Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 (2 mục tiêu) ✔ Chính xác
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Không ✔ Chính xác
- 1X2 Botafogo Mirassol ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-0 ✖ Không đúng
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.08
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Mirassol win · Mirassol 2–0 Botafogo
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "36edc7345e0131666d17acf051f45c072c8ee87b1a036b39ecbfb3672b9e3cd6",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.41,
"away_win_prob": 0.4021,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.456,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2939,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.49,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.4,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.29,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.2,
"home_win_prob": 0.304,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.484,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.516
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Mirassol or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Mirassol"
},
"away_xg": 1.41,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Botafogo",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1314,
"edge_gap": 0.0977,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2703,
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 40.2,
"draw": 29.4,
"home": 30.4
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.58
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.58,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Botafogo Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 3.7,
"market_odds": 3.58,
"model_odds": 2.49,
"overround": 3.3,
"prob_edge": 12.2,
"value_pct": 43.8,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 4,
"away_failed_to_score": 6,
"away_played": 26,
"away_score_rate": 75.6,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 7,
"home_played": 26,
"home_score_rate": 69.9,
"no_prob": 45.6,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.4,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.4
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.41,
"home_expected": 1.2,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.4
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.5
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Mirassol or Draw",
"prob": 59.8
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Mirassol or Botafogo",
"prob": 70.6
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Botafogo",
"prob": 69.6
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Mirassol or Botafogo",
"pick_prob": 70.6
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 40.2,
"draw_pct": 29.4,
"home_pct": 30.4,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Botafogo"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.61,
"away_avg_scored": 1.5,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.1,
"over_prob": 48.4,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.61,
"under_prob": 51.6
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 43.9,
"implied_prob": 27.9,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Botafogo Win",
"model_prob": 40.2,
"odds": 3.58
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Botafogo",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 27.03,
"draw": 26.44,
"home": 46.53
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 19:59:03",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 19:29:43",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Mirassol",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 46.53,
"gap_pp": -16.12,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 30.41
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.44,
"gap_pp": 2.98,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.42
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.03,
"gap_pp": 13.14,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 40.17
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 55.13,
"gap_pp": -6.73,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.4
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 44.87,
"gap_pp": 6.73,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.6
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.08,
"early": 2.08,
"implied_closing_pct": 46.53,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 46.53,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.66,
"early": 3.66,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.44,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 26.44,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.58,
"early": 3.58,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.03,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 27.03,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.75,
"early": 1.75,
"implied_closing_pct": 55.13,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 55.13,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.15,
"early": 2.15,
"implied_closing_pct": 44.87,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 44.87,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 13.1,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.9,
"ev": -0.132,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.124,
"model_prob_pct": 12.4,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.4
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.4
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.4
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.8
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.5
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.2,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.5074,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.03,
"edge": 0.0269,
"edge_pp": 2.7,
"market_prob": 0.463,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.516,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5581,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": -0.0296,
"ev": -0.112,
"implied_prob": 0.537,
"model_prob": 0.484,
"p_final": 0.5074
},
"p_final": 0.4899,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.3,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0475,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0056,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.5074,
"best_odd": 2.03,
"edge": 0.0269,
"ev": -0.0056,
"implied_prob": 0.463,
"model_prob": 0.516,
"p_final": 0.4899
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1143,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.4,
"text": "-11.4%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1094,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 10.9,
