Thống kê / Bóng đá / Germany. Bundesliga / SC Freiburg vs VfL Wolfsburg

SC Freiburg vs VfL Wolfsburg Statistics & Analysis

May 03, 2026 - 17:30
1 1.82
1 1.16
xG Accuracy: 76%
Nhà cái cao cấp 1xBet: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi 1x_3342271. Đăng ký ngay

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Trên / Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 Dưới 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 SC Freiburg Vẽ tranh ✖ Incorrect
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Bundesliga
  • Fixture: SC Freiburg vs VfL Wolfsburg
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 51.5% · Draw 25.8% · Away 22.8%
  • xG (showing): SC Freiburg 1.82 — VfL Wolfsburg 1.16 (total xG ≈ 2.98)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): SC Freiburg
  • Model: 51.5% · Implied: 39.6% · Probability edge: +11.9 pts · Est. EV: +5.1%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 58.9% · No 41.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.7%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Kèo tốt nhất và lý do

Primary angle highlighted on the page: SC Freiburg.

If 1X2 looks tight, the engine may still find clearer structure in totals or BTTS — that is intentional.

Edges shrink quickly if prices move; always re-check the number on your book.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Why might 1X2 look unattractive while totals do not?

Tight 1X2 prices often embed a fair three-way split, so EV on match-winner can sit negative even when Over/Under or BTTS still diverges from the model — compare the 1X2 row on the market cards to O/U and BTTS.

Who has the edge in the match-winner market?

Use the 1X2 model percentages in the summary and the 1X2 market card: the side with the highest model % is the model lean, but check EV — a lean can still be -EV after prices.

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Yếu tố rủi ro

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Phương pháp

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Cập nhật lần cuối

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

Cách sử dụng cái này
  • Hãy tập trung vào dòng Chính khi bạn muốn có một ý tưởng có thể thực hiện được.
  • Đừng ghép nhiều quân mỏng với nhau;các cạnh không thêm đáng tin cậy.
  • Chỉ coi những cú đánh dài là những lượt chơi tùy chọn, có mức đặt cược cao.

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho SC Freiburg & VfL Wolfsburg!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
Bundesliga BundesligaBảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 Bayern München 34 28 5 1 89
2 Borussia Dortmund 34 22 7 5 73
3 RB Leipzig 34 20 5 9 65
4 VfB Stuttgart 34 18 8 8 62
5 1899 Hoffenheim 34 18 7 9 61
6 Bayer Leverkusen 34 17 8 9 59
7 SC Freiburg 34 13 8 13 47
8 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 11 11 12 44
9 FC Augsburg 34 12 7 15 43
10 FSV Mainz 05 34 10 10 14 40
11 Union Berlin 34 10 9 15 39
12 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 9 11 14 38
13 Hamburger SV 34 9 11 14 38
14 1. FC Köln 34 7 11 16 32
15 Werder Bremen 34 8 8 18 32
16 VfL Wolfsburg 34 7 8 19 29
17 1. FC Heidenheim 34 6 8 20 26
18 FC St. Pauli 34 6 8 20 26
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 Bayern München 34 122 36 +86 89
2 VfB Stuttgart 34 71 49 +22 62
3 Borussia Dortmund 34 70 34 +36 73
4 Bayer Leverkusen 34 68 47 +21 59
5 RB Leipzig 34 66 47 +19 65
6 1899 Hoffenheim 34 65 52 +13 61
7 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 61 65 -4 44
8 SC Freiburg 34 51 57 -6 47
9 1. FC Köln 34 49 63 -14 32
10 FC Augsburg 34 45 61 -16 43
11 VfL Wolfsburg 34 45 69 -24 29
12 FSV Mainz 05 34 44 53 -9 40
13 Union Berlin 34 44 58 -14 39
14 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 42 53 -11 38
15 1. FC Heidenheim 34 41 72 -31 26
16 Hamburger SV 34 40 54 -14 38
17 Werder Bremen 34 37 60 -23 32
18 FC St. Pauli 34 29 60 -31 26
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 Bayern München 34 94.5 37.0 +57.5 89
2 Borussia Dortmund 34 60.5 38.5 +22.0 73
3 Bayer Leverkusen 34 60.9 43.0 +17.9 59
4 RB Leipzig 34 65.2 48.7 +16.5 65
5 VfB Stuttgart 34 59.0 47.2 +11.8 62
6 1899 Hoffenheim 34 53.4 50.0 +3.4 61
7 SC Freiburg 34 47.0 46.7 +0.3 47
8 1. FC Köln 34 50.0 52.1 -2.1 32
9 FSV Mainz 05 34 49.4 52.0 -2.6 40
10 Eintracht Frankfurt 34 42.8 49.0 -6.2 44
11 Borussia Mönchengladbach 34 41.3 50.8 -9.5 38
12 Union Berlin 34 41.7 51.7 -10.0 39
13 Werder Bremen 34 40.0 51.5 -11.5 32
14 FC Augsburg 34 44.7 59.4 -14.7 43
15 1. FC Heidenheim 34 44.9 59.9 -15.0 26
16 VfL Wolfsburg 34 43.6 60.3 -16.7 29
17 Hamburger SV 34 36.5 53.8 -17.3 38
18 FC St. Pauli 34 29.0 52.8 -23.8 26