Thống kê / Bóng đá / Turkey. 1. Lig / Bandırmaspor vs Sivasspor

Bandırmaspor vs Sivasspor Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 13:00
1 1.30
0 0.92
xG Accuracy: 72%
Nhà cái cao cấp 1xBet: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi 1x_3342271. Đăng ký ngay

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Trên / Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Không ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Bandırmaspor Bandırmaspor ✔ Correct
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-0 1-0 ✔ Correct

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: 1. Lig
  • Fixture: Bandırmaspor vs Sivasspor
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 43.7% · Draw 31.6% · Away 24.7%
  • xG (showing): Bandırmaspor 1.3 — Sivasspor 0.92 (total xG ≈ 2.22)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 61.7% · Implied: 50.2% · Probability edge: +11.5 pts · Est. EV: +17.2%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 45.4% · No 54.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-0 (14.1%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Kèo tốt nhất và lý do

Primary pick from the decision engine: Under 2.5 goals.

Model probability is compared to implied probability from odds to highlight a probability edge; EV uses the same model probability with the best decimal price tracked.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Yếu tố rủi ro

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Phương pháp

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Cập nhật lần cuối

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

Cách sử dụng cái này
  • Hãy tập trung vào dòng Chính khi bạn muốn có một ý tưởng có thể thực hiện được.
  • Đừng ghép nhiều quân mỏng với nhau;các cạnh không thêm đáng tin cậy.
  • Chỉ coi những cú đánh dài là những lượt chơi tùy chọn, có mức đặt cược cao.

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Bandırmaspor & Sivasspor!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
1. Lig 1. LigBảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 Erzurumspor FK 38 23 12 3 81
2 Amed 38 21 11 6 74
3 Esenler Erokspor 38 21 11 6 74
4 Çorum FK 38 21 8 9 71
5 Bodrum FK 38 18 10 10 64
6 Pendikspor 38 16 15 7 63
7 Keçiörengücü 38 16 12 10 60
8 Bandırmaspor 38 16 12 10 60
9 Manisa F.K. 38 16 7 15 55
10 Sivasspor 38 14 11 13 53
11 İstanbulspor 38 13 13 12 52
12 Sarıyer 38 15 7 16 52
13 Iğdır FK 38 13 11 14 50
14 Vanspor FK 38 13 10 15 49
15 Boluspor 38 14 6 18 48
16 Ümraniyespor 38 13 7 18 46
17 Serik Spor 38 11 6 21 39
18 Sakaryaspor 38 8 10 20 34
19 Hatayspor 38 2 8 28 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 1 3 34 -57
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 Erzurumspor FK 38 82 27 +55 81
2 Esenler Erokspor 38 81 35 +46 74
3 Amed 38 81 42 +39 74
4 Keçiörengücü 38 73 43 +30 60
5 Bodrum FK 38 71 39 +32 64
6 Çorum FK 38 63 39 +24 71
7 Boluspor 38 61 57 +4 48
8 Pendikspor 38 58 33 +25 63
9 İstanbulspor 38 57 55 +2 52
10 Manisa F.K. 38 57 56 +1 55
11 Vanspor FK 38 52 47 +5 49
12 Iğdır FK 38 52 54 -2 50
13 Bandırmaspor 38 47 34 +13 60
14 Sivasspor 38 47 43 +4 53
15 Ümraniyespor 38 47 51 -4 46
16 Sakaryaspor 38 45 72 -27 34
17 Sarıyer 38 44 44 0 52
18 Serik Spor 38 44 75 -31 39
19 Hatayspor 38 33 102 -69 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 22 169 -147 -57
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 Bodrum FK 38 36.3 21.7 +14.6 64
2 Boluspor 38 34.5 20.9 +13.6 48
3 Erzurumspor FK 38 26.5 14.2 +12.3 81
4 Çorum FK 38 32.2 20.3 +11.9 71
5 Esenler Erokspor 38 30.7 19.1 +11.6 74
6 Amed 38 37.6 26.5 +11.1 74
7 Keçiörengücü 38 35.2 24.2 +11.0 60
8 Iğdır FK 38 28.2 21.6 +6.6 50
9 Pendikspor 38 29.8 24.3 +5.5 63
10 Bandırmaspor 38 26.5 23.2 +3.3 60
11 Manisa F.K. 38 29.0 29.1 -0.1 55
12 Vanspor FK 38 24.9 25.2 -0.3 49
13 Sarıyer 38 24.4 27.4 -3.0 52
14 Sivasspor 38 22.2 25.2 -3.0 53
15 İstanbulspor 38 25.2 28.8 -3.6 52
16 Ümraniyespor 38 23.9 27.9 -4.0 46
17 Serik Spor 38 20.8 29.9 -9.1 39
18 Sakaryaspor 38 24.7 34.1 -9.4 34
19 Hatayspor 38 17.8 37.7 -19.9 14
20 Adana Demirspor 38 11.0 60.4 -49.4 -57