"text": "+10.9%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1094,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over_prob": 48.4,
"sort_key": 10248.46,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.6,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"consensus_odds": 3.58,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.0811,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.1,
"text": "+8.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0811,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.1,
"text": "+8.1%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.1,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+43.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Botafogo",
"sort_key": 10072.99,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3975,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0142,
"edge_pp": 1.4,
"market_prob": 0.4203,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.456,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.3975,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0142,
"ev": -0.0441,
"implied_prob": 0.4203,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"p_final": 0.4345
},
"p_final": 0.4345,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 3.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0032,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0441,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5466,
"best_odd": 1.595,
"edge": -0.0195,
"ev": -0.1065,
"implied_prob": 0.5797,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"p_final": 0.5602
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0488,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.9,
"text": "+4.9%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1024,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.2,
"text": "-10.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0488,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 45.6,
"sort_key": 10043.92,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.4
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.2,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.4
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "8/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "8/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"alert_team": "Botafogo",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 16.1,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -16.13,
"hero_label": "Mirassol",
"market_prob_pct": 27.0,
"market_team": "Mirassol",
"model_prob_pct": 40.2,
"model_team": "Botafogo",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 56,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.1,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.1,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4382,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Botafogo at 40.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Botafogo as the value side (40.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Botafogo",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Botafogo \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.79 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +44% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1492385 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.79 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +10.9% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +10.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+10.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"Decision strength: 3.8/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +44% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0811,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.1%",
"consensus_odds": 3.58,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.27932960893854747,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+43.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 4.4,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.21
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "8/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.8888888888888888,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (16 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 16.9,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 8.9,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 57,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 16.13,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 16.13,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.41,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 4.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.2,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.41,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.20 \u00b7 Away xG 1.41 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +4%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 16.1,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"steam_team": "Botafogo",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 40,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.1,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.1,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4382,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Botafogo at 40.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Botafogo as the value side (40.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Botafogo",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Botafogo \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.79 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +44% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1492385 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.79 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +10.9% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +10.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+10.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"Decision strength: 3.8/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +44% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0811,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.1%",
"consensus_odds": 3.58,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.27932960893854747,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+43.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 4.4,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.21
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Mirassol 1.20 xG vs Botafogo 1.41 \u2192 Botafogo 40.2%",
"Market: Mirassol ~27.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Botafogo odds \u2191 +16.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Botafogo, but the market has moved away from Botafogo.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -16.13,
"fair_prob": 30.4,
"label": "Mirassol",
