Thống kê / Bóng đá / Germany. Bundesliga / Bayern München vs 1. FC Heidenheim

Bayern München vs 1. FC Heidenheim Statistics & Analysis

Bayern München Bayern München
May 02, 2026 - 13:30
3 3.24
3 1.16
xG Accuracy: 56%
1. FC Heidenheim 1. FC Heidenheim
Nhà cái cao cấp 1xBet: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi 1x_3342271. Đăng ký ngay

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Each row compares the model’s highlighted side (or lean) to what happened at full time.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Trên / Dưới 2.5 Trên 2.5 Trên 2.5 (6 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Có ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Bayern München Vẽ tranh ✖ Incorrect
  • Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 3-1 3-3 ✖ Incorrect

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Tóm tắt trận đấu AI

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Bundesliga
  • Fixture: Bayern München vs 1. FC Heidenheim
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-02 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 77.0% · Draw 13.7% · Away 9.3%
  • xG (showing): Bayern München 3.24 — 1. FC Heidenheim 1.16 (total xG ≈ 4.4)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): BTTS Yes
  • Model: 66.6% · Implied: 59.5% · Probability edge: +7.2 pts · Est. EV: +6.6%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 66.6% · No 33.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 3-1 (8.1%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Kèo tốt nhất và lý do

Primary angle highlighted on the page: BTTS Yes.

We separate probability edge (model minus implied, in points of probability) from estimated EV (economic edge at the best price shown on the page).

When several markets sit near +EV, keep stakes small — correlation means edges do not add cleanly.

Câu hỏi thường gặp

What is the best-supported line in this snapshot?

Match the hero card above: if it says “Betting Primary Pick”, that leg cleared primary rules; if it says “Best +EV (tracked markets)”, it is the strongest +EV line that did not meet stricter Primary thresholds. The bullets below repeat the same model %, implied %, edge (pts), and EV % as that card.

Is the most likely correct score a good bet?

Usually no as a standalone bet: the “most likely” scoreline is still a low absolute probability tail event (often single digits, sometimes low teens). Use it as context; keep any correct-score stake in the “fun / small” bucket.

Safer market than correct score?

Markets with more liquidity and smoother prices (often 1X2 or O/U 2.5 from many books) are usually easier to reason about than long-tail correct-score prices; still read EV on each leg.

What changes first if odds move?

Implied probabilities and EV move immediately with price; model probabilities in this snapshot do not update until the pipeline is re-run. Refresh after material line moves.

Yếu tố rủi ro

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Phương pháp

  • Inputs: Same structured facts bundle as the public prediction page (xG / Poisson snapshot, market EV where available, decision engine v2).
  • Narrative: Template sentence library with fixture-stable selection (no per-request LLM for this block).
  • Compliance: Educational framing only; not personalised advice.

Cập nhật lần cuối

May 01, 2026 (UTC)

Cách sử dụng cái này
  • Hãy tập trung vào dòng Chính khi bạn muốn có một ý tưởng có thể thực hiện được.
  • Đừng ghép nhiều quân mỏng với nhau;các cạnh không thêm đáng tin cậy.
  • Chỉ coi những cú đánh dài là những lượt chơi tùy chọn, có mức đặt cược cao.

Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Bayern München & 1. FC Heidenheim!

Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.

Đăng ký ngay
Quay lại Thống kê
Bundesliga Bundesliga — Bảng xếp hạng
# Đội Tr T H B Đ
1 Bayern München 33 27 5 1 86
2 Borussia Dortmund 33 21 7 5 70
3 RB Leipzig 33 20 5 8 65
4 VfB Stuttgart 33 18 7 8 61
5 1899 Hoffenheim 33 18 7 8 61
6 Bayer Leverkusen 33 17 7 9 58
7 SC Freiburg 33 12 8 13 44
8 Eintracht Frankfurt 33 11 10 12 43
9 FC Augsburg 33 12 7 14 43
10 FSV Mainz 05 33 9 10 14 37
11 Hamburger SV 33 9 10 14 37
12 Union Berlin 33 9 9 15 36
13 Borussia Mönchengladbach 33 8 11 14 35
14 1. FC Köln 33 7 11 15 32
15 Werder Bremen 33 8 8 17 32
16 VfL Wolfsburg 33 6 8 19 26
17 1. FC Heidenheim 33 6 8 19 26
18 FC St. Pauli 33 6 8 19 26
# Đội Tr BT BB +/- Đ
1 Bayern München 33 117 35 +82 86
2 VfB Stuttgart 33 69 47 +22 61
3 Borussia Dortmund 33 68 34 +34 70
4 Bayer Leverkusen 33 67 46 +21 58
5 RB Leipzig 33 65 43 +22 65
6 1899 Hoffenheim 33 65 48 +17 61
7 Eintracht Frankfurt 33 59 63 -4 43
8 1. FC Köln 33 48 58 -10 32
9 SC Freiburg 33 47 56 -9 44
10 FC Augsburg 33 45 57 -12 43
11 FSV Mainz 05 33 42 53 -11 37
12 VfL Wolfsburg 33 42 68 -26 26
13 1. FC Heidenheim 33 41 70 -29 26
14 Union Berlin 33 40 58 -18 36
15 Hamburger SV 33 39 53 -14 37
16 Borussia Mönchengladbach 33 38 53 -15 35
17 Werder Bremen 33 37 58 -21 32
18 FC St. Pauli 33 28 57 -29 26
# Đội Tr xG xGC +/- Đ
1 Bayern München 33 94.5 37.0 +57.5 86
2 Borussia Dortmund 33 60.5 38.5 +22.0 70
3 Bayer Leverkusen 33 60.9 43.0 +17.9 58
4 RB Leipzig 33 65.2 48.7 +16.5 65
5 VfB Stuttgart 33 59.0 47.2 +11.8 61
6 1899 Hoffenheim 33 53.4 50.0 +3.4 61
7 SC Freiburg 33 47.0 46.7 +0.3 44
8 1. FC Köln 33 50.0 52.1 -2.1 32
9 FSV Mainz 05 33 49.4 52.0 -2.6 37
10 Eintracht Frankfurt 33 42.8 49.0 -6.2 43
11 Borussia Mönchengladbach 33 41.3 50.8 -9.5 35
12 Union Berlin 33 41.7 51.7 -10.0 36
13 Werder Bremen 33 40.0 51.5 -11.5 32
14 FC Augsburg 33 44.7 59.4 -14.7 43
15 1. FC Heidenheim 33 44.9 59.9 -15.0 26
16 VfL Wolfsburg 33 43.6 60.3 -16.7 26
17 Hamburger SV 33 36.5 53.8 -17.3 37
18 FC St. Pauli 33 29.0 52.8 -23.8 26
Các giải đấu phổ biến