": 0.6118
},
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"p_final": 0.1857
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.1779,
"best_odd": 4.075,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0131,
"ev": -0.0045,
"implied_prob": 0.2312,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.157,
"draw": 0.2312,
"home": 0.6118
},
"model_prob": 0.3048,
"p_final": 0.2443
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3454,
"best_odd": 1.54,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0977,
"ev": -0.2083,
"implied_prob": 0.6118,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.157,
"draw": 0.2312,
"home": 0.6118
},
"model_prob": 0.3289,
"p_final": 0.5141
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 6.21,
"edge": 0.2052,
"ev": 1.2744,
"implied_prob": 0.161,
"model_prob": 0.3663
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 4.18,
"edge": 0.0656,
"ev": 0.2742,
"implied_prob": 0.2392,
"model_prob": 0.3048
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.62,
"edge": -0.2884,
"ev": -0.4672,
"implied_prob": 0.6173,
"model_prob": 0.3289
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.3407,
"alpha_yes": 0.3407,
"best_no_odd": 1.91,
"best_yes_odd": 1.91,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0179,
"edge_yes": 0.0179,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0851,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0801,
"ev_yes": -0.0049,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0577,
"implied_no": 0.4969,
"implied_yes": 0.5031,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"best_odd": 1.875,
"edge": -0.006,
"ev": -0.0801,
"implied_prob": 0.4966,
"model_prob": 0.479,
"p_final": 0.4906
},
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"best_odd": 1.85,
"edge": 0.006,
"ev": -0.0577,
"implied_prob": 0.5034,
"model_prob": 0.521,
"p_final": 0.5094
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4906,
"p_final_yes": 0.5094,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.3325,
"alpha_under": 0.3325,
"best_over_odd": 1.88,
"best_under_odd": 2.03,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.84,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.95,
"edge_over": -0.0656,
"edge_under": 0.0656,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1521,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0922,
"ev_under": 0.1145,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0121,
"implied_over": 0.5166,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5145,
"implied_under": 0.4834,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4855,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": -0.0211,
"ev": -0.0922,
"implied_prob": 0.5145,
"model_prob": 0.451,
"p_final": 0.4934
},
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0211,
"ev": -0.0121,
"implied_prob": 0.4855,
"model_prob": 0.549,
"p_final": 0.5066
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4934,
"p_final_under": 0.5066,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.48,
"variance_flag": true
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.4834,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.549,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "alternative",
"side": "under",
"slot": "alternative"
},
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1145,
"best_outlier_ev": 1.2744,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1145,
"confidence": 6.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_draw_above_30",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.9,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.9
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.9,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1145,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.012744,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 27,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Chapecoense at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 15.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Chapecoense as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 20.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Chapecoense",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +11.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +11.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +11.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "60 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "27 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+11.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 60,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Chapecoense, but the model still strongly favours Chapecoense.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1144,
"consensus_ev_display": "+11.4%",
"consensus_odds": 6.0,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"raw_edge_display": "+20.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 20.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.16666666666666666,
"raw_signal_ev": 1.1978,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+119.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -5.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.521,
"draw_prob": 0.3048,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3663,
"over_prob": 0.451,
"total_xg": 2.48,
"under_prob": 0.549,
"xg_diff": 0.08
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 6.0,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0287,
"ev": 0.1144,
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Chapecoense"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.85,
"edge": 0.006,
"market_prob": 0.5034,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.521,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"best_odd": 1.875,
"edge": -0.006,
"ev": -0.0801,
"implied_prob": 0.4966,
"model_prob": 0.479,
"p_final": 0.4906
},
"p_final": 0.5094,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0577,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3407,