"market_prob": 46.53,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.95,
"fair_prob": 29.39,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 26.44,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.18,
"fair_prob": 40.21,
"label": "Botafogo",
"market_prob": 27.03,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.74,
"fair_prob": 48.4,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 54.14,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.74,
"fair_prob": 51.6,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 45.86,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -3.6,
"fair_prob": 54.4,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 58.0,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.6,
"fair_prob": 45.6,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 42.0,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -16.13,
"fair_prob_pct": 30.4,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Mirassol",
"market_prob_pct": 46.53,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Botafogo"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Mirassol\u0027s win probability at 46.5%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 30.4%, a difference of 16.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 16.13,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Botafogo",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 27.0,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+13.2 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 13.2,
"model_prob_pct": 40.2,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+13.2 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 13.2,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 57,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 40,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Mirassol 1.20 xG vs Botafogo 1.41 \u2192 Botafogo 40.2%",
"Market: Mirassol ~27.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Botafogo odds \u2191 +16.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Botafogo, but the market has moved away from Botafogo.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -16.13,
"hero_label": "Mirassol",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Botafogo odds lengthened \u2191 +16.1%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Botafogo has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 16.1%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Mirassol than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Botafogo \u2014 odds lengthened by 16.1% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Mirassol than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Botafogo has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 16.1%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Botafogo \u2014 odds lengthened by 16.1% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Mirassol more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Botafogo has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 16.1%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (8/9) supports the current market view on Botafogo."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 16.13,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 9.8 pp (at 40.2%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 9.8,
"max_prob_pct": 40.2,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Mirassol",
"largest_gap_pp": -16.1,
"lead": "The closing market prices Mirassol higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 16.1,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -16.13,
"edge_pp": -16.13,
"fair_prob_pct": 30.4,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Mirassol",
"market_prob_pct": 46.53,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 2.95,
"edge_pp": 2.95,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.39,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 26.44,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 13.18,
"edge_pp": 13.18,
"fair_prob_pct": 40.21,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Botafogo",
"market_prob_pct": 27.03,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Botafogo \u2014 odds lengthened by 16.1% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Mirassol (27.0%).",
"However, Botafogo has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +16.1%, 8/9) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Botafogo, Market \u2192 Mirassol, while Botafogo odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 48.08,
"closing_odds": 2.08,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 48.08,
"entry_odds": 2.08,
"match_phase": "live",
"match_phase_detail": "1H",
"match_phase_display": "Live \u00b7 1H",
"match_phase_label": "Live",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 8,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 16.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.1
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "8/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 16.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 136h 2m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"8/9 books lengthened Botafogo together (16.1% drift, score 56) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 16.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.60",
"3.35",
"3.10"
],
"display": "3.60 \u2192 2.89 \u2192 3.60",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 136h 2m",
"pick_team": "Botafogo",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.60"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.89"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.60"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.1,
3.58,
3.6
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.7 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.10"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.60"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.60"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.1,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 8/9 sportsbooks on Botafogo",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Botafogo",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.6,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"open_odds": 3.1,
"summary": "Market moved away from Botafogo while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Botafogo",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_drift",
"signal_label": "Strong drift",
"steam_score": 56,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "8/9",
"current_odds": 3.6,
"move_display": "\u2191 +16.1%",
"open_odds": 3.1,
"pick_team": "Botafogo",
"steam_score": 56,
"steam_team_name": "Botafogo",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 16.1,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "botafogo",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": 0,
