Thống kê / Bóng đá / Germany. 2. Bundesliga / Holstein Kiel vs Eintracht Braunschweig

Holstein Kiel vs Eintracht Braunschweig Statistics & Analysis

May 02, 2026 - 11:00
2 1.35
0 1.06
xG Accuracy: 62%
Nhà cái cao cấp 1xBet: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi 1x_3342271. Đăng ký ngay

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Trên / Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Không ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Holstein Kiel Holstein Kiel ✔ Correct
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: 2. Bundesliga
  • Fixture: Holstein Kiel vs Eintracht Braunschweig
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 11:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.7% · Draw 30.6% · Away 27.7%
  • xG (showing): Holstein Kiel 1.35 — Eintracht Braunschweig 1.06 (total xG ≈ 2.41)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 56.7% · Implied: 46.4% · Probability edge: +10.3 pts · Est. EV: +19.1%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 50.1% · No 49.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.9%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Correct score remains high-variance even when a line is most likely on paper.

Kèo tốt nhất và lý do

Primary angle highlighted on the page: Under 2.5 goals.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

No pick is a guarantee; variance is especially large in scoreline markets.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

Yếu tố rủi ro

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Phương pháp

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Cập nhật lần cuối

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

Cách sử dụng cái này
  • Hãy tập trung vào dòng Chính khi bạn muốn có một ý tưởng có thể thực hiện được.
  • Đừng ghép nhiều quân mỏng với nhau;các cạnh không thêm đáng tin cậy.
  • Chỉ coi những cú đánh dài là những lượt chơi tùy chọn, có mức đặt cược cao.

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Holstein Kiel & Eintracht Braunschweig!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
2. Bundesliga 2. BundesligaBảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 FC Schalke 04 33 20 7 6 67
2 SV Elversberg 33 17 8 8 59
3 Hannover 96 33 16 11 6 59
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 17 8 8 59
5 SV Darmstadt 98 33 13 13 7 52
6 Hertha BSC 33 14 9 10 51
7 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 15 4 14 49
8 1. FC Nürnberg 33 12 9 12 45
9 Karlsruher SC 33 12 8 13 44
10 VfL Bochum 33 10 11 12 41
11 Holstein Kiel 33 11 8 14 41
12 1. FC Magdeburg 33 12 3 18 39
13 Dynamo Dresden 33 10 8 15 38
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 10 7 16 37
15 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 11 4 18 37
16 Arminia Bielefeld 33 9 9 15 36
17 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 9 7 17 34
18 Preußen Münster 33 6 12 15 30
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 SV Elversberg 33 61 39 +22 59
2 Hannover 96 33 57 41 +16 59
3 SV Darmstadt 98 33 57 43 +14 52
4 SC Paderborn 07 33 57 45 +12 59
5 Dynamo Dresden 33 52 52 0 38
6 1. FC Magdeburg 33 52 57 -5 39
7 Karlsruher SC 33 52 62 -10 44
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 51 47 +4 49
9 FC Schalke 04 33 49 31 +18 67
10 VfL Bochum 33 47 46 +1 41
11 Arminia Bielefeld 33 47 50 -3 36
12 Hertha BSC 33 46 38 +8 51
13 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 46 68 -22 34
14 1. FC Nürnberg 33 44 42 +2 45
15 Holstein Kiel 33 43 46 -3 41
16 Preußen Münster 33 38 58 -20 30
17 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36 53 -17 37
18 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 33 50 -17 37
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 SC Paderborn 07 33 56.3 36.5 +19.8 59
2 FC Schalke 04 33 49.1 30.0 +19.1 67
3 Hannover 96 33 52.2 36.8 +15.4 59
4 SV Elversberg 33 49.5 37.0 +12.5 59
5 1. FC Magdeburg 33 51.5 44.5 +7.0 39
6 VfL Bochum 33 50.7 45.7 +5.0 41
7 1. FC Nürnberg 33 44.6 41.1 +3.5 45
8 1. FC Kaiserslautern 33 44.9 43.0 +1.9 49
9 SV Darmstadt 98 33 50.5 50.0 +0.5 52
10 Arminia Bielefeld 33 45.2 44.8 +0.4 36
11 Dynamo Dresden 33 42.4 42.9 -0.5 38
12 Hertha BSC 33 43.4 46.3 -2.9 51
13 Fortuna Düsseldorf 33 39.6 47.4 -7.8 37
14 Eintracht Braunschweig 33 36.4 46.3 -9.9 37
15 Holstein Kiel 33 40.0 52.2 -12.2 41
16 SpVgg Greuther Fürth 33 37.4 50.6 -13.2 34
17 Preußen Münster 33 36.4 53.8 -17.4 30
18 Karlsruher SC 33 39.5 60.6 -21.1 44