"best_odd": 1.85,
"edge": 0.006,
"ev": -0.0577,
"implied_prob": 0.5034,
"model_prob": 0.521,
"p_final": 0.5094
}
},
"edge": 0.0179,
"ev": -0.0049,
"implied_prob": 0.5031,
"model_prob": 0.521,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0211,
"market_prob": 0.4855,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.549,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"best_odd": 1.84,
"edge": -0.0211,
"ev": -0.0922,
"implied_prob": 0.5145,
"model_prob": 0.451,
"p_final": 0.4934
},
"p_final": 0.5066,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0121,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3325,
"best_odd": 1.95,
"edge": 0.0211,
"ev": -0.0121,
"implied_prob": 0.4855,
"model_prob": 0.549,
"p_final": 0.5066
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0656,
"ev": 0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.4834,
"model_prob": 0.549,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1492399,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1145,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3663,
"draw": 0.3048,
"home": 0.3289
},
"reason_codes": [
"variance_medium"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.4834,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.549,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1145,
"implied_prob": 0.4834,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.549,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Chapecoense",
"home": "Vit\u00f3ria"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.046095,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1144,
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "weak",
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Chapecoense",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": true
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1144,
"consensus_ev_display": "+11.4%",
"consensus_odds": 6.0,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.157,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3663,
"raw_edge_display": "+20.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 20.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.16666666666666666,
"raw_signal_ev": 1.1978,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+119.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1492399,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-07T19:20:39.347455+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Vitória & Chapecoense!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Serie A Brazil — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 29 | 18 | 7 | 4 | 61 |
| 2 | Palmeiras | 28 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 57 |
| 3 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 49 |
| 4 | Cruzeiro | 29 | 14 | 6 | 9 | 48 |
| 5 | Fluminense | 28 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 48 |
| 6 | Bahia | 28 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 46 |
| 7 | Atlético Mineiro | 28 | 12 | 7 | 9 | 43 |
| 8 | Santos | 29 | 11 | 9 | 9 | 42 |
| 9 | Coritiba | 28 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 38 |
| 10 | RB Bragantino | 29 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 37 |
| 11 | São Paulo | 29 | 10 | 6 | 13 | 36 |
| 12 | Vitória | 29 | 10 | 6 | 13 | 36 |
| 13 | Botafogo | 29 | 9 | 8 | 12 | 35 |
| 14 | Vasco da Gama | 28 | 9 | 7 | 12 | 34 |
| 15 | Mirassol | 29 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 33 |
| 16 | Corinthians | 29 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 32 |
| 17 | Internacional | 29 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 31 |
| 18 | Grêmio | 29 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 30 |
| 19 | Remo | 29 | 5 | 9 | 15 | 24 |
| 20 | Chapecoense | 28 | 3 | 9 | 16 | 18 |
| 20 | Chapecoense B | 20 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 10 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 29 | 57 | 25 | +32 | 61 |
| 2 | Palmeiras | 28 | 47 | 21 | +26 | 57 |
| 3 | Santos | 29 | 45 | 43 | +2 | 42 |
| 4 | Fluminense | 28 | 44 | 36 | +8 | 48 |
| 5 | Cruzeiro | 29 | 44 | 40 | +4 | 48 |
| 6 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 43 | 32 | +11 | 49 |
| 7 | Bahia | 28 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 46 |
| 8 | Botafogo | 29 | 42 | 47 | -5 | 35 |
| 9 | Atlético Mineiro | 28 | 37 | 32 | +5 | 43 |
| 10 | Coritiba | 28 | 37 | 43 | -6 | 38 |
| 11 | Vasco da Gama | 28 | 36 | 42 | -6 | 34 |
| 12 | RB Bragantino | 29 | 34 | 33 | +1 | 37 |
| 13 | Mirassol | 29 | 34 | 43 | -9 | 33 |
| 14 | São Paulo | 29 | 33 | 34 | -1 | 36 |
| 15 | Remo | 29 | 33 | 48 | -15 | 24 |
| 16 | Internacional | 29 | 32 | 37 | -5 | 31 |
| 17 | Vitória | 29 | 32 | 42 | -10 | 36 |
| 18 | Grêmio | 29 | 31 | 39 | -8 | 30 |
| 19 | Corinthians | 29 | 30 | 34 | -4 | 32 |
| 20 | Chapecoense | 28 | 29 | 57 | -28 | 18 |
| 21 | Chapecoense B | 20 | 19 | 41 | -22 | 10 |
| # | Đội | Tr | xG | xGC | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bahia | 28 | 12.2 | 6.9 | +5.3 | 46 |
| 2 | Santos | 29 | 9.9 | 6.6 | +3.3 | 42 |
| 3 | Flamengo | 29 | 9.0 | 5.7 | +3.3 | 61 |
| 4 | Vasco da Gama | 28 | 9.2 | 6.1 | +3.1 | 34 |
| 5 | Atlético Mineiro | 28 | 5.9 | 2.9 | +3.0 | 43 |
| 6 | Corinthians | 29 | 7.2 | 4.7 | +2.5 | 32 |
| 7 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 10.2 | 8.1 | +2.1 | 49 |
| 8 | Fluminense | 28 | 8.7 | 6.8 | +1.9 | 48 |
| 9 | Palmeiras | 28 | 8.2 | 6.5 | +1.7 | 57 |
| 10 | Botafogo | 29 | 11.0 | 10.9 | +0.1 | 35 |
| 11 | São Paulo | 29 | 4.9 | 4.8 | +0.1 | 36 |
| 12 | RB Bragantino | 29 | 4.9 | 5.7 | -0.8 | 37 |
| 13 | Cruzeiro | 29 | 9.3 | 10.2 | -0.9 | 48 |
| 14 | Mirassol | 29 | 7.1 | 9.0 | -1.9 | 33 |
| 15 | Remo | 29 | 5.6 | 7.7 | -2.1 | 24 |
| 16 | Coritiba | 28 | 4.9 | 7.1 | -2.2 | 38 |
| 17 | Chapecoense | 28 | 7.3 | 9.9 | -2.6 | 18 |
| 18 | Internacional | 29 | 8.8 | 11.5 | -2.7 | 31 |
| 19 | Vitória | 29 | 6.6 | 11.7 | -5.1 | 36 |
| 20 | Grêmio | 29 | 5.3 | 13.5 | -8.2 | 30 |
| 21 | Chapecoense B | 20 | — | — | — | 10 |