"away_team_display_name": "Botafogo",
"away_team_id": 120,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/120.webp",
"away_team_name": "Botafogo",
"away_team_public_id": "5slOQBRrRmVA3M",
"away_team_slug": "botafogo",
"country_code": "BR",
"country_display_name": "Brazil",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/br.svg",
"country_id": 24,
"country_name": "Brazil",
"fixture_id": 1492385,
"goals_away": 0,
"goals_home": 0,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": 0,
"home_team_country": "Brazil",
"home_team_display_name": "Mirassol",
"home_team_id": 7848,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/7848.webp",
"home_team_name": "Mirassol",
"home_team_public_id": "10qabFBUElLG9L",
"home_team_slug": "mirassol",
"ht.home_team_slug": "mirassol",
"league_country": "Brazil",
"league_country_display": "Brazil",
"league_display_name": "Serie A Brazil",
"league_id": 71,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/71.webp",
"league_name": "Serie A Brazil",
"league_public_id": "0wg055kq66Q9K5",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-19 20:00:00",
"public_id": "62Ipf8kifaTlk0",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "First Half",
"status_short": "1H",
"venue_city": "Mirasol",
"venue_name": "Jos\u00e9 Maria de Campos Maia"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2409,
"best_odd": 3.58,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0317,
"ev": 0.0811,
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2703,
"draw": 0.2644,
"home": 0.4653
},
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"p_final": 0.302
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2866,
"best_odd": 3.66,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0085,
"ev": -0.001,
"implied_prob": 0.2644,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2703,
"draw": 0.2644,
"home": 0.4653
},
"model_prob": 0.2942,
"p_final": 0.273
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3412,
"best_odd": 2.08,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.055,
"ev": -0.1467,
"implied_prob": 0.4653,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2703,
"draw": 0.2644,
"home": 0.4653
},
"model_prob": 0.3041,
"p_final": 0.4103
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.58,
"edge": 0.1224,
"ev": 0.4382,
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"model_prob": 0.4017
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.66,
"edge": 0.021,
"ev": 0.0768,
"implied_prob": 0.2732,
"model_prob": 0.2942
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.08,
"edge": -0.1767,
"ev": -0.3676,
"implied_prob": 0.4808,
"model_prob": 0.3041
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.3975,
"alpha_yes": 0.5466,
"best_no_odd": 2.3,
"best_yes_odd": 1.65,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.036,
"edge_yes": -0.036,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0488,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0441,
"ev_yes": -0.1024,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1065,
"implied_no": 0.42,
"implied_yes": 0.58,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.3975,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0142,
"ev": -0.0441,
"implied_prob": 0.4203,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"p_final": 0.4345
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5466,
"best_odd": 1.595,
"edge": -0.0195,
"ev": -0.1065,
"implied_prob": 0.5797,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"p_final": 0.5602
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.4345,
"p_final_yes": 0.5602,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.5581,
"alpha_under": 0.5074,
"best_over_odd": 1.83,
"best_under_odd": 2.15,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.75,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.03,
"edge_over": -0.0574,
"edge_under": 0.0574,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1143,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.112,
"ev_under": 0.1094,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0056,
"implied_over": 0.5414,
"implied_over_mf": 0.537,
"implied_under": 0.4586,
"implied_under_mf": 0.463,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5581,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": -0.0296,
"ev": -0.112,
"implied_prob": 0.537,
"model_prob": 0.484,
"p_final": 0.5074
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.5074,
"best_odd": 2.03,
"edge": 0.0269,
"ev": -0.0056,
"implied_prob": 0.463,
"model_prob": 0.516,
"p_final": 0.4899
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5074,
"p_final_under": 0.4899,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.61,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4382,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1094,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 3.8,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.8,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 3.8,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.8
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 16.1,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 16.1,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1094,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.4382,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.8,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Botafogo at 40.2%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Botafogo as the value side (40.2%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Botafogo",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Botafogo \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.79 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +44% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1492385 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.79 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +10.9% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +10.9% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +10.9% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +10.9% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+10.9% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"Decision strength: 3.8/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +44% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Botafogo, but the model still strongly favours Botafogo.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0811,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.1%",
"consensus_odds": 3.58,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.27932960893854747,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+43.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 4.4,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.21
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u672a\u5206\u578b",
"scoring_type": "neutral",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
"draw_prob": 0.2942,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4017,
"over_prob": 0.484,
"total_xg": 2.61,
"under_prob": 0.516,
"xg_diff": 0.21
},
"type": "neutral",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.58,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0317,
"ev": 0.0811,
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Botafogo"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3975,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0142,
"market_prob": 0.4203,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.456,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.3975,
"best_odd": 2.2,
"edge": 0.0142,
"ev": -0.0441,
"implied_prob": 0.4203,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"p_final": 0.4345
},
"p_final": 0.4345,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0441,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5466,
"best_odd": 1.595,
"edge": -0.0195,
"ev": -0.1065,
"implied_prob": 0.5797,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"p_final": 0.5602
}
},
"edge": 0.036,
"ev": 0.0488,
"implied_prob": 0.42,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.5074,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.03,
"edge": 0.0269,
"market_prob": 0.463,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.516,
"n_bookmakers": 8,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5581,
"best_odd": 1.75,
"edge": -0.0296,
"ev": -0.112,
"implied_prob": 0.537,
"model_prob": 0.484,
"p_final": 0.5074
},
"p_final": 0.4899,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0056,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.5074,
"best_odd": 2.03,
"edge": 0.0269,
"ev": -0.0056,
"implied_prob": 0.463,
"model_prob": 0.516,
"p_final": 0.4899
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0574,
"ev": 0.1094,
"implied_prob": 0.4586,
"model_prob": 0.516,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1492385,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1094,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4017,
"draw": 0.2942,
"home": 0.3041
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Botafogo",
"home": "Mirassol"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.05645,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1094,
"implied_prob": 0.4586,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.516,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 3,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0811,
"consensus_ev_display": "+8.1%",
"consensus_odds": 3.58,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2703,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4017,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.27932960893854747,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.4381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+43.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1492385,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-19T20:05:45.816235+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Mirassol & Botafogo!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Serie A Brazil — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 28 | 18 | 6 | 4 | 60 |
| 2 | Palmeiras | 28 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 57 |
| 3 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 49 |
| 4 | Fluminense | 28 | 13 | 9 | 6 | 48 |
| 5 | Bahia | 28 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 46 |
| 6 | Cruzeiro | 28 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 45 |
| 7 | Atlético Mineiro | 27 | 11 | 7 | 9 | 40 |
| 8 | Santos | 27 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 38 |
| 9 | Coritiba | 28 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 38 |
| 10 | RB Bragantino | 27 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 36 |
| 11 | São Paulo | 27 | 10 | 6 | 11 | 36 |
| 12 | Botafogo | 28 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 35 |
| 13 | Vitória | 28 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 33 |
| 14 | Corinthians | 28 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
| 15 | Mirassol | 28 | 8 | 8 | 12 | 32 |
| 16 | Vasco da Gama | 27 | 8 | 7 | 12 | 31 |
| 17 | Grêmio | 28 | 7 | 8 | 13 | 29 |
| 18 | Internacional | 28 | 6 | 10 | 12 | 28 |
| 19 | Remo | 28 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 23 |
| 20 | Chapecoense | 27 | 3 | 9 | 15 | 18 |
| 20 | Chapecoense B | 20 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 10 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flamengo | 28 | 55 | 23 | +32 | 60 |
| 2 | Palmeiras | 28 | 47 | 21 | +26 | 57 |
| 3 | Fluminense | 28 | 44 | 36 | +8 | 48 |
| 4 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 43 | 32 | +11 | 49 |
| 5 | Bahia | 28 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 46 |
| 6 | Cruzeiro | 28 | 42 | 40 | +2 | 45 |
| 7 | Santos | 27 | 41 | 40 | +1 | 38 |
| 8 | Botafogo | 28 | 41 | 45 | -4 | 35 |
| 9 | Coritiba | 28 | 37 | 43 | -6 | 38 |
| 10 | Atlético Mineiro | 27 | 36 | 32 | +4 | 40 |
| 11 | Vasco da Gama | 27 | 34 | 41 | -7 | 31 |
| 12 | RB Bragantino | 27 | 33 | 31 | +2 | 36 |
| 13 | Mirassol | 28 | 33 | 42 | -9 | 32 |
| 14 | São Paulo | 27 | 32 | 30 | +2 | 36 |
| 15 | Remo | 28 | 32 | 47 | -15 | 23 |
| 16 | Internacional | 28 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 28 |
| 17 | Grêmio | 28 | 30 | 38 | -8 | 29 |
| 18 | Corinthians | 28 | 29 | 32 | -3 | 32 |
| 19 | Chapecoense | 27 | 29 | 53 | -24 | 18 |
| 20 | Vitória | 28 | 28 | 42 | -14 | 33 |
| 21 | Chapecoense B | 20 | 19 | 41 | -22 | 10 |
| # | Đội | Tr | xG | xGC | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bahia | 28 | 12.2 | 6.9 | +5.3 | 46 |
| 2 | Santos | 27 | 9.9 | 6.6 | +3.3 | 38 |
| 3 | Flamengo | 28 | 9.0 | 5.7 | +3.3 | 60 |
| 4 | Vasco da Gama | 27 | 9.2 | 6.1 | +3.1 | 31 |
| 5 | Atlético Mineiro | 27 | 5.9 | 2.9 | +3.0 | 40 |
| 6 | Corinthians | 28 | 7.2 | 4.7 | +2.5 | 32 |
| 7 | Athletico Paranaense | 28 | 10.2 | 8.1 | +2.1 | 49 |
| 8 | Fluminense | 28 | 8.7 | 6.8 | +1.9 | 48 |
| 9 | Palmeiras | 28 | 8.2 | 6.5 | +1.7 | 57 |
| 10 | Botafogo | 28 | 11.0 | 10.9 | +0.1 | 35 |
| 11 | São Paulo | 27 | 4.9 | 4.8 | +0.1 | 36 |
| 12 | RB Bragantino | 27 | 4.9 | 5.7 | -0.8 | 36 |
| 13 | Cruzeiro | 28 | 9.3 | 10.2 | -0.9 | 45 |
| 14 | Mirassol | 28 | 7.1 | 9.0 | -1.9 | 32 |
| 15 | Remo | 28 | 5.6 | 7.7 | -2.1 | 23 |
| 16 | Coritiba | 28 | 4.9 | 7.1 | -2.2 | 38 |
| 17 | Chapecoense | 27 | 7.3 | 9.9 | -2.6 | 18 |
| 18 | Internacional | 28 | 8.8 | 11.5 | -2.7 | 28 |
| 19 | Vitória | 28 | 6.6 | 11.7 | -5.1 | 33 |
| 20 | Grêmio | 28 | 5.3 | 13.5 | -8.2 | 29 |
| 21 | Chapecoense B | 20 | — | — | — | 10 |
